Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 38 No. 1: 29 Oct. 2024
Type: Article
Published: 2024-06-27
DOI: 10.11646/bionomina.38.1.3
Page range: 30-42
Abstract views: 152
PDF downloaded: 1

Conservation of Coluber lanceolatus as the valid name of the Martinique fer-de-lance (no matter who its author is)

Department of Biology and Center for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Stewardship; Villanova University; 800 Lancaster Avenue; Villanova; PA 19085; USA
Department of Biology; Avila University; Kansas City; MO 64145; USA
Serpentes Viperidae Bothrops diadochonym nomen oblitum nomen protectum availability precedence

Abstract

The fer-de-lance of Martinique is a pitviper of medical importance and conservation concern. It was described by La Cepède in 1789 as Coluber lanceolatus but as a result of a ruling of the Commission (Opinion 1463) this nomen is unavailable. Although a proposed new use of the Plenary Power by the Commission could restore the availability of Coluber lanceolatus La Cepède, 1789, this possibility remains hypothetical and under the Code-compliant interpretation, C. lanceolatus was made available by Bonnaterre in 1790 who proposed a homonymous poieonym. Coluber lanceolatus, which, as Bothrops lanceolatus, is currently universally accepted as the valid nomen of the fer-de-lance, is at risk because of the existence of two older nomina that apply to this taxon, Vipera cærulescens Laurenti, 1768 and its replacement name Coluber glaucus Gmelin, 1789. Consequently, we here provide the evidence necessary to demonstrate that Vipera cærulescens and Coluber glaucus are nomina oblita and to designate Coluber lanceolatus, under both the current proposed interpretations of its authorship, as a nomen protectum. Coluber lanceolatus Bonnaterre, 1790 has precedence over Coluber brasiliensis and C. tigrinus, two nomina with which it is considered synonymous and which were made available in the same work. However, precedence was established as a result of determination by the First Reviser only as recently as 2021. The case of Bothrops lanceolatus highlights that even well-established and widely accepted nomina may be potentially vulnerable to destabilisation by long-forgotten synonyms and illustrates the particular nomenclatural complications that can arise from valid Bonnaterre nomina that are homonymous with long-used but now unavailable La Cepède names.

References

  1. Anonymous (1809 or 1810) A genuine and universal system of natural history; Comprising the three kingdoms of animals, vegetables, and minerals, arranged under their respective classes, orders, genera, and species. By the late Sir Charles Linnæus, Professor of Physic and Botany in the University of Upsal, and President of the Royal Academy of Stockholm. Improved, corrected, and enlarged, By J. Frid. Gmelin, M. D. Professor of Natural History in the Royal Society of Gottingen. Faithfully translated, and rendered more complete by the addition of Vaillant’s beautiful Birds of Africa, the superb Fish of Mark Eliezer Bloch; the amphibious animals, reptiles, insects, &c. in the costly works of Albertus Seba, Merian, Fabricius, Knorr, &c. the elegant improvements of the Compte de Buffon, and the more modern discoveries of the British navigators in the South Pacific Ocean, New Holland, New South Wales, China, Cochin-China, &c. Methodically incorporated and arranged by the editors of the Encyclopædia Londinensis. Volume the Twelfth. London (W. Lewis): 1–735, pl. 1– 21.
  2. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1987) Opinion 1463. De Lacépède, 1788–1789, Histoire Naturelle des Serpens and later editions: rejected as a non-bionominal work. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 44 (4): 265–267.
  3. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature. Fourth edition. London (International Trust for zoological Nomenclature): i–xxix + 1–306.
  4. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2005) Opinion 2104 (Case 3226). Lacepède, B. G. É. de la V., 1788, Histoire Naturelle des Quadrupèdes Ovipares: rejected as a non-binominal work. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 62 (1): 55.
  5. Anonymous [UICN (Union Internationale pour la Conservation de la Nature), OFB (Office Français de la Biodiversité) and MNHN (Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle)] (2020) La liste rouge des espèces menacées en France. Faune de Martinique. Paris (UICN): 1–31.
  6. Amaral, A. do. (1955) Contribuição ao conhecimento dos ofidios neotrópicos XXXV. A propósito de revalidação de Coluber lanceolatus Lacépède, 1789. Memórias do Instituto Butantan, ‘1954’, 26: 207–214.
  7. Anderson, L. G. (1898) Catalogue of Linnean type-specimens of snakes in the royal Museum in Stockholm. Bihang till Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, 4 (Afd. IV No. 6): 1–35.
  8. Bauer, A. M. & Lavilla, E. O. (2022) J. G. Schneider’s Historiae Amphibiorum. Herpetology at the dawn of the 19th century. Ithaca (Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles): i–lxvi + 1–777.
  9. Bechstein, J. M. (1801) Herrn de la Cepede’s Naturgeschichte der Amphibien, oder der eyerlegenden vierfüssigen Thiere und der Schlangen: eine Fortsetzung von Buffon’s Naturgeschichte. Aus dem Französichen übersetzt und mit Anmerkungen und Zusätzen versehen. Weimar (Industrie Comptoir), 3: i–xxvi +1–454, pl. 1–30.
  10. Bonnaterre, [P. J.] (1789) Tableau encyclopédique et méthodique des trois règnes de la nature. Erpétologie. Paris (Panckoucke): i–xxviii + 1–71, pl. 1–7 + 1–6 + 1–6, 6 (2), 7–13 + 1–35. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.59326>.
  11. Bonnaterre, [P. J.] (1790) Tableau encyclopédique et méthodique des trois règnes de la nature. Ophiologie. Paris (Panckoucke): i–xliv + 1–76, pl. A + 1–42. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.58955>.
  12. Boulenger, G. A. (1896) Catalogue of the snakes in the British Museum (Natural History). Volume III, containing the Colubridæ (Opisthoglyphæ and Proteroglyphæ), Amblycephalidæ, and Viperidæ. London (British Museum [Natural History]): i–xiv + 1–727, pl. 1–25.
  13. Brongersma, L. D. (1972) On the “Histoire Naturelle des Serpents” by de la Cépède, 1789 and 1790, with a request to reject this work as a whole, and with proposals to place seven names of snakes, being nomina oblita, on the official index of rejected and invalid names in zoology, and to place three names of snakes on the Official List of Specific Names in Zoology. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 29: 44–61.
  14. Campbell, J. A. & Lamar, W. W. (2004) The venomous reptiles of the Western Hemisphere. Volume 1. Ithaca (Comstock Publishing Associates): i–xviii + 1–475 + [1–28].
  15. Cochran, D. M. (1943) Poisonous reptiles of the world: a wartime handbook. Smithsonian Institution War Background Studies, 10: i–v + 1–37, pl. 1–17. < https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.49968>.
  16. Daudin, F. M. (1803) Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière, des reptiles. Tome 6. Paris (F. Dufart): 1–447, pl. 71–80.
  17. Dewynter, M. (2019) Bothrops lanceolatus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T50957018A50957026. <https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-2.RLTS.T50957018A50957026.en>. [Accessed on 20 May 2024].
  18. Dewynter, M., Angin, B., Questel, K., Sculfort, O., Courtois, E. A. & Frétey, T. (2023) Les amphibiens et les reptiles de la Martinique: identification, répartition et bibliographie. Herp me!, 7: 1–70.
  19. Dewynter, M., Massary, J.-C. de, Bochaton, C., Bour, R., Ineich, I., Vidal, N. & Lescure, J. (2019) Liste taxinomique de l’herpétofaune dans l’outre-mer français. III. Collectivité territoriale de Martinique. Bulletin de la Société herpétologique de France, 169: 53–82.
  20. Dixon, J. R. & Smith, H. M. (1993) Bothrops Wagler, 1824. In: P. Golay, H. M. Smith, D. G. Broadley, J. R. Dixon, C. McCarthy, J.-C. Rage, B. Schätti & M. Toriba (ed.), Endoglyphs and other major venomous snakes of the world: a checklist, Geneva (Azemiops S.A., Herpetological Data Center): 41–51.
  21. Donndorff, J. A. (1798) Zoologische Beyträge zur XIII. Ausgabe des Linneischen Natursystems. Dritter Band. Amphibien und Fische. Leipzig (Weidmannschen Buchhandlung): i–vi + 1–980.
  22. Du Tertre, J.-B. (1654) Histoire generale des isles de S. Christophe, de la Guadeloupe, de la Martinique, et autres dans l’Amérique. Où l’on verra l’establiſſement des colonies françoises, dans ces isles; leurs guerres ciuiles & eſtrangeres, & tout ce qui ſe paſſe dans les voyages & retours des Indes. Comme auſſi pluſieurs belles particularitez des Antiſles de l’Amerique. Une description generale de l’Iſle de la Guadeloupe: de tous ſes mineraux, de ſes pierreries, de ſes riuieres, fontaines & eſtangs: & de toutes ſes plantes. De plus, la deſcription de tous les animaux de la mer, de l’air, & de la terre: & un traité fort ample des moeurs des sauuages du pays, de l’eſtat de la colonie françoiſe, & des eſclaves, tant mores, que sauuages. Paris (Jacques Langlois et Emmanuel Langlois): [i‒xv] + 1–481 + [1–xi], 1 pl. < https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.46401>.
  23. Dubois, A. (2017) A few problems in the generic nomenclature of insects and amphibians, with recommendations for the publication of new generic nomina in zootaxonomy and comments on taxonomic and nomenclatural databases and websites. Zootaxa, 4237 (1): 1–16. <https://doi.org/10.11 646/zootaxa.4237.1.1>.
  24. Dubois, A., Bauer, A. M., Ceríaco, L. M. P., Dusoulier, F., Frétey, T., Löbl, I., Lorvelec, O., Ohler, A., Stopiglia, R. & Aescht, E. (2019) The Linz Zoocode project, a set of new proposals regarding the terminology, the Principles and Rules of zoological nomenclature. First report of activities (2014‒2019). Bionomina, 17: 1–111.
  25. Dubois, A., Frétey, T., Lorvelec, O. & Ohler, A. (2021) The nomenclatural status of the amphibian and reptile nomina introduced by La Cepède in his Histoire Naturelle des Quadrupèdes Ovipares et des Serpens, with comments on various questions of zoological nomenclature. Bionomina, 23: 1–180.
  26. Duméril, A.-M.-C., Bibron, G. & Duméril, A. H. A. (1854) Erpétologie générale ou Histoire naturelle des reptiles. Tome 7, partie 2. Paris (Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret): i–xii + 781–1536. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.11 2229>.
  27. Dundee, H. A. (1994) Current names for Linnaeus’s herpetological species in Systema Naturae X. Smithsonian herpetological Information Service, 100: 41–53. <https://doi.org/10.5479/si.23317515.100.41>.
  28. Frétey, T. (2023) Etymology of nomina of amphibians and reptiles of the French Antilles. Bionomina, 35: 20–50. < https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.35.1.3>.
  29. Gmelin, J. F. (1789) Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locus. Editio decima tertia, aucta, reformata. Tomus 1, pars 3. Lipsiae (G. E. Beer): 1033–1516.
  30. Gray, J. E. (1849) Catalogue of the specimens of snakes in the collection of the British Museum. London (British Museum [Natural History]): i–xv + 1–125.
  31. Hallermann, J. (2006) Die von Lacepède (1756-1825) in die Herpetologie eingeführten Taxa und ihr Schicksal. Sekretär, 6 (2): 26–29.
  32. Hopkinson, J. (1907) Dates of publication of the separate parts of Gmelin’s edition (13th) of the ‘Systema Naturæ’ of Linnaeus. Proceedings of the zoological Society of London, 64: 1035–1037. <https://doi.org/10.1111 /j.1469-7998.1907.tb06965.x>.
  33. Kerr, R. (1802) The natural history of oviparous quadrupeds and serpents, arranged and published from the papers and collections of the Count de Buffon by the Count de la Cepede, keeper of the royal cabinet, and the member of the academies and societies of Dijon, Lyons [sic], Bourdeaux [sic], Rome, Stockholm, &c. &c. London (T. Cadell, Jun. and W. Davies) and Edinburgh (W. Creech), 3: [1–4] + i–x + 1–383, pl. 1–9.
  34. Klemmer, K. (1963) Liste der rezenten Giftschlangen: Elapidae, Hydropheidae, Viperidae und Crotalidae. In: Die Giftschlangen der Erde. Wirkung und Antigenität der Gifte, Therapie von Giftschlangenbissen, Marburg/Lahn (N. G. Elwert Unversitäts-Verlags-Buchhandlung): 255–464.
  35. La Cepède, [B.-G.-É. de la Ville], de (1788) Histoire naturelle des quadrupèdes ovipares et des serpens. [In-quarto]. Tome 1. Paris (Hôtel de Thou): [i–v] + 6–17 + 1–651, pl. 1–41, 2 tab.
  36. La Cépède, [B.-G.-É. De la Ville], de (1789) Histoire naturelle des serpens. [In-quarto]. Tome 2. Paris (Hôtel de Thou): [i] + 1–8 + 1–19 + [i] + 1–144 + 1–527, pl. 1–22, 1 folding table.
  37. Laurenti, J. N. (1768) Specimen medicum, exhibens synopsin Reptilium emendatam cum experimentis circa venena et antidota Reptilium austriacorum. Viennae (Joan. Thom. Nob. De Trattnern): i–ii + 1–214 + errata, pl. 1–5. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.5108>.
  38. Lazell, J. D., Jr. (1964) The Lesser Antillean representatives of Bothrops and Constrictor. Bulletin of the Museum of comparative Zoology, 132: 245–273.
  39. Lescure, J., Bochaton, C., Breuil, M., Ineich, I., Massary, J. C. de & Vidal, N. (2020) Liste taxinomique des serpents des Petites Antilles. Bulletin de la Société herpétologique de France, 174: 59–92.
  40. Lescure, J. & David, P. (2008) The birth and infancy of herpetology. Part. 2. From natural to modern classifications. Bibliotheca herpetologica, 7 (2): 22–32.
  41. Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima, reformata. Tomus 1. Holmiae (Laurentii Salvii): [i–iv] + 1–824. < https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542>.
  42. Lönnberg, E. (1896) Linnean type-specimens of birds, reptiles, batrachians and fishes in the Zoological Museum of the R. University in Upsala. Bihang till Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, 22 (Afd. 4, no. 1): 1–45.
  43. McDiarmid, R. W., Campbell, J. A. & Touré, T. A. (1999) Snake species of the world. A taxonomic and geographic reference. Volume 1. Washington (The Herpetologists’ League): i–xi + 1–511.
  44. Melville, R. V. (1986) De La Cepede, 1788–1789 ‘Histoire Naturelle des Serpens’ and later editions: proposed rejection as a non-binominal work. Z.N.(S.)1985. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 43: 80–83. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.380>.
  45. Merrem, B. (1820) Versuch eines Systems der Amphibien. Marburg (Johann Christian Krieger): i–xv + 1–191, 1 pl. [Pages 2–188 duplicated in facing German and Latin versions of the text]. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.5037>.
  46. Mierte, D. (2013) Case 3599. Coluber irregularis Leach in Bowdich, 1819 (currently Philothamnus irregularis; Reptilia, Squamata): proposed conservation. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 70 (2): 89–98. <https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v70i2.a12>.
  47. Ohler, A., Kourgli, A. & Dubois, A. (2018) Zum Leben und Werk des Josephus Nicolaus Laurenti (1735–1805). Sekretär, 18 (1): 115–126.
  48. Oppel, M. (1811) Suite du Ier mémoire sur la classification des Reptiles. Annales du Muséum dʼHistoire naturelle, ‘1810’, 16: 376–393.
  49. Peters, J. A. & Orejas-Miranda, B. (1970) Catalogue of the neotropical Squamata: Part 1. Snakes. United States national Museum Bulletin, 297: i–viii + 1–347. <https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.297.1>.
  50. Roze, J. A. (1966) La taxonomia y zoografia de los ofidios de Venezuela. Caracas (Universidad Central de Venezuela, Ediciones de la Biblioteca): 1–362.
  51. Sandner Montilla, F. (1990) I. Bothrops lanceolatus (LaCépѐde, 1789). Redescripción amplia y bastante de la especie. Estudio complete sobre su taxonomía y características morfológicas. II. Diferencias evidentes entre la especie Bothrops lanceolatus (LaCépѐde, 1789) y las otras dos especies de distribución geográfica vecina, Bothrops atrox (Linneo, 1758) y Bothrops isabelae Sandner-Montilla, 1979. III. Una nueva subespecie de Bothrops lanceolatus (LaCépѐde, 1789). Género Bothrops Wagler, Familia Crotalidae, Gray del Estado Carabobo y regions adyacentes: Bothrops lanceolatus nacaritae, Ssp. Nov. IV. Las cinco subescpecies de la especie, Bothrops lanceolatus (LaCépѐde, 1789). Memorias científicas de Ofidiología, 10: 1–47.
  52. Schlegel, H. (1837) Essai sur la physionomie des serpens. 2. Partie Descriptive. La Haye (J. Kips, J.Hz. et W. P. Van Stockum): 1–606 + i–xv + errata. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4693>.
  53. Sonnini, C. S. & Latreille, P. A. (1801) [An X] Histoire naturelle des reptiles, avec figures dessinées d’après nature. Tome 4. Seconde partie. Serpens. Paris (Deterville): 1–410, 14 pl. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.4688>.
  54. Suckow, G. A. (1798) Anfangsgründe der theoretischen und angewandten Naturgeschichte der Thiere. Dritter Theil, von den Amphibien. Leipzig (Weissmann): 1–298. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.62582>.
  55. Ulber, T. (1993) Bothrops lanceolatus. In: T. Ulber (ed.), Catalogue of valid species and synonyms, Volume 1, Crotalidae, Bredell (Herprint International): 50.1.
  56. Ulber, T. (1995) Bothrops lanceolatus. In: T. Ulber (ed.), Catalogue of valid species and synonyms, Volume 1, Crotalidae, Bredell (Herprint International): 50.1–50.2 (extension pages).
  57. Vaillant, L. (1887) Sur la coloration des petits au moment de l’éclosion chez la Vipѐre, fer de lance (Bothrops glaucus Lin.). Bulletin de la Société philomathique de Paris, (7), 11: 48–49.
  58. Wagler, J. (1830) Natürliches System der Amphibien, mit vorangehender Classification der Säugethiere und Vögel. München, Stuttgart & Tübingen (J. G. Cotta): i–vi + 1–354, 2 pl. <https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.58730>.
  59. Wallach, V., Williams, K. L. & Boundy, J. (2014) Snakes of the world. A catalogue of living and extinct species. Boca Raton (CRC Press): i–xxvii + 1–1209. <https://doi.org/10.1201/b16901-2>.
  60. Wallin, L. (2001) Catalogue of type specimens. 4. Linnaean specimens. Revised version 6 (2001/02/14). Uppsala (Uppsala University, Museum of Evolution, Zoology Section): 1‒128. [Accessed on 2 February 2023].
  61. Wilkes, J. (ed.) (1810) Encyclopædia Londinensis; or, Universal dictionary of arts, sciences, and literature. Comprehending, under one general alphabetical arrangement, all the words and substance of every kind of dictionary extant in the English language. In which the improved departments of the mechanical arts, the liberal sciences, the higher mathematics, and the several branches of polite literature, are selected from the acts, memoirs, and transactions, of the most eminent literary societies, in Europe, Asia, and America. Forming a comprehensive view of the rise, progress, and present state, of human learning in every part of the world. Embellished by a most magnificent set of copper engravings, illustrating, amongst other interesting subjects, the most curious, rare, and elegant, productions of nature, in every part of the universe; and enriched with portraits of eminent and learned personages, in all ages of the world. Together with a comprehensive system of heraldry, finely illuminated, and enriched with the armorial bearings of the royal family; of the English, Scotch, and Irish nobility; of the baronets of the United Kingdom; and of numerous distinguished families, patrons of this work. Volume 4. London (J. Adlard): [i–iii] +1–911 + [i].
  62. Williams, E. E. (1999) Over 300 years of collecting in the Caribbean. In: B. I. Crother (ed.), Caribbean amphibians and reptiles, San Diego (Academic Press): 1–30. <https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012197955-3/50013-6>.
  63. Wüster, W., Golay, P. & Warrel, D. A. (1997). Synopsis of recent developments in venomous snake systematics. Toxicon, 35: 319–340. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-0101(96)00152-3>.