Abstract
A clone culture of Epidinium caudatum was observed to contain cells with different numbers of caudal spines, suggesting that caudal spination may not be a valid criteria for classification into separate species. Thus, five clone cultures, with either 1, 3 or 5 caudal spines, were established from a culture which was originally started with a single cell of E. caudatum. After sufficient growth, each culture was divided into two separate cultures and then transferred and sampled for counting after incubation periods of 3, 4, and 3 days, respectively. The two clone cultures started with either one or three spines gave rise to populations with cells having from 0–5 spines, with the highest percentages having 3 or 5 spines. In contrast, caudal spination remained the same in the three clone cultures of 5-spined cells. In some cells, bifurcate spine forms were observed. All cultures were grown under similar conditions in the absence of predatory species, suggesting that although probably not as metabolically efficient as propagation of forms with a lower number of spines (0–2), the 5-spined form is apparently quite stable.References
Clarke, R.T.J. (1963) The cultivation of some oligotrich protozoa. Journal of General Microbiology, 33, 401–408.
Coleman, G.S. & White, R.W. (1970) Re-establishment of Entodinium caudatum, cultured in vitro, in the rumen of a defaunated sheep. Journal of General Microbiology, 62, 265–266.
Coleman, G.S. Laurie, J.I. & Bailey, J.E. (1977) The cultivation of the rumen ciliate Entodinium bursa in the presence of Entodinium caudatum. Journal of General Microbiology, 101, 253–258.
Coleman, G.S., Davies, J.I., & Cash, M.A. (1972) The cultivation of the rumen ciliates Epidinium ecaudatum caudatum and Polyplastron multivesiculatum in vitro. Journal of General Microbiology, 73, 509–521.
Dehority, B.A. (1998) Generation times of Epidinium caudatum and Entodinium caudatum, determined in vitro by transferring at various time intervals. Journal of Animal Science, 76, 1189–1196.
Dehority, B.A. (2005) Effect of pH on viability of Entodinium caudatum, Entodinium exiguum, Epidinium caudatum, and Ophryoscolex purkynjei in vitro. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 52, 339–342.
Göçmen, B. (1999) Epidinium Crawley, 1923 (Protozoa, Ciliophora: Entodiniomorphida) cinsi hakkinda morfolojik ve taksonomik araştirmalar. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 23, 429–463.
Hungate, R.E. (1942) The culture of Eudiplodinium neglectum, with experiments on the digestion of cellulose. Biological Bulletin, 83, 303–319.
Hungate, R.E. (1943) Further experiments on cellulose digestion by the protozoa in the rumen of cattle. Biological Bulletin, 84, 157–163.
Imai, S., Abe, M, & Ogimoto, K. (1981) Ciliate protozoa from the rumen of the Japanese serow, Capricornis crispus (Temminck). The Japanese Journal of Veterinary Science, 43, 359–367.
Lubinsky, G. (1957) Studies on the evolution of the ophryoscolecidae (ciliate:oligotricha) I. A new species of entodinium with “caudatum,” “lobosospinosum,” and “dubardi” forms, and some evolutionary trends in the genus Entodinium. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 35, 111–133.
Mah, R.A. (1964) Factors influencing the in vitro culture of the rumen ciliate Ophryoscolex purkynei Stein. Journal of Protozoology, 11, 546–552.
Poljansky, G. & Strelkow, A. (1934) Beobachtungen über die Variabilität einiger Ophryoscolecidae (Infusoria Entodiniomorpha) in Klonen. Zoogischer Anzeiger, 107, 215–220.
Poljansky, G. & Strelkow, A. (1938) Etude experimentale sur la variabilité de quelque Ophryoscolecidés. Archives de Zoologie Experimentale et Generale, 80, 1–123.
Sharp, R.G. (1914) Diplodinium ecaudatum with an account of its neuromotor apparatus. University of California publications in Zoology, 13, 43–122.