Abstract
The confusion about the genus Tubella began when Carter (1881) relocated three species described by Bowerbank (1863)—Spongilla paulula; Spongilla reticulata and Spongilla recurvata to the genus Tubella, and also described Tubella spinata. However, Carter ignored Gray (1867) who proposed the genus Metania for S. reticulata and S. paulula, and Acalle for S. recurvata. Later, Vejdovsky (1888) described the genus Trochospongilla comprising species which have only one type of megasclere, without microscleres and birotulate gemmoscleres with rotules that may have unequal size. These features were congruent with some species of Tubella. After seven decades, De Laubenfels (1936) returned to the classification proposed by Gray (1867) concerning the genus Metania. On occasion, De Laubenfels proposed types species, designating Spongilla reticulata Bowerbank, 1863 for the genus Metania, and Tubella paulula Bowerbank, 1863 (misspelled as Tubella paulata) for the genus Tubella. Thus, Trochospongilla should be considered a junior synonym of Tubella but unfortunately this did not happen. Penney & Racek (1968) complicated this scenario when they recommended that the genus Tubella should be removed from the sponge classification, since it would be a conglomerate of several species belongin to different genera. This recommendation has been followed by recent authors, and the genus Tubella is commonly referred as a synonym of the genera Acalle, Metania and especially Trochospongilla. In order to correct this taxonomic misconception, we propose here the revalidation and redefinition of genus Tubella.
References
Belén, C. (1968) Nomina de las esponjas dulceacuícolas de la fauna del rio Uruguay, América Del Sur. Physis, 27, 285–289.
Bonetto, A.A. & Ezcurra De Drago, I.D. (1969) Notas sistematicas sobre el genero Uruguaya Carter (Porifera, Spongillidae). Physis, 28, 351–358.
Bowerbank, J.S. (1863) A Monograph of the Spongillidae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1863, 440–472.
Burton, M. (1938) Some Freshwater Sponges from the Belgian Congo, including descriptions of two new species from Northern Rhodesia. Revue de Zoologie et de Botanique Africaines, 30, 458–468.
Carter, H.J. (1881) History and Classification of the known Species of Spongilla. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 5, 77-–107.
Cordero, E. H. (1924) Dos esponjas de água dulce sudamericanas. Comunicaciones del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 2, 113–124.
De Laubenfels, M. W. (1936) A discussion of the sponge fauna of the Dry Tortugas in particular and the West Indies in general, with material for a revision of the families and orders of the Porifera. Carnegie Institution, Washington DC, 467pp.
Evans, R. (1899) A Description of two new species of Spongilla from Lake Tanganyika. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 41, 471–488.
Gee, N. G. (1932) The genus Trochospongilla of freshwater sponges. Peking Natural History Bulletin 6, 1–32.
Gray, J.E. (1867) Notes on the arrangement of sponges, with the descriptions of some new genera. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1867, 492–558.
Hinde, G.J. (1888) On some new Species of Uruguaya, Carter, with Remarks on the Genus. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 2, 1–12.
Kirkpatrick, R. (1906) Report on the Porifera, with notes on species from the Nile and Zambesi. Zoological results of the third Tanganyika Expedition. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1, 218–227.
Manconi, R. & Pronzato, R. (2002) Suborder Spongillina subord. nov.: Freshwater sponges. In: J.N.A. Hooper & R.W.M. van Soest (Eds), Systema Porifera. A guide to the classification of sponges. Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Pub-lishers, New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow, pp. 921–1020.
Penney, J. T. (1960) Distribution and bibliography (1892-1957) of freshwater sponges. University of South Carolina Publisher III, Columbia, 97pp.
Penney, J.T. & Racek, A.A. (1968) Comprehensive revision of a worldwide collection of freshwater sponges (Porifera: Spongillidae). Bulletin of the United States National Museum 272. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, 184pp.
Van Soest, R. (2012) Trochospongilla Vejdovsky, 1888. In: Van Soest, R.W.M, Boury-Esnault, N., Hooper, J.N.A., Rützler, K, de Voogd, N.J., Alvarez de Glasby, B., Hajdu, E., Pisera, A.B., Manconi, R., Schoenberg, C., Janussen, D., Tabachnick, K.R., Klautau, M., Picton, B., Kelly, M., Vacelet, J. (2012) World Porifera database. Accessed through: Van Soest, R.W.M, Boury-Esnault, N., Hooper, J.N.A., Rützler, K, de Voogd, N.J., Alvarez de Glasby, B., Hajdu, E., Pisera, A.B., Manconi, R., Schoenberg, C., Janussen, D., Tabachnick, K.R., Klautau, M., Picton, B., Kelly, M., Vacelet, J. (2012) World Porifera database at http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera../porifera.php?p=taxdetails&id=167255 on 2012-03-01.
Vejdovsky, F. (1888) Diagnosis of European Spongillidae. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1888, 172–180.
Volkmer-Ribeiro, C. & De Rosa-Barbosa, R. (1978) Neotropical freshwater sponges of the family Potamolepidae Brien, 1967. In: Lévi, C. & Boury-Esnault, N. (Eds), Sponge Biology. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, pp. 503–511.
Volkmer-Ribeiro, C. & De Rosa-Barbosa, R. (1985) Redescription of the freshwater sponges Trochospongilla repens (Hinde, 1888) and Trochospongilla amazonica (Weltner, 1895) with an account of the South American species of Trochospongilla (Porifera, Spongillidae). Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 65, 77–93.
Weltner, W. (1895) Spongilliden studien III. Katalog und Verbreitung der bekannten üsswasserschwämme. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 61, 114–144.