Abstract
As Faith et al. (2011) present it, drawing conclusions from possibly conflicting sources of evidence can be facilitated by what those authors call corroboration assessment
References
Carpenter, J.M., Goloboff, P.A. & Farris, J.S. (1998) PTP is meaningless, T-PTP is contradictory: a reply to Trueman. Cladistics, 14, 105–116.
Faith, D.P. (1992) On corroboration: a reply to Carpenter. Cladistics, 8, 265–273.
Faith, D.P. (2004) From species to supertrees: Popperian corroboration and some current controversies in systematics. Australian Systematic Botany, 17, 1–16.
Faith, D.P. (2006) Science and philosophy for molecular systematics: which is the cart and which is the horse? Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 38, 553–557.
Faith, D.P., Köhler. F., Puslednik, L. & Ballard, J.W.O. (2011) Phylogenies with corroboration assessment. Zootaxa 2946, 52–56.
Farris, J.S. (2008) Parsimony and explanatory power. Cladistics, 24, 825–847.
Farris, J.S., Källersjö, M. , Kluge, A. G., & Bult, C. (1994) Permutations. Cladistic, 10, 65–76.
Farris, J.S., Kluge, A.G., & Carpenter, J.M. (2001). Popper and likelihood versus ‘‘Popper.*’’. Systematic Biology, 50, 438–444.
Nayenizgani, T.N. (1990) The Systematics Association enters its golden years. Cladistics, 6, 307–314.
Popper, K.R. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London.
Popper, K.R. (1963) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Harper and Rowe, New York.
Popper, K.R. (1983) Realism and the Aim of Science, Routledge, London.
Sneath, P.H.A. (1988) The phenetic and cladistic approaches. Pages 252–273 in Prospects in systematics (D.L. Hawksworth, ed.). Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.
Williams, D.M., Ebach, M.C. & Wheeler, Q.D. (2010) Beyond belief. Pages 169–196 in Beyond Cladistics (D.M. Williams & S. Knapp, eds.), University of California Press, Berkeley.