Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2017-08-29
Page range: 56–70
Abstract views: 32
PDF downloaded: 273

Molecular, morphological, and biogeographic perspectives on the classification of Acrobolboideae (Acrobolbaceae, Marchantiophyta)

Science & Education, The Field Museum, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA Chicago Botanic Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Road, Glencoe, Illinois 60022, USA Northwestern University, Plant Biology and Conservation, 2205 Tech Drive, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
Chicago Botanic Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Road, Glencoe, Illinois 60022, USA Northwestern University, Plant Biology and Conservation, 2205 Tech Drive, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
Science & Education, The Field Museum, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA
Naturalis Biodiversity Center, PO Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
Science & Education, The Field Museum, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA
Science & Education, The Field Museum, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA
Chicago Botanic Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Road, Glencoe, Illinois 60022, USA Northwestern University, Plant Biology and Conservation, 2205 Tech Drive, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
ancestral areas Acrobolbus biogeography liverworts molecular phylogeny Marsupidium morphology systematics taxonomy Tylimanthus Bryophytes

Abstract

The liverwort subfamily Acrobolboideae has historically contained the three genera: Acrobolbus, Marspidium, and Tylimanthus. Generic delimitations in this subfamily have been historically inferred from morphological characters, specifically the location of gametangia. Taxonomists have had difficulty separating the genera, with some combining Tylimanthus and Acrobolbus, whereas others merged Marsupidium and Tylimanthus. We used five chloroplast loci to reconstruct a phylogeny of the group, revealing all three genera are polyphyletic as currently described. An assessment of key morphological characters used to separate genera in the subfamily resulted in several observations: characters used to circumscribe Acrobolbus were homoplasious; characters used to circumscribe each genus (e.g., the placement of female reproductive organs) do not reflect phylogenetic relationships; and the evolutionary trajectories of some characters (i.e., the number of antheridia, male reproductive organs, per male bract) correspond directly with previous evolutionary hypotheses for the family, but do not follow historical taxonomic inferences. Irrespective of generic concepts, several well–supported clades within the phylogeny have a strong biogeographic structure. Using these lines of evidence, we recognize Acrobolbus as a single genus in Acrobolboideae.