Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Correspondence
Published: 2020-01-31
Page range: 67–72
Abstract views: 659
PDF downloaded: 525

On species concepts, phylogenetics and the science of natural history—three current issues facing taxonomy

Curtin University, Perth, Australia
classification nomenclature taxonomy name changes biodiversity natural history education science funding fundamental sciences

Abstract

Taxonomy faces some major challenges in the 21st Century (Godfray 2002). The threat to biodiversity comes largely from human overpopulation, but the impact of climate change is unprecedented (Pievani 2014) and increasingly a risk factor for many species. This makes it even more critical to rapidly catalogue our biodiversity to better protect it (Mace 2004). If you do not know what is there, it is impossible to know what we are losing, let alone protect something for which we have no name and cannot identify. Understanding diversity and the dynamics of evolution and speciation is important to discover the adaptability of species in a changing world dominated by humans (e.g. Harvey et al. 2014), but at the same time education about the natural world seems to have failed our children.

Below I address three major questions or issues that are current in taxonomy, and natural history in the broader sense, related to species concepts, classification, communication and education.

 

References

  1. Abbott, R.J. & Rieseberg, L.H. (2012) Hybrid speciation. eLS.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0001753.pub2

    Agnarsson, I. & Kuntner, M. (2007) Taxonomy in a changing world: seeking solutions for a science in crisis. Systematic Biology, 56 (3), 531–539.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701424546

    APG (2009) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 161 (2), 105–121.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x

    APG (2016) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 181 (1), 1–20.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12385

    Barrington, D.S., Haufler, C.H. & Werth, C.R. (1989) Hybridization, reticulation, and species concepts in the ferns. American Fern Journal, 79 (2), 55–64.

    https://doi.org//10.2307/1547160

    Bauhin, C. (1596) ΦΥΤΟΠΙΝΑΞ [Phytopinax] seu enumeratio plantarum ab herbarijs nostro seculo descriptarum, cum earum differentijs. Basel: Sebastianum Henricpetri, 669 pp.

    Blaxter, M.L. (2004) The promise of a DNA taxonomy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, ser. B, Biological Sciences, 359, 669–679.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1447

    Brandrud, M.K., Baar, J., Lorenzo, M.T., Athanasiadis, A., Bateman, R.M., Chase, M.W., Hedrén, M. & Paun, O. (2019) Phylogenenomic relationships of diploids and the origins of allotetraploids in Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae). Systematic Biology, 69, 91–109.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syz035

    Bryant, D., Bouckaert, R., Felsenstein, J., Rosenberg, N.A. & Roychoudhury, A. (2012) Inferring species trees directly from biallelic genetic markers: bypassing gene trees in a full coalescent analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29, 1917–1832.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss086

    Burma, B.H. (1949) The species concept, a semantic review. Evolution, 3, 369–370, 372–373.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1949.tb00037.x

    Celik, M., Cascini, M., Haouchar, D., Van der Burg, C., Dodt, W., Evans, A.R., Prentis, P., Bunce, M., Fruciano, C. & Phillips, M.J. (2019) A molecular and morphometric assessment of the systematics of the Macropus complex clarifies the tempo and mode of kangaroo evolution. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 186, 793–812.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz005

    Christenhusz, M.J.M. & Chase, M.W. (2014) Trends and concepts in fern classification. Annals of Botany, 113, 571–594.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct299

    Colwell, M. (2019) Campaign to introduce a GCSE in Natural History. Curlew Media. Available from: http://www.curlewmedia.com/gcse-natural-history (Accessed 6 December 2019).

    Cook, L.G. & Crisp, M.D. (2005) Not so ancient: the extant crown group of Nothofagus represents a post-Gondwanan radiation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, ser. B, Biological Sciences, 272 (1580), 2535–2544.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3219

    Darwin, C. (1845) Journal of researches into the natural history and geology of the countries visited during the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle round the world, under the Command of Capt. FitzRoy, R.N. 2nd. edition. John Murray, London, 519 pp.

    Darwin, C. (1875) Letter to J. D. Hooker, August 1st 1875. Darwin Correspondence Project, letter no. DCP-LETT-2130. Available from: http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/DCP-LETT-2130 (Accessed: 14 December 2019).

    Darwin, C. & Wallace, A.R. (1858) On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, 3, 46–50.

    https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1096-3642.1858.tb02500.x.

    De Queiroz, K. (1998) The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation. In: Howard, D.J. & Berlocher, S.H. (Eds.) Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 57–75.

    De Queiroz, K. (2007) Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology, 56, 879–886.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701701083

    Dobzhansky, T. (1950) Mendelian populations and their evolution. The American Naturalist, 84, 401–418.

    https://doi.org/10.1086/281638

    Dodt, W.G., Gallus, S., Phillips, M.J. & Nilsson, M.A. (2017) Resolving kangaroo phylogeny and overcoming retrotransposon ascertainment bias. Scientific Reports, 7, 16811.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16148-0

    Godfray, H.C.J. (2002) Challenges for taxonomy. Nature, 417, 17–19.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/417017a

    Grey-Wilson, C. (2019) Change for change’s sake. The Plantsman, 18(2), 64–65.

    Harrington, T.C. & Rizzo D.M. (1999) Defining species in the fungi. In: Worrall, J.J. (Ed.) Structure and dynamics of fungal populations. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 43–71.

    Harvey, B.P., Al-Janabi, B., Broszeit, S., Cioffi, R., Kumar, A., Aranguren-Gassis, M., Bailey, A., Green, L., Gsottbauer, C.M., Hall, E.F., Lechler, M., Mancuso, F.P., Pereira, C.O., Rocevuto, E., Schram, J.B., Stapp, L.S., Stenberg, S. & Santa Rosa, L.T. (2014) Evolution of marine organisms under climate change at different levels of biological organisation. Water, 6, 3545–3574.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/w6113545

    Heenan, P.B. & Smissen, R.D. (2013) Revised circumscription of Nothofagus and recognition of the segregate genera Fuscospora, Lophozonia, and Trisyngyne (Nothofagaceae). Phytotaxa, 146, 1–31.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.146.1.1

    Humboldt, A. (1828) Essai politique sur l’île de Cuba. 2 vols. Librairie de Gide Fils, Paris, 408 pp.

    Humboldt, A. (1849) Ansichten der Natur mit wissenschaftlichen Erläuterungen. Gotta, Stuttgart & Tübingen, 200 pp.

    Jackson, S. & Groves, C. (2015) Taxonomy of Australian mammals. CSIRO Publishing, Clayton South, 536 pp.

    Lidén, M.L. (2019) Characters do not make a genus. The Plant Review, 1(2), 58.

    Linder, H.P. & Crisp, M.D. (1995) Nothofagus and Pacific biogeography. Cladistics, 11, 5–32.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1995.tb00002.x

    Linnaeus, C. (1736) Fundamenta botanica quae majorum operum prodromi instat theoriam scientiae botanices per breves Aphorismos tradunt. S. Schouten, Amsterdam, 226 pp.

    Mace, G.M. (2004) The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, ser. B, Biological Sciences, 359, 711–719.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1454

    Mayr, E. (1942) Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York, 334 pp.

    Mayr, E. (1949) The species concept: semantics versus semantics. Evolution, 3, 371–372.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1949.tb00038.x

    Mayr, E. (1992). A local flora and the biological species concept. American Journal of Botany, 79, 222–238.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb13641.x

    Medina, M., Weil, E. & Szmant, A.M. (1999) Examination of the Montastraea annularis species complex (Cnidaria: Scleractinia) using ITS and COI sequences. Marine Biotechnology, 1, 89–97.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011756

    Meredith, R.W., Westerman, M., Case, J.A. & Springer, M.S. (2008) A phylogeny and timescale for marsupial evolution based on sequences for five nuclear genes. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 15, 1–36.

    https://doi.org//10.1007/s10914-007-9062-6

    Newton, I. (1687) Philosophiæ naturalis principia mathematica. Pepys, London, 494 pp.

    Nilsson, M.A., Zheng, Y., Kumar, V., Phillips, M.J. & Janke, A. (2017) Speciation generates mosaic genomes in kangaroos. Genome Biology and Evolution, 10, 33–44.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evx245

    Paton, A. (2019) Rosemary, sage and Salvia. The Plant Review, 1 (2), 50–52.

    Paun, O., Forest, F., Fay, M.F. & Chase, M.W., (2009) Hybrid speciation in angiosperms: parental divergence drives ploidy. New Phytologist, 182, 507–518.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02767.x

    Pievani, T. (2014) The sixth mass extinction: Anthropocene and the human impact on biodiversity. Rendiconti Lincei, 25, 85–93.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-013-0258-9

    Ray, J. (1686) Historia plantarum species [History of plants], Vol. 1. Clark, London, 983 pp.

    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.61178

    Salter, A.J. & Martin, B.R. (2001) The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy, 30, 509–532.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00091-3

    Stec, D., Krzywanìski, Ł., Zawierucha, K. & Michalczyk, Ł. (2020) Untangling systematics of the Paramacrobiotus areolatus species complex by an integrative redescription of the nominal species for the group, with multilocus phylogeny and species delineation in the genus Paramacrobiotus. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 188, zlz163.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz163

    Svenson, K.H. (1953) Linnaeus and the species problem. Taxon, 2, 55–58.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1217341

    Swenson, U., Hill, R.S. & McLoughlin, S. (2001) Biogeography of Nothofagus supports the sequence of Gondwana break-up. Taxon, 50, 1025–1041.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/1224719

    Taylor, J.W., Jacobson, D.J., Kroken, S., Kasuga, T., Geiser, D.M., Hibbett, D.S. & Fisher, M.C. (2000) Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 31, 21–32.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/fgbi.2000.1228

    Taylor, W.C., Luebke, N.T. & Smith, M.B. (1985) Speciation and hybridisation in North American quillworts. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences, 86, 259–263.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269727000008216

    Wheeler, D.W. & Meier, R. (2000) Species concepts and phylogenetic theory – a debate. Columbia University Press, New York, 256 pp.

    Wright, S. (1940) The statistical consequences of Mendelian heredity in relation to speciation. In: Huxley, J. (ed.) The New Systematics. Oxford University Press, London, pp. 161–183.

    Wulf, A. (2015) The invention of nature: the adventures of Alexander von Humboldt, the lost hero of science. Knopf, New York, 496 pp.