Abstract
I believe the top three questions facing taxonomy today all relate to the health and future of the discipline itself. 1. How do we ensure taxonomy is valued? 2. How do we build and maintain taxonomic capability? 3. How do we ensure taxonomy benefits from emerging opportunities?
References
Anon. (2016) Review of Crown Research Institute Core Funding. New Zealand Ministry for Business, Innovation, and Employment, Wellington, 46 pp.
Boxshall, G. & Self, D. (2011) UK Taxonomy & Systematics Review – 2010. Natural Environment Research Council, London, 37 pp.
de Carvalho, M.R., Ebach, M.C., Williams, D.M., Nihei, S.S., Rodrigues, M.T., Grant, T., Silveira, L.F., Zaher, H., Gill, A.C., Schelly, R.C., Sparks, J.S., Bockmann, F.A., Séret, B., Ho, H.-C., Grande, L., Rieppel, O., Dubois, A., Ohler, A., Faivovich, J., Assis, L.C.S., Wheeler, Q.D., Goldstein, P.Z., Almeida, E.A.B. de, Valdecasas, A.G. & Nelson, G. (2014) Does counting species count as taxonomy? On misrepresenting systematics, yet again. Cladistics, 30, 322–329.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12045
Clark, B.R., Godfray, H.C.J., Kitching, I.J., Mayo, S.J. & Scoble, M.J. (2009) Taxonomy as an eScience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 367, 953–966.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0190
Coleman, C.O. (2015) Taxonomy in Times of the Taxonomic Impediment – Examples from the Community of Experts on Amphipod Crustaceans. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 35, 729–740.
https://doi.org/10.1163/1937240X-00002381
Ebach, M.C., Valdecasas, A.G. & Wheeler, Q.D. (2011) Impediments to taxonomy and users of taxonomy: Accessibility and impact evaluation. Cladistics, 27, 550–557.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00348.x
Hamilton, A. & Wheeler, Q.D. (2008) Taxonomy and Why History of Science Matters for Science. Isis, 99, 331–340.
https://doi.org/10.1086/588691
Hennig, W. (1966) Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, 280 pp.
Hoebeke, E.R. & Carter, M.E. (2003) Halyomorpha halys (Stål) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae): A polyphagous plant pest from Asia newly detected in North America. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 105, 225–237.
House of Lords (2008) Systematics and Taxonomy: Follow-up. House of Lords Science & Technology Committee, London, 386 pp.
Iglésias, S.P., Toulhoat, L. & Sellos, D.Y. (2010) Taxonomic confusion and market mislabelling of threatened skates: important consequences for their conservation status. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 20, 319–333.
https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.1083
Nelson, W., Brietweiser, I., Fordyce, E., Bradford-Grieve, B., Penman, D., Roskruge, N., Trnski, T., Waugh, S. & Webb, C. (2015) National Taxonomic Collections in New Zealand. Royal Society of New Zealand, Wellington, 68 pp.
Sluys, R. (2013) The unappreciated, fundamentally analytical nature of taxonomy and the implications for the inventory of biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22, 1095–1105.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0472-x
Wheeler, Q. (2010) What would NASA do? Mission-critical infrastructure for species exploration. Systematics and Biodiversity 8, 11–15.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14772001003628075
Wheeler, Q. (2018) Blank canvas: The case for descriptive taxonomy. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 58, 1118–1121.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icy067
Wheeler, Q., Bourgoin, T., Coddington, J., Gostony, T., Hamilton, A., Larimer, R., Polaszek, A., Schauff, M. & Solis, A. (2012) Nomenclatural benchmarking: the roles of digital typification and telemicroscopy. ZooKeys, 209, 193–202.
https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.209.3486
Wheeler, Q.D. (2005) Losing the plot: DNA “barcodes” and taxonomy. Cladistics, 21, 405–407.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00075.x
Wheeler, Q.D. (2009) Revolutionary thoughts on taxonomy: declarations of independence and interdependence. Zoologia (Curitiba), 26, 1–4.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702009000100001
Will, K.W., Mishler, B.D. & Wheeler, Q.D. (2005) The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Systematic Biology, 54, 844–851.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150500354878