Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 68 No. 2: 3 Sept. 2025
Type: Article
Published: 2025-09-03
DOI: 10.12976/jib/2025.68.2.1
Page range: 32-47
Abstract views: 215
PDF downloaded: 2

Restoration of ant fauna in environments with different land use histories in the southern Atlantic Forest biome

Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó, 89809-900, Chapecó (SC), Brazil.
Biology Laboratory, Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul (UFFS), Chapecó (SC), Brazil.
Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó, 89809-900, Chapecó (SC), Brazil.
Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó
Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó, 89809-900, Chapecó (SC), Brazil.
Environmental Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó, 89809-900, Chapecó (SC), Brazil
Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó
Institute of Biology, Dept. of Ecology, Zoology and Genetics, Lab. of insect ecology, Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel)
Biological Conservation Energy production Environmental planning Richness Landscape ecology Species inventory

Abstract

Ants stand out as bioindicators for monitoring impacted areas. This study evaluates the richness, abundance, and composition of ant assemblages in environments with different land use histories in the southern Atlantic Forest biome. The study was carried out in five sites with different land use histories inserted in a Permanent Preservation Area (PPA) isolated for passive restoration. Two sampling campaigns were carried out (December 2018 and January 2019; and December 2019 and January 2020) using seven sampling methods (soil pitfall traps, canopy pitfall traps, sardine baits, glucose baits, entomological umbrella, entomological sweeping net, and manual collection). We used a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to assess the association of species with sites. Overall, 151 ant species were identified, belonging to 36 genera and eight subfamilies. We identified differences (p<0.05) between the assemblage sampled at the site that was initially more impacted than the others. We verified an association of species considered generalists with the sites occupied by a construction site, agricultural areas, and reforestation areas. On the other hand, specialized and predatory species were associated with sites that were occupied by pasture or forest fragments. The results are relevant for understanding the impacts caused by the construction of hydroelectric projects on ants’ biodiversity and other associated organisms. Ant biodiversity may be benefiting from isolated areas such as PPAs around hydroelectric reservoirs. These environments may be providing shelter for the ant fauna and its associated biodiversity.

References

  1. Agosti D., Majer J. D., Alonso L. E. & Schultz T. R. 2000. Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity. Washington, Smithsonian Institution Press. 304 pp.

  2. Alonso L. E. 2000. Ants as indicators of diversity. In Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity. Biological Diversity Handbook Series (Agosti, D.; Majer, J. D.; Alonso, L. E. & Schultz, T. R. eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 80–88.

  3. Alvares C. A., Stape J. L., Sentelhas P. C., Moraes Gonçalves J. L. & Sparovek G. 2013. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22(6): 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507

  4. Aneel 2021. BIG—Generation Information Bank. Electronic Database.

  5. Baccaro F. B., Feitosa, R. M., Fernandez F., Fernandes I. O., Izzo T. J., Souza J. L. P. & Solar R. 2015. Guia para gêneros de formigas no Brasil. 1. ed. Manaus: INPA. 388 p.

  6. Bolton B. 2024. Synopsis and Classification of Formicidae. Gainesville: The American Entomological Institute.

  7. Brasil 2012. Código Florestal. Law n°12,651 of 2012, Brasília: Diário Oficial da União. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12651.htm (accessed on 30 July 2025)

  8. Carlucci M. B., Marcilio-Silva V. & Toreza J. M. 2021. The southern Atlantic Forest: use, degradation, and perspectives for conservation. In: The Atlantic Forest (Marcia, C. M.; Carlos, E. & Grelle, V. eds.). Springer. pp. 91–111.

  9. Chao A., Colwell R. K., Lin C.-W. & Gotelli N. J. 2009. Sufficient sampling for asymptotic minimum species richness estimators. Ecology 90: 1125–1133. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-2147.1

  10. Conceição-Neto R., França E. C. B., Feitosa R. M. & Queiroz J. M. 2021. Revisiting the ideas of trees as templates and the competition paradigm in pairwise analyses of ground-dwelling ant species occurrences in a tropical forest. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia [online] 65(1): e20200026. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9665-rbent-2020-0026

  11. Elrahmani A., Hannun J., Eljack F. & Kazi M.-K. 2021. Status of renewable energy in the GCC region and future opportunities. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 31: 100664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2020.100664

  12. Fernandes T. T., Silva R. R., Souza-Campana D. R., Silva O. G. M. & Morini M. S. C. 2019. Winged ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) presence in twigs on the leaf litter of Atlantic Forest. Biota Neotropica 19: e20180694. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2018-0694

  13. Foz de Chapecó. 2023. Informações online sobre o consórcio da Hidrelétrica Foz do Chapecó. Consórcio Foz do Chapecó, Florianópolis. Available at: http:www.fozdochapeco.com.br (accessed on 30 July 2025)

  14. García-Martínez M. A., Vanoye-Eligio V., Leyva-Ovalle O. R., Zetina-Córdoba P., Aguilar-Méndez M. J. & Mejía M. R. 2019. Diversity of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a sub-montane and sub-tropical cityscape of Northeastern Mexico. Sociobiology 66: 440. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v66i3.4264

  15. Gehrke P., Goretti A. A. T. & Ávila L. V. 2021. Impactos da matriz energética no desenvolvimento sustentável do Brasil. Revista de Administração da UFSM [online] 14(spe1): 1032–1049. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465964409

  16. Gotelli N. J. & Colwell R. K. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4: 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x

  17. Hammer O., Harper D. A. T. & Rian P. D. 2001. Past: Palaeonthological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Version 4.3. Available at: http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/past.pdf (accessed on 30 July 2025)

  18. Hölldobler B. & Wilson E. O. 1990. The Ants. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 746 pp.

  19. Hu X., Huang B., Verones F., Cavalett O. & Cherubini F. 2021. Overview of recent land‐cover changes in biodiversity hotspots. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 19(2): 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2276

  20. Huang X., Gao L., Yang P. & Xi Y. 2018. Cumulative impact of dam constructions on streamflow and sediment regime in lower reaches of the Jinsha River, China. Journal of Mountain Science 15(12): 2752–2765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-4924-3

  21. Jamshidi S., Pourhossein K. & Asadi M. 2021. Size estimation of wind/solar hybrid renewable energy systems without detailed wind and irradiation data: A feasibility study. Energy Conversion and Management 234: 113905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113905

  22. Ladino N. & Feitosa R. M. 2022. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the Parque Estadual São Camilo, an isolated Atlantic Forest remnant in western Paraná, Brazil. Zoologia (Curitiba) 39: e22001. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-4689.v39.e22001

  23. Lopes F. A. 2019. Spatiotemporal Patterns of Species Turnover in Ground Dwelling Ant Assemblages (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) In an Amazon Basin Hydroelectric Power Plant. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia. 50 pp.

  24. Lutinski J. A., Lutinski C. J., Guarda C., Busato M. A. & Garcia F. R. M. 2017. Richness and structure of ant assemblies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Atlantic forest in southern Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 89: 2719–2729. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720160892

  25. Lutinski J. A., Dorneles F. E., Guarda C., Lutinski C. J., Busato M. A., Giovenardi R. & Garcia F. R. M. 2023. Ant diversity (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Turvo State Park, municipality of Derrubadas, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 3: e239642. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.239642

  26. Madi A. P. L. M., Boeger M. R. T., Larcher L., Pelozo A., Sereneski C., Reissmann C. B. & Padial A. A. 2016. Estrutura do componente de regeneração natural e arbóreo de dois manguezais no estado do Paraná. Ciência Florestal 26: 159–170. https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509821100

  27. Magalhães F. S., Campana D. R. S., Freitas G. S., Abonizio-Santos M. R., Prado L. P. & Morini M. S. C. 2022. Natural regeneration in Atlantic Forest Fragments: using ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) for monitoring a conservation unit. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia 62: e202262071. https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2022.62.071

  28. Marques M. C. M. & Grelle C. E. V. (eds.) 2021. The Atlantic forest: history, biodiversity, threats and opportunities of the mega-diverse forest. Springer, Cham. 527 pp.

  29. MMA 2021. Biomas. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília. Available at: https://antigo.mma.gov.br/biomas.html (accessed on 30 July 2025)

  30. Martins M. F. O., Thomazini M. J., Baretta D., Brown G. G., Rosa M. G., Zagatto M. R. G., Santos A., Nadolny H. S., Cardoso G. B. X., Niva C. C., Bartz M. L. C. & Feitosa R. M. 2020. Accessing the subterranean ant fauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in native and modified subtropical landscapes in the Neotropica. Biota Neotropica 20: e20190782. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2019-0782

  31. Muhamed A. A., Abdullah N. A., Yácob Z. & Manson M. S. 2022. Diversity and composition of tropical metropolitan ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): An indicator to urban biodiversity and ecosystem health. Research Square 1: 1–25. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1111-2732

  32. Passera L., Wild A. & Deligeorges S. 2016. Formidables fourmis! Éditions Quæ, Versailles. 50 pp.

  33. Pedroso J., Guarda C. & Lutinski J. A. 2021. Campus universitário como ambiente para a conservação de uma assembleia de formigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) / University campus as an environment for ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) assembly conservation. Brazilian Journal of Animal and Environmental Research 4(2): 2717–2735. https://doi.org/10.34188/bjaerv4n2-094

  34. Powell S., Del-Claro K., Feitosa R. M. & Brandão C. R. F. 2014. Mimicry and eavesdropping enable a new form of social parasitism in ants. The American Naturalist 184: 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1086/677927

  35. Rafael J. A. (ed.) 2024. Insetos do Brasil: Diversidade e Taxonomia. Editora do Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, AM. 2ª. ed., 880 pp.

  36. Ribas C. R., Schmidt F. A., Solar R. R. C., Campos R. B. F., Valentim C. L. & Schoereder J. H. 2012. Ants as indicators of the success of rehabilitation efforts in deposits of gold mining tailings. Restoration Ecology 20: 712–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00831.x

  37. Romero H. & Jaffe K. 1989. A Comparison of Methods for Sampling Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in Savannas. Biotropica 21: 348. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388285

  38. Santos-Silva L., Vicente R. E. & Feitosa R. M. 2016. Ant species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of forest fragments and urban areas in a Meridional Amazonian landscape. Checklist 12: 1885. https://doi.org/10.15560/12.3.1885

  39. Santos E. W. M. 2014. Formigas como Bioindicadoras em Diferentes Áreas de Cerrado no sul do Tocantins. Universidade Federal do Tocantins, Campus Universitário de Gurupi. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Produção Vegetal. Tocantins. 88 pp. Available at: https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/35213 (accessed on 30 July 2025)

  40. Shimadzu H., Dornelas M. & Magurran A. E. 2015. Measuring temporal turnover in ecological communities. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6: 1384–1394. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12438

  41. Sid-Ali S., Ali-Ahmed Djamila S., Ali-Ahmed Fatiha M., Ouiza O. & Said S. 2021. Diversity of ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in two forest sites from Kabylia of Djurdjura, Northern Algeria. Sociobiology 68: e6232. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v68i3.6232

  42. Silva R. R., Martello F., Feitosa R. M., Brandão C. R. F., Santos A. D., Ramos K. S. et al. 2022. Atlantic ants: a data set of ants in Atlantic Forests of South America. Ecology 103(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3580

  43. Silvestre R., Brandão C. R. F. & Silva R. R. 2003. Grupos funcionales de hormigas: el caso de los grêmios del cerrado. In: Fernández F (Ed), Introducción a las hormigas de la región neotropical. Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, pp. 113–148.

  44. Ulysséa M. A., Cereto C. E., Rosumek F. B., Silva R. R. & Lopes B. C. 2011. Updated list of ant species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) recorded in Santa Catarina State, southern Brazil, with a discussion of research advances and priorities. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 55: 603–611. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262011000400018

  45. Veronez F. A.; Lima F. R. D. & Tshibangu G. M. 2022. Environmental impacts of hydropower plants in Brazil: an identification guide. Sustentabilidade em Debate 13: 210. https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v13n1.2022.40635

  46. Vicente R. E., Dáttilo W. & Izzo T. J. 2014. Differential recruitment of Camponotus femoratus (Fabricius) ants in response to ant garden herbivory. Neotropical Entomology 43: 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-014-0245-6

  47. Zhang D., Han D. & Song X. 2020. Impacts of the Sanmenxia Dam on the interaction between surface water and groundwater in the Lower Weihe River of Yellow River Watershed. Water 12: 1671. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061671