Abstract
Paradoxical frogs (Pseudae) have been difficult to characterize morphologically, and their phylogenetic affinities have long remained elusive despite several taxonomic revisions of the group. Based on the analysis of 1388 specimens we evaluate morphological characters used to identify and group species throughout their distributions. We also suggest other, previously unreported phylogenetically informative morphological characters and evaluate morphometric differences among species. The geographic distribution of Pseudae in Brazil confirms, to a certain degree, their association with hydrographic basins. Geographic variation in morphology is extensive in some species. Some characters traditionally used to identify species (e.g. stripes on the ventral surface of the thigh) vary extensively among populations, and in most cases do not distinguish among species. Body shape differences, skin texture, size and number of carpal and metatarsal tubercles, supernumerary tubercles, vocal sac structure, dorsal coloration, ventral stripes on the thigh, and geographic distribution need to be considered together to correctly identify species. Size of reproductive Pseudis varies considerably, most likely as a response to local conditions altering larval size at metamorphosis, given that postmetamorphic growth is reduced or absent in Pseudis. The previously suggested suite of ecological characters that allow disproportionate larval growth are therefore substantiated, while the paradox of a conserved body plan coupled with extensive character variation is implicated as the cause for confusion in the taxonomy of paradoxical frogs.References
Aguiar, O., Bacci, M., Lima, A.P., Rossa-Feres, D.C., Haddad, C.F.B. & Recco-Pimentel, S.M. (2007) Phylogenetic relationships of Pseudis and Lysapsus (Anura, Hylidae, Hylinae) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences. Cladistics, 23, 455–463.
Alford, R.A. & Harris, R.N. (1988) Effects of larval growth history on anuran metamorphosis. American Naturalist, 131, 91–106.
Austin, J.D., Davila, J.A., Lougheed, S.C. & Boag, P.T. (2003) Genetic evidence for female-biased dispersal in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana (Ranidae). Molecular Ecology, 12, 3165–3172.
Barrio-Amorós, C.L. (2004) Amphibians of Venezuela: systematic list, distribution and references, an update. Revista de Ecología Latinoamericana, 9, 1–48.
Bokermann, W.C.A. (1966) Lista anotada das localidades tipo de anfíbios brasileiros. Serviço de Documentação – RUSP, São Paulo, 181 pp.
Bokermann, W.C.A. (1967) Girinos de anfíbios brasileiros—3: sôbre um girino gigante de Pseudis paradoxa (Amphibia, Pseudidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 27, 209–212.
Boulenger, G.A. (1882) Catalogue of the Batrachia Salientia in the collection of the British Museum. Taylor and Francis, London,pp.
Busin, C.S., Andrade, G.V., Bertoldo, J., Del Grande, M.L., Uetanabaro, M. & Recco-Pimentel, S.M. (2008) Cytogenetic analysis of four species of Pseudis (Anura, Hylidae), with the description of ZZ/ZW sex chromosomes in P. tocantins. Genetica, 133, 119–127.
Busin, C.S., Lima, A.P., Prado, C.P.A., Strussmann, C., Junior, S.S. & Recco-Pimentel, S.M. (2006) Chromosomal differentiation of populations of Lysapsus limellus limellus, L. l. bolivianus, and of Lysapsus caraya (Hylinae, Hylidae). Micron, 37, 355–362.
Busin, C.S., Vinciprova, G. & Recco-Pimentel, S.M. (2000) Chromosomal rearrangements as the source of variation in the number of chromosomes in Pseudis (Amphibia, Anura). Genetica, 110, 131–141.
Caramaschi, U. & Cruz, C.A.G. (1998) Notas taxonômicas sobre Pseudis fusca Garman e P. bolbodactyla A. Lutz, com descrição de uma nova espécie correlata (Anura, Pseudidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 15, 929–944.
Cochran, D.M. & Goin, C.J. (1970) Frogs of Colombia. United States National Museum Bulletin, 288, 1–655.
Collins, J. (1979) Intrapopulation variation in the body size at metamorphosis and timing of metamorphosis in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Ecology, 60, 738–749.
Cope, E.D. (1862a) Catalogues of the reptiles obtained during the explorations of the Parana, Paraguay, Vermejo and Uruguay Rivers by Capt. Thos. J. Page, U.S.N.; and of those produced by Lieut. N. Michler, U.S. Top. Eng., Commander of the expedition conducting the survey of the Atrato River. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1862, 346–359.
Cope, E.D. (1862b) On some new and little known American Anura. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1862, 151–159.
da Silva, H.R. (1998) Phylogenetic relationships of the family Hylidae with emphasis on the relationships within the subfamily Hylinae (Amphibia: Anura). In: Department of Systematics and Ecology. University of Kansas
Darst, C.R. & Cannatella, D.C. (2004) Novel relationships among hyloid frogs inferred from 12S and 16S mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 31, 462–475.
de la Riva, I., Köhler, J., Lötters, S. & Reichle, S. (2000) Ten years of research on Bolivian amphibians: updated checklist, distribution, taxonomic problems, literature and iconography. Revista Española de Herpetología, 14, 19–164.
Dixon, J.R., Mercolli, C. & Yanosky, A.A. (1995) Some aspects of the ecology of Pseudis paradoxa from Northeastern Argentina. Herpetological Review, 26, 183–185.
Downie, J.R., Ramnarine, I., Sams, K. & Walsh, P.T. (2009) The paradoxical frog Pseudis paradoxa: larval habitat, growth and metamorphosis. Herpetological Journal, 19, 11–19.
Duellman, W.E. & Trueb, L. (1986) Biology of Amphibians. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, 670 pp.
Emerson, S.B. (1988) The giant tadpole of Pseudis paradoxa. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 34, 93–104.
Fabrezi, M., Quinzio, S.I. & Goldberg, J. (2009) Giant tadpole and delayed metamorphosis of Pseudis platensis Gallardo, 1961 (Anura, Hylidae). Journal of Herpetology, 43, 228–243.
Faivovich, J., Haddad, C.F.B., Garcia, P.C.A., Frost, D.R., Campbell, J.A. & Wheeler, W.C. (2005) Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to hylinae: phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 294, 1–240.
Gallardo, J.M. (1961) On the species of Pseudidae (Amphibia, Anura). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 125, 111–134.
Gallardo, J.M. (1964) Una nueva forma de Pseudidae (Amphibia, Anura) y algunas consideraciones sobre las especies argentinas de esta familia. Acta Zoologica Lilloana, 20, 193–209.
Garda, A.A. & Cannatella, D.C. (2007) Phylogeny and biogeography of paradoxical frogs (Anura, Hylidae, Pseudae) inferred from 12S and 16S mitochondrial DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 44, 104–114.
Garda, A.A., Costa, G.C., França, F.G.R. & Mesquita, D.O. (2007) Ecology of Lysapsus limellum in the Brazilian Amazon river basin. Herpetological Journal, 17, 141–148.
Garman, S. (1883) A species of Pseudis from the rio Arassuahy, Brazil. Science Observer, 4, 47.
Garman, S.W. (1877) Pseudis, "The paradoxical frog". American Naturalist, 11, 587–591.
Goldberg, J. & Fabrezi, M. (2008) Development and variation of the anuran webbed feet (Amphibia, Anura). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 152, 39–58.
Günther, A. (1858) Catalogue of the Batrachia Salientia in the collection of the Bristish Museum, London. pp.
Hoegg, S., Vences, M., Brinkmann, H. & Meyer, A. (2004) Phylogeny and comparative substitution rates of frogs inferred from sequences of three nuclear genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 21, 1188–1200.
Klappenbach, M.A. (1985) Notas herpetologicas, V. Comunicaciones Zoologicas del Museo de Historia Natural de Montevideo, 11, 1–23.
Kwet, A. (2000) The genus Pseudis (Anura: Pseudidae) in Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil, with description of a new species. Amphibia-Reptilia, 21, 39–55.
Lampert, K.P., Rand, A.S., Mueller, U.G. & Ryan, M.J. (2003) Fine-scale genetic pattern and evidence for sex-biased dispersal in the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Molecular Ecology, 12, 3325–3334.
Leviton, A.E., Gibbs, R.H., Heal, E. & Dawson, C.E. (1985) Standards in herpetology and ichthyology: 1. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyology. Copeia, 802–832.
Linnaeus, C.V. (1758) Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species cum Characteribus Differentis, Synonymis, Locis, Stockholm.
Lutz, A. (1925) Batraciens du Brésil. Société Brésilienne de Biologie, 211–214.
Miranda, T., Ebner, M., Solé, M. & Kwet, A. (2005) Estimation of population size in Pseudis cardosoi (Anura, Pseudidae), using photoidentification as a method for individual recognition. Biociencias, 13, 49–54.
Miranda-Ribeiro, A.D. (1926) Notas para servirem ao estudo dos Gymnobatrachios (Anura) Brasileiros. Achivos do Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro, 27, 1–227.
Noble, G.K. (1922) The phylogeny of Salientia. I. The osteology and thigh musculature; their bearing on classification and phylogeny. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 46, 1–87.
Núñez, D., Maneyro, R., Langone, J.A. & de Sá, R.O. (2004) Distribuición geográfica de la fauna de anfibios del Uruguay. Smithsonian Herpetological Information Service, 134, 1–34.
Palo, J.U., Lesbarreres, D., Schmeller, D.S., Primmer, C.R. & Merila, J. (2004) Microsatellite marker data suggest sex-biased dispersal in the common frog Rana temporaria. Molecular Ecology, 13, 2865–2869.
Parker, H.W. (1935) The frogs, lizards, and snakes of British Guiana. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 505–530,
Pizzaro, D. (1876) Nota descriptiva de um pequeno animal extremamente curioso e denominado Batrachycthis. Archivos do Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro, 1, 31–35.
Roček, Z., Böttcher, R. & Wassersug, R. (2006) Gigantism in tadpoles of the Neogene frog Palaeobatrachus. Paleobiology, 32, 666–675.
Savage, J.M. & de Carvalho, A.L. (1953) The family position of neotropical frogs currently referred to the genus Pseudis. Zoologica, 38, 193–200.
Steindachner, F. (1864) Batrachologische Mittheilungen. Verhandlungen der kaiserlich-königlichen zoologischen botanischen Gesellschaft, 14, 239–288.
Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2001) Using Multivariate Statistics. Allyn and Bacon, 966 pp.
Wagler, J.G. (1830) Natürliches System der Amphibien, mit vorangehender Classification der Säugthiere und Vögel. Ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Zoologie. München, Stuttgart und Tübingen, 354 pp.
Wiens, J.J., Fetzner, J.W., Parkinson, C.L. & Reeder, T.W. (2005) Hylid frog phylogeny and sampling strategies for speciose clades. Systematic Biology, 54, 719–748.
Wiens, J.J., Kuczynski, C.A., Hua, X. & Moen, D.S. (2010) An expanded phylogeny of treefrogs (Hylidae) based on nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 55, 871–882.
Wilbur, H.M. & Collins, J.P. (1973) Ecological aspects of amphibian metamorphosis. Science, 182, 1305–1314.
Yeh, J. (2002) The effect of miniaturized body size on skeletal morphology in frogs. Evolution, 56, 628–641.
Zar, J.H. (1999) Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 663 pp.