Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 5168 No. 3: 22 Jul. 2022
Type: Article
Published: 2022-07-22
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5168.3.1
Page range: 251-284
Abstract views: 553
PDF downloaded: 34

The hole is deeper: description of two new species within the Parastacus brasiliensis (von Martens, 1869) species complex with an integrative taxonomy approach

Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Animal, Departamento de Zoologia (Laboratório de Carcinologia), Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Animal, Departamento de Zoologia (Laboratório de Carcinologia), Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Animal, Departamento de Zoologia (Laboratório de Carcinologia), Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto (FFCLRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
Conservation freshwater crayfish cryptic species molecular analysis Rio Grande do Sul Crustacea

Abstract

In this contribution, we describe two new species of burrowing crayfish species complex Parastacus brasiliensis from forestry areas in the central region of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil. We used an integrative taxonomy approach with morphology and the mitochondrial DNA 16S rRNA gene and also evaluated their conservation status according to the IUCN Red List Criteria. Parastacus guapo sp. nov. was collected near the municipality of Pantano Grande and it differs from all other congeneric species in having an epistome anterolateral section with a large conical projection ending in a big sharp spine on both sides. It also differs from P. brasiliensis sensu stricto in the shape of the rostral surface, sub-orbital angle, postorbital carina straight, sub-orbital angle > 90°, postorbital carinae prominent in anterior and middle portions, carpal spine present, the internal surface of chelipeds palm with sparse tubercules, areola narrow and pleon short. Parastacus gomesae sp. nov. was collected in the municipality of São Jerônimo, it differs from all analysed species for rostral spine absent, epistome anteromedian lobe heptagonal and mandible incisive process with seven teeth (the second tooth from the anterior margin is the largest). It is also distinguished of P. brasiliensis sensu stricto in the sub-orbital angle > 90°, postorbital carinae prominent in anterior and middle portions, 3–4 rows of verrucose tubercles irregularly distributed on the palm dorsal surface of chelipeds, areola narrow and pleon short. Phylogenetic relationships confirmed the distinct position of these new species to the already described species. The extent of occurrence (EOO) / area of occurrence (AOO) of P. guapo sp. nov and P. gomesae sp. nov. were estimated at 937 km² / 1,87 km², and 2.107 km² / 23,9 km² respectively. The main threats identified were continued decline in the quality of habitats, resulting from deforestation and forestry areas. However, as we know only one point of occurrence for each new species, we suggest that both be categorized as Data Deficient.

References

  1. Abell, R. (2002) Conservation biology for the biodiversity crisis: a freshwater follow-up. Conservation Biology, 16 (5), 1435–1437.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01532.x

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01532.x

  2. AGEITEC—Agência Embrapa de Informação e Tecnologia (2021a) EMBRAPA, Brasília, DF, Brazil. Argissolos Vermelhos. Available from: https://www.agencia.cnptia.embrapa.br/gestor/solos_tropicais/arvore/CONT000gmziudsg02wx5ok0liq1mqdz33gbr.html (accessed 17 August 2021)

  3. AGEITEC—Agência Embrapa de Informação e Tecnologia (2021b) EMBRAPA, Brasília, DF, Brazil. Neossolos Flúvicos. Available from: https://www.agencia.cnptia.embrapa.br/gestor/solos_tropicais/arvore/CONT000gn230xho02wx5ok0liq1mqfveqah8.html (accessed 17 August 2021)

  4. Almerão, M.P., Rudolph, E., Souty-Grosset, C., Crandall, K.A., Buckup, L., Amouret, J., Verdi, A., Santos, S. & Araujo, P.B. (2014) The native South American crayfishes (Crustacea, Parastacidae): state of knowledge and conservation status. Aquatic Conservation, 25 (2), 288–301.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2488

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2488

  5. Amador, L., Victoriano, P.F. & D’Elía, G. (2021) Molecular species delimitation reveals hidden specific diversity within a freshwater burrowing crayfish (Decapoda: Parastacidae) from southern Chile. Systematics and Biodiversity, 19 (3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2020.1865471

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2020.1865471

  6. Amaral, C.R.L., Brito, P.M., Silva, D.A. & Carvalho, E.F. (2013) A New Cryptic Species of South American Freshwater Pufferfish of the Genus Colomesus (Tetraodontidae), Based on Both Morphology and DNA Data. PLoS ONE, 8 (9), e74397. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074397

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074397

  7. ANA—Agência Nacional de Águas, Brasil (2007) Manual de construção de base hidrográfica ottocodificada: fase 1 - construção da base topológica de hidrografia e ottobacias conforme a codificação de bacias hidrográficas de Otto Pfafstetter: versão 2.0 de 1/11/2007. Agência Nacional de Águas, Superintendência de Gestão da Informação, Brasília, Brasília, 141 pp.

  8. Bartholomei-Santos, M.L., Roratto, P.A. & Santos, S. (2011) High genetic differentiation of Aegla longirostri (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura) populations in southern Brazil revealed by multi-loci microsatellite analysis. Genetics and Molecular Research, 10 (4), 4133–4146. https://doi.org/10.4238/2011.November.22.4

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4238/2011.November.22.4

  9. Bickford, D., Lohman, D.J., Sodhi, N.S., Ng, P.K.L., Meier, R., Winker, K., Ingram, K.K. & Das, I. (2007) Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22 (3), 148–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.004

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.004

  10. Bond-Buckup, G. & Buckup, L. (1994) A família Aeglidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura). Arquivos de Zoologia, 32 (4), 159–346.  https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-7793.v32i4p159-346

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-7793.v32i4p159-346

  11. Boos, H., Salge, P.G. & Pinheiro, M.A.A. (2019) Conservation status and threats of Aeglidae: beyond the assessment. In: Santos, S. & Bueno, S.L.S. (Eds.) & Wehrtmann, I.S. (Series Ed.), Aeglidae: life history and conservation status of unique freshwater anomuran decapods. Advances in Crustacean Research. Vol. 21. CRC—Taylor & Francis Group, New York, New York, pp. 233–255.  https://doi.org/10.1201/b22343-9 ISBN: 9781315100937

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b22343-9

  12. Bouckaert, R., Heled, J., Kühnert, D., Vaughan, T., Wu, C-H., Xie, D., Suchard, MA., Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A.J. (2014) BEAST 2: A Software Platform for Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis. PLoS Computational Biology, 10 (4), e1003537. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537

  13. Buckup, L. (2010a) Parastacus nicoleti. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2010, e.T153697A4533324.  https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-3.RLTS.T153697A4533324.en

  14. Buckup, L. (2010b) Parastacus pugnax. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2010, e.T153709A4535070.  https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-3.RLTS.T153709A4535070.en

  15. Buckup, L. & Rossi, A. (1980) O Gênero Parastacus no Brasil (Crustacea, Decapoda, Parastacidade). Revista Brasieira de Biologia, 40 (4), 663–681.

  16. Bueno, S.L.S., Santos, S., Sérgio, S.R., Gomes, K.M., Mossolin, E.C. & Mantelatto, F.L. (2016) AVALIAÇÃO DOS EGLÍDEOS (DECAPODA: AEGLIDAE). In: Pinheiro, M. & Boos, H. (Eds.), Livro Vermelho dos Crustáceos do Brasil: Avaliação 2010–2014. Sociedade Brasileira de Carcinologia, Porto Alegre, RS, pp 35–63.

  17. Caumo, M., Paim, L.P., Avrella, E.D., Orlandi, C.R., Freitas, E.M. & Fior, C.S. (2020) Diversidade florística em Áreas de Preservação Permanente de um plantio comercial de eucalipto no bioma Pampa, sul do Brasil. Rodriguésia, 71, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860202071141

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860202071141

  18. Clarke, J.D. (2009) Cetyltrimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB) DNA Miniprep for Plant DNA Isolation. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, 2009 (3), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot5177

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot5177

  19. CMPC Brasil (2018) Áreas de Alto Valor de Conservação da CMPC Celulose Riograndense–Resumo Público Atualizado, 2018. Available from: https://cmpcbrasil.com.br/uploads/pdfs/1540901111-1540899088-aavc-2018.pdf (accessed 17 August 2021)

  20. Cook, B.D., Page, T.J. & Hughes, J.M. (2008) Importance of cryptic species for identifying ‘representative’ units of biodiversity for freshwater conservation. Biological Conservation, 141 (11), 2821–2831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.08.018

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.08.018

  21. Crandall, K.A. & De Grave, S. (2017) An updated classification on the freshwater crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae) of the world, with a complete species list. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 37 (5), 615–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcbiol/rux070

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcbiol/rux070

  22. Crandall, K.A. & Fitzpatrick, J.F. (1996) Crayfish Molecular Systematics: Using a Combination of Procedures to Estimate Phylogeny. Systematic Biology, 45 (1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/45.1.1

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/45.1.1

  23. Cumberlidge, N., Ng, P.K.L, Yeo, D.C.J., Magalhães, C., Campos, M.R., Alvarez, F., Naruse, T., Daniels, S.R., Esser, L.J., Attipoe, F.Y.K., Clotilde-Ba, F.L., Darwall, W., McIvor, A., Baillie, J.E.M., Collen, B. & Ram, M. (2009) Freshwater crabs and the biodiversity crisis: importance, threats, status, and conservation challenges. Biological Conservation, 142 (8), 1665–1673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.038

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.038

  24. Cumberlidge, N., Rasamy, R.J., Ranaivoson, C.H., Randrianasolo, H.H., Sayer, C., Máiz-Tomé, L., Van Damme, D. & Darwall, W.R.T. (2017) Updated extinction risk assessments of Madagascar’s freshwater decapod crustaceans reveal fewer threatened species but more Data Deficient species. Malagasy Nature, 12, 32–41.

  25. Darriba, D., Taboada, G.L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods, 9, 772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109

  26. Dawkins, K.L., Furse, J.M., Wild, C.H. & Hughes, J.M. (2017) A novel genus and cryptic species harboured within the monotypic freshwater crayfish genus Tenuibranchiurus Riek, 1951 (Decapoda: Parastacidae). PeerJ, 5, e3310. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3310

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3310

  27. Drummond, A.J., Nicholls, G., Rodrigo, A.G. & Solomon, W. (2002) Estimating Mutation Parameters, Population History and Genealogy Simultaneously From Temporally Spaced Sequence Data. Genetics, 161 (3), 1307–1320. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/161.3.1307

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/161.3.1307

  28. Drummond, A.J., Suchard, M.A., Xie, D. & Rambaut, A. (2012) Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29 (8), 1969–1973. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss075

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss075

  29. Edgar, R.C. (2004a) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research, 32 (5), 1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340

  30. Edgar, R.C. (2004b) MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics, 5 (1), 113.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-5-113

  31. Efron, B. (1979) Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. The Annals of Statistics, 7 (1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344552

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344552

  32. Faxon, W. (1898) Observations on the Astacidae in the United States National Museum and in the Museum of Comparative Zoology, with descriptions of new species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 20 (1136), 642–694.  https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.20-1136.643

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.20-1136.643

  33. FigTree (2021) FigTree. Version 1.4.4. Molecular evolution, phylogenetics and epidemiology. Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed 17 August 2021)

  34. Filipová, L., Holdich, D.M., Lesobre, J., Grandjean, F. & Petrusek, A. (2010) Cryptic diversity within the invasive virile crayfish Orconectes virilis (Hagen, 1870) species complex: new lineages recorded in both native and introduced ranges. Biological Invasions, 12, 983–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9526-0

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9526-0

  35. Fišer, C., Robinson, C.T. & Malard, F. (2018) Cryptic species as a window into the paradigm shift of the species concept. Molecular Ecology, 27 (3), 613–635.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14486

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14486

  36. Fontoura, N.F. & Conter, M.R. (2008) Description of a new subspecies of the crayfish Parastacus brasiliensis (Von Martens, 1869) from São Francisco de Paula, RS, Brazil (Decapoda, Parastacidae). Zootaxa, 1849 (1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1849.1.2

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1849.1.2

  37. Frankham, R., Ballou, J.D. & Briscoe, D.A. (2004) A Primer of Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, 220 pp.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817359

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817359

  38. Gomes, L.C., Pessali, T.C., Sales, N.G., Pompeu, P.S. & Carvalho, D.C. (2015) Integrative taxonomy detects cryptic and overlooked fish species in a neotropical river basin. Genetica, 143 (5), 581–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-015-9856-z

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-015-9856-z

  39. Hobbs, H.H.Jr. (1942) The crayfishes of Florida. Published as Vol. III. No. 2. Biological Science Series of University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, v + 179 pp. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/36.2.258

  40. Hobbs, H.H. Jr. (1991) A new generic assignment for a South American crayfish (Decapoda, Parastacidae) with revised diagnoses of the South American genera and comments on the parastacid mandible. Proceeding of the Biological Society of Washington, 104 (4), 800–811.

  41. Horn, A.C.M., Buckup, L., Noro, C.K. & Barcelos, D.F. (2008) Morfologia externa de Parastacus brasiliensis (Decapoda, Parastacidae). Iheringia Serie Zoologia, 98 (1), 148–155.

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0073-47212008000100019

  42.         https://doi.org/10.1590/S0073-47212008000100019

  43. Horwitz, P.H. & Richardson, A.M.M. (1986) An ecological classification of the burrows of Australian freshwater crayfish. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 37 (2), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9860237

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9860237

  44. Huber, A.F., Ribeiro, F.B. & Araujo, P.B. (2018) New endemic species of freshwater crayfish Parastacus Huxley, 1879 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastacidae) from the Atlantic forest in southern Brazil. Nauplius, 26 , e2018015. https://doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2018015

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2018015

  45. Huber, A.F., Rockhill, E.R., Araujo, P.B. & Ribeiro, F.B. (2020) A new species of burrowing crayfish in genus Parastacus Huxley, 1879 (Decapoda, Parastacidae) from the Sinos River Basin, Southern Brazil. Zoological Studies, 59 (47). https://doi.org/10.6620/ZS.2020.59-47

  46. Huxley, T.H. (1879) On the classification and the distribution of the crayfishes. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 46 (1), 752–788.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1878.tb08020.x

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1878.tb08020.x

  47. IBGE—Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Biomas e Sistema Costeiro-Marinho do Brasil (2004a) Solos 1:5.000.000. Available from: https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias/informacoes-ambientais/pedologia/15829-solos.html?=&t=o-que-e (accessed 17 August 2021)

  48. IBGE—Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Biomas e Sistema Costeiro-Marinho do Brasil (2004b) Vegetação Brasileira 1:5.000.000, Available from: https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias/informacoes-ambientais/vegetacao/10872-vegetacao.html?=&t=o-que-e (accessed 17 August 2021)

  49. IUCN—International Union for Conservation of Nature (2019) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 14. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Committee. Available from: http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf (accessed 7 October 2021)

  50. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35 (6), 1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096

  51. Larson, E.R., Abbott, C.L., Usio, N., Azuma, N., Wood, K.A., Herborg, L.M. & Olden, J.D. (2012) The signal crayfish is not a single species: cryptic diversity and invasions in the Pacific Northwest range of Pacifastacus leniusculus. Freshwater Biology, 57 (9), 1823–1838. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02841.x

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02841.x

  52. Larson, E.R., Castelin, M., Williams, B.W., Olden, J.D. & Abbott, C.L. (2016) Phylogenetic species delimitation for crayfishes of the genus Pacifastacus. PeerJ, 4, e1915. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1915

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1915

  53. Latreille, P.A. (1802) Histoire Naturelle Genrale et Particulière, des Crustacés et des Insectes. Vol. 7. F. Dufart, Paris, 413 pp., pls. 58–66.

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.15764

  54. Mathews, L.M., Adams, L., Anderson, E., Basile, M., Gottardi, E. & Buckholt, M.A. (2008) Genetic and morphological evidence for substantial hidden biodiversity in a freshwater crayfish species complex. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 48 (1), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.02.006

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.02.006

  55. Miller, M.A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 2010, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129

  56. Miller, M.A., Schwartz, T., Pickett, B.E., He, S., Klem, E.B., Scheuermann, R.H., Passarotti, M. & Kaufman, S. (2015) A RESTful API for access to phylogenetic tools via the CIPRES Science Gateway. Evolutionary Bioinformatics, 11, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.4137/EBO.S21501/

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4137/EBO.S21501

  57. Miranda, I., Gomes, K.M., Ribeiro, F.B., Araujo, P.B., Souty-Grosset, C. & Schubart, C.D. (2018) Molecular systematics reveals multiple lineages and cryptic speciation in the freshwater crayfish Parastacus brasiliensis (von Martens, 1869) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastacidae). Invertebrate Systematics, 32 (6), 1265–1281. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS18012

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/IS18012

  58. Mol, J.H. & Ouboter, P.E. (2004) Downstream effects of erosion from small-scale gold mining on the instream habitat and fish community of a small Neotropical rainforest stream. Conservation Biology, 18 (1), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00080.x

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00080.x

  59. Moraes, J.C.B., Terossi, M., Buranelli, R.C., Tavares, M., Mantelatto, F.L., Luiz, S. & Bueno, S.L.S. (2016) Morphological and molecular data reveal the cryptic diversity among populations of Aegla paulensis (Decapoda, Anomura, Aeglidae), with descriptions of four new species and comments on dispersal routes and conservation status. Zootaxa, 4193 (1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4193.1.1

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4193.1.1

  60. Okamiya, H., Sugawara, H., Nagano, M. & Poyarkov, N.A. (2018) An integrative taxonomic analysis reveals a new species of lotic Hynobius salamander from Japan. PeerJ, 6, e5084. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5084

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5084

  61. Pérez-Losada, M., Bond-Buckup, G., Jara, C.G. & Crandall, K.A. (2009) Conservation assessment of Southern South American freshwater ecoregions on the basis of the distribution and genetic diversity of crabs from the genus Aegla. Conservation Biology, 23 (3), 692–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01161.x

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01161.x

  62. Philippi, R.A. (1882) Zoología chilena. Sobre los Astacus. Anales de la Universidad de Chile, 61, 624–628. https://doi.org/10.5354/0717-8883.2012.21621

  63. Poepigg, E. (1835) Reise in Chile, Peru und auf dem Amazonas strome, während der Jahre 1827–1832. Vol. 1. Fleischer und Hinrichs, Leipzig, 466 pp.

  64. ProForest (2008) Good practice guidelines for High Conservation Value assessments: A practical guide for practitioners and auditors. Available from: https://www.proforest.net/pt/recursos/publicacoes/guia-de-boas-praticas-para-as-avaliacoes-de-alto-valor-de-conservacao-um-guia-pratico-para-profissionais-e-auditores-13611/ (accessed 17 August 2021)

  65. QGIS Development Team (2021) QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. Available from: http://qgis.osgeo.org (accessed 17 August 2021)

  66. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., Xie, D., Baele, G. & Suchard, M.A. (2018) Posterior summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology, 67 (5), 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032

  67. Ribeiro, F.B. & Araujo, P.B. (2017) Designation of a neotype for Parastacus nicoleti (Philippi, 1882) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastacidae). Zootaxa, 4338 (2), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4338.2.13

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4338.2.13

  68. Ribeiro, F.B., Buckup, L., Gomes, K.M. & Araujo, P.B. (2016) Two new species of South American freshwater crayfish genus Parastacus Huxley, 1879 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Parastacidae). Zootaxa, 4158 (3), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5158.3.1

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4158.3.1

  69. Ribeiro, F.B., Gomes, K.M., Huber, A.F. & Loureiro, T.G. (2020) Diversity and Conservation Strategies of Freshwater Crayfish in South America: An Update. In: Ribeiro FB (Ed). Crayfish: Evolution, Habitat and Conservation Strategies. Nova Science Publishers, New York, New York, pp. 1–42.

  70. Ribeiro, F.B., Huber, A.F., Schubart, D. & Araujo, P.B. (2017) A new species of Parastacus Huxleys, 1879 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Parastacidae) from a swamp forest in southern Brazil. Nauplius, 25, e2017008.  https://doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2017008

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2017008

  71. Richardson, A.M.M. (2007) Behavioral ecology of semiterrestrial crayfish. In: Duffy JE, Thiel M (eds) Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems—crustaceans as model organisms. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, 520 pp. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179927.003.0015

  72. Richman, N.I., Bohm, M., Adams, S.B., Alvarez, F., Bergey, E.A., Bunn, J.J.S., Burnham, Q., Cordeiro, J., Coughran, J., Crandall, K.A., Dawkins, K.L., DiStefano, J., Doran, N.E., Edsman, L., Eversole, A.G., Füreder, L., Furse, J.M., Gherardi, F., Hamr, P., Holdich, D.M., Horwitz, P., Johnston, K., Jones, C.M., Jones, J.P.G., Jones, R.L., Jones, T.G., Kawai, T., Lawler, S., López-Mejía, M., Miller, R.M., Pedraza-Lara, C., Reynolds, J.D., Richardson, A.M.M., Schultz, M.B., Schuster, G.A., Sibley, P.J., Souty-Grosset, C., Taylor, A., Thoma, R.F., Walls, J., Walsh, T.S. & Collen, B. (2015) Multiple drivers of decline in the global status of freshwater crayfish (Decapoda: Astacidea). Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B, 370 (1662), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0060

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0060

  73. Rogers, D.C., Magalhães, C., Peralta, M., Ribeiro, F.B., Bond-Buckup, G., Price, W.W., Guerrero-Kommritz, J., Mantelatto, F.L., Bueno, A., Camacho, A.I., González, E.R., Jara, C.G., Pedraza, M., Pedraza-Lara, C., Latorre, E.R. & Santos, S. (2020) Chapter 23—Phylum Arthropoda: Crustacea: Malacostraca. In: Rogers, D., Christopher; Damborenea, C. & Thorp, J. (Org.), Thorp and Covich’s Freshwater Invertebrates. Vol. 5. 4th Edition. Academic Press, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 809–986. [ISBN 9780128042250] https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804225-0.00023-X.

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804225-0.00023-X

  74. Rudolph, E.H. (1997) Intersexualidad en el camarón excavador Parastacus pugnax (Poeppig, 1835) (Decapoda, Parastacidae). Investigaciones marinas, 25, 7–18.  https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-71781997002500002

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-71781997002500002

  75. Santos, S., Bond-Buckup, G., Gonçalves, A.S., Bartholomei-Santos, M.L., Buckup, L. & Jara, C.G. (2017) Diversity and conservation status of Aegla spp. (Anomura, Aeglidae): an update. Nauplius, 25, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2017011

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2017011

  76. Santos, H.G., Carvalho-Junior, W., Dart, R.O., Aglio, M.L.D., Sousa, J.S., Pares, J.G., Fontana, A., Martins, A.L.S. & Oliveira, A.P. (2011) O novo mapa de solos do Brasil: legenda atualizada. Embrapa Solos, Rio de Janeiro. Available from: http://geoinfo.cnps.embrapa.br/layers/geonode%3Asolos_br5m_2011_lat_long_wgs84 (accessed 17 August 2021)

  77. Santos, H.G., Zaroni, M.J., Almeida, E.P.C. & AGEITEC—Agência Embrpa de Ciência e Tecnologia (2021a) Neossolos Litólicos. Available from: https://www.agencia.cnptia.embrapa.br/gestor/solos_tropicais/arvore/CONT000gn230xho02wx5ok0liq1mqxhk6vk7.html (acessed 17 August 2021)

  78. Santos, H.G., Zaroni, M.J., Almeida, E.P.C. & AGEITEC—Agência Embrpa de Ciência e Tecnologia (2021b) Neossolos Regolíticos. Available from: https://www.agencia.cnptia.embrapa.br/gestor/solos_tropicais/arvore/CONT000gn230xhp02wx5ok0liq1mqq4c4en9.html (acessed 17 August 2021)

  79. Schönrogge, K., Barr, B., Wardlaw, J.C., Napper, E., Gardner, M.G., Breen, J., Elmes, G.W. & Thomas, J.A. (2002) When rare species become endangered: cryptic speciation in myrmecophilous hoverflies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 75 (3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00019.x

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2002.tb02070.x

  80. Schubart, C.D., Neigel, J.E. & Felder, D.L. (2000) Use of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene for phylogenetic and population studies of Crustacea. In: von Vaupel Klein, J.C. & Schram, F.R. (Eds.), The biodiversity crisis and Crustacea. Proceedings of the Fourth International Crustacean Congress, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2000, pp. 817–830.

  81. Schubart, C.D., Cuesta, J.A. & Felder, D.L. (2002) Glyptograpsidae, a new brachyuran family from Central America: larval and adult morphology, and a molecular phylogeny of the Grapsoidea. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 22 (1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1163/20021975-99990206

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/20021975-99990206

  82. Schultz, M.B., Smith, S.A., Richardson, A.M.M., Horwitz, P., Crandall, K.A. & Austin, C.M. (2007) Cryptic diversity in Engaeus Erichson, Geocharax Clark and Gramastacus Riek (Decapoda : Parastacidae) revealed by mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequences. Invertebrate Systematics, 21 (6), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS07019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/IS07019

  83. SIGBio—RS (2021) Sistema de Informações Geográficas da Biodiversidade do Rio Grande do Sul—SEMA/RS, Secretaria Estadual do Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Porto Alegre—RS. Available from: https://gis.fepam.rs.gov.br/sigbiovisualizador#/ (accessed 17 Agusut 2021)

  84. Silk, N. (2005) The Global Challenge of Freshwater Biodiversity Conservation. In: Silk, N. & Ciruna, K. (Eds.), A Practitioner’s Guide to Freshwater Biodiversity Conservation. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 1–9.

  85. Silva-Junior, E.F., Moulton, T.P., Boëchat, I.G. & Gücker, B. (2014) Leaf decomposition and ecosystem metabolism as functional indicators of land use impacts on tropical streams. Ecological Indicators, 36, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.027

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.027

  86. Stamatakis, A. (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics, 22, 2688–2690. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446

  87. Stamatakis, A. (2014) RAxML Version 8: A tool for Phylogenetic Analysis and Post-Analysis of Large Phylogenies. Bioinformatics, 30 (9), 1312–1313. [http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/01/21/bioinformatics.btu033.abstract]

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033

  88. Streck, E.V., Kämpf, N., Dalmolim, R.S.D., Klamt, E., Nascimento, P.C. & Scheneider, P. (2002) Solos do Rio Grande do Sul. UFRGS, Porto Alegre, 107 pp.

  89. Streck, E.V., Kämpf, N., Dalmolim, R.S.D., Klamt, E., Nascimento, P.C. & Scheneider, P., Giasson, E. & Pinto, L.F.S. (2008) Solos do Rio Grande do Sul. 2ª Edition. EMATER/RS, Porto Alegre, 222 pp.

  90. Technelysium Pty Ltd. (2021) Available from: Chromas. Available from: http://technelysium.com.au/wp/chromas/ (accessed 17 August 2021)

  91. Teixeira, M.B., Coura-Neto, A.B., Pastore, U., Rangel Filho, A.L.R. (1986) Vegetação. As regiões Fitoecológicas, sua natureza e seus recursos econômicos. Estudos fitogeográficos. In: IBGE—Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (Ed.), Levantamento de recursos naturais, Rio de Janeiro, 33. pp. 541–632.

  92. UFRGS-IB-Centro de Ecologia (2016) Mapeamento da cobertura vegetal do Bioma Pampa: Ano-base. Porto Alegre: UFRGS-IB-Centro de Ecologia. Available from: https://www.ufrgs.br/labgeo/index.php/dados-espaciais/245-mapeamento-da-cobertura-vegetal-do-bioma-pampa-ano-base-2009 (accessed 17 August 2021)

  93. Veloso, H.P., Rangel Filho, A.L.R. & Lima, J.C.A. (1991) Classificação Da Vegetação Brasileira, Adaptada A Um Sistema Universal. Vol. 1. Departamento de Recursos Naturais e Estudos Ambientais, Rio de Janeiro IBGE, 124 pp. [ISBN 85-240-0384-7]

  94. Victoriano, P.F. & D’Elía, G. (2021) Evolving in islands of mud: old and structured hidden diversity in an endemic freshwater crayfish from the Chilean hotspot. Scientific Reports, 11 (8573). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88019-8

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88019-8

  95. von Martens, E. (1869) Südbrasilische Süss- und Brackwasser-Crustaceen nach den Sammlungen des Dr. Reinh. Hensel. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 35, 1–37.

  96. Vörösmarty, C.J., McIntyre, P.B., Gessner, M.O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P.,Glidden, S., Bunn, S.E., Sullivan, C.A., Liermann, C.R. & Davies, P.M. (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467, 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09440

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09440