Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 20 No. 1: 31 December 2020
Type: Article
Published: 2020-12-31
DOI: 10.11646/bionomina.20.1.3
Page range: 36–46
Abstract views: 308
PDF downloaded: 0

Herpetological higher taxa nomina 4. Batrachia Brongniart, 1800

Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB – UMR 7205 – CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Université, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 30, F-75005, Paris, France
Association RACINE, 5 allée des Cygnes, 35750 Saint Maugan, France
Availability authorship allocation priority validity hoplonym sozodiaphonym hypnokyronym batrachians bony fishes Amphibia Anura Batrachia Batrachoidei Gymnophiona Teleostei Urodela

Abstract

The nomen Batrachia has been very extensively used in the scientific literature since 1800, but for two different taxa of recent amphibians. The first one, originally introduced by Brongniart (1800), corresponds to a taxon encompassing all recent taxa of frogs and salamanders but excluding the caecilians. The second one, used first by Oppel (1811), corresponds to a taxon including all recent amphibians (frogs, salamanders and caecilians). Both these nomina are shown here to be sozodiaphonyms, and therefore, under DONS, the latter must be definitively rejected as invalid, in favour of the nomen Lissamphibia Gadow, 1898. As for Batrachia Brongniart, 1800, we also consider it for the time being as invalid, as the trichotomy involving the three main groups of recent amphibians is not yet resolved. But if the sister-taxa relationship between Anura and Urodela is later confirmed, the nomen Batrachia, which is currently a hypnokyronym, will be available for it.

References

  1. Blainville, H. de (1816) Prodrome d’une nouvelle distribution systématique du règne animal. Bulletin des Sciences de la Société philomatique de Paris, juillet 1816: ‘105–112’ [113–120] + 121–124.

    Brongniart, A. (1800) Essai d’une classification naturelle des Reptiles. Iere partie. Etablissement des ordres. Bulletin des Sciences, par la Société philomatique, 2 (35): 81–82.

    Cannatella, D. C. & Hillis, D. M. (2004) Amphibians: leading a life of slime. In: J. Cracraft & M. J. Donoghue (ed.), Assembling the tree of life, New York (Columbia University Press): 430‒450.

    Cuvier, G. (1802) Lectures on comparative anatomy. Translated from the French of G. Cuvier (…) by William Ross, under the inspection of James Macartney (…). Vol. 1. On the organs of motion. London (Longman & Rees): i–xl + 1–542, tab. 1–9. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.118777>.

    Dubois, A. (2015) The Duplostensional Nomenclatural System for higher zoological nomenclature. Dumerilia, 5: 1–108.

    Dubois, A. & Frétey, T. (2020) Herpetological higher taxa nomina. 1. Introduction and methodology. Bionomina, 19: 1–56. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.19.1.1>.

    Dubois, A. & Frétey, T. (in press) Herpetological higher taxa nomina. 6. Lissamphibia Gadow, 1898. Bionomina, in press.

    Dubois, A. & Ohler, A. (2019) The nomina Anura, Urodela, Ecaudata and Caudata, credited to ‘Fischer von Waldheim, 1813’, do not exist, with comments on the nomenclature of higher zoological taxa and on the authorships and dates of other amphibian nomina. Bionomina, 14: 1‒68. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.14.1.1>.

    Dubois, A., Ohler, A. & Pyron, R. A. (in press) New concepts and methods for phylogenetic taxonomy and nomenclature in zoology, exemplified by a new ranked cladonomy of recent amphibians (Lissamphibia). Megataxa, 5 (1): in press.

    Dubois, A. & Raffaëlli, J. (2012) A new ergotaxonomy of the order Urodela Duméril, 1805 (Amphibia, Batrachia). Alytes, 28 (3–4): 77–161.

    Duméril A. M. C. (1805) Zoologie analytique, ou méthode naturelle de classification des animaux, rendue plus facile à l’aide de tableaux synoptiques. Paris (Allais), ‘1806’: i–xxxiii + 1–544. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.44835>.

    Feller, A. E. & Hedges, S. B. (1998) Molecular evidence for the early history of living amphibians. Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution, 9 (3): 509–516. <https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1998.0500>.

    Flower, S. S. (1927) Reptilia and Batrachia. Zoological Record, 63 (14): 1–55.

    Frost D. R., Grant, T., Faivovich, J., Bazin, R. H., Haas, A., Haddad, C. F. B., de Sá, R. O., Channing, A., Wilkinson, M., Donnellan, S. C., Raxworthy, C. J., Campbell, J. A., Blotto, B. L., Moler, P., Drewes, R. C., Nussbaum, R. A., Lynch, J. D., Green, D. M., Wheeler, W. C. (2006) The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of natural History, 297: 1–370. <https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090(2006)297[0001:TATOL]2.0.CO;2>.

    Gadow, H. (1898) A classification of Vertebrata, recent and extinct. London (Adam & Charles Black): i‒xvii + 1‒82. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.24205>.

    Leuckart, F. S. (1840) Einige zoologische Bemerkungen. 2. Ueber das Gen. Cryptobranchus. Neue Notizen aus dem Gebiete der Natur- und Heilkunde, 13 (2): 19–20.

    Mayer, F. J. C. (1849) System des Thier-Reichs oder eintheilung der Thiere nach einem Princip. Verhandlungen des naturhistorischen Vereins der Preussischen Rheinlande and Westphalens, 6: 177–210.

    Merrem, B. (1820) Versuch eines Systems der Amphibien. Tentamen systematis Amphibiorum. Marburg (Iohann Christian Krieger): [i–xv + 1–191] × 2, 1 pl. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.5037>.

    Meyer, H., von (1832) Palaeologica zur Geschichte der Erde und ihrer Geschöpfe. Frankfurt am Main (Siegmund Schmerber): 1–560.

    Müller, J. (1831) Kiemenlöcher an einer jungen Coecilia hypocyanea, im Museum der Naturgeschichte zu Leyden beobachtet vom Prof. Joh Müller. Isis von Oken, 24: 709–711.

    Oppel, M. (1811) Ordre II. Reptiles à écailles. Section 2. Ophidiens. Annales du Muséum d’Histoire naturelle, ‘1810’, 16: 254–295 + 376–393.

    Owen, O. (1841) Odontography; or, a treatise on the comparative anatomy of the teth; their physiological relations, mode of development, and microscopic structure, in the vertebrate animals. Volume 1. Text. London (Hippolyte Baillière): i–xxi + i–lxxiv + 1–655. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.113905>.

    Pyron, R. A. & Wiens, J. J. (2011) A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including ovder 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders and caecilians. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 61: 543–583. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.06.012>.

    Queiroz, K. de & Gauthier, J. (1992) Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 23: 449–480. <https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.002313>.

    Rafinesque-Schmaltz, C. S. (1814) Fine del Prodromo d’Erpetologia Siciliana. Specchio delle Scienze o Giornale enciclopedico di Sicilia, 2 (10): 102–104.

    Roelants, K. & Bossuyt, F. (2005) Archaeobatrachian paraphyly and pangaean diversification of crown-group frogs. Systematic Biology, 54 (1): 111–126. <https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150590905894>.

    Ruggiero, M. A., Gordon, D. P, Orrell, T. M., Bailly, N., Bourgoin, T., Brusca, R. C., Cavalier-Smith, T., Guiry, M. D. & Kirk, P. M. (2015) A higher level classification of all living organisms. PloS One, 10 (4) [e0119248]: 1‒60 + S1 Appendix (1‒12) + S1 Table. <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119248>.

    San Mauro, D. (2010) A multilocus timescale for the origin of extant amphibians. Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution, 56: 554‒561. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2010.04.019>.

    Zardoya, R. & Meyer, A. (2001) On the origin of and phylogenetic relationships among living amphibians. Proceedings of the national Academy of Sciences of the USA, 98: 7380–7383. <https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.111455498>.

    Zhang, P., Liang, D., Mao, R.-L., Hillis, D. M., Wake, D. B. & Cannatella, D. C. (2013) Efficient sequencing of anuran mtDNAs and a mitogenomic exploration of the phylogeny and evolution of frogs. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30 (8): 1899–1915. <https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst091>.