Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2017-03-24
Page range: 4–38
Abstract views: 427
PDF downloaded: 3

The need for reference specimens in zoological taxonomy and nomenclature

Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB – UMR 7205 – CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 30, F-75005, Paris, France

Abstract

A debate is currently developing among zootaxonomists: its purpose is to clarify whether or not the current Code should be amended in order to make the deposition of at least one nomen-bearer (‘name-bearing type’) in a permanent collection compulsory so as to provide nomenclatural availability to the nomina of new species or subspecies. Recent papers published in Nature and Zootaxa strongly suggest that an overwhelming majority of practicing taxonomists from around the world are in favour of such a change. Arguments for and against it are presented here and the need for this change is supported without restriction. An intermediate solution is however proposed: after a starting date which should be agreed upon and established, a general Rule requiring deposition of at least one specimen should be introduced and approved. However the possibility should also exist to apply for permission to describe new taxa without specimens in exceptional cases, provided relevant data are furnished to justify this request. This decision should not be left to individual zoologists, whether authors, referees or editors, but should be taken by a special international committee of experts dedicated to this task. Another question discussed here concerns the conditions that should be specified by the Code regarding collections where nomen-bearers of the new taxa are deposited, their permanency and accessibility to taxonomists. Precise new formulations are proposed for the Articles of the Code and the entries in its ‘Glossary’ concerned with such changes. Of course, the proposed changes should not be retroactive, so as not to upset the nomenclatural status of nomina established before their starting date.

References

  1. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature. Fourth edition. London (International Trust for zoological Nomenclature): i–xxix + 1–306. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4137.1.9>.

    Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2003) Declaration 44. Amendment of Article 74.7.3. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 60 (4): 263.

    Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2012) Amendment of Articles 8, 9, 10, 21 and 78 of the International Code of Zoological nomenclature to expand and refine methods of publication. Bulletin of zoological nomenclature, 69 (3), 161–169.

    Anonymous (2016) Vitual taxonomy. Nature, 535: 323–324.

    Amorim, D. S., Santos, C. M. D., Krell, F.-T., Dubois, A., Nihei, S. S., Oliveira, O. M. P., Pont, A., Song, H., Verdade, V. K., Fachin, D. A., Klassa, B., Lamas, C. J. E., Oliveira, S.S., de Carvalho, C. J. B., Mello-Patiu, C. A., Hajdu, E., Couri, M. S., Silva, V. C., Capellari, R. S., Falaschi, R. L., Feitosa, R. M., Prendini, L., Pombal, J. P. Jr., Fernández, F., Rocha, R. M., Lattke, J. E., Caramaschi, U., Duarte, M., Marques, A. C., Reis, R. E., Kurina, O., Takiya, D. M., Tavares, M., Silva Fernandes, D., Franco, F. L., Cuezzo, F., Paulson, D., Guénard, B., Schlick-Steiner, B. C., Arthofer, W., Steiner, F. M., Fisher, B. L., Johnson, R. A., Delsinne, T. D., Donoso, D. A., Mulieri, P. R., Patitucci, L. D., Carpenter, J. M., Herman, L. & Grimaldi, D. (2016) Timeless standards for species delimitation. Zootaxa, 4137 (1): 121–128.

    Banks, R. C., Goodman, S. M., Lanyon, S. M. & Schulenberg, T. S. (1993) Type specimens and basic principles of avian taxonomy. The Auk, 110: 413–414.

    Bates, J. M., Bowie, R. C. K., Willard, D. E., Voelker, G. & Kahindo, C. (2004) A need for continued collecting of avian voucher specimens in Africa: why blood is not enough. Ostrich, 75: 187–191. <https://doi.org/10.2989/00306520409485442>.

    Bickford, D., Iskandar, D. & Barlian, A. (2008) A lungless frog discovered in Borneo. Current Biology, 18: R374–R375. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.010>.

    Bour, R. & Dubois, A. (1984) Nomenclatural availability of Testudo coriacea Vandelli, 1761: a case against a rigid application of the Rules to old, well-known zoological words. Journal of Herpetology, 17: 356–361. <https://doi.org/10.2307/1563588>.

    Bour, R. & Dubois, A. (1994) Dumerilia: présentation d’un nouveau journal herpétologique. Dumerilia, 1: 1–4.

    Bruun, A. F. (1950) The Systema Naturae of the twentieth century. Science, 112: 342–343. <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.112.2908.342-a>.

    Ceríaco, L. M. P., Gutiérrez, E. E., Dubois, A. et al. [490 additional signatories] (2016) Photography-based taxonomy is inadequate, unnecessary, and potentially harmful for biological sciences. Zootaxa, 4196 (3): 435–445. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4196.3.9>.

    Cianferoni, F. & Bartolozzi, L. (2016) Warning: potential problems for taxonomy on the horizon? Zootaxa, 4139 (1): 128–130. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4139.1.8>.

    Collar, N.J. (1999) New species, high standards and the case of Laniarius liberatus. Ibis, 141: 358–367. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1999.tb04406.x>.

    Collar, N. J. (2009) New species in photographs: risks, rights and responsibilities. Birding Asia, 12: 36–37.

    Cook, O. F. (1898) The method of types. Science, 8 (198): 513–516. <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8.198.513>.

    Costello, M. J., May, R. M. & Stork, N. E. (2013) Can we name earth’s species before they go extinct? Science, 339: 413–416. <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230318>.

    Dayrat, B. (2005) Toward integrative taxonomy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 85: 407–415. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00503.x>.

    De Carvalho, M. R., Bockmann, F. A., Amorim, D. S., F. Brandão, C. R. F., de Vivo, M., de Figueiredo, J. L., Britski, H. A., de Pinna, M. C. C., Menezes, N. A., Marques, F. P. L., Papavero, N., Cancello, E. M., Crisci, J. V., McEachran, J. D., Schelly, R. C., Lundberg, J. G., Gill, A. C., Britz, R., Wheeler, Q. D., Stiassny; M. L. J., Parenti, L. R., Page, L. M., Wheeler, W. C., Faivovich, J., Vari, R. P., Grande, L., Humphries, C. J., DeSalle, R., Ebach, M. C. & Nelson, G. J. (2017) Taxonomic impediment or impediment to taxonomy? A commentary on systematics and the cybertaxonomic-automation paradigm. Evolutionary Biology, 34: 140–143. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-007-9011-6>.

    De Carvalho, M. R., Ebach, M. C., Williams, D. M., Nihei, S. S., Rodrigues, M. T., Grant, T., Silveira, L. F., Zaher, H., Gill, A. C., Schelly, R. C., Sparks, J. S., Bockmann, F. A., Séret, B., Ho, H.-C., Grande, L., Rieppel, O., Dubois, A., Ohler, A., Faivovich, J., Assis, L. C. S., Wheeler, Q. D., Goldstein, P. Z., de Almeida, E. A. B., Valdecasas, A. G. & Nelson, G. (2014) Does counting species count as taxonomy? On misrepresenting systematics, yet again. Cladistics, 30 (3): 322–329. <https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12045>.

    Dennler, J. G. (1939) La importancia de la distribución geográfica en la sistemática de los vertebrados. Physis, 16: 41–53, pl. 1–8.

    Donegan, T. M. (2008) Nomenclatural availability of nomina of new species or subspecies does not and should not require the deposition of dead specimens in collections. Zootaxa, 1761: 37–48.

    Donegan, T. M. (2009) Type specimens, samples of live individuals and the Galapagos pink land iguana. Zootaxa, 2021: 12–20.

    Donovan, K. D. & van den Hoek Ostende, L. W. (2009) What’s in a name? Or a namer’s name? A reply to Dubois (2008). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 96: 709–711. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01144.x>.

    Dubois, A. (2003) The relationships between taxonomy and conservation biology in the century of extinctions. Comptes rendus Biologies, 326 (suppl. 1): S9–S21. <https://doi.org/10.1016/s1631-0691(03)00022-2>.

    Dubois, A. (2005) Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomina of higher-ranked zoological taxa in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 1. Some general questions, concepts and terms of biological nomenclature. Zoosystema, 27 (2): 365–426.

    Dubois, A. (2008) A partial but radical solution to the problem of nomenclatural taxonomic inflation and synonymy load. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 93: 857–863. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00900.x>.

    Dubois, A. (2009) Endangered species and endangered knowledge. Zootaxa, 2201: 26-29.

    Dubois, A. (2010a) Nomenclatural rules in zoology as a potential threat against natural history museums. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution, 10: 81–90. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-010-0015-1>.

    Dubois, A. (2010b) Retroactive changes should be introduced in the Code only with great care: problems related to the spellings of nomina. Zootaxa, 2426: 1–42.

    Dubois, A. (2010c) Zoological nomenclature in the century of extinctions: priority vs. ‘usage’. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution, 10: 259–274. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-010-0021-3>.

    Dubois, A. (2011a) The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature must be drastically improved before it is too late. Bionomina, 2, 1–104. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.2.1.1>.

    Dubois, A. (2011b) Species and “strange species” in zoology: do we need a “unified concept of species”? Comptes rendus Palevol, 10: 77–94. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2011.01.002>.

    Dubois, A. (2013) Zygoidy, a new nomenclatural concept. Bionomina, 6: 1–25. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.6.1.1>.

    Dubois, A. (2015) Zoological nomina in the century of extinctions: new proposals. Bionomina, 8: 11–53. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.8.1.2>.

    Dubois, A. (2017a) The nomenclatural status of Hysaplesia, Hylaplesia, Dendrobates and related nomina (Amphibia, Anura), with general comments on zoological nomenclature and its governance, as well as on taxonomic databases and websites. Bionomina, 11, 1–48. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.11.1.1>.

    Dubois, A. (2017b) Diagnoses in zoological taxonomy and nomenclature. Bionomina, 12: ***.

    Dubois, A. & Aescht, E. (2016) The Linz Zoocode Committee. Dumerilia, 6: 35–37.

    Dubois, A., Aescht, E. & Dickinson, E. C. (2016) Burning questions of zoological nomenclature. The Linz International Workshop of Zoological Nomenclature (9–10 July 2014). Dumerilia, 6: 24–34.

    Dubois, A. & Frétey, T. (2016) A new nomen for a subfamily of frogs (Amphibia, Anura). Dumerilia, 6: 17–23.

    Dubois, A. & Nemésio, A. (2007) Does nomenclatural availability of nomina of new species or subspecies require the deposition of vouchers in collections? Zootaxa, 1409: 1–22.

    Dubois, A. & Ohler, A. (1997) Early scientific names of Amphibia Anura. I. Introduction. Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, (4), 18 (3–4): 297–320.

    Dubois, A. & Ohler, A. (2001) Systematics of the genus Philautus Gistel, 1848 (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae, Rhacophorinae): some historical and metataxonomic comments. Journal of South Asian natural History, 5 (2): 173–186.

    Fontaine, B., van Achterbeg, K., Alonso-Zarazaga, M. A., Araujo, R., Asche, M., Aspöck, H., Aspöck, U., Audisio, P., Aukema, B., Bailly, N., Balsamo, M., Bank, R. A., Belfiore, C., Bogdanowicz, W., Boxshall, G., Burckhardt, D., Chylarecki, P., Deharveng, L., Dubois, A., Enghoff, H., Fochetti, R., Fontaine, C., Gargominy, O., Gomez Lopez M. S., Goujet, D., Harvey, M. S., Heller, K.-G., van Helsdingen, P., Hoch, H., De Jong, Y., Karsholt, O., Los, W., Magowski, W., Massard, J. A., McInnes, S. J., Mendes, L. F., Mey, E., Michelsen, V., Minelli, A., Nieto Nafria, J. M., van Nieukerken, E. J., Pape, T., De Prins, W., Ramos, M., Ricci, C., Roselaar, C., Rota, E., Segers, H., Timm, T., van Tol, J. & Bouchet, P. (2012) New species in the Old World: Europe as a frontier in biodiversity exploration, a test bed for 21st century taxonomy. Plos One, 7 (5): 1–7 + [i] (SOM). <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036881>.

    Garraffoni, A. R. S. & Freitas, A. V. L. (2017) Photos belong in the taxonomic Code. Science, 355 (6327): 805. <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam7686>.

    Gentile, G. & Snell, H. (2009) Conolophus marthae sp. nov. (Squamata: Iguanidae), a new species of land iguana from the Galápagos archipelago. Zootaxa, 2201: 1–10.

    González-Oreja, J. A. (2008) The Encyclopedia of Life vs. the Brochure of Life: exploring the relationships between the extinction of species and the inventory of life on earth. Zootaxa, 1965: 61–68.

    Hennig, W. (1950) Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Berlin (Deutscher Zentralverlag): i–vii + 1–370.

    Iskandar, D. T. (1978) A new species of Barbourula. First record of a discoglossid anuran in Borneo. Copeia, 1978: 564–566. <https://doi.org/10.2307/1443681>.

    Jäger, P. (2016) A plea for taxonomic drawings and against pure photo-taxonomy. Indian Journal of Arachnology, 5 (1–2): 61–66.

    Krell, F.-T., Klimeš, P., Rocha, L. A., Fikáček, M. & Miller, S. E. (2016) Preserve specimens for reproducibility. Nature, 539: 168. <https://doi.org/10.1038/539168b>.

    Krell, F.-T. & Wheeler, Q. D. (2014) Specimen collection: plan for the future. Science, 344 (6186): 815–816. <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.344.6186.815>.

    Latreille, P. A. (1810) Considérations générales sur l’ordre naturel des animaux composant les classes des Crustacés, des Arachnides et des Insectes. Paris (F. Schoell): [1–9] + 10–444.

    LeCroy, M. & Vuilleumier, F. (1992) Guidelines for the description of new species in ornithology. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club, 112A: 191–198.

    Löbl, I., Cibois, A. & Landry, B. (2016) Describing new species in the absence of sampled specimens: a taxonomist’s own-goal. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 73: 83–86. <https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v73i1.a2>.

    Lonsdale, O. & Marshall, S. A. (2016) Revision of the family Nothybidae (Diptera: Schizophora). Zootaxa, 4098 (1): 1–42. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4098.1.1>.

    Lü, J., Chen, R., Brusatte, S. L., Zhu, Y. & Shen, C. (2016) A Late Cretaceous diversification of Asian oviraptorid dinosaurs; evidence from a new species preserved in an unusual posture. Scientific Reports, 6 (35780): 1–12 + Supplementary Information (1–34).

    Marshall, S. A & Evenhuis, N. L. (2015) New species without dead bodies: a case for photo-based descriptions, illustrated by a striking new species of Marleyimyia Hesse (Diptera, Bombyliidae) from South Africa. Zookeys, 525: 117–127. <https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.525.6143>.

    Mayden, R. L. (1997) A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. In: M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah & M. R. Wilson (ed.), Species: the units of biodiversity, London (Chapman & Hall): 381–424.

    Minelli, A. (2009) Commentaries on Gentile & Snell (2009): an introduction. Zootaxa, 2201: 11.

    Minteer, B. A., Colins, J. P. & Puschendorf, R. (2014) Avoiding (re)extinction. Science, 344: 260–261. <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250953>.

    Nemésio, A. (2009a) Nomenclatural availability of nomina of new species should always require the deposition of preserved specimens in collections: a rebuttal to Donegan (2008). Zootaxa, 2045: 1–16.

    Nemésio, A. (2009b) On the live holotype of the Galápagos pink land iguana, Conolophus marthae Gentile & Snell, 2009 (Squamata: Iguanidae): is it an acceptable exception? Zootaxa, 2201: 21–25.

    Nguembock, B., Fjeldsa, Couloux, A. & Pasquet, E. (2008) Phylogeny of Laniarius: molecular data reveal L. liberatus synonymous with L. erlangeri and ‘plumage coloration’ as unreliable morphological characters for defining species and species groups. Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution, 48: 396–407. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.04.014>.

    Padial, J. M., Miralles, A., De la Riva, I. & Vences, M. (2010) The integrative future of taxonomy. Frontiers in Zoology, 7 (16): 1–14. <https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-7-16>.

    Pape, T., Allison, A., Bickel, D. J., Carlton, J. T., Dikow, T., Donegan, T., Duszynski, D. W., El-Hawagry, M. S., Evenhuis, N. L., Fautin, D. G., Gaimari, S. D., Gharali, B., Greenwalt, D. E., Kaiser, H., Kirk-Spriggs, A. H., Lamas, G., Lonsdale, O., Mah, C., Marshall, S. A., Meier, R., Ohl, M., Patterson, D. J., Penev, L., Pentcheff, N. D., Pyle, R. L., Rubinoff, D. J., Runyon, J., Tallowin, O., Thorpe, S., Wang, B., Welter-Schultes, F., Yanega, D. Yang, D., Yao, G., Yeung, N. W. (2016) Species can be named from photos. Nature, 537: 307. <https://doi.org/10.1038/537307b>.

    Patterson, B. D. (2002) On the continuing need for scientific collecting of mammals. Journal of neotropical Mammalogy, 9: 253–262.

    Payne, R. B. (1989) Commentary on the melba finches Pytilia melba of Djibouti and the requirement of a specimen for a taxonomic description. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club, 109 (2): 117–119.

    Pearsall, J. (ed.) (2001) The new Oxford dictionary of English. Oxford (Oxford University Press): i–xxi + 1–2152.

    Pearson, D. L., Hamilton, A. L. & Erwin, T. L. (2011) Recovery plan for the endangered taxonomy profession. Bioscience, 61: 58. <https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.1.11>.

    Polaszek, A., Grubb, P., Groves, C, Ehardt, C. L. & Butynski, T. M. (2005) What constitutes a proper description? Response. Science, 309: 2164–2166.

    Poropat, S. F., Mannion, P. D., Upchurch, P., Hocknull, S. A., Kear, B. P., Kundrát, M., Tischler, T. R., Sloan, T., Sinapius, G. H. K., Elliott, J. A. & Elliott, D. A. (2016) New Australian sauropods shed light on Cretaceous dinosaur palaeobiogeography. Scientific Reports, 6 (34467): 1–12 + Supplementary Information (1–66 + unnumbered plates).

    Rocha, L. A., Aleixo, A., Allen, G., Almeda, F., Baldwin, C. C., Barclay, M. V. L., Bates, J. M., Bauer, A. M., Benzoni, F., Berns, C. M., Berumen, M. L., Blackburn, D. C., Blum, S., Bolaños, F., Bowie, R. C. K., Britz, R., Brown, R. M., Cadena, C. D., Carpenter, K., Ceríaco, L. M., Chakrabarty, P., Chaves, G., Choat, J. H., Clements, K. D., Collette, B. B., Collins, A., Coyne, J., Cracraft, J., Daniel, T., de Carvalho, M. R., de Queiroz, K., Di Dario, F., Drewes, R., Dumbacher, J. P., Engilis, A., Jr., Erdmann, M. V., Eschmeyer, W., Feldman, C. R., Fisher, B. L., Fjeldså, J., Fritsch, P. W., Fuchs, J., Getahun, A., Gill, A., Gomon, M., Gosliner, T., Graves, G. R., Griswold, C. E., Guralnick, R., Hartel, K., Helgen, K. M., Ho, H., Iskandar, D. T., Iwamoto, T., Jaafar, Z., James, H. F., Johnson, D., Kavanaugh, D., Knowlton, N., Lacey, E., Larson, H. K., Last, P., Leis, J. M., Lessios, H., Liebherr, J., Lowman, M., Mahler, D. L., Mamonekene, V., Matsuura, K., Mayer, G. C., Mays, H., Jr., McCosker, J., McDiarmid, R. W., McGuire, J., Miller, M. J., Mooi, R., Mooi, R. D., Moritz, C., Myers, P., Nachman, M. W., Nussbaum, R. A., Foighil, D. Ó, Parenti, L. R., Parham, J. F., Paul, E., Paulay, G., Pérez-Emán, J., Pérez-Matus, A., Poe, S., Pogonoski, J., Rabosky, D. L., Randall, J. E., Reimer, J. D., Robertson, D. R., Rödel, M.-O., Rodrigues, M. T., Roopnarine, P., Rüber, L., Ryan, M. J., Sheldon, F., Shinohara, G., Short, A., Simison, W. B., Smith-Vaniz, W. F., Springer, V. G., Stiassny, M., Tello, J. G., Thompson, C. W., Trnski, T., Tucker, P., Valqui, T., Vecchione, M., Verheyen, E., Wainwright, P. C., Wheeler, T. A., White, W. T., Will, K., Williams, J. T., Williams, G., Wilson, E. O., Winker, K., Winterbottom, R., Witt, C. C. (2014) Specimen collection: an essential tool. Science, 344 (6186): 814–815. <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.344.6186.814>.

    Santos, C. M. D., Amorim, D. S., Klassa, B., Fachin, D. A., Nihei, S. S., Carvalho, C. J. B., Falaschi, R. L., Mello-Patiu, C. A., Couri, M. S., Oliveira, S. S., Silva, V. C., Ribeiro, G. C., Capellari, R. S. & Lamas, C. J. E. (2016) On typeless species and the perils of fast taxonomy. Systematic Entomology, 41 (3): 511–515. <https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12180>.

    Santos, L. M. & Faria, L. R. R. (2011) The taxonomy’s new clothes: a little more about the DNA-based taxonomy. Zootaxa, 3025: 66–68.

    Schopf, J. M. (1960) Emphasis on holotype (?). Science, 131: 1043. <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.131.3406.1043>.

    Simpson, D. D. (2000) Cassell’s Latin-English English-Latin dictionary. Fifth edition, ninth impression, reprinted 2000. London & New York (Continuum): i–xviii + 1–883.

    Simpson, G. G. (1940) Types in modern taxonomy. American Journal of Science, 238: 413–431. <https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.238.6.413>.

    Smith, E. F. G., Arctander, P., Fjeldsa, J. & Amir, O. G. (1991) A new species of shrike (Laniidae, Laniarius) from Somalia, verified by DNA sequence data from the only known individual. Ibis, 133: 227–235. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1991.tb04564.x>.

    Sokal, R. R. & Crovello, T. J. (1970) The biological species concept: a critical evaluation. American Naturalist, 104: 127–153. <https://doi.org/10.1086/282646>.

    Sundberg, P. & Strand, M. (2009) Taxonomic inflation or taxonomic deflation? A comment on Dubois. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 96: 712–714. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01157.x>.

    Tancoigne, E. & Dubois, A. (2013) Taxonomy: no decline, but inertia. Cladistics, 29 (5): 567–570. <https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12019>.

    Thorpe, S. E. (2017) Is photography-based taxonomy really inadequate, unnecessay, and potentially harmful for biological sciences. A reply to Ceríaco et al. (2016). Zootaxa, 4226 (3): 449–450. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4226.3.9>.

    Wakeham-Dawson, A., Morris, S., Tubbs, P., Dalebout, M.L. & Baker, C.S. (2002) Type specimens: dead or alive? Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 59 (4): 282–286.

    Warren, A., Patterson, D. J., Dunthorn, M., Clamp, J. C., Achilles-Day, U. E. M., Aescht, A., Al-Farraj, S. A., Al-Quraishy, S., Al-Rasheid, K., Carr, M., Day, J. G., Dellinger, M., El-Serehy, H. A., Fan, Y., Gao, F., Gao, S., Gong, J., Gupta, R., Hu, X., Kamra, K., Langlois, G., Lin, X., Lipscomb, D., Lobban, C. S., Luporini, P., Lynn, D. H., Ma, H., Macek, M., Mackenzie-Dodds, J., Makhija, S., Mansergh, R. I., Martíın-Cereceda, M., McMiller, N., Montagnes, D. J. S., Nikolaeva, S., Ong’ondo, G. O., Pérez-Uz, B., Purushothaman, J., Quintela-Alonso, P, Rotterová, J., Santoferrara, L., Shao, C., Shen, Z., Shi, X., Song, W., Stoeck, T., La Terza, A., Vallesi, A., Wang, M., Weisse, T., Wiackowski, K., Wu, L., Xu, K., Yi, Z., Zufall, R. & Agatha, S. (2017) Beyond the ‘Code’: a guide to the description and documentation of biodiversity in Ciliated Protists (Alveolata, Ciliophora). Journal of eukaryotic Microbiology, 0: 1–16. <https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12391>.

    Wheeler Q. D., Raven, P. H. & Wilson, E. O. (2004) Taxonomy: impediment or expedient? Science, 303: 285. <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.303.5656.285>.

    Wilson, E. O. (1985) The global biodiversity crisis: a challenge to science. Issues in Science & Technology, 2: 20–29.