Abstract
Ernst Mayr’s (1961, Science 131: 1501–1506) distinction between proximate and ultimate causation in biology is examined with regard to the acquisition of understanding in biological systematics. Rather than a two-part distinction, understanding in systematics is characterized by relations between three explanatory components: descriptive (observation statements)—proximate (ontogenetic hypotheses)—ultimate (e.g. specific and phylogenetic hypotheses). Initial inferential actions in each component involve reasoning to explanatory hypotheses via abductive inference, providing preliminary understanding. Testing hypotheses, to critically assess understanding, is varied. Descriptive- and proximate-level hypotheses are routinely tested, but ultimate hypotheses present inherent difficulties that impose severe limits, contrary to what is usually claimed in the systematics literature. The problem is compounded by imprecise considerations of ‘evidence’ and ‘support.’ For instance, in most cases, the ‘evidence’ offering ‘support’ for phylogenetic hypotheses, as cladograms, is nothing more than the abductive evidence (premises) used to infer those hypotheses, i.e. character data and associated phylogenetic-based theories. By definition, such evidence only offers initial, trivial understanding, whereas the pertinent evidence sought in the sciences is test evidence, which cannot be supplanted by character data. The pursuit of ultimate understanding by way of spurious procedures such as contrived testing, Bremer support, and resampling methods are discussed with regard to phylogenetic hypotheses.
References
Achinstein, P. (1970) Inference to scientific laws. In: Stuewer, R.H. (Ed.), Volume V: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 87–111.
Achinstein, P. (2001) The Book of Evidence. Oxford University Press, New York, 290 pp.
Aliseda, A. (2006) Abductive Reasoning: Logical Investigations into Discovery and Explanation. Springer, Dordrecht, 225 pp.
Archibald, J.K., Mort, M.E. & Crawford, D.J. (2003) Bayesian inference of phylogeny: a non-technical primer. Taxon, 52, 187–191.
Ariew, A. (2003) Ernst Mayr’s ‘ultimate/proximate’ distinction reconsidered and reconstructed. Biology & Philosophy, 18, 553–565.
Asher, R.J., Geisler, J.H. & Sánchez-Villagra, M.R. (2008) Morphology, paleontology, and placental mammal phylogeny. Systematic Biology, 57, 311–317.
Asher, R.J., Novacek, M.J. & Geisler, J.G. (2003) Relationships of endemic African mammals and their fossil relatives based on morphological and molecular evidence. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 10, 131–194.
Bailey, A.L., Brewer, M.S., Hendrixson, B.E. & Bond, J.E. (2010) Phylogeny and classification of the trapdoor spider genus Myrmekiaphila: an integrative approach to evaluating taxonomic hypotheses. PLoS ONE, 5, e12744. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012744.
Barker, S.F. (1957) Induction and Hypothesis. Cornell University Press, New York, 203 pp.
Beatty, J. (1994) The proximate/ultimate distinction in the multiple careers of Ernst Mayr. Biology & Philosophy, 9, 333–356.
Bourlat, S.J., Nielsen, C., Economou, A.D. & Telford, M.J. (2008) Testing the new animal phylogeny: a phylum level molecular analysis of the animal kingdom. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 49, 23–31.
Bremer, K. (1988) The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution, 42, 795–803.
Bremer, K. (1994) Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics, 10, 295–304.
Brent, J. (1998) Charles Sanders Peirce: A Life. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 412 pp.
Brower, A.V.Z. (2006) The how and why of branch support and partitioned branch support, with a new index to assess partition incongruence. Cladistics, 22, 378–386.
Brower, A.V.Z. (2010) Stability, replication, pseudoreplication and support. Cladistics, 26, 112–113.
Brower, A.V.Z. (2011) Repeatability and reality. Cladistics, 27, 447–448.
Bucknam, J., Boucher, Y. & Bapteste, E. (2006) Refuting phylogenetic relationships. Biology Direct, 1, 26.
Bull, J.J., Huelsenbeck, J.P., Cunningham, C.W., Swofford, D.L. & Waddell, P.J. (1993) Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology, 42, 384–397.
Carnap, R. (1950) Logical Foundations of Probability. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 607 pp.
Chen, W.-J., Bonillo, C. & Lecointre, G. (2003) Repeatablility of clades as a criterion of reliability: a case study for molecular phylogeny of Acanthomorpha (Teleostei) with larger number of taxa. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 26, 262–288.
Cleland, C.E. (2001) Historical science, experimental science, and the scientific method. Geology, 29, 987–990.
Cleland, C.E. (2002) Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science. Philosophy of Science, 69, 474–496.
Cleland, C.E. (2011a) Philosophical issues in natural history and historiography. In: Tucker, A. (Ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, pp. 44–62.
Cleland, C.E. (2011b) Prediction and explanation in historical natural science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62, 551–582.
Crawford, N.G., Faircloth, B.C., McCormack, J.E., Brumfield, R.T., Winker, K. & Glenn, T.C. (2012) More than 1000 ultraconserved elements provide evidence that turtles are the sister group of archosaurs. Biology Letters, doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0331.
Crespo, A., Lumbsch, H.T., Mattsson, J.-E., Blanco, O., Divakar, P.K., Articus, K., Wiklund, E., Bawingan, P.A. & Wedin, M. (2007) Testing morphology-based hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships in Parmeliaceae (Ascomycota) using three ribosomal markers and the nuclear RPB1 gene. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 44, 812–824.
Curd, M.V. (1980) The logic of discovery: an analysis of three approaches. In: Nickles, T. (Ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp. 201–219.
Davis, J.I. (1995) A phylogenetic structure for the monocotyledons, as inferred from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation, and a comparison of measures of clade support. Systematic Botany, 20, 503–527.
de Queiroz, A. (1993) For consensus (sometimes). Systematic Biology, 42, 368–372.
de Queiroz, K. (2004) The measurement of test severity, significance tests for resolution, and a unified philosophy of phylogenetic inference. Zoologica Scripta, 33, 463–473.
de Queiroz, K. & Poe, S. (2001) Philosophy and phylogenetic inference: a comparison of likelihood and parsimony methods in the context of Karl Popper’s writings on corroboration. Systematic Biology, 50, 305–321.
de Queiroz, K. & Poe, S. (2003) Failed refutations: further comments on parsimony and likelihood methods and their relationship to Popper’s degree of corroboration. Systematic Biology, 52, 322–330.
Dunn, C.W., Hejnol, A., Matus, D.Q., Pang, K., Browne, W.E., Smith, S.A., Seaver, E., Rouse, G.W., Obst, M., Edgecombe, G.D., Sørensen, M.V., Haddock, S.H.D., Schmidt-Rhaesa, A., Okusu, A., Kristensen, R.M., Wheeler, W.C., Martindale, M.Q. & Giribet, G. (2008) Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature, 452, 745–750.
Efron, B. (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1–26.
Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R.J. (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York, 436 pp.
Efron, B., Halloran, E. & Holmes, S. (1996) Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 7085–7090.
Egan, M.G. (2006) Support versus corroboration. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 39, 72–85.
Eldredge, N. & Cracraft, J. (1980) Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process: Method and Theory in Comparative Biology. Columbia University Press, New York, 349 pp.
Eernisse, D. & Kluge, A.G. (1993) Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 10, 1170–1195.
Faith, D.P. (2004) From species to supertrees: Popperian corroboration and some current controversies in systematics. Australian Systematic Botany, 17, 1–16.
Faith, D.P. (2006) Science and philosophy for molecular systematics: which is the cart and which is the horse? Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 38, 553–557.
Faith, D.P. & Cranston, P.S. (1991) Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone?: On permutation tests for cladistic structure. Cladistics, 7, 1–28.
Faith, D.P. & Cranston, P.S. (1992) Probability, parsimony, and Popper. Systematic Biology, 41, 252–257.
Faith, D.P. & Trueman, J.W.H. (1998) When the topology-dependent permutation test (T–PTP) for a null hypothesis of non-monophyly returns significant support for monophyly, should that be equated with (a) rejecting a null hypothesis, (b) rejecting a null hypothesis of ‘no structure’, (c) failing to falsify a hypothesis of monophyly, or (d) none of the above? Systematic Biology, 45, 577–584.
Faith, D.P. & Trueman, J.W.H. (2001) Towards an inclusive philosophy for phylogenetic inference. Systematic Biology, 50, 331–350.
Faith, D.P., Köhler, F., Puslednik, L. & Ballard, J.W.O. (2011) Phylogenies with corroboration assessment. Zootaxa, 2946, 52–56.
Farris, J. (2002) RASA attributes highly significant structure to randomized data. Cladistics, 18, 334–353.
Fann, K.T. (1970) Peirce’s Theory of Abduction. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 62 pp.
Farris, J.S., Albert, V.A., Källersjö, M., Lipscomb, D. & Kluge, A.G. (1996) Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics, 12, 99–124.
Farris, J.S., Kluge, A.G. & Carpenter, J.M. (2001) Popper and likelihood versus “Popper*.” Systematic Biology, 50, 438–444.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 17, 368–376.
Felsenstein, J. (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783–791.
Felsenstein, J. (2004) Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, 664 pp.
Fetzer, J.H. (1993) Philosophy of Science. Paragon House, New York, 197 pp.
Fetzer, J.H. & Almeder, R.F. (1993) Glossary of Epistemology/Philosophy of Science. Paragon House, New York, 149 pp.
Fitzhugh, K. (2005a) Les bases philosophiques de l’inférence phylogénétique: une vue d’ensemble. Biosystema, 24, 83–105.
Fitzhugh, K. (2005b) The inferential basis of species hypotheses: the solution to defining the term ‘species.’ Marine Ecology, 26, 155–165.
Fitzhugh, K. (2006a) The abduction of phylogenetic hypotheses. Zootaxa, 1145, 1–110.
Fitzhugh, K. (2006b) The ‘requirement of total evidence’ and its role in phylogenetic systematics. Biology & Philosophy, 21, 309–351.
Fitzhugh, K. (2006c) The philosophical basis of character coding for the inference of phylogenetic hypotheses. Zoologica Scripta, 35, 261–286.
Fitzhugh, K. (2008a) Fact, theory, test and evolution. Zoologica Scripta, 37, 109–113.
Fitzhugh, K. (2008b) Abductive inference: implications for ‘Linnean’ and ‘phylogenetic’ approaches for representing biological systematization. Evolutionary Biology, 35, 52–82.
Fitzhugh, K. (2008c) Clarifying the role of character loss in phylogenetic inference. Zoologica Scripta, 37, 561–569.
Fitzhugh, K. (2009) Species as explanatory hypotheses: refinements and implications. Acta Biotheoretica, 57, 201–248.
Fitzhugh, K. (2010a) Evidence for evolution versus evidence for intelligent design: parallel confusions. Evolutionary Biology, 37, 68–92.
Fitzhugh, K. (2010b) Revised systematics of Fabricia oregonica Banse, 1956 (Polychaeta: Sabellidae: Fabriciinae): an example of the need for a uninomial nomenclatural system. Zootaxa, 2647, 35–50.
Franz, N.M. (2005) Outline of an explanatory account of cladistic practice. Biology & Philosophy, 20, 489–515.
Gaffney, E.S. (1979) An introduction to the logic of phylogeny reconstruction. In: Cracraft, J. & Eldredge, N. (Eds), Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 79–111.
Gatesy, J. (1998) Molecular evidence for the phylogenetic affinities of Cetacea. In: Thewissen, J.G.M. (Ed.), The Emergence of Whales. Plenum, New York, pp. 63–112.
Giribet, G., Distel, D.L., Polz, M., Sterrer, W. & Wheeler, W.C. (2000) Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the acoelomates and the position of Gnathostomulida, Cycliophora, Plathelminthes, and Chaetognatha: a combined approach of 18S rDNA sequences and morphology. Systematic Biology, 49, 539–562.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2003) Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 272 pp.
Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S., Källersjö, M., Oxelman, B., Ramírez, M.J. & Szumik, C.A. (2003) Improvements to resampling measures of group support. Cladistics, 19, 324–332.
Grandcolas, P., Deleporte, P. & Desutter-Grandcolas, L. (1997) Testing evolutionary processes with phylogenetic patterns: test power and test limitations. In: Grandcolas, P. (Ed.), The Origin of Biodiversity in Insects: Phylogenetic Tests of Evolutionary Scenarios. Mémoires du Muséum National d=Histoire Naturelle, 173, 53–71.
Grant, T. & Kluge, A.G. (2007) Ratio of explanatory power (REP): a new measure of group support. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 44, 483–487.
Grant, T. & Kluge, A.G. (2008) Clade support measures and their adequacy. Cladistics, 24, 1051–1064.
Haack, S. & Kolenda, K. (1977) Two fallibilists in search of the truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement, 51, 63–104.
Haber, M.H. (2005) On probability and systematics: possibility, probability, and phylogenetic inference. Systematic Biology, 54, 831–841.
Haber, M. (2011). Phylogenetic inference. In: Tucker, A. (Ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, pp. 231–242.
Hacking, I. (2001) An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. Cambridge University Press, New York, 302 pp.
Halanych, K.M. (2004) The new view of animal phylogeny. Annual Review of Ecology and Evolutionary Systematics, 35, 229–256.
Hanson, N.R. (1958) Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge University Press, New York, 241 pp.
Hausman, D.M. (1998) Causal Asymmetries. Cambridge University Press, New York, 300 pp.
Helfenbein, G.K. & DeSalle, R. (2005) Falsifications and corroborations: Karl Popper’s influence on systematics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 35, 271–280.
Hempel, C.G. (1962) Deductive nomological vs. statistical explanation. In: Feigl, H. & Maxwell, G. (Eds), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume. 3. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 98–169.
Hempel, C.G. (1965) Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. The Free Press, New York, 505 pp.
Hempel, C.G. (1966) Recent problems of induction. In: Colodny, R.G. (Ed.), Mind and Cosmos. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 112–134.
Hempel, C.G. (2001) The Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel: Studies in Science, Explanation, and Rationality. In: Fetzer, J.H. (Ed.). Oxford University Press, New York, 423 pp.
Hennig, W. (1966) Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 263 pp.
Holmes, S. (2003) Bootstrapping phylogenetic trees: theory and methods. Statistical Science, 18, 241–255.
Hovenkamp, P. (2012) Syncretism and corroboration. Cladistics, 28, 115–116.
Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Crandall, K.A. (1997) Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 437–466.
Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. (2001) MrBayes: bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics, 17, 754–755.
Huelsenbeck, J.P., Ronquist, F., Nielsen, R. & Bollback, J.P. (2001) Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science, 294, 2310–2314.
Jenner, R.A. (2003) Unleashing the force of cladistics? Metazoan phylogenetics and hypothesis testing. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 43, 207–218.
Josephson, J.R. & Josephson, S.G. (Eds) (1994) Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy, Technology. Cambridge University Press, New York, 306 pp.
Kluge, A.G. (1989) A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology, 38, 7–25.
Kluge, A.G. (1997a) Sophisticated falsification and research cycles: consequences for differential character weighting in phylogenetic systematics. Zoologica Scripta, 26, 349–360.
Kluge, A.G. (1997b) Testability and the refutation and corroboration of cladistic hypotheses. Cladistics, 13, 81–96.
Kluge, A.G. (1998) Total evidence or taxonomic congruence: cladistics or consensus classification. Cladistics, 14, 151–158.
Kluge, A.G. (1999) The science of phylogenetic systematics: explanation, prediction, and test. Cladistics, 15, 429–436.
Kluge, A.G. (2001) Philosophical conjectures and their refutation. Systematic Biology, 50, 322–330.
Kluge, A.G. (2004) On total evidence: for the record. Cladistics, 20, 205–207.
Kluge, A.G. & Wolf, A.J. (1993) Cladistics: what=s in a word? Cladistics, 9, 183–199.
Leonelli, S. (2009) Understanding in biology: the impure nature of biological knowledge. In: de Regt, H., Leonelli, S. & Eigner, K. (Eds), Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 189–209.
Lecointre, G. & Deleporte, P. (2005) Total evidence requires exclusion of phylogenetically misleading data. Zoologica Scripta, 34, 101–117.
Lee, M.S.Y. & Camens, A.B. (2009) Strong morphological support for the molecular evolutionary tree of placental mammals. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22, 2243–2257.
Levasseur, C. & Lapointe, F.-J. (2001) War and peace in phylogenetics: a rejoinder to total evidence and consensus. Systematic Biology, 50, 881–891.
Lienau, E.K. & DeSalle, R. (2010) Is the microbial tree of life verificationist? Cladistics, 26, 195–201.
Lipton, P. (2004) Inference to the Best Explanation. Routledge, New York, 219 pp.
Lipton, P. (2005) Testing hypotheses: prediction and prejudice. Science, 307, 219–221.
Longhorn, S.J., Pohl, H.W. & Vogler, A.P. (2010) Ribosomal protein genes of holometabolan insects reject the Halteria, instead revealing a close affinity of Strepsiptera with Coleoptera. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 55, 846–859.
Longino, H.E. (1979) Evidence and hypothesis: an analysis of evidential relations. Philosophy of Science, 46, 35–56.
Magnani, L. (2001) Abduction, Reason, and Science: Processes of Discovery and Explanation. Kluwer Academic, New York, 205 pp.
Maher, P. (1988) Prediction, accommodation, and the logic of discovery. In: PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 273–285.
Mahner, M. & Bunge, M. (1997) Foundations of Biophilosophy. Springer, New York, 423 pp.
Mayo, D.G. (1996) Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 493 pp.
Mayr, E. (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science, 131, 1501–1506.
Mayr, E. (1982) The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 974 pp.
Mayr, E. (1993) Proximate and ultimate causation. Biology & Philosophy, 8, 95–98.
Mayr, E. (1994) Response to John Beatty. Biology & Philosophy, 9, 359–371.
Meredith, R.W., Janecka, J.E., Gatesy, J., Ryder, O.A., Fisher, C.A., Teeling, E.C., Goodbla, A., Eizirik, E., Simão, T.L.L., Stadler, T., Rabosky, D.L., Honeycutt, R.L., Flynn, J.J., Ingram, C.M., Steiner, C., Williams, T.L., Robinson, T.J., Burk-Herrick, A., Westerman, M., Ayoub, N.A., Springer, M.S. & Murphy, W.J. (2011) Impacts of the Cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification. Science, DOI: 10.1126/science.1211028.
Miller, J.A. (2003) Assessing progress in systematics with continuous jackknife function analysis. Systematic Biology, 52, 55–65.
Miyamoto, M.M. & Fitch, W.M. (1995) Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Systematic Biology, 44, 64–76.
Montgelard, C., Douzery, E.J.P. & Michaux, J. (2007) Classification and molecular phylogeny. In: Miller, D.L. (Ed.), Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Cetacea. Science Publishers, Enfield, New Hampshire, pp. 95–125.
Mooi, R.D. & Gill, A.C. (2010) Phylogenies without synapomorphies—a crisis in fish systematics: time to show some character. Zootaxa, 2450, 26–40.
Nickles, T. (1980) Introductory essay: scientific discovery and the future of philosophy of science. In: Nickles, T. (Ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp. 1–59.
Nixon, K.C. & Carpenter, J.M. (1996) On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics, 12, 221–241.
Nogueira, J.M.D.M., Fitzhugh, K. & Rossi, M.C.S. (2010) A new genus and new species of fan worms (Polychaeta: Sabellidae) from Atlantic and Pacific Oceans—the formal treatment of taxon names as explanatory hypotheses. Zootaxa, 2603, 1–52.
Norton, J.D. (2003) A material theory of induction. Philosophy of Science, 70, 647–670.
O’Leary, M.A. & Gatesy, J. (2008) Impact of increased character sampling on the phylogeny of Cetartiodactyla (Mammalia): combined analysis including fossils. Cladistics, 24, 397–442.
Peirce, C.S. (1878) Illustrations of the logic of science. Sixth paper.—Deduction, induction, and hypothesis. Popular Science Monthly, 13, 470–482.
Peirce, C.S. (1901) Reasoning. In: Baldwin, J.M. (Ed.), Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, Including many of the Principal Conceptions of Ethics, Logic, Aesthetics, Philosophy of Religion, Mental Pathology, Anthropology, Biology, Neurology, Physiology, Physical Science, and Education and giving a Terminology in English, French, German, and Italian. Vol. II. The Macmillan Company, New York, pp. 426–428.
Peirce, C.S. (1931) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume 1, Principles of Philosophy. In: Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P. & Burks, A. (Eds). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 393 pp.
Peirce, C.S. (1932) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume 2, Elements of Logic. In: Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P. & Burks, A. (Eds). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 535 pp.
Peirce, C.S. (1933a) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume 3, Exact Logic. In: Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P. & Burks, A. (Eds). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 433 pp.
Peirce, C.S. (1933b) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume 4, The Simplest Mathematics. In: Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P. & Burks, A. (Eds). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 601 pp.
Peirce, C.S. (1934) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume 5, Pragmatism and Pragmaticism. In: Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P. & Burks, A. (Eds). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 455 pp.
Peirce, C.S. (1935) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume 6, Scientific Metaphysics. In: Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P. & Burks, A. (Eds). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 462 pp.
Peirce, C.S. (1958a) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume 7, Science and Philosophy. In: Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P. & Burks, A. (Eds). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 415 pp.
Peirce, C.S. (1958b). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume 8, Correspondence and Bibliography. In: Burks, A. (Ed.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 352 pp.
Philippe, H., Brinkmann, H., Lavrov, D.V., Littlewood, D.T.J., Manuel, M., Wörheide, G. & Baurain, D. (2011) Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: why more sequences are not enough. PLoS Biology, 9, e1000602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000602.
Philippe, H., Derelle, R., Lopez, P., Pick, K., Borchiellini, C., Boury-Esnault, N., Vacelet, J., Renard, E., Houliston, E., Quéinnec, E., Da Silva, C., Wincker, P., Le Guyader, H., Leys, S., Jackson, D.J., Schreiber, F., Erpenbeck, D., Morgenstern, B., Wörheide, G. & Manuel, M. (2009) Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Current Biology, 19, 706–712.
Philippe, H. & Telford, M. (2006) Large-scale sequencing and the new animal phylogeny. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21, 614–620.
Popper, K.R. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books, Inc., New York, 480 pp.
Popper, K.R. (1962) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Basic Books, Publishers, New York, 412 pp.
Popper, K. (1966) The Open Society and Its Enemies. Volume II. The High Tide of Prophecy: Hegel, Marx, and the Aftermath. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 420 pp.
Popper, K.R. (1983) Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford University Press, New York, 395 pp.
Popper, K.R. (1992) Realism and the Aim of Science. Routledge, New York, 420 pp.
Popper, K. (1994) The Poverty of Historicism. Routledge, New York, 166 pp.
Prasad, A.B., Allard, M.W., NISC Comparative Sequencing Program & Green, E.D. (2008) Confirming the phylogeny of mammals by use of large comparative sequence data sets. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 25, 1795–1808.
Psillos, S. (2002) Simply the best: a case for abduction. In: Kakas, A.C. & Sadri, F. (Eds), Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond. Springer, New York, pp. 605–625.
Psillos, S. (2007) Philosophy of Science A–Z. University Press, Edinburgh, 280 pp.
Regier, J.C., Shultz, J.W., Zwick, A., Hussey, A., Ball, B., Wetzer, R., Martin, J.W. & Cunningham, C.W. (2010) Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences. Nature, 463, 1079–1083.
de Regt, H.W. & Dieks, D. (2005) A contextual approach to scientific understanding. Synthese, 144, 137–170.
de Regt, H.W., Leonelli, S. & Eigner, K. (2009) Focusing on scientific understanding. In: de Regt, H., Leonelli, S. & Eigner, K. (Eds), Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 1–17.
Reilly, F.E. (1970) Charles Peirce=s Theory of Scientific Method. Fordham University Press, New York, 200 pp.
Rescher, N. (1970) Scientific Explanation. The Free Press, New York, 242 pp.
Rieppel, O. (1988) Fundamentals of Comparative Biology. Birkhäuser Verlag, Boston, 202 pp.
Rieppel, O. (2003) Semaphoronts, cladograms and the roots of total evidence. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 80, 167–186.
Rindal, E. & Brower, A.V.Z. (2011) Do model-based phylogenetic analyses perform better than parsimony? A test with empirical data. Cladistics, 27, 131‒334.
Ronquist, F., van der Mark, P. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. (2009) Bayesian phylogenetic analysis using MrBayes. In: Lemey, P., Salemi, M. & Vandamme, A.-M. Eds), The Phylogenetic Handbook: A Practical Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis and Hypothesis Testing. Cambridge University Press, pp. 210‒266.
Rota-Stabelli, O., Campbell, L., Brinkmann, H., Edgecombe, G.D., Longhorn, S.J., Peterson, K.J., Pisani, D., Philippe, H. & Telford, M.J. (2011) A congruent solution to arthropod phylogeny: phylogenomics, microRNAs and morphology support monophyletic Mandibulata. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278, 298–306.
Salmon, W.C. (1967) The Foundations of Scientific Inference. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 157 pp.
Salmon, W.C. (1984a) Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 305 pp.
Salmon, W.C. (1984b) Logic. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, 180 pp.
Salmon, W.C. (1989) Four decades of scientific explanation. In: Kitcher, P. & Salmon, W.C. (Eds.), Scientific Explanation. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume XIII. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 3–219.
Salmon, W.C. (1998) Causality and Explanation. Oxford University Press, New York, 434 pp.
Schierwater, B., Eitel, M., Jakob, W., Osigus, H.J., Hadrys, H., Dellaporta, S.L., Kolokotronis, S.-O. & DeSalle, R. (2009) Concatenated analysis sheds light on early metazoan evolution and fuels a modern ‘‘urmetazoon’’ hypothesis. PLoS Biology, 7, e1000020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000020.
Schmidt, H.A. (2009) Testing tree topologies. In: Lemey, P., Salemi, M. & Vandamme, A.-M. Eds), The Phylogenetic Handbook: A Practical Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis and Hypothesis Testing. Cambridge University Press, pp. 381‒404.
Schuh, R.T. (2000) Biological Systematics: Principles and Applications. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 236 pp.
Schuh, R.T. & Brower, A.V.Z. (2009) Biological Systematics: Principles and Applications. Second edition. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 311 pp.
Schurz, G. (2008) Patterns of abduction. Synthese, 164, 201–234.
Siddall, M.E. & Kluge, A.G. (1997) Probabilism and phylogenetic inference. Cladistics, 13, 313–336.
Sober, E. (1975) Simplicity. Oxford University Press, New York, 189 pp.
Sober, E. (1988) Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference. MIT Press, Cambridge, 265 pp.
Sober, E. (2002) Reconstructing the character states of ancestors: a likelihood perspective on cladistic parsimony. Monist, 85, 156–176.
Sober, E. (2008) Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind the Science. Cambridge University Press, New York, 392 pp.
Sober, E. & Steel, M. (2002) Testing the hypothesis of common ancestry. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 218, 395–408.
Soltis, P.S. & Soltis, D.E. (2003) Applying the bootstrap in phylogeny reconstruction. Statistical Science, 18, 256–267.
Spaulding, M., O’Leary, M.A. & Gatesy, J. (2009) Relationships of Cetacea (Artiodactyla) among mammals: increased taxon sampling alters interpretations of key fossils and character evolution. PLoS ONE, 4, e7062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007062.
Springer, M.S., Burk-Herrick, A., Meredith, R., Eizirik, E., Teeling, E., O’Brien, S.J. & Murphy, W.J. (2007) The adequacy of morphology for reconstructing the early history of placental mammals. Systematic Biology, 56, 673–84.
Strahler, A.N. (1992) Understanding Science: An Introduction to Concepts and Issues. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, 409 pp.
Swofford, D.L., Olsen, G.J., Waddell, P.J. & Hillis, D.M. (1996) Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis, D.M., Moritz, C. & Mable, B.K. (Eds), Molecular Systematics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp. 407–514.
Thagard, P. (1988) Computational Philosophy of Science. The MIT Press, Cambridge, 240 pp.
Tinbergen, N. (1963) On aims and methods in ethology. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 20, 410–433.
Tucker, A. (2011) Historical science, over- and underdetermined: A study of Darwin’s inference of origins. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62, 805–829.
Turjak, M. & Trontelj, P. (2012) A method for measuring support for synapomorphy using character state distributions on phylogenetic trees. Cladistics, doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00403.x
Uhen, M.D. (2010) The origin(s) of whales. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 38, 189–219.
Van Fraassen, B.C. (1990) The Scientific Image. Clarendon Press, New York, 235 pp.
Vila, R., Bell, C.D., Macniven, R., Goldman-Huertas, B., Ree, R.H., Marshall, C.R., Bálint, Z., Johnson, K., Benyamini, D. & Pierce, N.E. (2011) Phylogeny and palaeoecology of Polyommatus blue butterflies show Beringia was a climate-regulated gateway to the New World. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2213.
Vogt, L. (2008) The unfalsifiability of cladograms and its consequences. Cladistics, 24, 62–73.
Von Dohlen, C.D., Rowe, C.A. & Heie, O.E. (2006) A test of morphological hypotheses for tribal and subtribal relationships of Aphidinae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae) using DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 38, 316–329.
Wägele, J.-W. (2005) Foundations of Phylogenetic Systematics. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, 365 pp.
Walton, D. (2004) Abductive Reasoning. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, 303 pp.
Wenzel, J.W. (1997) When is a phylogenetic test good enough? In: Grandcolas, P. (Ed.), The Origin of Biodiversity in Insects: Phylogenetic Tests of Evolutionary Scenarios. Mémoires du Muséum National d=Histoire Naturelle, 173, 31–45
Wheeler, Q.D. (2004) Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 359, 571–583.
Wheeler, Q.D. (2010) Do we need to describe, name, and classify all species? In: Williams, D.M. & Knapp, S. (Eds), Beyond Cladistics: The Branching of a Paradigm. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 67–75.
Wiens, J.J. (2009) Paleontology, genomics, and combined-data phylogenetics: can molecular data improve phylogeny estimation for fossil taxa? Systematic Biology, 58, 87–99.
Wiley, E.O. (1975) Karl R. Popper, systematics, and classification: a reply to Walter Bock and other evolutionary taxonomists. Systematic Zoology, 24, 233–243.
Wiley, E.O. (1981) Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 439 pp.
Wiley, E.O. & Lieberman, B.S. (2011) Phylogenetics: Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, 406 pp.
Xiong, Y., Brandley, M.C., Xu, S., Zhou, K. & Yang, G. (2009) Seven new dolphin mitochondrial genomes and a time-calibrated phylogeny of whales. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 9: 20 doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-20.