Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Articles
Published: 2011-07-08
Page range: 5–6
Abstract views: 48
PDF downloaded: 18

Overview

Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Trav. 14, no. 101, São Paulo, 05508-900, SP, Brazil
Department of Marine Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico, 00681, U.S.A.

Abstract

 

 At about this time last year, one of us (MRC) edited a manuscript submitted by systematic ichthyologists Randall D. Mooi and Anthony C. Gill to Zootaxa entitled “Phylogenies without synapomorphies—a crisis in fish systemat­ics: time to show some character” (Mooi & Gill, 2010; hereafter M&G). A preview of this manuscript had been presented at an American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists (ASIH) meeting in 2008, and caused quite a stir among many in attendance. The strong reaction was a response to what was perceived as unfair criticism of the molecular paradigm in the phylogeny of fishes, particularly of percomorphs, the core of their presentation. Before publishing M&G in Zootaxa, the authors were advised that a similarly strong reaction would probably occur. They did not flinch, and hence M&G was published (after peer review). Needless to say, M&G got strong feedback, either in a negative or positive vein, from molecular and morphological workers, respectively. MRC even received a critical e-mail from one molecular worker accusing M&G of superficiality and Zootaxa of employing “low” stan­dards of scholarship.

References

  1. Britz, R. & Johnson, G.D. (2011) Comments on the establishment of the one-to-one relationship between characters as a prerequisite for homology assessment in phylogenetic studies. Zootaxa, 2946, 63–70.

    Britz, R. & Conway, K.W. (2011) The Cypriniformes Tree of Confusion. Zootaxa, 2946, 71–76.

    Craig, M.T. (2010) The ghost of crises past: a reply to Mooi and Gill. Zootaxa, 2946, 38–40.

    Cruickshank, R.H. (2011) Exploring character conflict in molecular data. Zootaxa, 2946, 45–51.

    Dillman, C.B. & Hilton, E.J. (2011)The Cause and Effect of Polarization: Thoughts on the “Morphological vs. Molecular Debate” in Systematics, with Examples from the Study of Sturgeons (Actinopterygii: Acipenseridae). Zootaxa, 2946, 77–115.

    Ebach, M.C., Carvalho, M.R. de & Williams, D.M. (2011) Opening Pandora’s Molecular Box. Zootaxa, 2946, 60–64.

    Faith, D.P., Köhler, F., Puslednik, L. & Ballard, J.W.O. (2011) Phylogenies with Corroboration Assessment. Zootaxa, 2946, 52–56.

    Gill, A.C. & Mooi, R.D. (2011) A show of character: a partial response to Wiley et al. Zootaxa, 2946, 29–32.

    Hastings, P.A. (2011) Complementary Approaches to Systematic Ichthyology. Zootaxa, 2946, 57–59.

    Mooi, R.D. & Gill, A.C. (2010) Phylogenies without synapomorphies — a crisis in fish systematics: time to show some character. Zootaxa, 2450, 26–40.

    Mooi, R.D. & Gill, A.C. (2011) Why we shouldn’t let sleeping dogmas lie: a partial reply to Craig. Zootaxa, 2946, 41–44.

    Mooi, R.D., Williams, D.M. & Gill, A.C. (2011) Numerical cladistics, an unintentional refuge for phenetics—a reply to Wiley et al. Zootaxa, 2946, 17–28.

    Nelson, G. (2011) Resemblance as Evidence of Ancestry. Zootaxa, 2946, 137–141.

    Patterson, C. [edited by Williams, D.M. & Gill, A.C.] (2010) Adventures in the fish trade. Zootaxa, 2946, 116–134.

    Wiley, E.O., Chakrabarty, P., Craig, M.T., Davis, M.P., Holcroft, N.I., Mayden, R.L. & Smith, W.L. (2011a) Will the real phylogeneticists please stand up? Zootaxa, 2946, 7–16.

    Wiley, E.O., Chakrabarty, P., Craig, M.T., Davis, M.P., Holcroft, N.I., Mayden, R.L. & Smith, W.L. (2011b) A Response to Mooi, Williams and Gill. Zootaxa, 2946, 33–37.