Abstract
This paper discusses problems with labelling plant structures in the context of attempts to create a unified Plant Structure Ontology. Special attention is given to structures with mixed, or doubtful identities that are difficult or even impossible to label with a single term. In various vascular plants (and some groups of animals) the structural categories for the description of forms are less distinct than is often supposed. Thus, there are morphological misfits that do not fit exactly into one or the other category and to which it is difficult, or even impossible, to apply a categorical name. After presenting three case studies of intermediate organs and organs whose identity is in doubt, we review five approaches to categorizing plant organs, and evaluate the potential of each to serve as a general reference system for gene annotations. The five approaches are (1) standardized vocabularies, (2) labels based on developmental genetics, (3) continuum morphology, (4) process morphology, (5) character cladograms. While all of these approaches have important domains of applicability, we conclude that process morphology is the one most suited to gene annotation.References
Albert, V.A. & Jobson, R.W. (2001) Relaxed structural constraints in Utricularia (Lentibulariaceae): a possible basis in one or few genes regulating polar auxin transport. Abstracts, Botany 2001, Albuquerque, New Mexico, August 12–16, 2001, p. 19.
Anthony, M. & Sattler, R. (1990) Pathological ramification of leaves and the pyramidal model of plant construction. Acta Biotheoretica, 38, 165–170.
Arber, A. (1950) The natural philosophy of plant form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 247 pp.
Baum, D.A. & Donoghue, M.J. (2002) Transference of function, heterotopy and the evolution of plant development. In: Cronk, Q.C.B., Bateman, R.M. & Hawkins, J.A. (Eds), Developmental genetics and plant evolution. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 52–69.
Bertalanffy, L. von (1955) An essay on the relativity of categories. Philosophy of Science, 22, 243–263.
Bharathan, G., Goliber, T.E., Moore, C., Kessler, S., Pham, T. & Sinha, N.R. (2002) Homologies in leaf form inferred from KNOXI gene expression during development. Science, 296, 1858–1860.
Butler, A. & Saidel, W.M. (2000) Defining sameness: historical, biological, and generative homology. BioEssays, 22, 846–853.
Cusset, G. & Cusset, C. (1988) Étude sur les Podostemales. 10. Structures florales et végétatives des Tristichaceae. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Section B, Adansonia, 10, 179–218.
Cutler, D.F., Botha, T. & Stevenson, D.W. (2008) Plant anatomy – an applied approach. Blackwell, Oxford, 302 pp.
Delpino, F. (1889) Anemofilia a scatto delle antere presso il Ricinus communis. Malpighia, 3, 337–338.
Engler, A. (1930). Reihe Podostemales. In: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (Eds), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd ed., 18a, pp. 1–68, 483–484. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.
Faria, M. (2008) RNA as code makers: a biosemiotic view of RNAi and cell immunity. In: Barbieri, M. (Ed), Introduction to Biosemiotics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 257–282.
Fisher, J.B. (2002) Indeterminate leaves of Chisocheton (Meliaceae): survey of structure and development. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 139, 207–221.
Fisher, J.B. & Rutishauser, R. (1990) Leaves and epiphyllous shoots in Chisocheton (Meliaceae): a continuum of woody leaf and stem axes. Canadian Journal of Botany, 68, 2316–2328.
Fuchs, L. (1542) De historia stirpivm commentarii insignes maximis impensis et vigiliis elaborati adjectis earvndem vivis plvsqvam quingentis imaginibus, nunquam antea ad naturæ imitationem artificiosius efictis & expressis. Officina Isingriniana, Basilea, 896 pp.
Glover, B. (2007) Understanding flowers and flowering. An integrated approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 256 pp.
Heimsch, C. & Seago, J.L. (2008) Organization of the root apical meristem in angiosperms. American Journal of Botany, 95, 1–21.
Hofer, J.M.I., Gourlay, C.W. & Ellis, T.H.N. (2001) Genetic control of leaf morphology: a partial view. Annals of Botany, 88, 1129–1139.
Huala, E., Dickerman, A.W., Garcia–Hernandez, M., Weems, D., Reiser, L., LaFond, F., Hanley, D., Kiphart, D., Zhuang, M.Z., Huang, W., Mueller, L.A., Bhattacharyya, D., Bhaya, D., Sobral, B.W., Beavis, W., Meinke, D.W., Town, C.D., Somerville, C. & Rhee, S.Y. (2001) The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): a comprehensive database and web–based information retrieval, analysis, and visualization system for a model plant. Nucleic Acids Research, 29, 102–105.
Ilic, K., Kellogg, E.A., Jaiswal, P., Zapata, F., Stevens, P. F., Vincent, L.P., Avraham, S., Reiser, L., Pujar, A., Sachs, M. M., Whitman, N.T., McCouch, S.R., Schaeffer, M.L., Ware, D.H., Stein, L.D. & Rhee, S.Y. (2007) The Plant Structure Ontology, a unified vocabulary of anatomy and morphology of a flowering plant. Plant Physiology, 143, 587–599.
Ingrouille, M.J. & Eddie, B. (2006) Plants – diversity and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 450 pp.
Jäger-Zürn, I. (1970) Morphologie der Podostemaceae. I. Tristicha trifaria (Bory ex Willd.) Spreng. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen, 47, 11–52.
Jäger-Zürn, I. (1992) Morphologie der Podostemaceae. II. Indotristicha ramosissima (Wight) van Royen (Tristichoideae). Tropische und Subtropische Pflanzenwelt, 80, 1–48.
Jäger-Zürn, I. (2003) Comparative morphology as an approach to reveal the intricate structures of the aquatic flowering plant family Podostemaceae. Recent Research Developments in Plant Science, 1, 147–172.
Jaramillo, M.A. & Kramer, E.M. (2007) The role of developmental genetics in understanding homology and morphological evolution in plants. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 168, 61–72.
Jeune, B., Barabé, D. & Lacroix, C. (2006) Classical and dynamic morphology: toward a synthesis through the space of forms. Acta Biotheoretica, 54, 277–293.
Jeune, B. & Sattler, R. (1992) Multivariate analysis in process morphology of plants. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 156, 147–167.
Kessler, S. & Sinha, N. (2004) Shaping up: the genetic control of leaf shape. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 7, 65–72.
Kim, M., Pham, T., Hamidi, A., McCormick, S., Kuzoff, R.K. & Sinha, N. (2003) Reduced leaf complexity in tomato wiry mutants suggests a role for PHAN and KNOX genes in generating compound leaves. Development, 130, 4405–4415.
Kirchoff, B.K. (2001) Character description in phylogenetic analysis: insights from Agnes Arber's concept of the plant. Annals of Botany, 88, 1203–1214.
Kirchoff, B.K., Richter, S.J. & Remington, D.L. (2007) Characters as groups: a new approach to morphological characters in phylogenetic analysis. Taxon, 56, 497–492.
Kirchoff, B.K., Richter, S.J., Remington, D.L. & Wisniewski, E. (2004) Complex data produce better characters. Systematic Biology, 53, 1–17.
Kusukawa, S. (1997) Leonhart Fuchs on the importance of pictures. Journal of the History of Ideas, 58, 403–427.
Kita, Y. & Kato, M. (2004) Molecular phylogeny of Cladopus and Hydrobryum (Podostemaceae, Podostemoideae) with implications for their biogeography in East Asia. Systematic Botany, 29, 921–932.
Koentges, G. (2008) Evolution of anatomy and gene control. Evo–devo meets systems biology. Nature, 451, 658–663.
Lacroix, C., Jeune, B. & Purcell–Macdonald, S. (2003) Shoot and compound leaf comparisons in eudicots: dynamic morphology as an alternative approach. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 143, 219–230.
Lacroix, C., Jeune, B. & Barabé, D. (2005) Encasement in plant morphology: an integrative approach from genes to organisms. Canadian Journal of Botany, 83, 1207–1221.
Lam, H.J. (1948) Classification and the new morphology. Acta Biotheoretica, 8, 107–154.
Langdale, J.A. & Harrison C.J. (2008) Developmental transitions during the evolution of plant form. In: Minelli, A. & Fusco, G. (Eds), Evolving pathways: key themes in evolutionary developmental biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 299–315.
Leszek, P., Vincent, D., Coe, E.H. & Polacco, M.L. (2003) Zea mays ontology – a database of international terms. Trends in Plant Science, 8, 517–520.
Meeuse A.D.J. (1966) Fundamentals of phytomorphology. Ronald, New York, 231 pp.
Minelli, A. 2003. The development of animal form: ontogeny, morphology, and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 323 pp.
Ota, M., Imaichi, R. & Kato, M. (2001) Developmental morphology of the thalloid Hydrobryum japonicum (Podostemaceae). American Journal of Botany, 88, 382–390.
Perrier de la Bâthie, H. (1929) Les Podostémacées de Madagascar. Archives de Botanique, Bulletin Mensuel, 3, 17–25.
Prenner, G., Box, M.S., Cunniff, J. & Rudall, P.J. (2008) The branching stamens of Ricinus and the homologies of the angiosperm stamen fascicle. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 169, 735–744.
Prenner, G. & Rudall, P.J. (2007) Comparative ontogeny of the cyathium in Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) and its allies: exploring the organ–flower–inflorescence boundary. American Journal of Botany, 94, 1612–1629.
Rhee, S.Y., Beavis, W., Berardini, T.Z., Chen, G.H., Dixon, D., Doyle, A., Garcia–Hernandez, M., Huala, E., Lander, G., Montoya, M., Miller, N., Mueller, L.A., Mundodi, S., Reiser, L., Tacklind, J., Weems, D.C., Wu, Y.H., Xu, I., Yoo, D., Yoon, J.W. & Zhang, P.F. (2003) The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): a model organism database providing a centralized, curated gateway to Arabidopsis biology, research materials and community. Nucleic Acids Research, 31, 224–228.
Rutishauser, R. (1995) Developmental patterns of leaves in Podostemaceae compared with more typical flowering plants – saltational evolution and fuzzy morphology. Canadian Journal of Botany, 73, 1305–1317.
Rutishauser, R. (1997) Structural and developmental diversity in Podostemaceae (river–weeds). Aquatic Botany, 57, 29–70.
Rutishauser, R. (1999) Polymerous leaf whorls in vascular plants: developmental morphology and fuzziness of organ identities. International Journal of Plant Science 160, (6 Suppl.), S81–S103.
Rutishauser, R. & Huber, K.A. (1991) The developmental morphology of Indotristicha ramosissima (Podostemaceae, Tristichoideae). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 178, 195–223.
Rutishauser, R. & Isler, B. (2001) Developmental genetics and morphological evolution of flowering plants, especially bladderworts (Utricularia): fuzzy Arberian morphology complements classical morphology. Annals of Botany, 88, 1173–1202.
Rutishauser, R. & Moline, P. (2005) Evo–devo and the search for homology ("sameness") in biological systems. Theory in Biosciences, 124, 213–241.
Rutishauser, R., Grob, V. & Pfeifer, E. (2008) Plants are used to having identity crises. In: Minelli, A. & Fusco. G. (Eds), Evolving pathways: key themes in evolutionary developmental biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 194–213.
Sattler, R. (1986) Biophilosophy: Analytic and holistic perspectives. Springer, Berlin, 284 pp.
Sattler, R. (1990) Towards a more dynamic plant morphology. Acta Biotheoretica, 38, 303–315.
Sattler, R. (1992) Process morphology: structural dynamics in development and evolution. Canadian Journal of Botany, 70, 708–714.
Sattler, R. (1994) Homology, homeosis, and process morpho-logy in plants. In: B.K. Hall (Ed), Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. Academic Press, New York, pp. 423–475.
Sattler, R. & Jeune, B. (1992) Multivariate analysis confirms the continuum view of plant form. Annals of Botany, 69, 249–262.
Sattler, R. & Rutishauser, R. (1990) Structural and dynamic descriptions of the development of Utricularia foliosa and Utricularia australis. Canadian Journal of Botany, 68, 1989–2003.
Scheres, B., McKhann, H.I. & van den Berg, C. (1996) Roots redefined: anatomical and genetic analysis of root development. Plant Physiology, 111, 959–964.
Sehgal, A., Sethi, M. & Ram, H.Y.M. (2002) Origin, structure, and interpretation of the thallus in Hydrobryopsis sessilis (Podostemaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences, 163, 891–905.
Sinha, N. (1999) Leaf development in angiosperms. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 50, 419–446.
Sober, E. (1993) Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 231 pp.
Taylor, P. (1989) The genus Utricularia: a taxonomic monograph. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London. (Kew Bulletin Additional Series XIV), 724 pp.
Troll, W. (1941) Vergleichende Morphologie der höheren Pflanzen. Vol. 3. Borntraeger, Berlin.
Van Heel, W.A. (1966) Morphology of the androecium in Malvales. Blumea, 13, 177–394.
Vergara-Silva, F. (2003) Plants and the conceptual articulation of evolutionary developmental biology. Biology & Philosophy, 18, 249–284.
Ware, D., Jaiswal, P., Ni, J.J., Pan, X.K., Chang, K., Clark, K., Teytelman, L., Schmidt, S., Zhao, W., Cartinhour, S., McCouch, S. & Stein, L. (2002a) Gramene: a resource for comparative grass genomics. Nucleic Acids Research, 30, 103–105.
Ware, D.H., Jaiswal, P.J., Ni, J.J., Yap, I., Pan, X.K., Clark, K.Y., Teytelman, L., Schmidt, S.C., Zhao, W., Chang, K., Cartinhour, S., Stein, L.D. & McCouch, S.R. (2002b) Gramene, a tool for grass Genomics. Plant Physiology, 130, 1606–1613.
Warming, E. (1899) Familien Podostemaceae V. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs, Naturvidenskabelige og Mathematisk Afdeling, 9, 105–154.
Weiss, K.M. (2005) The phenogenetic logic of life. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6, 36–46.
Wilkins, A.S. (2002) The evolution of developmental pathways, Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 575 pp.
Wolpert, L., Beddington, R., Jessell, T., Lawrence, P., Meyerowitz, E. & Smith, J. (2002) Principles of development, Second Edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 542 pp.