Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Correspondence
Published: 2019-09-25
Page range: 393–396
Abstract views: 95
PDF downloaded: 3

The tadpole of Scinax camposseabrai (Bokermann) (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae)

Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Evolução, Museu de Zoologia, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana – UEFS, Av. Transnordestina, 44036-900 Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brasil
Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Departamento de Ciências Naturais. Estrada do Bem Querer Km4, 45083-900 Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brasil
Museu de Zoologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua Barão de Jeremoabo, Campus Universitário de Ondina, 40170–115 Salvador, Bahia, Brasil
Laboratório de Anfíbios e Répteis-LAR, Departamento de Botânica e Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Av. Salgado Filho S/N, Lagoa Nova, 59072–970 Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Evolução, Museu de Zoologia, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana – UEFS, Av. Transnordestina, 44036-900 Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brasil
Amphibia Anura Hylidae

Abstract

The treefrog Scinax camposseabrai (Bokermann) is endemic to the Brazilian semiarid region and known from the municipalities of Maracás, Igaporã and Curaçá, in the state of Bahia, and from the municipality of Matias Cardoso, northern Minas Gerais state, Brazil (Frost 2019). It was removed from the synonymy of Scinax x-signatus (Spix), recognized as a valid species, and placed in the S. ruber clade (sensu Faivovich et al. 2005) by Caramaschi & Cardoso (2006). Taxonomic changes proposed by Duellman et al. (2016) for the genus Scinax were discussed by Lourenço et al. (2016) and Faivovich et al. (2018), and we follow here their suggestion to consider Ololygon and Julianus (erected for the S. uruguayus group) as synonyms of Scinax. This large genus Scinax currently would include 123 species (Frost 2019), many of which have had their larval morphology formerly described. Here, we describe the external morphology of the previously unknown tadpoles of S. camposseabrai.

 

References

  1. Alcalde, L., Vera Candioti, F., Kolenc, F., Borteiro, C. & Baldo, D. (2011) Cranial anatomy of tadpoles of five species of Scinax (Hylidae, Hylinae). Zootaxa, 2787, 19–36.

    Altig, R. (1970) A key to the tadpoles of the continental United States and Canada. Herpetologica, 26, 180–207.

    Altig, R. & McDiarmid, R.W. (1999) Body Plan Development and Morphology. In: McDiarmid, R.W. & Altig, R. (Eds.), Tadpoles, The Biology of Anuran Larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 24–51.

    Bokermann, W.C.A. & Sazima, I. (1973) Anfíbios da Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brasil 2: Duas espécies novas de Hyla (Anura, Hylidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 33, 521–528.

    Caramaschi, U. & Cardoso, M.C.S. (2006) Taxonomic status of Hyla camposseabrai Bokermann, 1968 (Anura: Hylidae). Journal of Herpetology, 40, 552–555.

    https://doi.org/10.1670/0022-1511(2006)40[549:TSOHCB]2.0.CO;2

    Duellman, W.E., Marion, A.B. & Hedges, S.B. (2016) Phylogenetics, classification, and biogeography of the treefrogs (Amphibia: Anura: Arboranae). Zootaxa, 4104 (1), 1–109.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4104.1.1

    Faivovich, J. (2002) A cladistic analysis of Scinax (Anura: Hylidae). Cladistics, 18, 367–393.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2002.tb00157.x

    Faivovich, J., Haddad, C.F.B., Garcia, P.C.A., Frost, D.R., Campbell, J.A. & Wheeler, W.C. (2005) Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to Hylinae: phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 294, 1–240.

    https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090(2005)294[0001:SROTFF]2.0.CO;2

    Faivovich, J., Pereyra, M.O., Luna, M.C., Hertz, A., Blotto, B.L., Vásquez-Almazán, C.R., et. al. (2018) On the monophyly and relationships of several genera of Hylini (Anura: Hylidae: Hylinae), with comments on recent taxonomic changes in Hylids. South American Journal of Herpetology, 13, 1–32.

    https://doi.org/10.2994/SAJH-D-17-00115.1

    Frost, D.R. (2019) Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Electronic Database. Available from: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html (accessed 29 May 2019)

    Gosner, K.L. (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryo and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica, 16, 183−190.

    Kolenc, F., Borteiro, C. & Tedros, M. (2003) La larva de Hyla uruguaya Schmidt, 1944 (Anura: Hylidae), con comentarios sobre su biología en Uruguay y su status taxonómico. Cuadernos de Herpetología, 17, 87−100.

    Lourenço, A.C.C., Zina, J., Catroli, G.F., Kasahara, S., Faivovich, J. & Haddad, C.F.B. (2016) A new species of the Scinax catharinae group (Anura: Hylidae) from southeastern Brazil. Zootaxa, 4154 (4), 415–435.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4154.4.3

    Mercês, E.A. & Juncá, F.A. (2010) Girinos de três espécies de Aplastodiscus Lutz, 1950 (Anura - Hylidae) ocorrentes no estado da Bahia, Brasil. Biota Neotropica, 10, 167−172.

    https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032010000400022