Abstract
The genus Elachistocleis Parker currently comprises 13 species widely distributed from Panama to central Argentina, east of the Andes (Caramaschi 2010). Because most species are difficult to diagnose and several currently recognized species might represent more than one lineage, tadpoles can contribute to the resolution of taxonomic problems (Rossa-Feres & Nomura 2006).
References
Altig, R. & McDiarmid, R.W. (1999) Body Plan. Development and Morphology. In: McDiarmid, R.W. & Altig, R. (Eds.) Tadpoles: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 24–51.
Caramaschi, U. (2010) Notes on the taxonomic status of Elachistocleis ovalis (Schneider, 1799) and description of five new species of Elachistocleis Parker, 1927 (Amphibia, Anura, Microhylidae). Boletim do Museu Nacional, 527, 1–32.
Gosner, K.L. (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica, 16, 183–190.
Kenny, J.S. (1969) The Amphibia of Trinidad. Studies on the Fauna of Curaçao and other Caribbean Islands, 29, 1–78.
Kwet, A. & Di-Bernardo, M. (1998) Elachistocleis Erythrogaster, a new microhylid species from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 33, 7–18.
Lavilla, E.O., Vaira, M. & Ferrari, L. (2003) A new species of Elachistocleis (Anura: Microhylidae) from the Andean Yungas of Argentina, with comments on the Elachistocleis ovalis – E. bicolor controversy. Amphibia-Reptilia, 24, 269–284.
Rossa-Feres, D.C. & Nomura, F. (2006) Characterization and taxonomic key for tadpoles (Amphibia: Anura) from the northwestern region of São Paulo State, Brazil. Biota Neotropica, 6, online article.
Toledo, L.F., Loebmann, D. & Haddad, C.F.B. (2010) Revalidation and redescription of Elachistocleis cesarii (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1920) (Anura: Microhylidae). Zootaxa, 2148, 50–60.
Williams, J.D. & Gudynas, E. (1987) Descripción de la larva de Elachistocleis bicolor (Valenciennes, 1838) (Anura: Microhylidae). Amphibia-Reptilia, 8, 225–229.