Abstract
The external, oral and buccopharyngeal morphologies of Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis tadpoles were studied using ste-reoscopic and scanning electron microscopy. Using DNA barcodes, taxonomic identity of the tadpoles was establishedand tadoples of N. sahyadrensis were reared in semi-natural conditions. Development in the species from hatching tometamorph was prolonged and it took about 100 days for the freshly hatched larvae to metamorphose. The tadpoles areexotrophic, torrent dwelling with a large ventral suctorial oral disc, broadly rounded snout, cylindrical body, and a funnelshaped vent tube opening medially. During development external and buccopharyngeal characters show extensive changes. During metamorphosis developmental asynchrony was observed.References
Aggarwal, R.K. (2004) Ancient frog could spearhead conservation efforts. Nature, 428, 467.
Altig, R. & Brodie, E.E. (1972) Laboratory behavior of Ascaphus truei tadpoles. Journal of Herpetology, 6, 21–24.
Altig, R. & Johnston, G.E. (1989) Guilds of anuran larvae: relationships among developmental modes, morphologies and habitats. Herpetological Monograph, 3, 81–109.
Altig, R. & McDiarmid, R.W. (1999) Body plan: development and morphology. In: McDiarmid, R.W. & Altig, R. (Eds.), Tadpoles: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, pp. 24–51.
Annandale, N. (1918) Some undescribed tadpoles from the hills of Southern India. Records of the Indian Museum, 15, 19–23.
Annandale, N. & Hora, S.L. (1922) Parallel evolution in the fish and tadpoles of mountain torrents. Records of the Indian Museum, 24, 505–510.
Annandale, N. & Rao, C.R.N. (1917) Indian tadpoles. Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 13, 185–186.
Biju, S.D. & Bossuyt, F. (2003) New frog family from India reveals an ancient biogeographical link with the Seychelles. Nature, 42, 711–714.
Das, I. (2007) Some forgotten descriptions of Nasikabatrachus (Anura: Sooglossidae). Herpetological Review, 38(3), 291–292.
Dutta, S.K., Vasudevan, K., Chaitra, M.S., Shankar, K. & Aggarwal, R.K. (2004) Jurassic frog and the evolution of amphibian endemism in the Western Ghats. Current Science, 86(1), 211–216.
Gosner, K.L. (1959) Systematic variations in tadpole teeth with notes on food. Herpetologica, 15, 203–210.
Gosner, K.L. (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica, 16, 183–190.
Grosjean, S., Strauß, A., Glos, J., Randrianiaina, R.D., Ohler, A. & Vences, M. (2011) Morphological and ecological uniformity in the funnel-mouthed tadpoles of Malagasy litter frogs, subgenus Chonomantis. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 162, 149 –183.
Grosjean, S., Vences, M. & Dubois, A. (2004) Evolutionary significance of oral morphology in the carnivorous tadpoles of tiger frogs, genus Hoplobatrachus (Ranidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 81, 171–181.
Haas, A. (1997) The larval hyobranchial apparatus of discoglossoid frogs: its structure and bearing on the systematics of the Anura (Amphibia: Anura). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 53, 179–197.
Haas, A. (2003) Phylogeny of frogs as inferred from primarily larval characters (Amphibia: Anura). Cladistics, 19, 23–89.
Hoff, K.S. & Wassersug, R.J. (2000) Tadpole locomotion: Axial movement and tail functions in a largely vertebrae less vertebrate. American Zoologist, 40, 62–76.
Inger, R.F. (1992) Variation of apomorphic characters in stream-dwelling tadpoles of the bufonid genus Ansonia (Amphibia: Anura). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 105, 225–237.
Larson, P.M. (2005) Ontogeny, phylogeny, and morphology in anuran larvae: A morphometric analysis of cranial development and evolution in Rana larvae (Anura: Ranidae). Journal of Morphology, 264, 34–52.
Larson, P.M., & De Sá, R.O. (1998) Chondrocranial morphology of Leptodactylus larvae (Leptodactylidae: Leptodactylinae): Its utility in phylogenetic reconstruction. Journal of Morphology, 238, 287–306.
Larson, P.M., De Sá, R.O. & Arrieta, D. (2003) Chondrocranial, hyobranchial and internal oral morphology in larvae of the basal bufonid genus Melanophryniscus (Amphibia: Anura). Acta Zoologica. 84, 145–154.
Maglia, A.M., Pugener, L.A. & Trueb, L. (2001) Comparative development of anurans: using phylogeny to understand ontogeny. American Zoologist, 41, 538 – 551.
Noble, G.K. (1931) The Biology of the Amphibia. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York. 1–540.
Orton, G.I. (1957) The role of ontogeny in systematics and evolution. Evolution, 9(1), 75–83.
Raj, P., Deepak, V. & Vasudevan, K. (2011) Monitoring of breeding in Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis (Anura: Nasikabatrachidae) in the southern Western Ghats, India. Herpetological Notes, 4, 11–16.
Ramaswami, L.S. (1943) An account of the chondocranium of Rana afghana and Megophrys, with a description of the masticatory musculature of some tadpoles. Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India, 9(1), 43–58.
Ramaswami, L.S. (1944) The chondrocranium of two torrent-dwelling anuran tadpoles. Journal of Morphology, 74(3), 347–374.
Rao, C.R.N. (1938) Tadpoles of a genus not recorded from India. Current Science, 6(9), 455–456.
Richards, S.J. (2002) Influence of flow regime on habitat selection by tadpoles in an Australian rainforest stream. Journal of Zoology, 257, 273–279.
Shanker, K., Ramadevi, J., Choudhury, B.C., Singh, L. & Aggarwal, R.K. (2004) Phylogeography of olive ridley turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea) on the east coast of India: implications for conservation theory. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1899–1909.
Sokol, O.M. (1975) The phylogeny of anuran larvae: a new look. Copeia, 1975, 1–24.
Sokol, O.M. (1977) The free swimming Pipa larvae, with a review of pipid larvae and pipid phylogeny (Anura: Pipidae). Journal of Morphology, 154, 357–426.
Taylor, C.L. & Altig, R. (1995) Oral disc kinematics of four rheophilous anuran tadpoles. Herpetological Natural History, 3, 101–106.
Vences, M., Thomas, M., Bonett, R.M. & Vieites, D.R. (2005a) Deciphering amphibian diversity through DNA barcoding: chances and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 360, 1859–1868.
Vences, M., Thomas, M., van der Meijden, A., Chiari, Y. & Vieites, D.R. (2005b) Comparative performance of the 16S rRNA gene in DNA barcoding of amphibians. Frontiers in Zoology, 2, 5 (1–12).
Vera Candioti, M.F. & Altig, R. (2010) A survey of shape variation in keratinized labial teeth of anuran larvae as related to phylogeny and ecology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 101(3), 609–625.
Wake, D.B. (1991) Homoplasy - the result of natural-selection, or evidence of design limitations. American Naturalist, 138, 543–567.
Wassersug, R.J. (1976) Oral morphology of anuran larvae: Terminology and general description. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, 48, 1–23.
Wassersug, R.J. (1980) Internal oral features of tadpoles from eight anuran families: Functional, systematic, evolutionary and ecological considerations. Miscellaneous publication, Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, 68, 1–146.
Wassersug, R.J. & Heyer, W.R. (1988) A survey of internal oral features of leptodactyloid larvae (Amphibia: Anura). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 457, 1–99.