Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 5311 No. 2: 29 Jun. 2023
Type: Article
Published: 2023-06-29
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5311.2.1
Page range: 151-189
Abstract views: 286
PDF downloaded: 32

Types of Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) deposited at the entomological collection of Instituto- Fundación Miguel Lillo, Tucumán, Argentina

Instituto de Entomología; Fundación Miguel Lillo. Miguel Lillo 251; T4000JFE; San Miguel de Tucumán; Argentina
Instituto de Entomología; Fundación Miguel Lillo. Miguel Lillo 251; T4000JFE; San Miguel de Tucumán; Argentina
Instituto de Entomología; Fundación Miguel Lillo. Miguel Lillo 251; T4000JFE; San Miguel de Tucumán; Argentina
Coleoptera ground beetles holotypes museum specimens paratypes South America

Abstract

The Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) type species of Entomological Collection of the Entomology Institute housed in the Zoology Area of Miguel Lillo Foundation (FML), Tucumán, Argentina, were examined and listed. This collection is considered one of the most prestigious collections in Argentina and South America. The Carabidae family is represented by 545 species, with ten holotypes, one allotype, 12 cotypes, and 65 paratypes, which correspond to 35 species. Complete information and images for each species are given.

 

References

  1. Allen, R.T. (1979) The occurrence and importance of ground beetles in agricultural and surrounding habitats. In: Erwin, T.L., Ball, G.E. & Whitehead, D.R. (Eds.), Carabid beetles, their evolution, natural history, and classification. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague, pp. 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9628-1_27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9628-1_27
  2. Aranda, S.G., Córdoba, S.P. & Sánchez, F.R. (2016) Catálogo de los tipos primarios de Coleoptera depositados en la colección entomológica del Instituto- Fundación Miguel Lillo. Acta Zoológica Lilloana, 60 (1), 10–6. https://doi.org/10.25085/rsea.761210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25085/rsea.761210
  3. Bouchard, P., Bousquet, Y., Davies, A.E., Alonso-Zarazaga, M.A., Lawrence, J.F., Lyal, C.H.C., Newton, A.F., Reid, C.A.M., Schmitt, M., ´Slipi´nski, S.A. & Smith, A.B.T. (2011) Family group names in Coleoptera (Insecta). Zookeys, 88, 1 ­̶ 972. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.88.807
  4. Claps, L.E., Claps, G. & Navarro, F.R. (2013) Abraham Willink: impulsor de la descentralización de la entomología Argentina. Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, 72 (1–2), 1 ­̶ 3. https://doi.org/10.25085/rsea.800101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25085/rsea.800101
  5. Erwin T.L. (1985) The taxon pulse: a general pattern of lineage radiation and extinction among carabid beetles. In: Ball, G.E. (Ed.), Taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of beetles and ants. Dr. W. Junk Publisher, The Hague, pp. 437 ­̶ 488.
  6. Erwin, T., Micheliv, C. & Chaboo, C. (2015) Beetles (Coleoptera) of Perú: A survey of the families, Carabidae. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 88 (2), 151­ ­̶ 162. https://doi.org/10.2317/kent-88-02-229-236.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2317/kent-88-02-151-162.1
  7. Etonti, M. & Mateu, J. (1992) Sette nuovi Trechinae del Peru (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Bollettino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Venezia, 41, 109 ­̶ 130. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.9543
  8. Holland, J.M. & Luff, M.L. (2000) The effects of agricultural practices on Carabidae in temperate agroecosystems. Integrated Pest Management Reviews, 5, 109 ­̶ 129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009619309424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009619309424
  9. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, Fourth Edition. Adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature. Available from: https://www.iczn.org/the-code/the-code-online/ (accessed 25 October 2022) https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.50608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.50608
  10. Kotze, D.J., Brandmayr, P., Casale, A., Dauffy Richard, E., Dekoninck, W., Koivula, M.J., Lövei, G.L., Mossakowski, D., Noordijk, J., Paarmann, W., Pizzolotto, R., Saska, P., Schwerk, A., Serrano, J., Szyszko, J., Taboada, A., Turin, H., Venn, S., Vermeulen, R. & Zetto, T. (2011) Forty years of carabid beetle research in Europe—from taxonomy, biology, ecology and population studies to bioindication, habitat assessment and conservation. ZooKeys, (100), 55–148. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1523
  11. Kult, K. (1947) The 3rd study to the knowledge of tribus Clivinini (Col., Carab.). Časopis Československé Společnosti Entomologické. Acta Societatis Entomologicae Čechosloveniae, 44, 26–37.
  12. Latreille, P.A. (1802) Histoire naturelle, générale et particuliere des crustacés et des insectes. In: de Buffon, L. (Ed.), Ouvrage faisant suite a l’histoire naturelle générale et particuliere. Tome Troisieme. Dufart, F., Paris, pp. 13–467. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.60678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.15764
  13. Mandl, K. (1967) Zweiter beitrag zur kenntnis der cicindeliden-fauna von Peru (Col.). Entomologischen Arbeiten aus dem Museum G. Frey München, 18, 432 ­̶ 439.
  14. Mateu, J. (1955) Revisión de los géneros Mimodromius, Chaudoir y Mimodromites Mateu (Col. Carabidae). Archivos Instituto de Aclimatación, Almería, 4, 63 ­̶ 108.
  15. Mateu, J. (1978) Más datos sobre los Tresisibus Motschulky del Perú (Coleoptera-Carabidae). Boletín de Entomología Venzolana, New Series, 1 (3), 25 ­̶ 36.
  16. Mateu, J. (1984) Notas Sobre una Nueva Especie del Género Prostolonis Mateu (Col. Carabidae). Acta Zoológica Lilloana, 37 (2), 183 ­̶ 186. https://doi.org/10.30550/j.azl/2019.63.2/1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30550/j.azl/2019.63.2/1
  17. Mateu, J. (1994) Un nouveau Zuphium Latreille d’Argentine (Col. Carabidae). Nouvelle Revue d’entomologie, New Series, 11 (4), 339 ­̶ 340.
  18. Moore, B.P. (1979) Chemical defense in carabids and its bearing on phylogeny. In: Erwin, T.L, Ball, G.E. & Whitehead, D.R. (Eds.), Carabid beetles, their evolution, natural history, and classification. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 193 ­̶ 203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9628-1_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9628-1_9
  19. Negrè, J., (1963) Révision du genre Polpochila Solier. Revue française d’Entomologie, 30 (4), 205 ­̶ 241.
  20. Roig Juñent, S.A. (1992) Revisión del género Barypus Dejean, 1828 (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Parte III. Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, 51, 1 ­̶ 4. https://doi.org/10.25085/rsea.800402
  21. Roig Juñent, S.A. (1993) Las especies argentinas de Cnemalobus Guerin- Meneville 1838 (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cnemalobini). Gayana, 57 (2), 285 ­̶ 304.
  22. Roig Juñent, S.A. (1995) Revisión sistemática de los Creobina de América del Sur (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Broscini). Acta Entomológica Chilena, 19, 51 ­̶ 74. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-078x2004000400011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-078X2004000400011
  23. Roig Juñent, S.A. (2002) Nuevas especies de Cnemalobus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) y consideraciones filogenéticas y biogeográficas sobre el género. Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, 61, 3 ­̶ 4. https://doi.org/10.25085/rsea.800102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25085/rsea.800102
  24. Roig Juñent, S.A. (2003) Un género nuevo de Platynini (Coleoptera: Carabidae) de la Argentina. Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, 62 (1–2), 43 ­̶ 51. https://doi.org/10.25085/rsea.800402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25085/rsea.800402
  25. Roig Juñent, S.A. & Cicchino, A.C. (1989) Revisión del género Barypus Dejean, 1828 (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Broscini). Parte 1. Boletín de la Sociedad de Biología de Concepción, 60, 201 ­̶ 225.
  26. Roig Juñent, S.A. & Ball, G.E. (1995) Nothobroscus chilensis, new genus and new species, from southern South America (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Broscini). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 49 (4), 301 ­̶ 312.
  27. Roig Juñent, S.A. & Domínguez, M.C. (2001) Diversidad de la familia Carabidae (Coleoptera) en Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 74, 549 ­̶ 571. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-078X2001000300006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-078X2001000300006
  28. Roig Juñent, S.A. & Scheibler, E.E. (2004) A new species of Pericompsus LeConte (Carabidae: Bembidiini, Tachyina) from Argentina. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 58 (3), 311 ­̶ 315. https://doi.org/10.1649/600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1649/600
  29. Straneo, S.L. (1969) Revisione del genere Argutoridius Chaudoir (Coleoptera Carabidae). Memorie della Societa Entomologica Italiana, 48 (2), 249 ­̶ 262.
  30. Straneo, S.L. (1986a). Sul genre Blennidius Mostchulsky 1865 (Col. Carabidae, Pterostichini). Bolletino delle Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali di Torino, 4, 369 ­̶ 393.
  31. Straneo, S.L. (1986b) Un nuovo Pterostichino (Col. Carab.) sudamericano. Acta Zoológica Lilloana, 38 (2), 155 ­̶ 156.
  32. Straneo, S.L. (1991) South american species of Loxandrus LeConte, 1852 (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Pterostichini). Annals of Carnegie Museum, 60 (1), 1 ­̶ 62. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.330460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/p.330460
  33. Straneo, S.L. (1993a) Review of the genus Adrimus Bates, 1872 (Insecta: Coleoptera: Carabidae: Pterostichini). Annals of Carnegie Museum, 62 (3), 255 ­̶ 269. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.215122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/p.215122
  34. Straneo, S.L. (1993b) Nuove specie del genere Ogmopleura Tschitschérine (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Pterostichinae) del Perù e dell’Ecuador e chiave per la loro determinazione. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale “Giacomo Doria”, 89, 351 ­̶ 399. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.9543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.9543
  35. Straneo, S.L. & Ball, G.E. (1989) Synopsis of the genera and subgenera of the tribe Peleciini, and revision of the neotropical and oriental species (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Insecta Mundi, 3 (2), 73 ­̶ 1.
  36. Thompson, R.G. (1979) Larvae of north american Carabidae with a key to the tribes. In: Erwin, T.L., Ball, G.E. & Whitehead, D.R. (Eds.), Carabid beetles, their evolution, natural history, and classification. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague, pp. 209 ­̶ 291. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9628-1_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9628-1_11