Abstract
In 2012, the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature decided to change the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature and to provide a path to afford nomenclatural availability to new nomina and nomenclatural acts through their publication online, as long as the work containing them is preregistered on the website Zoobank under precise conditions. This 2012 Amendment soon raised a number of problems. First, it allows ‘admissible errors’ in this registration, which serves to encourage zootaxonomists, referees, editors and publishers not to pay close attention to this Amendment and to make inadmissible errors, which results in the unavailability of the new nomina and nomenclatural acts at stake. Another source of errors is the fact that Zoobank, contrary to initial plans, does not currently allow the preregistration of nomenclatural acts other than the establishment of new nomina. Other issues are the fuzzy or controversial distinctions made in this Amendment between ‘facsimiles of unavailable works’ and ‘available paper publications’ on one hand, and between ‘preliminary versions’ and ‘final versions’ of online publications on the other hand. Less than ten years after its promulgation, this Amendment has already contributed to the publication of hundreds of unavailable nomina and, which is perhaps worse, of nomina the nomenclatural status regarding availability of which is unclear, according to different interpretations of some terms or rules. The best solution to these problems would no doubt be the publication, as soon as possible, of a revised version of this Amendment addressing these problems, but in the meanwhile better attention given by authors, referees, editors and publishers to the details of this Amendment could limit the damages. Precise proposals are offered in this respect. A distinction is introduced here between two kinds of scientific publications, according to whether they contain nomenclatural acts or not. Those which do but which have first been published online without complying with the requirements of the 2012 Amendment, then later in a Code-compliant manner, may have to be cited as two distinct works, one (publication sensu lato) containing non-nomenclatural information and one (nomenclatural publication or promulgation) providing availability to some nomenclatural acts, which will be a source of confusion and misunderstanding. Proposals are also provided to cope with this new difficulty.
References
Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature. ‘Fourth edition’. London (International Trust for zoological Nomenclature): i–xxix + 1–306.
Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2012a) Amendment of Articles 8, 9, 10, 21 and 78 of the International Code of Zoological nomenclature to expand and refine methods of publication. Zootaxa, 3450: 1–7. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3450.1.1>.
Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2012b) Amendment of Articles 8, 9, 10, 21 and 78 of the International Code of Zoological nomenclature to expand and refine methods of publication. Zookeys, 219: 1–10. <https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.219.3944>.
Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2012c) Amendment of Articles 8, 9, 10, 21 and 78 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature to expand and refine methods of publication. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 69 (3): 161–169. <https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v69i3.a8.161>.
Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2014) Zoological nomenclature and electronic publication—a reply to Dubois et al. (2013). Zootaxa, 3779 (1): 3–5. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3779.1.2>.
Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2017) Declaration 45. Addition of Recommendations to Article 73 and of the term “specimen, preserved” to the Glossary. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 73 (2–4): 96–97. <https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v73i2.a2>.
Anquetin, J. (2015) Establishment of a lectotype for the species Plesiochelys langii Rütimeyer, 1873. PeerJ, 1108: 1–3. <https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1108>.
Anquetin, J., Püntener, C. & Billon-Bruyat, J.-P. (2014) A taxonomic review of the late Jurassic eucryptodiran turtles from the Jura mountains (Switzerland and France). PeerJ, 369: 1–45. <https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.369>.
Bocquet, C. (1976) Les problèmes de l’espèce chez quelques Crustacés: le genre Tisbe (Copépodes Harpacticoïdes) et le complexe Jaera albifrons (Isopodes Asellotes). Mémoires de la Société zoologique de France, 38: 307–340.
Cappellini, E., Gentry, A., Palkopoulou, E., Ishida, Y., Cram, D., Roos, A.-M., Watson, M., Johansson, U. S., Fernholm, B., Agnelli, P., Barbagli, F., Littlewood, D. T. J., Kelstrup, C. D., Olsen, J. V., Lister, A. M., Roca, A. L., Dalén, L. & Gilbert, M. T. P. (2013) Resolution of the type material of the Asian elephant, Elephas maximus Linnaeus, 1758 (Proboscidea, Elephantidae). Linnean Society, London: 1–11. <doi: 10.1111/zoj.12084>. [Published online on the website of the Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society on 4 November 2013 without preregistration on Zoobank; accessibility removed from the journal website on 14 January 2014; not accessible on PubMed Central online archives on 15 November 2014; work therefore unavailable in zoological nomenclature]. <https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj12084>.
Cappellini, E., Gentry, A., Palkopoulou, E., Ishida, Y., Cram, D., Roos, A.-M., Watson, M., Johansson, U. S., Fernholm, B., Agnelli, P., Barbagli, F., Littlewood, D. T. J., Kelstrup, C. D., Olsen, J. V., Lister, A. M., Roca, A. L., Dalén, L. & Gilbert, M. T. P. (2014) Resolution of the type material of the Asian elephant, Elephas maximus Linnaeus, 1758 (Proboscidea, Elephantidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 170 (1): 222–232. <doi: 10.1111/zoj.12084>. [Published on paper and online on 14 January 2014]. <https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj12084>.
Ceríaco, L. M. P., Gutiérrez, E. E., Dubois, A. et al. [490 additional signatories] (2016) Photography-based taxonomy is inadequate, unnecessary, and potentially harmful for biological sciences. Zootaxa, 4196 (3): 435–445. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4196.3.9>.
Denys, C., Lecompte, E., Dubois, A. & Taylor, P. J. (2017) Diagnoses and contents of new African and Eurasian Murinae (Rodentia, Muridae) tribes. Dumerilia, 7: 82‒90.
Dubois, A. (1998) List of European species of amphibians and reptiles: will we soon be reaching ‘stability’? Amphibia-Reptilia, 19 (1): 1–28. <https://doi.org/10.1163/156853898X00304>.
Dubois, A. (2000) Synonymies and related lists in zoology: general proposals, with examples in herpetology. Dumerilia, 4 (2): 33–98.
Dubois, A. (2003) The relationships between taxonomy and conservation biology in the century of extinctions. Comptes rendus Biologies, 326 (suppl. 1): S9–S21. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S1631-0691(03)00022-2>.
Dubois, A. (2012) The distinction between introduction of a new nomen and subsequent use of a previously introduced nomen in zoological nomenclature. Bionomina, 5: 57–80. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.5.1.2>.
Dubois, A. (2013) Zygoidy, a new nomenclatural concept. Bionomina, 6: 1–25. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.6.1.1>.
Dubois, A. (2017a) A few problems in the generic nomenclature of insects and amphibians, with recommendations for the publication of new generic nomina in zootaxonomy and comments on taxonomic and nomenclatural databases and websites. Zootaxa, 4237 (1): 1–16. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4237.1.1>.
Dubois, A. (2017b) The need for reference specimens in zoological taxonomy and nomenclature. Bionomina, 12: 4–38. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.12.1.2>.
Dubois, A. (2017c) Report 2017-1 of the Observatory on Availability in Zoological Nomenclature. Dumerilia, 7: 50–61.
Dubois, A. & Aescht, E. (ed.) (2017) LZC Session 13. Proposal AVA-04. Problems with the 2012 Amendment of the Code. Dumerilia, 7: 35–47.
Dubois, A. & Aescht, E. (ed.) (2019a) LZC Session 16. What is the meaning of ‘fixed content and layout’ in Article 8.1.3.2 of the 2012 Amendment of the Code? Consequences regarding this Amendment. Dumerilia, 8: 6–34.
Dubois, A. & Aescht, E. (ed.) (2019b) LZC Session 33. The Principles of the Zoocode. 15. The Principle of Sozoidy. Dumerilia, 8: 133–142.
Dubois, A. & Aescht, E. (ed.) (2019c) LZC Session 35. The Principles of the Zoocode. 17. The Principle of Registration. Dumerilia, 8: 147–154.
Dubois, A., Bauer, A. M., Ceríaco, L. M. P., Dusoulier, F., Frétey, T., Löbl, I., Lorvelec, O., Ohler, A., Stopiglia, R. & Aescht, E. (2019) The Linz Zoocode project: a set of new proposals regarding the terminology, the Principles and Rules of zoological nomenclature. First report of activities (2014‒2019). Bionomina, 17: 1–111. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.17.1.1>.
Dubois, A., Bour, R. & Ohler, A. (2015a) What is an online ‘preliminary version’ of a publication in the meaning of Article 9.9 of the Code?—One more step on the trail of the Asian elephant. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 72 (1): 6–18. <https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v72i1.a13>.
Dubois, A., Bour, R. & Ohler, A. (2015b) Nomenclatural availability of preliminary electronic versions of taxonomic papers: in need of a clear definition. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 72 (3): 252–265. <https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v72i3.a1>.
Dubois, A., Crochet, P.-A., Dickinson, E. C., Nemésio, A., Aescht, E., Bauer, A. M., Blagoderov, V., Bour, R., de Carvalho, M. R., Desutter-Grandcolas, L., Frétey, T., Jäger, P., Koyamba, V., Lavilla, E. O., Löbl, I., Louchart, A., Malécot, V., Schatz, H. & Ohler, A. (2013) Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems related to the electronic publication of new nomina and nomenclatural acts in zoology, with brief comments on optical discs and on the situation in botany. Zootaxa, 3735 (1): 1–94. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3735.1.1>.
Dubois, A., Frétey, T. & Ohler, A. (2018) The Relictus case: it is high time that taxonomists follow the Code’s requirements for nomenclatural availability and validity of new zoological nomina. Bionomina, 13: 51‒64. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.13.1.4>.
Dubois, A. & Nemésio, A. (2007) Does nomenclatural availability of nomina of new species or subspecies require the deposition of vouchers in collections? Zootaxa, 1409: 1–22.
Fautin, A. & Pyle, R. (2008) Summary of session on ZooBank (Session 5). In: International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature Special Session of the Commission – Paris, France, Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 65 (4): 257–260.
Hofstetter, V., Buyck, B., Eyssartier, G., Schnee, S. & Gindro, K. (2019) The unbearable lightness of sequenced-based identification. Fungal Diversity, 96: 243‒284. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00428-3>.
Krell, F.-T. (2015) A mixed bag: when are early online publications available for nomenclatural purposes? Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 72 (1): 19–32. <https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v72i1.a14>.
Lecompte, E., Aplin, K., Denys, C., Catzeflis, F., Chades, M. & Chevret, P. (2008) Phylogeny and biogeography of African Murinae based on mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences, with a new tribal classification of the subfamily. BMC evolutionary Biology, 8 (199): 1–21 + 4 additional online files. Online document <http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2148-8-199.pdf>.
Polaszek, A., Agosti, D., Alonso-Zarazaga, M., Beccaloni, G., Bjørn, P. d. P., Bouchet, P., Brothers, D. J., Cranbrook, G., Evenhuis, N. L., Godfray, H. C. J., Johnson, N. F., Krell, F.-T., Lipscomb, D., Lyal, C. H. C., Mace, G. M., Mawatari, S., Miller, S. E., Minelli, A., Morris, S., Ng, P. K. L., Patterson, D. J., Pyle, R. L., Robinson, N. J., Rogo, L., Taverne, J., Thompson, F. C., van Tol, J., Wheeler, Q. D. & Wilson, E. O. (2005a) A universal register for animal names. Nature, 437: 4. <https://doi.org/10.1038/437477a>.
Polaszek, A., Alonso-Zarazaga, M., Bouchet, P., Brothers, D. J., Evenhuis, N., Krell, F.-T., Lyal, C. H. C., Minelli, A., Pyle, R. L., Robinson, N. J., Thompson, F. C. & van Tol, J. (2005b) ZooBank: the open-access register for zoological taxonomy: technical discussion paper. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 62: 210–220.
Raposo, M. A., Stopiglia, R., Brito, G. R. R., Bockmann, F. A., Kirwan, G. M., Gayon, J. & Dubois, A. (2017) What really hampers taxonomy and conservation? A riposte to Garnett and Christidis (2017). Zootaxa, 4317 (1): 179–184. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4317.1.10>.
Silva, T., Guzmán, A., Urantówka, A. D. & Mackiewicz, P. (2017) A new parrot taxon from the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico—its position within genus Amazona based on morphology and molecular phylogeny. PeerJ, 3475: 1–40. <https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3475/correction-1>.
Tissier, J., Rage, J.-C., Boistel, R., Fernandez, V., Pollet, N., Garcua, G. & Laurin, M. (2015) Synchrotron analysis of a ‘mummified’ salamander (Vertebrata: Caudata) from the Eocene of Quercy, France. Linnean Society, London: 1–18. [Published online on the website of the Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society on 5 October 2015; accessibility removed from the journal website at unknown date in 2016; not accessible on PubMed Central online archives on 12 November 2019; work therefore unavailable in zoological nomenclature]. <https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12341>.
Tissier, J., Rage, J.-C., Boistel, R., Fernandez, V., Pollet, N., Garcua, G. & Laurin, M. (2016) Synchrotron analysis of a ‘mummified’ salamander (Vertebrata: Caudata) from the Eocene of Quercy, France. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 177 (1): 147–164. [Published on paper an online in 2016]. <https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12341>.