Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 5536 No. 2: 4 Nov. 2024
Type: Article
Published: 2024-11-04
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5536.2.8
Page range: 325-335
Abstract views: 421
PDF downloaded: 264

A new genus for the Blackfin Sucker, Thoburnia atripinnis (Cypriniformes: Catostomidae)

Auburn University Museum of Natural History; 101 Life Sciences Building; Auburn University; AL 36849
Pisces Hypentelium Moxostoma Thoburnini Taxonomy

Abstract

Thoburnia atripinnis is more closely related to Hypentelium (hogsuckers) than it is to other Thoburnia, and its presence in the Barren River of Kentucky is disjunct from that of true Thoburnia. Its unique morphology is unlike that of the easily recognized hogsuckers, making placement of the species within Hypentelium untenable; thus, a new genus is described. The new genus can be separated from all other catostomids by the presence of thin, black, prominent stripes on the body, a large black mark on the anterodist al portion of the dorsal fin, presence of pads ventrally on the leading portion of the pectoral fin, lateral laminae of the dermethmoid angled anteriorly, and the base of the lateral ethmoid narrow.

 

References

  1. Almeida, D., Almodóvar, A., Nicola, G.G. & Elvira B. (2008) Fluctuating asymmetry, abnormalities and parasitism as indicators of environmental stress in cultured stocks of goldfish and carp. Aquaculture, 279, 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.04.003
  2. Armbruster, J.W. (2012) Standardized measurements, landmarks, and meristic counts for cypriniform fishes. Zootaxa, 3586 (1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3586.1.3
  3. Armbruster, J.W. (2024) Supplementary tables: Blackfin Sucker mensural and locality data. Available from: https://aurora.auburn.edu/handle/11200/50650 (Accessed 7 Oct. 2024) https://doi.org/10.35099/nfcp-8538
  4. Armbruster, J.W., Lujan, N.K. & Bloom, D.D. (2021) Redescription of the Guiana Shield darter species Characidium crandellii and C. declivirostre (Crenuchidae) with descriptions of two new species. Ichthyology & Herpetology, 109, 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1643/i2019299
  5. Bagley, J.C., Mayden, R.L. & Harris, P.M. (2018) Phylogeny and divergence times of suckers (Cypriniformes: Catostomidae) inferred from Bayesian total-evidence analyses of molecules, morphology, and fossils. PeerJ, 6, e5168. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5168
  6. Bailey, R.M. (1959) A new catostomid fish, Moxostoma (Thoburnia) atripinne, from the Green River drainage, Kentucky and Tennessee. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, 559, 1–19.
  7. Bleeker, P. (1863) Mayden, R.M. (2004) Fishes of Alabama. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 736 pp.
  8. Buth, D.G. (1979) Genetic relationships among the torrent suckers, genus Thoburnia. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 7, 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-1978(79)90010-3
  9. Chen, W.J. & Mayden, R.L. (2012) Phylogeny of suckers (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Catostomidae): further evidence of relationships provided by the single-copy nuclear gene IRBP2. Zootaxa, 3586 (1), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3586.1.18
  10. Clements, M.D., Bart, H.L. Jr. & Hurley, D.L. (2012) A different perspective on the phylogenetic relationships of the Moxostomatini (Cypriniformes: Catostomidae) based on cytochrome-b and Growth Hormone intron sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 63, 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.01.001
  11. Conway, K.W., Lujan, N.K., Lundberg, J.G., Mayden, R.L. & Siegel, D.S. (2012) Microanatomy of the paired‐fin pads of ostariophysan fishes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi). Journal of Morphology, 273, 1127–1149. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20049
  12. Doosey, M.H., Bart Jr, H.L., Saitoh, K. & Miya, M. (2010) Phylogenetic relationships of catostomid fishes (Actinopterygii: Cypriniformes) based on mitochondrial ND4/ND5 gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 54, 1028–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2009.06.006
  13. Etnier, D.A. & Starnes W.C. (1993) The fishes of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press. Knoxville, Tennessee, 681 pp.
  14. Ferris, S.D. & Whitt, G.S. (1978) Phylogeny of tetraploid catostomid fishes based on the loss of duplicate gene expression. Systematic Zoology, 27, 189–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412971
  15. Fowler, H.W. (1913) Notes on catostomoid fishes. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 65, 45–60.
  16. GBIF.org (2023) GBIF Occurrence Download. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.96aukf (accessed 13 December 2023)
  17. Harris, P.M., Hubbard, G. & Sandel, M. (2014) Catostomidae: suckers. In: Warren, M.L. & Burr, B.M. (Eds.), Freshwater fishes of North America. Vol. 1. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 451–502.
  18. Harris, P.M. & Mayden, R.L. (2001) Phylogenetic relationships of major clades of Catostomidae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) as inferred from mitochondrial SSU and LSU rDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 20, 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.2001.0980
  19. Harris, P.M., Mayden, R.L., Espinosa Perez, H.S. & De Leon, F.G. (2002) Phylogenetic relationships of Moxostoma and Scartomyzon (Catostomidae) based on mitochondrial cytochrome b sequence data. Journal of Fish Biology, 61, 1433–1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb02488.x
  20. Hubbs, C.L. (1930) Materials for a revision of the catostomid fishes of eastern North America. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology Miscellaneous Publications, 20, 1–47.
  21. Jelks, H.L., Walsh, S.J., Burkhead, N.M., Contreras-Balderas, S., Dφaz-Pardo, E., Hendrickson, S.A., Lyons, J., Mandrak, N.E., McCormick, F., Nelson, J.S., Platania, S.P., Porter, B.A., Renaud, C.B., Schmitter-Soto, J., Taylor, E.B. & Warren, M.L. Jr. (2008) Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries, 33, 372–407. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446-33.8.372
  22. Jenkins, R.E. (1970) Systematic Studies of the Catostomid Fish Tribe Moxostomatini. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 799 pp.
  23. Jenkins, R.E. & Burkhead, N.M. (1994) The freshwater fishes of Virgina. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, 1080 pp.
  24. Jordan, D.S. (1917) Changes in names of American fishes. Copeia, 1917, 85–89. https://doi.org/10.2307/1435924
  25. Jordan, D.S. & Evermann, B.W. (1896) The fishes of North and Middle America: a descriptive catalogue of the species of fish-like vertebrates found in the waters of North America, north of the Isthmus of Panama. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 47, 1–1240. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.46755
  26. Kentucky Ecological Services Field Office (2017) Blackfin Sucker (Thoburnia atripinnis) species status assessment. Report to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Kentucky Ecological Services Field Office, Frankfort, Kentucky, 38 pp.
  27. Lehner, B. & Grill, G. (2013) Global river hydrography and network routing: baseline data and new approaches to study the world’s large river systems. Hydrological Processes, 27, 2171–2186. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9740
  28. Lujan, N.K. & Conway, K.W. (2015) Life in the fastlane: a review of rheophily in freshwater fishes. In: Plath, M., Riesch, R. & Tobler, M. (Eds.), Extremophile Fishes: Ecology, Evolution, and Physiology of Teleosts in Extreme Environments. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 107–136.
  29. Lutfiyah, L. & Budi, D.S. (2023) Fluctuating asymmetry patterns of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) in fish hatchery center of Kabat, Banyuwangi, Indonesia. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 1273. IOP Publishing, Bristol, 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1273/1/012007
  30. Messager, M.L., Lehner, B., Grill, G., Nedeva, I. & Schmitt, O. (2016) Estimating the volume and age of water stored in global lakes using a geo-statistical approach. Nature Communications, 7, 13603. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13603
  31. NatureServe (2014) Thoburnia atripinnis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2014, e.T13914A19034838. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2014-3.RLTS.T13914A19034838.en
  32. Page, L.M. & Burr, B.M. (2011) Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston, Massachusetts, 663 pp.
  33. QGIS.org (2023) QGIS Geographic Information System. QGIS Association. Available from: http://www.qgis.org (accessed 7 October 2024)
  34. Rafinesque, C.S. (1818) Description of three new genera of fluviatile fish, Pomoxis, Sarchirus and Exoglossum. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 1, 417–422.
  35. Rafinesque, C.S. (1820) Fishes of the Ohio River. [Ichthyologia Ohiensis. Part 6]. Western Review and Miscellaneous Magazine: a monthly publ., devoted to literature and science, Lexington, Kentucky, 2, 299–307.
  36. Raney, E.C. & Lachner, E.A. (1946) Thoburnia hamiltoni, a new sucker from the upper Roanoke River system in Virginia. Copeia, 1946, 218–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/1438108
  37. Robins, C.R. & Raney, E.C. (1956) Studies of the catostomid fishes of the genus Moxostoma, with descriptions of two new species. Cornell University Agricultural Experimental Station Memoirs, 343, 1–56.
  38. Sabaj, M.H. (2020) Codes for natural history collections in ichthyology and herpetology. Copeia, 108, 593–669. https://doi.org/10.1643/ASIHCODONS2020
  39. Smith, G.R. (1992) Phylogeny and biogeography of the Catostomidae, freshwater fishes of North America and Asia. In: Mayden, R.L. (Ed.), Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 778–813.
  40. Sperstad, Z.E. (2018) Reconstructing the phylogeny and characterizing the patterns of molecular evolution of the tetraploid freshwater suckers (Cypriniformes: Catostomidae). Unpublished Master Thesis, University of North Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa. [unknown pagination]
  41. Stringfield, C. (2013) Population distribution and abundance of the blackfin sucker (Thoburnia atripinnis) in the upper Barren River System. Unpublished Master Thesis, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, Kentucky. [unknown pagination]
  42. Stout, C.C., Tan, M., Lemmon, A.R., Lemmon, E.M. & Armbruster, J.W. (2016) Resolving Cypriniformes relationships using an anchored enrichment approach. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 16, 244. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-016-0819-5
  43. Timmons, T.J. & Rogers, W.A. (1977) Dactylogyrus atripinnei sp. n. from the Blackfin Sucker in Tennessee. The Journal of Parasitology, 63, 238–239. https://doi.org/10.2307/3280049
  44. Timmons, T.J., Ramsey, J.S. & Bauer, B.H. (1983) Life history and habitat of the blackfin sucker, Moxostoma atripinne (Osteichthyes: Catostomidae). Copeia, 1983, 538–541. https://doi.org/10.2307/1444405
  45. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (2017) 50 CFR Part 17: Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 12-month findings on petitions to list four species as endangered or threatened species. Federal Register, 82, 57562–57595.
  46. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Louisville District (2012) Endemic, endangered, and select uncommon fauna of the Green River, Kentucky. Sustainable Rivers. Environmental Resources Section Planning Branch, Louisville, Kentucky. Available from: https://www.hec.usace.army.mil/sustainablerivers/publications/docs/Green%20-%20Select%20endemic%20and%20rare%20fauna.pdf (accessed 7 Ocotber 2024)
  47. Warren Jr, M.L., Burr, B.M., Walsh, S.J., Bart, H.L. Jr, Cashner, R.C. Etnier, D.A., Freeman, B.J., Kuhajda, B.R., Mayden, R.L, Robison, H.W. & Ross, S.T. (2000) Diversity, distribution, and conservation status of the native freshwater fishes of the southern United States. Fisheries, 25, 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(2000)025<0007:DDACSO>2.0.CO;2
  48. Young, A., Kochenkov, V., McIntyre, J.K., Stark, J.D. & Coffin, A.B. (2018) Urban stormwater runoff negatively impacts lateral line development in larval zebrafish and salmon embryos. Scientific Reports, 8, 2830. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21209-z