Abstract
Many genus-level changes to the classification of Trochilini were enacted in Stiles et al. (2017b). We have since found that two further genera therein emended each require replacement names. The first of these requiring a replacement name is Uranomitra Reichenbach, 1854 [March], which is herewith interpreted as an additional synonym of Saucerottia Bonaparte, 1850, along with its junior synonym Cyanomyia Bonaparte, 1854a [May]. We show that both must have the same type species, as originally designated, Trochilus quadricolor Vieillot, 1822 = Ornismya cyanocephala Lesson, 1829. The second case in which a replacement name is required is Leucolia Mulsant & E. Verreaux, 1866, herewith interpreted as an additional synonym of Leucippus Bonaparte, 1850, with the same type species, Trochilus fallax Bourcier, 1843. We herein propose replacement names for both Uranomitra and Leucolia.
References
Allen, J.A. (1908) A list of the genera and subgenera of North American birds, with their types, according to Article 30 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 24 (1), 1‒50.
Boié, F. (1831) Über Species und einige ornithologische Familien und Sippen. Isis von Oken, 24 (5), cols. 538–548.
Bonaparte, C.L.J.L. (1850) Notes sur les Trochilidés. Comptes rendu hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris, 30 (13), 379‒383.
Bonaparte, C.L. (1854a) Tableau des oiseaux-mouches. Revue et Magasin de Zoologie pure et appliquée, Series 2, 6, 248–257.
Bonaparte, C.L. (1854b) Conspectus Systematis Ornithologiæ. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie, Series 4, 1, 105‒152.
Bourcier, C.M.J. (1843) Oiseaux-mouches nouveaux. Revue Zoologique, 6, 99‒104.
Bourcier, C.M.J. & Mulsant, M.E. (1846) Description de vingt espèces nouvelles d’oiseaux-mouches. Annales des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles, d’Agriculture et d’Industrie, Lyon, 9 (2), 312‒332.
Brisson, M.J. (1760) Ornithologie, ou méthode contenant la division des oiseaux en Ordres, Sections, Genres, Especes & leurs Variétés. Tome 1. Cl. Jean-Baptiste Bauche, Paris, xxiv + 526 + lxxiii pp., 37 pls.
Browning, M.J. & Monroe Jr., B.L. (1991) Clarifications and corrections of the dates of issue of some publications containing descriptions of North American birds. Archives of Natural History, 18 (3), 381‒405.
https://doi.org/10.3366/anh.1991.18.3.381
Bruce, M.D. (2021) The Genera of Birds (1844‒1849) by George Robert Gray: a review of its part publication, dates, new names, suppressed content and other details. Zoological Bibliography, 7 (1). [in press]
Buffon, G.-L.L.C. de (1783) Histoire Naturelle des Oiseaux. Tome 7. L’Imprimerie Royale, Paris, xii + 435 pp.
Cabanis, J. (1863) Lichtenstein’s Preis-Verzeichniss mexicanischer Vögel etc. Journal für Ornithologie, 11, 54‒60.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02005194
Cabanis, J. & Heine, F. (1860) Museum Heineanum. Verzeichniss der ornithologischen Sammlung des Oberamtmann Ferdinand Heine auf Gut St. Burchard vor Halberstadt. Mit kritischen Anmerkungen und Beschreibung der neuen Arten, systematisch bearbeitet. Theil III. Die Schrillvögel, und die Zusammenstellung der Gattungen und Arten des 1‒3 Theils enthaltend. R. Frantz, Halberstadt, 221 pp.
Coues, E. (1880) Third instalment of American ornithological bibliography. Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories, 5 (4), 521‒1066.
Deppe, W. (1830) Preis-Verzeichniss der Säugethiere, Vögel, Amphibien, Fische und Krebse, welche von den Herren Deppe und Schiede in Mexico gesammelt worden, und bei dem unterzeichneten Bevollmächtigten in Berlin gegen baare Zahlung in Preuss. Courant zu erhalten sind, Berlin, 3 pp.[1]
Elliot, D.G. (1871) Descriptions of two new species of humming-birds belonging to the genera Eupherusa and Cyanomyia. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 4, 8 (46), 266‒267.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222937108696482
Elliot, D.G. (1879) Classification and synopsis of the Trochilidae. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 317, 1‒277.
Gould, J. (1854) Descriptions of five new species of humming birds. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 21, 61‒62. [1853]
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1853.tb07183.x
Gould, J. (1859) Descriptions of four new species of humming-birds from Mexico. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 3, 4 (20), 96‒98.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222935908697093
Gould, J. (1860) Descriptions of twenty-two new species of humming-birds. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 28, 304‒312.
Gray, G.R. (1848) s.n. In: The Genera of Birds: Comprising their Generic Characters, a Notice of the Habits of each Genus and an Extensive List of Species Referred to their Several Genera. Longman, Brown, Green & Longman, London, Part 46, pp. [103]‒[116], [195]‒[200], [480]‒[483], pls. XXXV‒XXXVII + LIII + CXXa + 35 + 53 + 120* + 120(2).
Gray, G.R. (1855) Catalogue of the Genera and Subgenera of Birds contained in the British Museum. Trustees of The British Museum, London, iv + 192 pp.
Gray, G.R. (1869) Hand-list of Genera and Species of Birds, Distinguishing those contained in The British Museum. Part 1. Accipitres, Fissirostres, Tenuirostres, and Dentirostres. Trustees of The British Museum, London, xx + 404 pp.
Gray, G.R. (1871) From the Prefaces to the ‘List of the Genera of Birds,’ with some Additional Remarks. Author, London, 10 pp.
Heine, F. (1863) Trochilidica. Journal für Ornithologie, 11, 172‒217.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02004901
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 4th Edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature. London, xxx + 306 pp.
Lesson, R.P. (1829 [1829‒1830]) Histoire Naturelle des Oiseaux-Mouches, ouvrage orné de planches dessinées et gravées par les meilleurs artistes, et dedié A.S.A.R. Mademoiselle. Arthus Bertrand, Paris, xlviii + 223 pp., pls. 1‒85, 48bis.
https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.111210
Linnaeus, C. (1735) Systema Naturae sive Regna Tri Naturae, Systematice Proposita per Classes, Ordines, Genera & Species. Theodorum Haak, Lugduni Batavorum, 14 pp.[2]
https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.877
Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. Tomo 1. 10th Edition, Reformata. Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae, 824 pp.
https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542
Mauersberger, G. (1988) Über Lichtensteinsche Vogelnamen und ihre Typen. Notizen über Typen der Vogelsammlung des Zoologischen Museums Berlin IV. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin, 64, Supplementheft, Annalen für Ornithologie, 12, 129‒148.
Molina, J.I. (1782) Saggio sulla Storia Naturale del Chili. S. Tommaso d’Aquino, Bologna, 367 pp., foldout map.
https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.62689
Mulsant, M.E., Verreaux, J. & Verreaux, E. (1866) Essai d’une classification des Trochilidés ou oiseaux-mouches. Mémoires de la Société Impériale des Sciences Naturelles de Cherbourg, Series 2, 7, 140–252.
https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.50222
Philippi, R.A. (1867) Comentario crítico sobre los animales descritos por Molina. Anales de la Universidad de Chile, 29, 775‒802.
Phillips, A.R. (1966) Notas sistemáticas sobre aves mexicanas, III. Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural, 25, 217‒242. [1964]
Reichenbach, H.G.L. (1854) Aufzählung der Colibris oder Trochilideen in ihrer wahren natürlichen Verwandtschaft, nebst Schlüssel ihrer Synonymik. Journal für Ornithologie, 1 [1853], Extraheft, 1‒24.
Reichenbach, H.G.L. (1855) Trochilinarum enumeratio ex affinitate naturali reciproca primum ducta provisoria. 2nd Edition [of the 1854 paper]. Hofmeister, Lipsiae, 12 pp.
https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.50085
Salvin, O. (1892) Catalogue of the Picariæ in the Collection of the British Museum: Upupæ and Trochili. In: Catalogue of the Birds in the British Museum. Vol. 16. Trustees of the British Museum, London, xvi + 703 pp., 14 pls.
Stiles, F.G., Piacentini, V. de Q. & Remsen Jr., J.V. (2017a) A brief history of the generic classification of the Trochilini (Aves: Trochilidae): the chaos of the past and problems to be resolved. Zootaxa, 4269 (3), 396‒412.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4269.3.4
Stiles, F.G. & Remsen Jr., J.V. (2019) The generic nomenclature of the Trochilini: a correction. Zootaxa, 4691 (2), 195‒196.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4691.2.10
Stiles, F.G., Remsen Jr., J.V. & McGuire, J.A. (2017b) The generic classification of the Trochilini (Aves: Trochilidae): Reconciling taxonomy with phylogeny. Zootaxa, 4353 (3), 401–424.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4353.3.1
Stresemann, E. (1954) Ferdinand Deppe’s travels in Mexico, 1824‒1829. Condor, 56, 86‒92.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1364664
van Rossem, A.J. (1934) Notes on some types of North American birds. Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 7 (30), 347‒362, pl. 27.
Vieillot, L.J.P. (1817) Colibri, Trochilus, Lath. In: Nouveau Dictionnaire d’Histoire Naturelle appliqueé aux Arts, Tome 7. Deterville, Paris, 340‒376, pls. B38 + B 19.
Vieillot, L.J.P. (1818) Oiseau-Mouche. In: Nouveau Dictionnaire d’Histoire Naturelle appliqueé aux Arts. Tome 23. Deterville, Paris, pp. 426‒431, pl. G36, figs. 3‒4.
Vieillot, L.J.P. (1822) Tableau Encyclopédique et Méthodique des Trois Règnes de la Nature. Livraison 91. Agasse, Paris, pp. 529‒848.
[1] Cabanis (1863) reproduced the text in a ‘facsimile’ style of this very rare sales catalogue, which became the main source for its content. Stresemann (1954) supported Cabanis’s view that new names should be credited to Wilhelm Deppe, the brother of the collector, Ferdinand Deppe, instead of Hinrich Lichtenstein, the curator at the Zoological Museum in Berlin. Mauersberger (1988) argued that authorship of the new names should be Lichtenstein, in Deppe, 1830, but although the new names were all credited to Lichtenstein, the only indication of authorship of the catalogue is apparently that of Wilhelm Deppe (Browning & Monroe 1991). Mauersberger (1988; see also Stresemann, in van Rossem 1934: 351) also noted that the only known copy, used by Cabanis, was subsequently lost. Fortunately, the copy was found in the Berlin Museum archives later, after Mauersberger’s death (Norbert Bahr, in litt., December 2020).
[2] Originally published as a single large sheet, but in its bound form, comprising a title page plus 13 pages, mostly of tabulated details, of the three proposed kingdoms (Lapideum, Vegetabile, Animale).