Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 1 No. 2: 30 Apr. 2024
Type: Article
Published: 2024-04-30
DOI: 10.11646/jihs.1.2.2
Page range: 107-121
Abstract views: 0
PDF downloaded: 0

Descriptions of Four New Western Hemisphere Palm Bugs (Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae: Xylastodorinae): A New Species of Xylastodoris from Haiti and Two Remarkable New Genera, One with Two New Species from Ecuador, and One with A New Species from Peru

Systematic Entomology Laboratory, ARS, USDA, c/o National Museum Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012 USA.
Insecta Hemiptera New World host distribution relationships biogeography subfamilies new taxa

Abstract

Four new Western Hemisphere xylastodorine palm bugs (Thaumastocoridae: Xylastodorinae) are recognized. Neolatebracoris new genus is described to accommodate Neolatebracoris erwini new species from Peru; Xylastodoris cornutus new species is described from specimens intercepted at Miami, Florida, from Haiti; and Xylastotylus new genus is described to accommodate Xylastotylus emarginatus new species (as the type species) and X. minutus new species from Ecuador. Dorsal and lateral habitus and available genital capsule images, diagnoses, and descriptions are provided for each new genus and species. Relationships and biogeography of the new taxa are discussed, and revised keys to the New World genera of the subfamily and the species of Xylastodoris and Xylastotylus are provided.

 

References

  1. Ali, A. D. and D. Caldwell. 2010. Royal palm bug Xylastodoris luteolus (Hemiptera: Thaumastocoridae) control with soil applied systemics. Florida Entomologist 93(2): 294–297. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.093.0222
  2. Baranowski, R. M. 1958. Notes on the biology of the royal palm bug, Xylastodoris luteolus Barber (Hemiptera, Thaumastocoridae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 51: 547–551. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/51.6.547
  3. Baranowski, R. M. 1966. The royal palm bug, Xylastodoris luteolus Barber (Hemiptera: Thaumastocoridae). Entomology Circular No. 46. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville.
  4. Barber, H. G. 1920. A new member of the family Thaumastocoridae. Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society 15: 98–105.
  5. Bechly, G. and M. Wittmann. 2000. Two new tropical bugs (Insecta, Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae – Xylastodorinae and Hypsipterygidae) from Baltic Amber. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Serie B (Geologie und Paläontologie) 289: 1–11.
  6. Caldwell, D. L. and A. D. Ali. 2010. Control of royal palm bug (Xylastodoris luteolus) populations with soil applied neonicotinoid insecticides. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society 123: 1–3.
  7. Carpintero, D. L. 2023. Thaumastocoridae, pp. 209–213. In Claps, L. E., S. Roig-Juñent, and J. J. Morrone, eds. Biodiverisdad de Artrópodos Argentinos. Vol. 6. Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, Editorial INSUE – UNT, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina. 527 pp.
  8. Carpintero, D. L. and P. M. Dellapé. 2006. A new species of Thaumastocoris Kirkaldy from Argentina (Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae: Thaumastocorinae). Zootaxa 1228(1): 61–68. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1228.1.4
  9. Cassis, G. and G. F. Gross. 1995. Hemiptera: Heteroptera (Coleorrhyncha to Cimicomorpha), pp. 389–394. In Houston, W. W. K. and G. V. Maynard, eds. Zoological Catalog of Australia. 27.3A. CSIRO, Melbourne. 506 pp.
  10. Cassis, G. and R. T. Schuh. 2010. Systematic methods, fossils, and relationships within Heteroptera (Insecta). Cladistics 26: 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00283x.
  11. Cassis, G., G. B. Monteith, and A. Postle. 2023. Hiding among the palms: The remarkable discovery of a new palm bug genus and species (Insecta: Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae: Xylastodorinae) from Norfolk Island; systematics, natural history, palm specialism and biogeography. Invertebrate Systematics 37(10): 702–740. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS23040
  12. Cassis, G., R.T. Schuh, and H. Brailovsky, 1999. A review of Onymocoris (Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae), with a new species, and notes on hosts and distributions of other thaumastocorid species. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemoslovenicae 63: 19–36.
  13. Cobben, R. H. 1978. Evolutionary Trends in Heteroptera. Part II. Mouthpart-structures and feeding strategies. Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool 78-5. Wageningen, The Netherlands. 407 pp.
  14. Couturier, G., F. Kahn, and M. S. Padilha de Oliveira. 1997. New evidence on the coevolution between bugs (Hemiptera: Thaumastocoridae: Xylastodorinae) and the New World palms. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 34(1): 99–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/21686351.1998.12277765
  15. Doesburg, P. H., van, G. Cassis, and G. B. Monteith. 2010. Discovery of a living fossil: A new xylastodorine species from New Caledonia (Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae) and first record of the subfamily from the Eastern Hemisphere. Zoologische Mededlingen, Leiden 84(6): 93–115.
  16. Drake, C. J. and J. A. Slater. 1957. The phylogeny and systematics of the family Thaumastocoridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 50: 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/50.4.353
  17. Erwin, T. L. 1982. Tropical forests: Their richness in Coleoptera and other arthropod species. Coleopterists Bulletin 36(1): 74–75.
  18. Froeschner, R. C. 1981. Heteroptera or true bugs of Ecuador: A partial catalog. Smithsonian Contributions 322: 1–147. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810282.322
  19. Froeschner, R. C. 1988. Family Thaumastocoridae Kirkaldy, 1907. The thaumastocorid bugs or royal palm bugs, pp. 696–697. In Henry, T. J. and R. C. Froeschner, eds. Catalog of the Heteroptera, or True Bugs, of Canada and the Continental United States. E. J. Brill Publishers, Leiden and New York. 958 pp. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004590601_044
  20. Heiss, E. and V. B. Golub. 2015. Thaumastotingis areolatus nov. gen., nov. sp. a conspicuous new Thaumastocoridae from Baltic amber (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Linzer Biologische Beiträge 47: 529–537.
  21. Heiss, E. and Y. A. Popov. 2002. Reconsideration of the systematic position of Thaicorinae with notes on fossil and extant Thaumastocoridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 71(3): 247–259.
  22. Henry, T. J. 2017. Biodiversity of Heteroptera, pp. 279–335. In Foottit, R. G. and P. H. Adler, eds. Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Volume 1, Second Edition. Wiley & Sons Ltd., Oxford. 867 pp. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568.ch10
  23. Hill, L. and C. W. Schaefer. 2000. Palm bugs (Thaumastocoridae), pp. 139–142. In Schaefer, C. W. and A. R. Panizzi, eds. Heteroptera of Economic Importance. CRC Press, Boca Raton and New York. 828 pp. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420041859
  24. Howard, F. W. and A. Stopek. 1999. Control of royal palm bug, Xylastodoris luteolus (Hemiptera: Thaumastocoridae), with imidacloprid: A refinement in the method. Palms 43(4): 174–176.
  25. Iturralde-Vinent, M. A. and R. D. E. MacPhee. 1996. Age and paleogeographical origin of Dominican amber. Science 273: 1850–1852. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.273.5283.1850
  26. Jacobs, D. H. and S. Neser. 2005. Thaumastocoris australicus Kirkaldy (Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae): A new insect arrival in South Africa, damaging to Eucalyptus trees. South African Journal of Science 101: 233–236.
  27. Kirkaldy, G. W. 1908. Memoir on a few heteropterous Hemiptera from eastern Australia. Proceedings of the Linnean Society 32: 768–788. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.19588
  28. Kormilev, N. A. 1955. Una curiosa familia de Hemípteros nueva para la fauna Argentina Thaumastotheriidae (Kirkaldy), 1907. Revista de la Sociedad Entomologica Argentina 18(1–2): 5–10.
  29. Kormilev, N. A. 1969. Thaicorinae, n. subfam. from Thailand (Hemiptera; Heteroptera: Piesmatidae). Pacific Insects 11: 645–648.
  30. Machado, D. N., E. Costa, V. C. Jerson, L. R. Barbosa, G. Martinez, et al. 2020. On maternal lineage leads the expansion of Thaumastocoris peregrinus (Hemiptera: Thaumastocoridae) in the New and Old Worlds. Scientific Reports 10: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60236-7
  31. Montemayor, S. I., P. M. Dellapé, and M. C. Melo. 2014. Geographical distribution modelling of the bronze bug: A worldwide invasion. Agriculture and Forest Entomology 17: 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12088
  32. Moznette, G. F. 1921. Notes on the royal palm bug. Quarterly Bulletin of the Florida State Plant Board 6: 10–15.
  33. Nel, A., A. Waller, and G. de Phloëg. 2004. The oldest palm bug in the lowermost Eocene amber of the Paris Basin (Heteroptera: Cimicomorpha: Thaumastocoridae). Geologica Acta 2: 51–55.
  34. Noack, A. E. and C. E. Coviella. 2006. Thaumastocoris australicus Kirkaldy (Hemiptera: Thaumastocoridae): First record of this invasive pest of Eucalyptus in the Americas. General and Applied Entomology 25: 13–14.
  35. Noack, A. E., G. Cassis, and H. A. Rose. 2011. Systematic revision of the Thaumastocoris Kirikaldy (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae). Zootaxa 3121(1): 1–60. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3121.1.1
  36. Poinar, Jr., G. O. and J. A. Santiago-Blay. 1997. Paleodoris lattini gen. n., sp. n., a fossil palm bug (Hemiptera: Thaumastocoridae, Xylastodorinae) in Dominican Amber, with habits discernible by comparative functional morphology. Entomologica Scandinavica 28: 307–310. https://doi.org/10.1163/187631297X00097
  37. Reinert, J. A. 1975. Royal palm bug, Xylastodoris luteolus, damage and control on royal palms in Florida. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society 88: 591–593.
  38. Reuter, O. M. 1912. Bemerkungen über mein neues Heteropterensystem. Öfversigt af Finska Vetenskaps-Societatens Förhandlingar 54A(6): 1–62.
  39. Schaefer, C. W. 1969. Morphological and phylogenetic notes on the Thaumastocoridae (Hemiptera-Heteroptera). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 42: 251–256.
  40. Schuh, R. T. 1976. Pretarsal structure in the Miridae (Hemiptera) with a cladistic analysis of relationships within the family. American Museum Novitates 2601: 1–39.
  41. Schuh, R. T. and J. A. Slater. 1995. True Bugs of the World (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London. 336 pp.
  42. Schuh, R. T. and P. Ŝtys. 1991. Phylogenetic analysis of cimicomorphan family relationships (Heteroptera). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 99(3): 298–350.
  43. Schuh, R. T. and C. Weirauch. 2020. True Bugs of the World (Hemiptera: Heteroptera): Classification and Natural History (Second Edition). Monograph Series. Volume 8. Siri Scientific Press, Manchester, UK. 767 pp.
  44. Slater, J. A. and P. D. Ashlock. 1959. A new species of Discocoris from Colombia. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 61(1): 25–26.
  45. Slater, J. A. and R. M. Baranowski. 2000. Discocoris dominicanus, new species of palm bug from Dominican amber (Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae). Florida Entomologist 83(3): 349–353. https://doi.org/10.2307/3496354
  46. Slater, J. A. and H. Brailovsky. 1983. The systematic status of the family Thaumastocoridae with the description of a new species of Discocoris from Venezuela (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 85(3): 560–563.
  47. Slater, J. A. and R. T. Schuh. 1990. A remarkably large new species of Discocoris from Colombia (Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 98(4): 402–405.
  48. Viana, M. J. and D. J. Carpintero. 1981. Una nueva especie de “Discocoris” Kormilev, 1955 (Hemiptera, Xylastodoridae). Comunicaciones del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia,” e Instituto Nacional de Investigación de las Ciencias Naturales. Entomología 1(4): 63–74.
  49. Weirauch, C., R. T. Schuh, G. Cassis, and W. C. Wheeler. 2019. Revisiting habitat and lifestyle transitions in Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera): Insights from a combined morphological and molecular phylogeny. Cladistics 35(1): 65–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12233
  50. WFO 2024. World Flora Online. http://wwww.worldfloraonline.org. [last accessed 5 February 2024].