Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Articles
Published: 2012-10-12
Page range: 75–82
Abstract views: 65
PDF downloaded: 2

Osteological description of Pseudopaludicola canga with implications for the taxonomic position of this taxon

Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Laboratorio de Genética Evolutiva, Departamento de Genética, Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Félix de Azara 1552, Posadas, N3300LQH, Misiones, Argentina
Laboratório de Citogenética, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Pará, Tv. Augusto Correia 1 Belém, 66075-900, Pará, Brazil
Amphibia Pseudopaludicola pusilla group osteology external morphology taxonomy

Abstract

Pseudopaludicola canga was described by Giaretta & Kokubum (2003) based on 74 individuals previously assigned to P.mystacalis by Lobo (1995). In the diagnosis of P. canga, the original authors assigned the presence of terminal T-shapedphalanges as a character state for this taxon. However, the osteology of P. canga is not described and the presence of toetips not expanded laterally is a characteristic share with all members of Pseudopaludicola unassigned to any group. In thiswork is describe for first time the osteology of P. canga, re-examining the external morphology providing a new diagnosisand establishing the taxonomic position of P. canga in the framework of phylogenetic hypothesis proposed by Lobo(1995). Additionally, is compared the toe tip digit IV, between P. falcipes and all the species included in the P. pusilla groupand updated the type locality of P. canga. The osteology reveals that P. canga has the toe tips not T-shaped as mentionedby the original authors and this characteristic has important consequences for the diagnosis of the species. Additionally, the erroneous inclusion of P. canga in the P. pusilla group is confirmed by the phylogenetic analysis.

References

  1. Alberch, P. & Gale, E.A. (1985) A developmental analysis of an evolutionary trend: digital reduction in Amphibians. Evolution, 39, 8–23.

    Cunha, O.R. da, Nascimento, F.P. & Avila-Pires, T.C.S. (1985) Os répteis da área de Carajás, Pará, Brasil (Testudines e Squamata) I. Publicações Avulsas do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, 40, 9–92.

    Carvalho, R.d.T. (2012) A new species of Pseudopaludicola Miranda-Ribeiro (Leiuperinae: Leptodactylidae: Anura) from the Cerrado of southeastern Brazil with a distinctive advertisement call pattern. Zootaxa, 3328, 47–54.

    Duarte T.C., Veiga-Menoncello, A.C.P, Lima, J.R., Strüssmann, C., Del-Grande, M.L., Giaretta, A.A., Pereira, E.G, Rossa-Feres, D.C & Recco-Pimentel, S.M. (2010) Chromosome analysis in Pseudopaludicola (Anura, Leiuperidae), with description of sex chromosomes XX/XY in P. saltica. Hereditas 147, 43–52.

    Duellman, W.E. (1970) The hylid frogs of Middle America. Monographs, Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, 1, 1–753.

    Fabrezi, M. (1992) El carpo de los anuros. Alytes, 10, 1–29.

    Fabrezi, M. (1993) The anuran tarsus. Alytes, 11, 47–63.

    Fabrezi, M. & Alberch, P. (1996) The carpal elements of anurans. Herpetologica, 52, 188–204.

    Frost, D.R. (2011) Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 5.5 (31 January, 2011). Electronic Database accessible at http://research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia/. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. (accessed 22 May 2012)

    Giaretta, A. A. & Kokubum, M.N. d. C.. (2003) A new species of Pseudopaludicola (Anura, Leptodactylidae) from northern Brazil. Zootaxa 383, 1–8.

    Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S. & Nixon, K. (2008) TNT: Tree Analysis Using New Technology. Program and documentation available at http://www.zmuc.dk/public/phylogeny. (accessed 22 May 2012)

    Jurgens, J.D. (1971) The morphology of the nasal region of Amphibia and its bearing on the phylogeny of the group. Annale Universiteit van Stellenbosch, 46A, 1–146.

    Lobo, F. (1994) Descripción de una nueva especie de Pseudopaludicola (Anura: Leptodactylidae), re descripción de P. falcipes (Hensel, 1867) y P. saltica (Cope, 1887) y osteología de las tres especies. Cuadernos de Herpetología. 8, 177–199.

    Lobo, F. (1995) Análisis filogenético del género Pseudopaludicola (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Cuadernos de Herpetología. 9, 21–43.

    Lobo, F. (1996) Evaluación del status taxonómico de Pseudopaludicola ternetzi Miranda Ribeiro, 1937; P. mystacalis y P. ameghini (Cope, 1887). Osteología y distribución de las especies estudiadas. Acta Zoológica Lilloana. 43, 327–346.

    Lynch, J.D. (1971) Evolutionary relationships, osteology, and zoogeography of leptodactyloid frogs. Miscellaneous Publication, Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, 53, 1–238.

    Lynch, J. (1989) A review of the leptodactylid frogs of the genus Pseudopaludicola in Northern South America. Copeia, 577–588.

    Savage, J.M. & Heyer, W.R. (1967) Variation and distribution in the tree-frog genus Phyllomedusa in Costa Rica, Central America. Beiträge für Neotropischen Fauna Band, 5, 111–131.

    Taylor, W.R. & Van Dyke, G.C. (1985) Revised procedures for staining and clearing small fishes and other vertebrates for bone and cartilage study. Cybium, IX(2), 107–119.

    Toledo, F. (2010) Description of a new species of Pseudopaludicola Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926 from the state of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil (Anura, Leiuperidae). Zootaxa. 2681, 47–56.

    Toledo, L.F., Siqueira, S., Duarte, T.C., Veiga-Menoncello, A.C.P., Recco-Pimentel, S.M. & Haddad, C.F.B. (2010) Description of a new species of Pseudopaludicola Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926 from the state of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil (Anura, Leiuperidae). Zootaxa. 2496, 38–48.

    Trewavas, E. (1933) The hyoid and larynx of Anura. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Series B), 222, 401–527.

    Trueb, L. (1973) Bones, frogs and evolution. In J. L. Vial (Ed) Evolutionary biology of the Anurans: contemporary research on major problems. Columbia: University of Missouri Press. pp. 65–132.