Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 31 No. 1: 20 December 2022
Type: Article
Published: 2022-12-20
DOI: 10.11646/bionomina.31.1.1
Page range: 1–23
Abstract views: 538
PDF downloaded: 5

Nomenclatural acts in zoological nomenclature

Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB - UMR 7205 - CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Université, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 30, 75005 Paris, France
Nomenclatural act nomenclatural status nomenclatural change nomenclatural novelty nomenclatural confirmation nomenclatural correction availability promulgation information affecting nomenclature uncertainty ambiguity error resolution correction taxonomic act taxonomic status 2012 Amendment of the Code terminology

Abstract

The present work proposes a precise formal definition and an expansion of the concept of ‘nomenclatural act’ which is present in the Code but not clearly delimitated from other related concepts, and provides a list of the published statements that correspond to this concept, a terminology for this and related acts, as well as for information affecting zoological nomenclature. These technical terms will be useful for unambiguous designation of the concepts of zoological nomenclature related to this concept, which are denoted in the Code by ‘common language’ terms having often widely different meanings. They will also be of great help for a future computerisation of the Rules of the Code, which will be possible only if distinct concepts are identified and pointed to by distinct terms. An important outcome of the present work is that genuine nomenclatural acts (onomatergies), as well as statements about nomenclatural status (cataphasy), acquire nomenclatural availability (i.e., existence) only if promulgated in paper or electronic publications complying with Article 8 of the Code, but cannot be made available online in electronic databases or other labile documents failing to comply with these Rules as revised in 2012.

References

  1. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature. ‘Fourth edition’. London (International Trust for zoological Nomenclature): i–xxix +1–306.

  2. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2003) Declaration 44. Amendment of Article 74.7.3. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 60 (4): 263.

  3. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2012) Amendment of Articles 8, 9, 10, 21 and 78 of the International Code of Zoological nomenclature to expand and refine methods of publication. Zootaxa, 3450: 1–7. <https://doi.org/10.11 646/zootaxa.3450.1.1>.

  4. Alonso-Zarazaga, M. A. (2005) Nomenclature of higher taxa: a new approach. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 62 (4): 189–199.

  5. Benichou, L., Buschbom, J., Campbell, M., Hermann, E., Kvacek , J., Mergen, P., Mitchell, L., Rinaldo; C. & Agosti, D. (2022) Joint statement on best practices for the citation of authorities of scientific names in taxonomy by CETAF, SPNHC and BHL. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 8 [e94338]: 1‒7. <https://doi.org/10.3897/rio8.e94338>.

  6. Blanchard, R. (ed.) (1905) Règles internationales de la nomenclature zoologique adoptées par les Congrès Internationaux de Zoologie. Paris (Rudeval): 1–64.

  7. Dubois, A. (1982) Le statut nomenclatural des noms génériques d’Amphibiens créés par Kuhl & Van Hasselt (1822): Megophrys, Occidozyga et Rhacophorus. Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, (4), 4 (A): 261–280.

  8. Dubois, A. (1998) List of European species of amphibians and reptiles: will we soon be reaching ‘stability’? Amphibia-Reptilia, 19 (1): 1–28. <https://doi.org/10.1163/156853898X00304>.

  9. Dubois, A. (2000) Synonymies and related lists in zoology: general proposals, with examples in herpetology. Dumerilia, 4 (2): 33–98.

  10. Dubois, A. (2003) The relationships between taxonomy and conservation biology in the century of extinctions. Comptes rendus Biologies, 326 (suppl. 1): S9–S21. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S1631-0691(03)00022-2>.

  11. Dubois, A. (2005a) Propositions pour l’incorporation des nomina de taxons de rang supérieur dans le Code international de nomenclature zoologique. In: A. Dubois, O. Poncy, V. Malécot & N. Léger (ed.), Comment nommer les taxons de rang supérieur en zoologie et en botanique?, Biosystema, 23: 73–96.

  12. Dubois, A. (2005b) Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked zoological taxa in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 1. Some general questions, concepts and terms of biological nomenclature. Zoosystema, 27 (2): 365–426. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1337.1.1>.

  13. Dubois, A. (2006) Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked zoological taxa in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 2. The proposed Rules and their rationale. Zoosystema, 28 (1): 165–258. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1337.1.1>.

  14. Dubois, A. (2008a) A partial but radical solution to the problem of nomenclatural taxonomic inflation and synonymy load. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 93: 857‒863. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00900.x>.

  15. Dubois, A. (2008b) Authors of zoological publications and nomina are signatures, not persons. Zootaxa, 1771: 63–68. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1771.1.6>.

  16. Dubois, A. (2010) Retroactive changes should be introduced in the Code only with great care: problems related to the spellings of nomina. Zootaxa, 2426: 1–42. <https://doi.org/10.11 646/zootaxa.2426.1.1>.

  17. Dubois, A. (2011a) The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature must be drastically improved before it is too late. Bionomina, 2: 1–104. <https://doi.org/10.11 646/bionomina.2.1.1>.

  18. Dubois, A. (2011b) A zoologist’s viewpoint on the Draft BioCode. Bionomina, 3: 45–62. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.3.1.4>.

  19. Dubois, A. (2013) Zygoidy, a new nomenclatural concept. Bionomina, 6: 1–25. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.6.1.1>.

  20. Dubois, A. (2015) The Duplostensional Nomenclatural System for higher zoological nomenclature. Dumerilia, 5: 1–108.

  21. Dubois, A. (2017a) A few problems in the generic nomenclature of insects and amphibians, with recommendations for the publication of new generic nomina in zootaxonomy and comments on taxonomic and nomenclatural databases and websites. Zootaxa, 4237 (1): 1–16. <http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4237.1.1>.

  22. Dubois, A. (2017b) The nomenclatural status of Hysaplesia, Hylaplesia, Dendrobates and related nomina (Amphibia, Anura), with general comments on zoological nomenclature and its governance, as well as on taxonomic databases and websites. Bionomina, 11: 1‒48. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.11.1.1>.

  23. Dubois, A. (2020) The status regarding publication date and availability of taxonomic works published online without proper Zoobank registration. Bionomina, 18: 44‒55. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.18.1.2>.

  24. Dubois, A. & Aescht, E. (ed.) (2017) LZC Session 13. Proposal AVA-04. Problems with the 2012 Amendment of the Code. Dumerilia, 7: 35‒47.

  25. Dubois, A. & Aescht, E. (ed.) (2019a) LZC Session 27. Suffixes in family-series nomenclature. Dumerilia, 8: 98–105.

  26. Dubois, A. & Aescht, E. (ed.) (2019b) LZC Session 28. The Principles of the Zoocode. 10. The Principle of Synonymy. Dumerilia, 8: 106–109.

  27. Dubois, A. & Aescht, E. (ed.) (2019c) LZC Session 32. The Principles of the Zoocode. 14. The Principle of Nomography. Dumerilia, 8: 119–132.

  28. Dubois, A. & Aescht, E. (ed.) (2019d) LZC Session 34. The Principles of the Zoocode. 16. The Principle of Archoidy. Dumerilia, 8: 143–146.

  29. Dubois, A. & Aescht, E. (ed.) (2019e) LZC Session 37. Diagrams of the Nomenclatural Process. Dumerilia, 8: 159–168.

  30. Dubois, A., Aneesh, P. T., Bauer, A. M., Ceríaco, L. M. P., Daniel, G. M., De Prins, J., Frétey, T., Löbl, I., Lorvelec, O., Marinov, M., Ohler, A., Schmitt, M., Whittington, A., Young, M. T. & Aescht, E. (2022c) The Linz Zoocode project. Fifth report of activities (2022). Nomenclatural availability. 4. Electronic publication. Bionomina, 28: 71–119. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.28.1.4>.

  31. Dubois, A., Aneesh, P. T., Bauer, A. M., Ceríaco, L. M. P., Daniel, G. M., Frétey, T., Löbl, I., Lorvelec, O., Marinov, M., Ohler, A., Schmitt, M., Whittington, A. & Aescht, E. (2022a) The Linz Zoocode project. Second report of activities (2020). Nomenclatural availability. 1. What is nomenclatural availability? Bionomina, 28: 1–17. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.28.1.1>.

  32. Dubois, A., Aneesh, P. T., Bauer, A. M., Ceríaco, L. M. P., Daniel, G. M., Frétey, T., Löbl, I., Lorvelec, O., Marinov, M., Ohler, A., Schmitt, M., Whittington, A. & Aescht, E. (2022b) The Linz Zoocode project. Third report of activities (2020). Nomenclatural availability. 2. Work availability. Bionomina, 28: 18–49. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.28.1.2>.

  33. Dubois, A., Bauer, A. M., Ceríaco, L. M. P., Dusoulier, F., Frétey, T., Löbl, I., Lorvelec, O., Ohler, A., Stopiglia, R. & Aescht, E. (2019) The Linz Zoocode project: a set of new proposals regarding the terminology, the Principles and Rules of zoological nomenclature. First report of activities (2014‒2019). Bionomina, 17: 1–111. <https://doi. org/10.11 646/bionomina.17.1.1>.

  34. Dubois, A. & Berkani, M. (2013) The misleading use of the terms parent, child, ancestor and descendant in databases dealing with biological evolution and taxonomy. Bionomina, 6: 52–56. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.6.1.4>.

  35. Dubois, A., Crochet, P.-A., Dickinson, E. C., Nemésio, A., Aescht, E., Bauer, A. M., Blagoderov, V., Bour, R., Carvalho, M. R. de, Desutter-Grandcolas, L., Frétey, T., Jäger, P., Koyamba, V., Lavilla, E. O., Löbl, I., Louchart, A., Malécot, V., Schatz, H. & Ohler, A. (2013) Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems related to the electronic publication of new nomina and nomenclatural acts in zoology, with brief comments on optical discs and on the situation in botany. Zootaxa, 3735 (1): 1–94. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3735.1.1>.

  36. Dubois, A. & Frétey, T. (2020) Herpetological higher taxa nomina. 1. Introduction and methodology. Bionomina, 19: 1–56. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.19.1.1>.

  37. Dubois, A. & Ohler, A. (2018) The Hyla quoyi-Hyla prasina case (Amphibia, Anura), with comments on bibliographic and taxonomic databases and on Article 23.9 of the Code. Zoosystema, 40 (23): 501‒506. <https://doi.org/10.5252/zoosystema2018v40a23>.

  38. Dubois, A., Ohler, A. & Pyron, R. A. (2021) New concepts and methods for phylogenetic taxonomy and nomenclature in zoology, exemplified by a new ranked cladonomy of recent amphibians (Lissamphibia). Megataxa, 5 (1): 1‒738. <https://doi.org/10.11 646/megataxa.5.1.1>.

  39. Engel, M. S., Ceríaco, L. M. P., Daniel, G. M., Dellapé, P. M., Löbl, I., Marinov, M., Reis, R. E., Young, M. T., Dubois, A. et al. [+ 77 signatories] (2021) The taxonomic impediment: a shortage of taxonomists, not the lack of technical approaches. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 193: 381‒387. <https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab072>.

  40. Meyer, A. (1926) Logik der Morphologie im Rahmen einer Logik der gesamten Biologie. Berlin (Julius Springer): i–vii +1–290. <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50733-5_1>.

  41. Ng, P. K. L. (1994) The citation of species names and the role of the author’s name. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 42 (3): 509–513.

  42. Pavlinov, I. Y. [Павлинов, И. Я.] (2014) Taxonomic nomenclature. Book 2. From Linnaeus to first Codes. [Таксономическая номенклатура. Книга 2. От Линея до первых кодексов]. Zoologitsheskie Issledovaniya Zoological Research [Зоологические исследования], 15: 1‒223.

  43. Simpson, G. G. (1940) Types in modern taxonomy. American Journal of Science, 238: 413–431. <https://doi.org/10.2475/ ajs.238.6.413>.

  44. Smith, H. M. & Pérez-Higareda, G. (1986) Nomenclatural name-forms. Systematic Zoology, 35 (3): 421–422. <https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/35.3.421>.