Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 5353 No. 6: 13 Oct. 2023
Type: Article
Published: 2023-10-13
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5353.6.4
Page range: 567-581
Abstract views: 445
PDF downloaded: 27

Larval morphology and natural history in two Minervarya species from Andaman Islands, with comments on a new phytotelmonous larval morphotype for the genus

Systematics Lab; Department of Environmental Studies; University of Delhi; Delhi; India
Systematics Lab; Department of Environmental Studies; University of Delhi; Delhi; India; Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology; Harvard University; Cambridge; Massachusetts; United States of America
Andaman and Nicobar Regional Centre; Zoological Survey of India; Port Blair; Andaman and Nicobar Islands; India
Andaman and Nicobar Regional Centre; Zoological Survey of India; Port Blair; Andaman and Nicobar Islands; India
Systematics Lab; Department of Environmental Studies; University of Delhi; Delhi; India; Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology; Harvard University; Cambridge; Massachusetts; United States of America; Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study; Harvard University; Cambridge; Massachusetts; United States of America
Amphibia breeding behaviour development dicroglossidae ecomorphological guild larval biology tadpole tree holes vocal sac morphology

Abstract

We studied the larval morphology and natural history of two species of Minervarya from the Andaman Islands of India. A recent assignment of Charles Darwin’s frog to the genus Minervarya opened up new questions on the systematic affinities and natural history of its enigmatic tadpoles. Originally described as Rana charlesdarwini Das, 1998, and long considered as Ingerana charlesdarwini, the tadpoles of this species were poorly understood and incomparable to those of other presumed close relatives based on an original brief description of its phytotelmonous tadpoles. Here we present a detailed redescription of the larval morphology of M. charlesdarwini based on genetically confirmed tadpoles. At the same time, we compared the external morphology of M. charlesdarwini tadpoles to that of its closest phylogenetic and sympatric congener, M. andamanensis, consequently reporting the first-ever larval description for M. andamanensis. For the first time also for minervaryan frogs, we record that M. charlesdarwini lays eggs on the inner walls of tree holes, and the tadpoles possess morphological adaptations for a phytotelmonous life. Their unique features, such as tail-to-body ratio >2.2, reduced labial tooth rows (LTRF 1/1), acutely pointed serrations in the jaw sheath, and the medial portion of the upper sheath broadly arched and that of the lower sheath U-shaped, justify adding a new larval morphotype to the genus Minervarya. In contrast, M. andamanensis breeds and undergoes development in ground water puddles and ponds, a common trait for other known minervaryan species. Furthermore, our study generates new knowledge on the amplexus, oviposition site, and early embryonic development in these species. The deeper understanding of the biology and habitat requirements contributes additional traits for future systematic and evolutionary studies, and helps guide conservation assessments for these two species endemic to a handful of islands in the Andaman Archipelago.

 

References

  1. Altig, R. (2007) A primer for the morphology of anuran tadpoles. Herpetological Conservation and Biology, 2, 71–74.
  2. Altig, R. & McDiarmid, R.W. (1999) Body plan. In: McDiarmid, R.W. & Altig, R. (Eds.), Tadpoles: The Biology of Anuran Larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, pp. 24–51.
  3. Altig, R. & Johnston, G.F. (1989) Guilds of anuran larvae: relationships among developmental modes, morphologies, and habitats. Herpetological Monographs, 3, 81–109. https://doi.org/10.2307/1466987
  4. AmphibiaWeb. (2022) Amphibiaweb: information on amphibian biology and conservation. Electronic Database. University of California, Berkeley, California. Available from: https://amphibiaweb.org/ (accessed 30 January 2023)
  5. Annandale, N. (1917) Zoological results of a tour in the Far East. Batrachia. Memoirs of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 6, 119–155. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.46524
  6. Annandale, N. (1918) Some undescribed tadpoles from the hills of southern India. Records of the Indian Museum, 15, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi/v15/i1/1918/163570
  7. Annandale, N. & Rao, C.R.N. (1918) The tadpoles of the families Ranidae and Bufonidae found in the plains of India. Records of the Indian Museum, 15, 25–40. https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi/v15/i1/1918/163571
  8. Biju, S.D., Senevirathne, G., Garg, S., Mahony, S., Kamei, R.G., Thomas A., Shouche, Y., Raxworthy, C.J., Meegaskumbura, M. & Van Bocxlaer, I. (2016) Frankixalus, a new rhacophorid genus of tree hole breeding frogs with oophagous tadpoles. PLoS ONE, 11, e0145727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145727
  9. Borteiro, C. & Kolenc, F. (2007) Redescription of the tadpoles of three species of frogs from Uruguay (Amphibia: Anura: Leiuperidae and Leptodactylidae), with notes on natural history. Zootaxa, 1638 (1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1638.1.1
  10. Chandramouli, S.R. & Prasad, K.V.D. (2020) Redescription of Minervarya nicobariensis (Stolizka, 1870) (Amphibia: Dicroglossidae) with a neotype designation. Taprobanica, 9, 205–209. https://doi.org/10.47605/tapro.v9i2.232
  11. Chandramouli, S.R., Ankaiah, D., Prasad, K.V.D. & Arul, V. (2021) Redescription of a poorly known, insular endemic frog Minervarya andamanensis (Stoliczka, 1870) with notes on distribution and natural history. Spixiana, 44, 43–53.
  12. Daniels, R.J.R. (1992) Geographical range and ecology of the Verrucose Frog Rana keralensis (Dubois). Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 89, 199–203.
  13. Das, I. (1998) A remarkable new species of ranid (Anura: Ranidae), with phytotelmonous larvae, from Mount Harriet, Andaman Island. Hamadryad, 23, 41–49.
  14. Downie, J.R. (1984) How Leptodactylus fuscus tadpoles make foam, and why. Copeia, 1984, 778–780. https://doi.org/10.2307/1445168
  15. Downie, J.R. (1989) Observations on foam-making by Leptodactylus fuscus tadpoles. Herpetological Journal, 1, 351–355.
  16. Dubois, A., Ohler, A. & Biju, S.D. (2001) A new genus and species of Ranidae (Amphibia, Anura) from south-western India. Alytes, 19, 53–79.
  17. Frost, D.R. (2022) Amphibian Species of the World: an online reference. Version 6.1. Electronic Database. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Available from: https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org. (accessed 30 January 2023)
  18. Garg, S. & Biju, S.D. (2017) Description of four new species of Burrowing frogs in the Fejervarya rufescens complex (Dicroglossidae) with notes on morphological affinities of Fejervarya species in the Western Ghats. Zootaxa, 4277, 451–490. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4277.4.1
  19. Garg, S. & Biju, S.D. (2021) DNA barcoding and systematic review of minervaryan frogs (Dicroglossidae: Minervarya) of Peninsular India: resolution of a taxonomic conundrum with description of a new species. Asian Herpetological Research, 12, 1–34.
  20. Garg, S., Chandrakasan, S., Gokulakrishnan, G., Gopika, C., Das. I. & Biju, S.D. (2022) The curious case of Charles Darwin’s frog, Rana charlesdarwini Das, 1998: Phylogenetic position and generic placement, with taxonomic insights on other minervaryan frogs (Dicroglossidae: Minervarya) in the Andaman and Nicobar Archipelago. Vertebrate Zoology, 72, 169–199. https://doi.org/10.3897/vz.72.e79496
  21. Gibson, R.C. & Buley, K.R. (2004) Maternal care and obligatory oophagy in Leptodactylus fallax: A new reproductive mode in frogs. Copeia, 2004, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1643/CE-02-091R2
  22. Gosner, K.L. (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica, 16, 183–190.
  23. Grosjean, S. (2005) The choice of external morphological characters and developmental stages for tadpole-based anuran taxonomy: a case study in Rana (Sylvirana) nigrovittata (Blyth, 1855) (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae). Contributions to Zoology, 74, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1163/18759866-0740102005
  24. Haas, A., Hertwig, S.T., Krings, W., Braskamp, E., Dehling, J.M., Pui, Y.M., Jankowski, A., Schweizer, M. & Das, I. (2012) Description of three Rhacophorus tadpoles (Lissamphibia: Anura: Rhacophoridae) from Sarawak, Malaysia (Borneo). Zootaxa, 3328 (1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3328.1.1
  25. Haas, A. (2003) Phylogeny of frogs as inferred from primarily larval characters (Amphibia: Anura). Cladistics, 19, 23–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0748-3007(03)00006-9
  26. Inger, R.F., Shaffer, H.B., Koshy, M. & Bakde, R. (1984) A report on a collection of amphibians and reptiles from the Ponmudi, Kerala, South India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 81, 406–427.
  27. Khan, M.S. (1996) Oropharyngeal morphology of tadpole of southern cricket frog Rana syhadrensis Annandale, 1919, and its ecological correlates. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 28, 133–138.
  28. Khan, M.S. (2003) Morphology of the Limnonectes tadpole, with notes on its feeding ecology and on the breeding habits of Limnonectes frogs in riparian Punjab. The Bulletin of the Chicago Herpetological Society, 38, 177–179.
  29. Khatiwada, J.R., Wang, B., Zhao, T., Xie, F. & Jiang, J.P. (2021) An integrative taxonomy of amphibians of Nepal: An updated status and distribution. Asian Herpetological Research, 12, 1–35.
  30. Kolenc, F., Borteiro, C., Alcalde, L., Baldo, D., Cardozo, D. & Faivovich, J. (2008) Comparative larval morphology of eight species of Hypsiboas Wagler (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae) from Argentina and Uruguay, with a review of the larvae of this genus. Zootaxa, 1927 (1), 1–66. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1927.1.1
  31. Kotaki, M., Kurabayashi, A., Matsui, M., Kuramoto, M., Djong, T.H. & Sumida, M. (2010) Molecular phylogeny of the diversified frogs of genus Fejervarya (Anura: Dicroglossidae). Zoological Science, 27, 386–395. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.27.386
  32. Kuramoto, M., Joshy, S.H., Kurabayashi, A. & Sumida, M. (2008 2007) The genus Fejervarya (Anura: Ranidae) in central Western Ghats, India, with descriptions of four new cryptic species. Current Herpetology, 26, 81–105. https://doi.org/10.3105/1881-1019(2007)26[81:TGFARI]2.0.CO;2
  33. Lannoo, M.J., Townsend, D.S. & Wassersug, R.J. (1987) Larval life in the leaves: arboreal tadpole types, with special attention to the morphology, ecology and behavior of the oophagous Osteopilus brunneus (Hylidae) larva. Fieldiana Zoology, 38, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.2932
  34. Lehtinen, R.M. (2022) Phytotelm-breeding frogs of the world, Version 1.11. Electronic Database. Available from: https://sites.google.com/site/phytotelmbreedingfrogsworld/ (accessed 30 January 2023)
  35. Lehtinen, R.M., Lannoo, M.J. & Wassersug, R.J. (2004) Phytotelm-breeding anurans: past, present, and future research. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 193, 1–9.
  36. Phuge, S., Dinesh, K.P., Andhale, R., Bhakare, K. & Pandit, R. (2019) A new species of Fejervarya Bolkay, 1915 (Anura: Dicroglossidae) from the northern Western Ghats parts of Maharashtra, India. Zootaxa, 4544 (2), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4544.2.6
  37. Roelants, K., Haas, A., & Bossuyt, F. (2011) Anuran radiations and the evolution of tadpole morphospace. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 8731–8736. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100633108
  38. Rowley, J.J.L., Dao, T.T.A., Duong, L.T.T., Huy, H.D. & Altig, R. (2012) The strangest tadpole: the oophagous, tree-hole dwelling tadpole of Rhacophorus vampyrus (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from Vietnam. Journal of Natural History, 46, 2969–2978. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2012.732622
  39. Sanchez, E., Biju, S.D., Islam, M.M., Hasan, M.K., Ohler, A, Vences, M. & Kurabayashi, A. (2018) Phylogeny and classification of Fejervaryan frogs (Anura: Dicroglossidae). Salamandra, 54, 109–116.
  40. Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenbach, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H. & Flook, P. (1994) Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 87, 651–701. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/87.6.651
  41. Tonini, J.F.R., Ferreira, R.B. & Pyron, R.A. (2020) Specialized breeding in plants affects diversification trajectories in Neotropical frogs. Evolution, 74, 1815–1825. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14037
  42. Vassilieva, A.B., Trounov, V.L., Poyarkov, N.A. Jr. & Galoyan, E.A. (2017) The phytotelm tadpoles of Microhyla arboricola (Anura: Microhylidae) from Vietnam, with comments on reproductive biology and development. Zootaxa, 4247 (4), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4247.4.4