Abstract
The original efforts of early naturalists are now placed in another context. Instead of adding lots of particulars to a catalogue of Life, the idea is now to contribute to an organized picture: comparative biology and general biology have merged. Systematics or the related sciences of Biodiversity employ a reasoning analogous to the one followed by early general biology when it separated from natural history and activities associated with collections in the early XXth century. There is a presumption one is already knowledgeable about laws or general patterns when studying biological processes or adding species: both contribute to the general picture. As a consequence of this state of mind, many authors do not feel the need for saving specimens. However, saving specimens is not only a way to keep records in a world which is still being discovered, it is also a very efficient way to store information and to allow one to return to the original specimens, thus generating additional data to answer other questions. We must be fully aware of both the rationale but also the present-day state of mind, in order to keep our motivation in the pursuit of an adequate sampling of Biodiversity.
References
De Carvalho, M. R., Bockmann, F. A., Amorim, D. S. & Brandão, C. R. F. (2008) Systematics must embrace comparative biology and evolution, not speed and automation. Evolutionary Biology, 35 (2): 150–157. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-008-9018-7>.
Ceríaco, L. M. P., Gutiérrez, E. E. & Dubois, A. (2016) Photography-based taxonomy is inadequate, unnecessary, and potentially harmful for biological sciences. Zootaxa, 4196 (3): 435–445. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4196.3.9>.
Daly, M., Herendeen, P. S., Guralnick, R. P., Westneat, M. W. & McDade, L. (2012) Systematics Agenda 2020: the mission evolves. Systematic Biology, 61 (4): 549–552. <https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys044>.
Darwin, C. (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or The preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London (John Murray): 1–502.
Dubois, A. & Nemésio, A. (2007) Does nomenclatural availability of nomina of new species or subspecies require the deposition of vouchers in collections? Zootaxa, 1409 (1): 1–22.
Farris, J. S. (1983) The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. In: N. Platnick & V. A. Funk (ed.), Advances in cladistics: proceedings of the second meeting of the Willi Hennig Society, Vol. 2, New York (Columbia University Press): 7–36.
Fischer, R. A. (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford (Oxford University Press): 1–308. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.27468>.
Gaiji, S., Chavan, V., Ariño, A. H., Otegui, J., Hobern, D., Sood, R. & Robles, E. (2013) Content assessment of the primary biodiversity data published through GBIF network: status, challenges and potentials. Biodiversity Informatics, 8 (2): 94–172.
Grandcolas, P., Deleporte, P. & Desutter-Grandcolas, L. (1997) Testing evolutionary processes with phylogenetic patterns: test power and test limitations. In: P. Grandcolas (ed.), The origin of Biodiversity in Insects: phylogenetic tests of evolutionary scenarios, Mémoires du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 173: 53–71.
Gause, G. F. (1934)The struggle for existence. Baltimore (Williams & Wilkins): 1–163. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4489>.
Haeckel, E. H. (1866) Generelle Morphologie der Organismen allgemeine Grundzuge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begrundet durch die von Charles Darwin reformirte Descendenz-Theorie von Ernst Haeckel. Zweiter Band. Allgemeine Entwickelungsgeschichte der Organismen kritische Grundzuge der mechanischen Wissenschaft von den entstehenden Formen der Organismen, begrundet durch die Descendenz-Theorie. Berlin (Verlag von Georg Reimer): i–clx + 1–462, pl. 1–8.
Hennig, W. (1966) Phylogenetic systematics. Translated by D. D. Davis & R. Zangerl. Urbana, Chicago & London (University of Illinois Press): i–vii + 1–263.
Jenner, R. A. (2006) Unburdening evo-devo: ancestral attractions, model organisms, and basal baloney. Development, Genes & Evolution, 216: 385–394. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-006-0084-5>.
Le Bras, G., Pignal, M., Jeanson, M. L., Muller, S., Aupic, C., Carré, B., Flament, G., Gaudeul, M., Gonçalves, C., Invernón, V. R., Jabbour, F., Lerat, E., Lowry, P. P., Offroy, B., Pimparé, E. P., Poncy, O., Rouhan, G. & Haevermans, T. (2017) The French Muséum national d’histoire naturelle vascular plant herbarium collection dataset. Sciences Data, 4: 170016. <http://doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.16>.
Lecointre, G. & Le Guyader, H. (2006) The tree of life: a phylogenetic classification. Vol. 20. Cambridge (Harvard University Press): 1–560.
Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima, reformata. Tomus 1. Holmiae (Laurentii Salvii): [i–iv] + 1–824.
Mahner, M. & Bunge, M. (1997) Foundations of biophilosophy. Berlin (Springer): 1–423. <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03368-5>.
Marshall, S. A., & Evenhuis, N. L. (2015) New species without dead bodies: a case for photo-based descriptions, illustrated by a striking new species of Marleyimyia Hesse (Diptera, Bombyliidae) from South Africa. Zookeys, 525: 117–127. <http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.525.6143>.
May, R. M. (2004) Tomorrow’s taxonomy: collecting new species in the field will remain the rate-limiting step. Philosophical Transactions of the royal Society of London, (B) Biological Sciences, 359: 733–734. <https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1455>.
Minteer, B. A., Collins, J. P., Love, E. E. & Puschendorf, R. (2014) Avoiding (re)extinction. Science, 344: 260–261. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1250953>.
Mooers, A. Ø. & Cotgreave, P. (1994) Sibley and Ahlquist’s tapestry dusted off. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9: 458–459. <https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(94)90308-5>.
Nelson, G. J. (1970) Outline of a theory of comparative biology. Systematic Zoology, 19: 373–384. <https://doi.org/10.2307/2412278>.
Padial, J. M., Miralles, A., De la Riva, I. & Vences, M. (2010) The integrative future of taxonomy. Frontiers in Zoology, 7 (16): 1–14. <https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-7-16>.
Pape, T. (2016) Taxonomy: species can be named from photos. Nature, 537: 307. <https://doi.org/10.1038/537307b>.
Pellens, R., Faith, D. P. & Grandcolas, P. (2016) The future of phylogenetic systematics in conservation biology: linking biodiversity and society. In: R. Pellens & P. Grandcolas (ed.), Biodiversity conservation and phylogenetic systematics, Preserving our evolutionary heritage in an extinction crisis, Berlin (Open Springer): 375–383. <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22461-9_19>.
Pleijel, F., Jondelius, U., Norlinder, E., Nygren, A., Oxelman, B., Schander, C., Sundberg, P. & Thollesson, M. (2008) Phylogenies without roots? A plea for the use of vouchers in molecular phylogenetic studies. Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution, 48 (1): 369–371. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.03.024>.
Rocha, L. A., Aleixo, A., Allen, G., Almeda, F., Baldwin, C. C., Barclay, M. V., Bates, J. M., Bauer, A. M., Benzoni, F., Berns, C. M., Berumen, M. L., Blackburn, D. C., Blum, S., Bolaños, F.,Bowie, R. C., Britz, R., Brown, R. M., Cadena, C. D., Carpenter, K., Ceríaco, L. M., Chakrabarty, P., Chaves, G., Choat, J. H., Clements, K. D., Collette, B. B., Collins, A., Coyne, J.,Cracraft, J., Daniel, T., de Carvalho, M. R., de Queiroz, K., Di Dario, F., Drewes, R., Dumbacher, J. P., Engilis, A. Jr., Erdmann, M. V., Eschmeyer, W., Feldman, C. R., Fisher, B. L., Fjeldså, J., Fritsch, P. W., Fuchs, J., Getahun, A., Gill, A., Gomon, M., Gosliner, T., Graves, G. R., Griswold, C. E., Guralnick, R., Hartel, K., Helgen, K. M., Ho, H., Iskandar, D. T., Iwamoto, T., Jaafar, Z., James, H. F., Johnson, D., Kavanaugh, D., Knowlton, N., Lacey, E., Larson, H. K., Last, P., Leis, J. M., Lessios, H., Liebherr, J., Lowman, M., Mahler, D. L., Mamonekene, V., Matsuura, K., Mayer, G. C., Mays, H. Jr., McCosker, J., McDiarmid, R. W., McGuire, J., Miller, M. J., Mooi, R., Mooi, R. D., Moritz, C., Myers, P., Nachman, M. W.,Nussbaum, R. A., Foighil, D. Ó., Parenti, L. R., Parham, J. F., Paul, E., Paulay, G., Pérez-Emán, J., Pérez-Matus, A., Poe, S., Pogonoski, J., Rabosky, D. L., Randall, J. E., Reimer, J. D., Robertson, D. R., Rödel, M. O., Rodrigues, M. T., Roopnarine, P., Rüber, L., Ryan, M. J., Sheldon, F., Shinohara, G., Short, A., Simison, W. B., Smith-Vaniz, W. F., Springer, V. G., Stiassny, M., Tello, J. G., Thompson, C. W., Trnski, T., Tucker, P., Valqui, T., Vecchione, M., Verheyen, E., Wainwright, P. C., Wheeler, T. A., White, W. T., Will, K., Williams, J. T., Williams, G., Wilson, E. O., Winker, K., Winterbottom, R. & Witt, C. C. (2014) Specimen collection: an essential tool. Science, 344 (6186): 814–815. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.344.6186.814>.
Santos, C. M. D., Amorim, D. S., Klassa, B., Fachin, D. A., Nihei, S. S., Carvalho, C. J. B., Falaschi, R. L., Mello-Patiu, C. A., Couri, M. S., Oliveira, S. S., Silva, V. C., Ribeiro, G. C., Capellari, R. S. & Lamas, C. J. E. (2016) On typeless species and the perils of fast taxonomy. Systematic Entomology, 41 (3): 511–515. <https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12180>.
Suarez, A. V. & Tsutsui, N. D. (2004) The value of museum collections for research and society. Bioscience, 54: 66–74. <https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0066:TVOMCF]2.0.CO;2>.