Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 35 No. 1: 15 Dec. 2023
Type: Article
Published: 2023-12-15
DOI: 10.11646/bionomina.35.1.2
Page range: 9-19
Abstract views: 73
PDF downloaded: 1

Redescription of two Bornean gekkonid lizard species of the Cyrtodactylus consobrinus (Peters, 1871) complex with comments on online supplementary material

Department of Biology and Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture; University of Washington; Seattle; WA; USA 98195
Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation; Universiti Malaysia Sarawak; 94300 Kota Samarahan; Sarawak; Malaysia
Department of Biology and Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture; University of Washington; Seattle; WA; USA 98195
Department of Biology; Colorado State University; Fort Collins; CO; USA 80521
Department of Biology and Center for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Stewardship; Villanova University; 800 Lancaster Avenue; Villanova; PA; USA 19085
Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology; University of California; Berkeley; CA; USA 94720
Division of Ecology and Evolution; Research School of Biology; ACT 2602; The Australian National University; Canberra; Australia; Natural History Museum; Cromwell Road; London SW7 5BD; UK
Basic Sciences Commission; Indonesian Academy of Sciences; Jakarta; Indonesia
Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation; Universiti Malaysia Sarawak; 94300 Kota Samarahan; Sarawak; Malaysia
Zoologica Scripta Cyrtodactylus consobrinus ZooBank International Code of Zoological Nomenclature Cyrtodactylus

Abstract

In a recent paper in Zoologica Scripta, the formal diagnoses and descriptions of two new Bornean gekkonid gecko species of the Cyrtodactylus consobrinus (Peters, 1871) complex were included in online supplementary material. Although the new nomina were associated with ZooBank registration identifiers, the supplementary document in which these LSIDs appeared was not published in a format with fixed content and layout. As such, the new nomina cannot be considered to have been promulgated in the electronic version of the paper, as it was not compliant with the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature as amended in 2012. A subsequently published printed version of the paper did make these nomina nomenclaturally available but, following author guidelines, relegated the descriptions and diagnoses, including data critical to justifying recognition of these new cryptic taxa, to online supplementary material. Because of the impermanence of this supplementary document, we here provide the diagnoses, descriptions and type specimen data for these two Cyrtodactylus. We recommend that taxonomists refrain from publishing works containing taxon descriptions and other nomenclatural acts in journals that require critical data to be placed in online supplementary documents.

References

  1. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. ‘Fourth edition’. London (International Trust for zoological Nomenclature): i–xxix + 1–306. [For the use of the authorship ‘Anonymous’ for this and the next reference, see Dubois 2015].
  2. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2012) Amendment of Articles 8, 9, 10, 21 and 78 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature to expand and refine methods of publication. Zootaxa, 3450:1–7. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3450.1.1>.
  3. Davis, H. R., Nashriq, I., Woytek, K. S., Wikramanayake, S. A., Bauer, A.M., Karin, B. R., Brennan, I. G., Iskandar, D. T. & Das, I. (2023) Genomic analysis of Bornean geckos (Gekkonidae: Cyrtodactylus) reveals need for updated taxonomy. Zoologica scripta, 52: 249–263. <https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12575>.
  4. Dubois, A. (2015) What is an anonymous publication? Is the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature anonymous? Bionomina, 9: 27–34. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.9.1.2>.
  5. Dubois, A. (2020) The status regarding publication date and availability of taxonomic works published online without proper Zoobank registration. Bionomina, 18: 44‒55. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.18.1.2>.
  6. Dubois, A. & Aescht, E. (ed.) (2016) LZC Session 2. Discussion INF-01. Nomenclatural problems with electronic publications. Dumerilia, 6: 45–46.
  7. Dubois, A. & Aescht, E. (ed.) (2017) LZC Session 13. Proposal AVA-04. Problems with the 2012 Amendment of the Code. Dumerilia, 7: 35–47.
  8. Dubois, A., Aneesh, P. T., Bauer, A. M., Ceríaco, L. M. P., De Prins, J., Frétey, T., Löbl, I., Lorvelec, O., Marinov, M., Ohler, A., Schmitt, M., Whittington, A., Young, M. & Aescht, E. (2022) The Linz Zoocode project. Fifth report of activities (2022). Nomenclatural availability. 4. Electronic publication. Bionomina, 28: 71–119. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.28.1.4>.
  9. Dubois, A., Bour, R. & Ohler, A. (2015) Nomenclatural availability of preliminary electronic versions of taxonomic papers: in need of a clear definition. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 72 (3): 252–265. <https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v72i3.a1>.
  10. Dubois, A., Crochet, P.-A., Dickinson, E. C., Nemésio, A., Aescht, E., Bauer, A. M., Blagoderov, V., Bour, R., de Carvalho, M. R., Desutter-Grandcolas, L., Frétey, T., Jäger, P., Koyamba, V., Lavilla, E. O., Löbl, I., Louchart, A., Malécot, V., Schatz, H. & Ohler, A. (2013) Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems related to the electronic publication of new nomina and nomenclatural acts in zoology, with brief comments on optical discs and on the situation in botany. Zootaxa, 3735 (1): 1–94. <https://doi.org/10.11 646/zootaxa.3735.1.1>.
  11. Dubois, A. & Frétey, T. (2023) Problems with the availability of zoological nomenclatural acts published online: the case of the Journal of Herpetology. Bionomina, 34: 9–34. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.34.1.2>.
  12. Gray, J. E. (1827) A description of new species of saurian reptiles; with a revision of the species of chamaeleons. The Philosophical Magazine and Annals of Philosophy, (2), 2 (9): 207–214. <https://doi.org/10.1080/14786442708675648>.
  13. Krell, F.-T. (2015) A mixed bag: when are early online publications available for nomenclatural purposes? Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 72 (1): 19–32. <https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v72i1.a14>.
  14. Peters, W. (1871) Uber neue Reptilien aus Ostafrika und Sarawak (Borneo), vorzüglich aus der Sammlung des Hrn. Marquis J. Doria zu Genua. Monatsberichte der königlich preussischen Akademie des Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1871: 566–581.
  15. Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. (2015) Use and mis-use of supplementary material in science publications. BMC Bioinformatics, 16 (237): 1–4. <https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0668-z>.