Abstract
Of the two centipede orders that complete segmentation during embryogenesis, most species belonging to Geophilomorpha have an intraspecifically variable number of trunk segments, whereas those of the Scolopendromorpha have been assumed to have a fixed segment number, with minor variation (21 or 23 segments) across the group as a whole. Trunk segment numbers are used as a taxonomic character as high as the familial or subordinal level in Scolopendromorpha. The first known instance of variability in trunk segment numbers within a scolopendromorph species has recently been proposed for the Brazilian Scolopendropsis bahiensis (Brandt, 1841), which has either 21 or 23 segments in different parts of its geographic range. Here we document a closely related scolopendrid from Tocantins State, central Brazil, Scolopendropsis duplicata n. sp., which differs from S. bahiensis in having either 39 or 43 segments. This unique segment count is incorporated into a revised diagnosis of the order Scolopendromorpha. The deeply nested position of Scolopendropsis within the Scolopendridae implies that the geophilomorph-like trunk segment number in S. duplicata is convergent with similar segmentation in Geophilomorpha.References
Attems, C. (1928) Neue Scolopendriden der Museen Wien und Hamburg. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 78, 279–309.
Attems, C. (1930) Myriapoda 2. Scolopendromorpha. In: Schulze, F.E. & Kükenthal,W. (Eds), Das Tierreich, 54. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 1–308.
Bonato, L., Foddai, D. & Minelli, A. (2001) Increase by duplication and loss of invariance of segment number in the centipede Mecistocephalus microporus Haase, 1887 (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha, Mecistocephalidae). Italian Journal of Zoology, 68, 345–352.
Brandt, J.-F. (1841) Note supplémentaire sur quelques espèces du genre des Scolopendres, suivie de la description de deux espèces nouvelles et d’un essai de subdivision de ce genre en deux sous-genres. Bulletin scientifique de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de St.-Pétersbourg, 8, 21–25.
Bücherl, W. (1943) Quilópodos do Peru. Memórias do Instituto Butantan, 17, 19–26.
Cavanna, F. (1881) Nuovo genere (Plutonium) e nuova specie (P. zwierleini) di Scolopendridi. Bullettino della Società Entomologica Italiana, 13, 169–178.
Edgecombe, G.D. (2007) Centipede systematics: progress and problems. Zootaxa, 1668, 327–341.
Edgecombe, G.D. & Koch, M. (2008) Phylogeny of scolopendromorph centipedes (Chilopoda): morphological analysis featuring characters from the peristomatic area. Cladistics, 24 [DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00220.x].
Koch, C.L. 1841. Arachniden und Myriapoden aus der Regentschaft Algier. In: Wagner, M. (Ed.), Reisen in der Regentschaft Algier in den Jahren 1836 1837 und 1838, 3. Leopold Voss, Leipzig, pp. 211–225.
Kraepelin, K. (1903) Revision der Scolopendriden. Jahrbuch der Hamburgischen wissenschaftlichen Anstalten, (2)20, 1–276.
Leach, W.E. (1815) A tabular view of the external characters of four classes of animals, which Linné arranged under Insecta; with the distribution of the genera composing three of these classes into orders, &c. and descriptions of several new genera. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 11, 306–400.
Lewis, J.G.E. (2001) The scolopendrid centipedes in the collection of the National Museum of Natural History in Sofia (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha: Scolopendridae). Historia naturalis bulgarica, 13, 5–51.
Lewis, J.G.E., Edgecombe, G.D. & Shelley, R.M. (2005) A proposed standardised terminology for the external taxonomic characters of the Scolopendromorpha (Chilopoda). Fragmenta Faunistica, 48, 1–8.
Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema naturae. Editio Decima. Laur. Salvius, Holmiae 1: 824 pp.
Meinert, F. (1886) Myriapoda Musei Cantabrigensis. Part I. Chilopoda. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 23, 161–233.
Minelli, A., Foddai, D., Pereira, L. A. & Lewis, J.G.E. (2000) The evolution of segmentation of centipede trunk and appendages. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 38, 103–117.
Newport, G. 1843. On some new genera of the class Myriapoda. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 10, 177–181.
Newport, G. (1844) [Conclusion of the monograph on the Myriapoda Chilopoda]. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, 1, 191–197.
Pocock, R.I. (1891) Notes on the synonymy of some species of Scolopendridae, with descriptions of new genera and species in the group. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 6, 7, 51–68, 221–231.
Schileyko, A.A. (1992) Scolopenders of Viet-Nam and some aspects of the system of Scolopendromorpha (Chilopoda Epimorpha). Part 1. Arthropoda Selecta, 1, 5–19.
Schileyko, A.A. (2006) Redescription of Scolopendropsis bahiensis (Brandt, 1841), the relations between Scolopendropsis and Rhoda, and notes on some characters used in scolopendromorph taxonomy (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha). Arthropoda Selecta, 15, 9–17.
Shelley, R.M. (2002) A synopsis of the North American centipedes of the order Scolopendromorpha (Chilopoda). Virginia Museum of Natural History Memoir 5, 1–108.
Uliana, M., Bonato, L. & Minelli, A. (2007) The Mecistocephalidae of the Japanese and Taiwanese islands (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha). Zootaxa, 1396, 1–84.