Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 41 No. 1: 22 Apr. 2025
Type: Article
Published: 2025-04-22
DOI: 10.11646/bionomina.41.1.2
Page range: 20-24
Abstract views: 54
PDF downloaded: 1

Nomenclature protects stability only when supported by good science: a response to Frétey’s (2024) list of turtle genus-series nomina

Society for Southeast Asian Herpetology; Calle Rio Segura 26; 30600 Archena; Murcia; Spain
Department of Biology; Victor Valley College; 18422 Bear Valley Road; Victorville; California 92395; USA; Department of Vertebrate Zoology; Leibniz-Institut zur Analyse des Biodiversitätswandels; Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig; Adenauerallee 160; 53113 Bonn; Germany
International Code of Zoological Nomenclature taxonomic stability taxonomic vandalism aspidonyms herpetology scientific integrity chelonian taxonomy Kaiser Veto consensus-building

Abstract

The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (the Code) aims to support taxonomic science by providing rules for creating and applying taxon names and thereby stabilizing taxonomic output. However, this stability is only achievable when the Code is supported by robust scientific practices. We here respond to the monograph on chelonian genus-series nomina by Frétey (2024) and critique the author’s inclusion of unscientific and controversial taxon names, with which he undermines the herpetological community’s decade-long consensus to reject such names. As part of Frétey’s decision to treat such nomina as available, the author failed to mention the widespread use of aspidonyms (shield names) to protect taxonomic integrity and in so doing elevates accounting over science. We argue that adherence to the Code alone is insufficient to counteract the destabilizing effects of taxonomic vandalism. Instead, the herpetological community’s unified stance against unscientific nomina, exemplified by the ‘Kaiser Veto’, has effectively safeguarded taxonomic stability even as it operates beyond the Code. By including consistently ignored names, Frétey’s work disrupts this consensus and risks reintroducing nomenclatural instability. We urge authors and editors to uphold scientific integrity by excluding unscientific nomina from taxonomic discourse, thereby preserving the spirit of the Code and ensuring the reliability of taxonomic science for its many users, including ecologists, conservationists and policymakers.

References

  1. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature. ‘Fourth edition’. London (International Trust for zoological Nomenclature): i–xxix +1–306.
  2. Anonymous [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (2021a) Opinion 2468 (Case 3601). Spracklandus Hoser, 2009 (Reptilia, Serpentes, Elapidae) and Australasian Journal of Herpetology issues 1–24: confirmation of availability declined; Appendix A (Code of Ethics): not adopted as a formal criterion for ruling on Cases. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 78 (1): 42–45. <https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v78.a012>.
  3. Anonymous [Turtle Taxonomy Working Group, TTWG] (2021b) Turtles of the world: annotated checklist and atlas of taxonomy, synonymy, distribution, and conservation status. 9th edition. Chelonian Research Monographs, 8: i–x + 1–472. <https://doi.org/10.3854/crm.8.checklist.atlas.v9.2021>.
  4. Denzer, W. & Kaiser, H. (2023) Naming and gaming: the illicit taxonomic practice of “nomenclatural harvesting” and how to avoid it. Journal of Zoology, 320 [161168]: 1‒8. <https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.13061>.
  5. Denzer, W., Manthey, U., Wagner, P. & Böhme, W. (2016) A critical review of Hoser’s writings on Draconinae, Amphibolurinae, Laudakia and Uromastycinae (Squamata: Agamidae). Bonn zoological Bulletin, 64: 117–138.
  6. Dubois, A., Denzer, W., Entiauspe-Neto, O. M., Frétey, T., Ohler, A., Bauer, A. M. & Pyron, R. A. (2024) Nomenclatural problems raised by the recent description of a new anaconda species (Squamata, Serpentes, Boidae), with a nomenclatural review of the genus Eunectes. Bionomina, 37 (1): 8–58. <https://doi.org/10.11646/bionomina.37.1.2>.
  7. Frétey, T. (2024) Etymology of the nomina of chelonians of the world. 1. Genus-series nomina. Bionomina, 40 (1): 1–116. <https://doi.org/10.11 646/bionomina.40.1.1>.
  8. Hodges, K., Donnellan, S. & Georges, A. (2014) Phylogeography of the Australian freshwater turtle Chelodina expansa reveals complex relationships among inland and coastal bioregions. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 111 (4): 789–805. <https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12221>.
  9. Hoser, R. T. (2016) A previously unrecognized species of sea snake (Squamata: Serpentes: Elapidae: Hydrophiinae). Australasian Journal of Herpetology, 33: 25–33.
  10. Iverson, J. B. (2022) A review of chelonian type specimens (Order Testudines). Megataxa, 7 (1): 1–85. <https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.7.1.1>.
  11. Jackson, S. M., Baker, A. M., Eldridge, M. D. B., Fisher, D. O., Frankham, G. J., Lavery, T. H., MacDonald, A. J., Menkhorst, P. W., Phillips, M. J., Potter, S., Rowe, K. C., Travouillon, K. J. & Umbrello, L. S. (2022) The importance of appropriate taxonomy in Australian mammalogy. Australian Mammalogy, 45 (1): 13–23. <https://doi.org/10.1071/am22016>.
  12. Kaiser, H. (2014) Best practices in herpetological taxonomy: errata and addenda. Herpetological Review, 45: 257–268.
  13. Kaiser, H., Crother, B. I., Kelly, C. M. R., Luiselli, L., O’Shea, M., Ota, H., Passos, P., Schleip, W. D. & Wüster, W. (2013) Best practices: in the 21st century, taxonomic decisions in herpetology are acceptable only when supported by a body of evidence and published via peer-review. Herpetological Review, 44: 8–23.
  14. Kehlmaier, C., Kuchling, G., Shea, G., Georges, A., Zhang, X., Fritz, U. & Thomson, S. (2024) History and historical DNA: identity of Chelodina intergularis Fry, 1915 and type localities of C. intergularis and C. rugosa Ogilby, 1890. Zootaxa, 5448 (4): 531–555. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5448.4.6>.
  15. Krell, F.-T. (2021) Suppressing works of contemporary authors using the Code’s publication requirements is neither easy nor advisable. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 78: 61–67. <https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v78.a021>.
  16. Petrov, K., Sutcliffe, S., Truscott, H., Kutay, C., Eisemberg, C. C., Spencer, R. J., Lawler, I., Bower, D. S., Van Dyke, J. U. & Georges, A. (2023) Turtles in trouble. Conservation ecology and priorities for Australian freshwater turtles. Austral Ecology, 48 (8): 1603–1656. <https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.13418>.
  17. Rhodin, A. G. J., Kaiser, H., van Dijk, P. P, Wüster, W., O’Shea, M., Archer, M., Auliya, M., Boitani, L., Bour, R., Clausnitzer, V., Contreras-MacBeath, T., Crother, B.I., Daza, J.M., Driscoll, C.A., Flores-Villela, O., Frazier, J., Fritz, U., Gardner, A.L., Gascon, C., Georges, A., Glaw, F., Grazziotin, F. G., Groves, C. P., Haszprunar, G., Havaš, P., Hero, J.-M., Hoffmann, M., Hoogmoed, M. S., Horne, B. D., Iverson, J. B., Jäch, M., Jenkins, C. L., Jenkins, R. K. B., Kiester, A. R., Keogh, J. S., Lacher, T. R., Jr., Lovich, J. E., Luiselli, L., Mahler, D. L., Mallon, D., Mast, R., McDiarmid, R. W., Measey, J., Mittermeier, R. A., Molur, S., Mosbrugger, V., Murphy, R. W., Naish, D., Niekisch, M., Ota, H., Parham, J. F., Parr, M. J., Pilcher, N. J., Pine, R. H., Rylands, A. B., Sanderson, J. G., Savage, J. M., Schleip, W., Scrocchi, G. J., Shaffer, H. B., Smith, E. N., Sprackland, R., Stuart, S. N., Vetter, H., Vitt, L. J., Waller, T., Webb, G., Wilson, E. O., Zaher, H. & Thomson, S. (2015) Comment on “Spracklandus Hoser, 2009 (Reptilia, Serpentes, Elapidae): request for confirmation of the availability of the generic name and for the nomenclatural validation of the journal in which it was published”. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 72 (1): 65–78.
  18. Shea, G., Thomson, S. & Georges, A. (2020) The identity of Chelodina oblonga Gray 1841 (Testudines: Chelidae) reassessed. Zootaxa, 4779 (3): 419–437. <https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4779.3.9>.
  19. Thomson, S. A., Friol, N. R., White, A., Wedd, D. & Georges, A. (2023) The Australian gulf snapping turtle Elseya lavarackorum (Testudines: Chelidae) revisited. Is the late Pleistocene fossil species extant? Vertebrate Zoology, 73: 237–256. <https://doi.org/10.3897/vz.73.e99495>.
  20. Wüster, W., Thomson, S. A., O’Shea, M. & Kaiser, H. (2021) Confronting taxonomic vandalism in biology: conscientious community self-organization can preserve nomenclatural stability. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 133: 635–670. <https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blab009>.