Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 5293 No. 2: 22 May 2023
Type: Article
Published: 2023-05-22
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5293.2.1
Page range: 201-229
Abstract views: 447
PDF downloaded: 27

On the quantitative criteria of subspecies in insects. Case study of Entomoscelis adonidis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in European Russia and the Caucasus

Tver State University; Tchaikovsky Avenue; 70; Tver 170002; Russia
Tver State University; Tchaikovsky Avenue; 70; Tver 170002; Russia
Coleoptera taxonomy morphology leaf-beetles rapeseed leaf beetle red turnip beetle

Abstract

Many insect subspecies are described without a statistical assessment of differences. In this work, an attempt is made to statistically process the morphological differences of some recently described subspecies. In this regard, a taxonomic review of Entomoscelis adonidis (Pallas, 1771) (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) and related taxa described from European Russia and the Caucasus is presented. Statistical processing of numerous materials (782 specimens) from type localities of the nominal taxa adonidis, spuria Jacobson, 1896, caucasica Kippenberg, 2020, and bashkiriae Kippenberg, 2020, and their environs showed the presence of geographical variability in several characters, which, however, does not reach the level of species or subspecies. For subspecies, the classic “75 %” rule is applied. Therefore, all these specimens are considered to belong to the same species and subspecies. For nomenclature stability and to clarify the taxonomic position of closely related taxa, the neotype of Chrysomela adonidis Pallas is designated from the type locality; the neotype is in accordance with the currently used interpretation of E. adonidis adonidis. Besides that, the lectotype of Entomoscelis adonidis var. spuria Jacobson is designated. The paratypes of E. adonidis caucasica Kippenberg and E. dorsalis bashkiriae Kippenberg were studied. The following new synonyms are proposed: E. adonidis adonidis (Pallas, 1771) = E. adonidis caucasica Kippenberg, 2020 (syn. nov.) = E. dorsalis bashkiriae Kippenberg, 2020 (syn. nov.). The status of E. adonidis var. spuria Jacobson, 1896 as a junior synonym of E. adonidis adonidis is confirmed. The endophallus, particularly, flagellum of E. adonidis was studied for the first time. Several Brassicaceae species, namely Berteroa incana, Barbarea vulgaris, Sisymbrium officinale, Capsella bursa-pastoris, and Thlaspi arvense, as well as Adonis vernalis (Ranunculaceae) are confirmed as host plants of the adults of E. adonidis in cages.

 

References

  1. Bezdĕk, J. (2008) New Species and Subspecies of Nymphius (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) from Iran and Turkey. Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, 48 (1), 79–93.
  2. Bezdĕk, J. & Baselga, A. (2015) Revision of Western Palaearctic Species of the Oulema melanopus Group, with Description of Two New Species from Europe (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Criocerinae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, 55 (1), 273–304.
  3. Bieńkowski, A.O. (2011) Leaf-beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of European Russia. Based on doctoral dissertation. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing: Saarbrücken, 534 pp. [in Russian]
  4. Bieńkowski, A.O. & Orlova-Bienkowskaja, M. Ja. (2011) Subspecies of Chrysolina limbata (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Zoological Journal, 90 (8), 942–958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873811090077
  5. Bieńkowski, A.O. (2015) Life of Reed Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Donaciinae). Mukhametov G.V. Publisher, Livny, 380 pp. [in Russian]
  6. Bieńkowski, A. (2021) The Structure of the Endophallus is a New Promising Feature and a Key to Study of Taxonomy of the Subgenus Metallotimarcha of the Genus Timarcha (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) in the Caucasus. Insects, 12 (937), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12100937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12100937
  7. Bieńkowski, A.O. & Orlova-Bienkowskaja, M.J. (2020) Rigorous Morphological Studies Confirm that the Classical Object of Pest Control Chilocorus kuwanae is the Same Species as Ch. renipustulatus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Insects, 11, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11060368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11060368
  8. Bourdonné, J.-C. (1999) Les Types de Chrysomela de Suffrian Appartenant au Sous-Genre Maenadochrysa Bechyné 1950 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Nouvelle Revue d’Entomologie, 16, 27–58.
  9. Brovdij, V.M. (1976) Data on Ecology of Entomoscelis adonidis Pall. In the Ukraine. Vestnik Zoologii, 4, 38–42. [in Russian]
  10. Brovdij, V.M. (1977) Leaf beetles. Chrysomelinae. Fauna of the Ukraine. 19. Beetles. 16. Naukova Dumka Publ., Kiev, 388 pp. [in Ukrainian]
  11. Bukejs, A. & Anichtchenko, A. (2019) Description of Fully Inflated Endophallus in Some Cassida Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae). Baltic Journal of Coleopterology, 19 (1), 29–34.
  12. Chikatunov, W.I. (1982) Comparative Phenetical Analysis of Wing Venation of Entomoscelis adonidis in the Southern Part of Mountain Central Asia. In: Yablokov, A.V., (Ed.), Phenetics of populations. Nauka Publ., Moscow, pp. 261–269. [in Russian]
  13. Chikatunov, W.I. & Kryukov, V.I. (1979) Phenetical Analysis of Wing Venation in the High Mountain Population of Entomoscelis adonidis Pall. (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Journal of General Biology, 40 (2), 301–306. [in Russian]
  14. Cho, H.-W. & Kim, S.K. (2021) An Integrative Approach Reveals a New Species of Fightless Leaf Beetle (Chrysomelidae: Suinzona) from South Korea. Scientifc Reports, 11, 8595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88011-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88011-2
  15. Ethnographic collections of naturalist Peter Simon Pallas (2022) Available from: http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/ALBUM/1242176074?index=20 (accessed 4 April 2022)
  16. Ge, S.-Q., Daccordi, M., Beutel, R.G., Li, W.-Z. & Yang, X.-K. (2011) Revision of the Chrysomeline Genera Potaninia, Suinzona and Taipinus (Coleoptera) from Eastern Asia, with a Biogeographic Scenario for the Hengduan Mountain Region in South-western China. Systematic Entomology, 36, 644–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2011.00581.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2011.00581.x
  17. Ge, S.-Q., Daccordi, M., Wang, S.-Y. & Yang, X.-K. (2009) Study of the genus Entomoscelis Chevrolat (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae; Chrysomelinae) from China. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 111 (2), 410–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4289/0013-8797-111.2.410
  18. Gerber, G.H. (1994) Biology of Entomoscelis Chevrolat. In: Jolivet, P.H., Cox, M.L. & Petitpierre, E. (Eds.), Novel Aspects of the Biology of Chrysomelidae. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 549–553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1781-4_42
  19. Hayashi, M. (2004) Revisional Study on Japanese Members of Donaciinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Bulletin of Hoshizaki Green Foundation, 7, 29–126.
  20. Horn, W. & Kahle, I. (1935–1937) Über Entomologische Sammlungen, Entomologen & EntomoMuseologie. Entomologische Beihefte aus Berlin-Dahlem, 2–4, 1–540.
  21. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 4th Edition. Russian Translation 2000. Saint Petersburg University Printing, Saint Petersburg, 221 pp. [in Russian]
  22. Jacobson, G. (1896) Materialia ad Cognitionem Faunae Chrysomelidarum Provinciae Saratowensis. Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, 30, 103–121. [in Russian]
  23. Kippenberg, H. (2010) Chrysomelinae. In: Löbl, I. & Smetana, A. (Eds.), Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Vol. 6. Apollo Books: Stenstrup, Denmark, pp. 390–443.
  24. Kippenberg, H. & Mikhailov, Y. (2020) Contribution to the Knowledge of Entomoscelis adonidis (Pallas, 1771) and Allied Species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Chrysomelinae). Koleopterologische Rundschau, 90, 257–290.
  25. Lee, C.-F. & Sekerka, L. (2018) Taxonomic Status of Wallacea dactyliferae Maulik (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae: Bothryonopini) from Taiwan. Japanese Journal of Systematic Entomology, 24 (2), 299–303.
  26. Lopatin, I.K. (2008) New Species of Leaf-Beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) from China. IX. Entomological Revue, 87, 831–841. [in Russian] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S001387380702008X
  27. Mayr, E. & Ashlock, P.D. (1991) Principles of Systematic Zoology. 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, XX + 475 pp.
  28. Medvedev, L.N. (2008) New and Poorly Known Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) from the Islands of Bali and Lombok (Indonesia). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde A, Neue Serie, 1, 431–434.
  29. Medvedev, L.N. (2015) To the Knowledge of Leaf Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) from Turkey. Caucasian Entomological Bulletin, 11, 391–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23885/1814-3326-2015-11-2-391-394
  30. Medvedev, L.N. & Beenen, R. (2005) Two New Species, a New Subspecies, and New Faunistic Data on African Clytrinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Genus, 16 (3), 355–365.
  31. Mikhailov, Yu. E. (2007) On the Northernmost Distribution of Leaf Beetles of the Genus Oreomela (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae): New Species from Mountains of Southern Siberia. Entomological Review, 87 (6), 740–749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873807060097
  32. Mikhailov, Yu. E. (2013) To the Knowledge of the Leaf Beetle Genus Cystocnemis (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Entomological Review, 93 (4), 483–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S001387381304009X
  33. Mikhailov, Yu. E. (2021) Leaf Beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) of Volga Region and South Urals Prospective for Investigation. In: Biological diversity of natural and anthropogenic landscapes: study and protection [Electronic resource]. Materials of II International Scientific and Practical Conference, 4 June 2021.Astrakhansky Publishing House: Astrakhan, Russia, pp. 155–158. [in Russian]
  34. Mikhailov, Yu. E. & Dudko, R. Yu. (2010) New for the Russian Fauna and Little Known Leaf Beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) from South-Eastern Altai. Euroasian Entomological Journal, 9 (3), 477–484. [in Russian]
  35. Mikhailov, Y., Simanchuk, E., Yunussova, G. & Kazkenova, G. (2021) A New Subspecies of Сryptocephalus ergenensis Morawitz, 1863 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) from Kazakhstan and Significance of Colour Pattern Polymorphism Examination. Ecologica Montenegrina, 49, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.37828/em.2021.49.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37828/em.2021.49.7
  36. Özdikmen, H., Coral Şahin, D. & Bal, N. (2020) A New Subspecies of Chrysolina sanguineocincta (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Chrysomelinae) from Turkey. Munis Entomology & Zoology, 15, 1, 85–90.
  37. Pallas, P.S. (1773) Journey Through Different Provinces of the Russian Empire. Part One. Imperial Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 657 + 117 pp. (Supplement). [in Russian]
  38. Pallas, P.S. (1771) Reise durch verschiedene Provinzen des Russischen Reichs. Erster Theil. Kayserliche Academie der Wissenschaften, St. Petersburg, 504 pp.
  39. Patten, M.A. (2015) Subspecies and the Philosophy of Science. The Auk: Ornithological Advances, 132, 481–485. https://doi.org/10.1642/AUK-15-1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1642/AUK-15-1.1
  40. Patten, M.A. & Unitt, P. (2002) Diagnosability Versus Mean Differences of Sage Sparrow Subspecies. The Auk: Ornithological Advances, 119, 26–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/119.1.26
  41. Remsen, J.V. (2010) Subspecies as a Meaningful Taxonomic Rank in Avian Classification. Ornithological Monographs, 67, 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1525/OM.2010.67.1.62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/om.2010.67.1.62
  42. Rising, J.D. (2007) Named Subspecies and their Significance in Contemporary Ornithology. Festschrift for Ned, K. Johnson: Geographic Variation and Evolution in Birds. Ornithological Monographs, 63, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/40166897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/40166897
  43. Sokolov, V.E. & Gromov, V.S. (1990) The Contemporary Ideas on Roe Deer (Capreolus Gray, 1821) Systematization: Morphological, Ethological and Hybridological Analysis. Mammalia, 54, 431–444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.1990.54.3.431
  44. Tosevskii, I., Caldara, R., Jović, J., Hernández-Vera, G., Baviera, C., Gassmann, A. & Emerson, B.C. Morphological, Molecular and Biological Evidence Reveal Two Cryptic Species in Mecinus janthinus Germar (Coleoptera, Curculionidae), a Successful Biological Control Agent of Dalmatian toadflax, Linaria dalmatica (Lamiales, Plantaginaceae). Systematic Entomology. 36, 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2011.00593.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2011.00593.x
  45. Tracy, J.L. & Robbins, Th.O. (2009) Taxonomic Revision and Biogeography of the Tamarix-feeding Diorhabda elongata (Brullé, 1832) Species Group (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Galerucini) and Analysis of Their Potential in Biological Control of Tamarisk. Zootaxa, 2101 (1), 1–152. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2101.1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2101.1.1
  46. Wheeler, Q.D. & Meier, R. (Eds.) (2000) Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: A Debate; Columbia University Press, New York, New York, 229 pp.
  47. Winkler, K. (2010) Subspecies Represent Geographically Partitioned Variation, a Gold Mine of Evolutionary Biology, and a Challenge for Conservation. Ornithological Monographs, 67, 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1525/om.2010.67.1.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/om.2010.67.1.6
  48. Zoia, S. (2007) New Data on African Eumolpinae from the Collection of the Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 54 (1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/mmnd.200700006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mmnd.200700006