Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 34 No. 1: 17 Nov. 2023
Type: Article
Published: 2023-11-17
DOI: 10.11646/bionomina.34.1.1
Page range: 1-8
Abstract views: 167
PDF downloaded: 1

The document that is not there

University of Padova; Department of Biology; Via Ugo Bassi; 58B; 35131 Padova; Italy
Biodiversity Heritage Library International Code of Zoological Nomenclature preservation of the authentic publication record replacement of potentially offensive names retracted publications Rhinogrades Sassius simplex stability of vernacular names type specimens

Abstract

Zoological nomenclature, the essential tool for exchanging information about the animal world, cannot depart from the principles of universality and stability fixed in the Code as its aim and pursued through the application of rules stemming from the principles of publication, typification and priority. To enforce these rules, we need to preserve and critically evaluate the whole record of publications (and associated specimens) available thus far. Attemps to erase part of this record or to dismiss names or documents as contrary to principles that have nothing to do with the scientific names of animals are increasingly widespread and even creep into a major repository of bibliographic record as the Biodiversity Heritage Library. This trend must be promptly rebutted.

References

  1. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature. ‘Fourth edition’. London (International Trust for zoological Nomenclature): i–xxix + 1–306.
  2. Agassiz, L. (1836) Prodrome d’une monographie des Radiaires ou Echinodermes. Mémoires de la Société des Sciences naturelles de Neuchâtel, 1: 168–199.
  3. Blanchard, R. (ed.) (1905) Règles internationales de la nomenclature zoologique adoptées par les Congrès Internationaux de Zoologie. Paris (Rudeval): 1–64.
  4. Canzoneri, S. (1981) Una nuova Asmeringa delle Isole Maldive (Diptera, Ephydridae). Lavori - Società Veneziana di Scienze naturali, 6: 87–88.
  5. Ceríaco, L. P. M., Aescht, E., Ahyong, S. T., Ballerio, A., Bouchard, P., Bourgoin, T., Dmitriev, D., Evenhuis, N., Grygier, M. J., Harvey, M. S., Kottelat, M., Kluge, N., Krell, F.-T., Kojima, J.-I., Kullander, S. O., Lucinda, P., Lyal, C. H. C., Pyle, R. L., Rheindt, F. E., Scioscia, C. L., Welter-Schultes, F., Whitmore, D., Yanega, D., Zhang, Z.-Q., Zhou H.-Z. & Pape, T. (2023) Renaming taxa on ethical grounds threatens nomenclatural stability and scientific communication. Communication from the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 197 (2): 283–286. <https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac107>.
  6. Dubois, A. (2011) The rich but confusing terminology of biological nomenclature: a first step towards a comprehensive glossary. Bionomina, 3 (1): 71–76. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.3.1.6>
  7. Dubois, A. (2020a) Nomenclatural consequences of the Oculudentavis khaungraae case, with comments on the practice of ‘retraction’ of scientific publications. Zoosystema, 42 (23): 475–482. <https://doi.org/10.5252/zoosystema2020v42a23>
  8. Dubois, A. (2020b) ‘Retraction’ of taxonomic papers: the meaning of the word ‘issued’ and related ones in zoological nomenclature. Zoosystema, 42 (26): 519–523. <https://doi.org/10.5252/zoosystema2020v42a26>.
  9. Dubois, A. & Nemésio, A. (2007) Does nomenclatural availability of nomina of new species or subspecies require the deposition of vouchers in collections? Zootaxa, 1409: 1–22. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1409.1.1>.
  10. Gillman, L. N. & Wright, S. D. (2020) Restoring indigenous names in taxonomy. Communications Biology, 3: 609. <https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01344-y>.
  11. Guedes, P., Alves-Martins, F., Martínez Arribas, J., Chatterjee, S., Santos, A. M. C., Lewin, A., Bako, L., Webala, P. W., Correia, R. A., Rocha, R. & Ladle, R. J. (2023) Eponyms have no place in 21st-century biological nomenclature. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 7 (8): 1157–1160. <https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02022-y>.
  12. Kelly, S. (2005) The book of lost books: an incomplete history of all the great books you’ll never read. New York (Viking): i–xx + 1–344.
  13. Kirkaldy, G. W. (1904) Bibliographical and nomenclatorial notes on the Hemiptera. No. 3. Entomologist, 37 (498): 279–283. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.2885>.
  14. Kočovský, P. M., Chapman, D. C. & Qian, S. (2018) ‘Asian Carp’ is societally and scientifically problematic. Let’s replace it. Fisheries, 43 (7): 311–316. <https://doi.org/10.1002/fsh.10087>.
  15. Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima, reformata. Tomus I. Holmiae (Laurentii Salvii): [i–iv]+ 1–824. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542>.
  16. Linné, C. a (1767) Systema Naturae. Editio duodecima, reformata. Tomus I, Pars II. Holmiae (Laurentii Salvii): 533–1327. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.157601>.
  17. Minelli, A. (1999) The names of animals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14 (12): 462–463. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01747-4>.
  18. Minelli, A. (2003) The status of taxonomic literature. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18 (2): 75–76. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00051-4>.
  19. Minelli, A. (2022) Culture as the natural history of Homo sapiens: pluralism, memory, creativity. Bullettin of the Gioenia Academy of natural Sciences of Catania, 55 (385): IP1–IP12. <https://doi.org/10.35352/gioenia.v55i385.101>.
  20. Minelli, A. & Tubbs, P. K. (2005) Reciprocal loan between vernacular and scientific names of animals. In: A. Minelli, G. Ortalli & G. Sanga (ed.), Animal names, Venezia (Istituto Veneto di Scienze Lettere ed Arti): 481–490.
  21. Mosyakin, S. L. (2023) Attempts to introduce a system of national, racial and/or ethnocultural discrimination in codes of biological nomenclature should not be tolerated: comments on some recent proposals (Wright & Gillman, 2022, etc.). Taxon, 72 (3): 469–482. <https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12837>.
  22. Nelson, J. S., Crossman, E. J., Espinosa-Pérez, H., Findley, L. T., Gilbert, C. R., Lea, R. N. & Williams, J. D. (2001) Recommended change in the common name for a marine fish: Goliath grouper to replace Jewfish (Epinephelus itajara). Fisheries, 26 (5): 31.
  23. Nelson, J. S., Crossman, E. J., Espinosa-Pérez, H., Gilbert, C. R., Lea, R. N. & Williams. J. D. (1998) Recommended changes in common fish names: pikeminnow to replace squawfish (Ptychocheilus spp.). Fisheries, 23 (9): 37.
  24. Olson, S. L. & Schifter, H. (1989) The identity of the fabricated bird Sassius simplex and its final dissociation from the Hawaiian avifauna. Rivista italiana di Ornitologia, 59: 43–48.
  25. Palma, R. L. & Heath, A. C. (2021) Science versus vernacular: should some taxa of animals and plants be renamed according to ‘indigenous’ practices? Bionomina, 22 (1): 1–7. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.22.1.1>.
  26. Renault, P. A. (1803–1804 [an XII]) Flore du département de l’Orne. Ouvrage élémentaire de botanique, composé de la réunion des systèmes de Tournefort, de Linné et de Jussieu; avec une description exacte des plantes, l’indication des lieux où elles se trouvent, et une notice sur leur usage et leur utilité dans les arts. Alençon (Malassis): i–x + 1–222.
  27. Roksandic, M., Musiba, C., Radović, P., Lindal, J., Wu, X.-J., Figueiredo, E., Smith, G. F., Roksandic, I. & Bae, C. J. (2023) Change in biological nomenclature is overdue and possible. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 7 (8): 1166–1167. <https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02104-x>.
  28. Rothschild, W. & Hartert, E. (1926) [Description of Sassius simplex]. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club, 46 (302): 51–53.
  29. Scott, P. & Rines, R. (1975) Naming the Loch Ness monster. Nature, 258 (5535): 466–468. <https://doi.org/10.1038/258466a0>.
  30. Smith, G. F. & Figueiredo, E. (2022) ‘Rhodes-’ must fall: some of the consequences of colonialism for botany and plant nomenclature. Taxon, 71 (1): 1–5. <https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12598>.
  31. Spalowsky, J. J. R. (1790) Beytrag zur Naturgeschichte der Vögel. Wien (Schmidtische Schriften): [i–xvi] + 3–20, 47 colour plates. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.144612>.
  32. Strickland, H. E. (1845) Report on the recent progress and present state of ornithology. Report of the Fourteenth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science held at York in September 1844: 170–221.
  33. Strickland, H. E., Henslow J. S., Phillips, J., Shuckard, W. E., Richardson, J. B., Waterhouse. G. R., Owen, R., Yarrell, W., Jenyns, L., Darwin, C., Broderip, W. J. & Westwood, J. O. (1842) Report of a Committee appointed to consider the rules by which the nomenclature of zoology may be established on a uniform and permanent basis. London (John Murray, for the British Association for the Advancement of Science): 1–17.
  34. Stümpke, H. (1961) Bau und Leben der Rhinogradentia. Stuttgart (Fischer): 1–83.
  35. Stümpke, H. (1962) Anatomie et biologie des Rhinogrades, un nouvel ordre de Mammifères. Paris (Masson): i–vii + 1–85.
  36. Wright, S. D. & Gillman, L. N. (2021) Replacing current nomenclature with pre-existing indigenous names in algae, fungi and plants. Taxon, 71 (1): 6–10. <https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12599>.
  37. Xing, L., O’Connor, J. K., Schmitz, L., Chiappe, L. M., McKellar, R. C., Yi, Q. & Li., G. (2020a) Hummingbird-sized dinosaur from the Cretaceous period of Myanmar. Nature, 579 (7798): 245–249. <https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2068-4>.
  38. Xing, L., O’Connor, J. K., Schmitz, L., Chiappe, L. M., McKellar, R. C., Yi, Q. & Li., G. (2020b), Retraction note: hummingbird-sized dinosaur from the Cretaceous period of Myanmar. Nature, 584 (7822): 652. <https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2553-9>.