Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Articles
Published: 2012-02-14
Page range: 67–68
Abstract views: 53
PDF downloaded: 1

Pseudopaludicola ternetzi (Anura: Leiuperidae): two lectotypes for the same taxon

Laboratorio de Genética Evolutiva, Departamento de Genética, Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
Laboratorio de Genética Evolutiva, Departamento de Genética, Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Argentina Instituto de Herpetología, Fundación Miguel Lillo, Miguel Lillo 251, CP: 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
Anura Leiuperidae

Abstract

Pseudopaludicola ternetzi was described on the basis of an undefined number of syntypes, but involving males and females (Miranda-Ribeiro 1937). Since Miranda-Ribeiro described this species, several taxonomic considerations were made on it. First, Bokermann (1966) considered P. ternetzi as a synonym of P. ameghini (Cope 1887), without giving any evidence to support this decision. Although some authors followed this proposal (like Gallardo 1968), others continued considering P. ternetzi as a good species (e.g., Frost 1985; Lynch 1989). Haddad and Cardoso (1987) provided bioacustic and morphometric evidence to consider P. ameghini as a junior synonym of P. mystacalis (Cope 1887). In 1996, Lobo reviewed the type specimens of P. ameghini, P. mystacalis, and P. saltica described by Cope (1887) and housed at the ANSP (Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia), and redescribed P. ternetzi based on four vouchers collected by Dr. Ternetz in December of 1923, deposited in the Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (MNRJ). In coincidence with Haddad and Cardoso (1987), Lobo (1996) considered P. ameghini as a junior synonym of P. mystacalis, assigned a lectotype for P. ternetzi (MNRJ 5462, male), and designated as paralectotypes the vouchers MNRJ 477, MNRJ 5460, and MNRJ 5461 (all females). Lobo choose the only male syntype examined by him as lectotype considering that the detailed description by Miranda-Ribeiro (1937) of a male matched with the size and morphology of this specimen, while only reported some details of a female. Such taxonomic decision was based on the article 74 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1985).

References

  1. Bokermann, W.C.A. (1966) Lista Anotada das Localidades Tipo de Anfíbios Brasileiros. Serviço de Documentação – RUSP, São Paulo. 183 pp.

    Caramaschi, U. & Pombal Jr. J.P. (2011) The type series of Pseudopaludicola ternetzi Miranda-Ribeiro, 1937 (Anura, Leiuperidae) with designation of a lectotype. Zootaxa, 3051, 62–64.

    Cope, E.D. (1887) Synopsis of the Batrachia and Reptilia obtained by H. H. Smith, in the Province of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 24, 44–60.

    Frost, D.R. (1985) Amphibians Species of the World. Allen Press, Inc., and the Association of Systematics Collections, 732 pp.

    Frost, D.R. (2011) Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 5.5 (31 January, 2011). Electronic Database accessible at http://research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia/ American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA (Accessed 03 November 2011).

    Gallardo, J.M. (1968) Observaciones biológicas sobre Pseudopaludicola falcipes (Hensel) (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Ciencia e Investigación, 24, 411–419.

    Haddad, C.F.B. & Cardoso, A. J. (1987) Taxonomia de três espécies de Pseudopaludicola (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 36, 287–300.

    ICZN – International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1985) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London. xx + 338 pp.

    ICZN – International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London. xxx + 306 pp.

    Lobo, F. (1996) Evaluación del status taxonómico de Pseudopaludicola ternetzi Miranda Ribeiro, 1937; P. mystacalis y P. ameghini (Cope, 1887). Osteología y distribución de las especies estudiadas. Acta Zoológica Lilloana, 43, 327–346.

    Lynch, J. (1989) A review of the leptodactylid frogs of the genus Pseudopaludicola in Northern South America. Copeia, 577–588.

    Miranda-Ribeiro, A. (1937) Alguns batrachios novos das colecções do Museu Nacional. O Campo, maio, 66–69.