Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2024-12-03
Page range: 265-275
Abstract views: 269
PDF downloaded: 22

Who decides whether two lacewing populations (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae) are two different species, them or us?

Biodiversity and Conservation Biology; Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL; Zürcherstrasse 111; CH-8903 Birmensdorf ZH; Switzerland
Museo Cantonale di Storia Naturale; Viale Carlo Cattaneo 4; 6901 Lugano; Switzerland
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology; University of Connecticut; Unit 3043; 75 North Eagleville Road; Storrs; CT 06269- 3043; USA
Neuroptera Chrysoperla mediterranea europaea biological species concept free choice experiment taxonomy reproductive separation panmictic behavior

Abstract

Most insects were dead when they were named by taxonomists, and predominantly morphological criteria have been used for more than two centuries. But in nature there are populations with individuals looking identical, that turn out to represent two or more different species, and others that look different but are single biological species. Coastal and several continental populations of the green lacewing Chrysoperla mediterranea (Hölzel 1972) had been considered to be one species, based on identical precopulatory “song patterns” (Henry et al. 1999) and viable hybrid production. More than 20 years later, Canard & Thierry (2020) described Chrysoperla europaea Canard and Thierry, 2020 as a new species, based on continental specimens, which they decided were morphologically different enough from the coastal morph of C. mediterranea. Here, we test in free choice experiments whether virgin males and females of coastal and continental populations can detect a difference between sexual partners of their own population versus members of the other morph. No reproductive separation between three populations were found, although they show significant morphological differences in claw shape and size. We conclude that all three tested populations from Southern France, Southern Switzerland, and Central Switzerland are the same biological species, and that C. europaea is therefore a junior synonym of C. mediterranea. We suggest the future use of behavioral tests in closely related allopatric species to see whether they are in fact the same species.

 

References

  1. Canard, M. & Thierry, D. (2020) Description of a new species of Chrysoperla Steinmann, 1964 of the Ch. mediterranea Hölzel, 1972 group from Europe (Neuropterida, Neuroptera, Chrysopidae). Linzer biologische Beiträge, 52 (1), 141–149.
  2. Coyne, J. & Orr, H.A. (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 545 pp.
  3. Duelli, P. (1987) Eine isolierte Reliktpopulation von Chrysoperla mediterranea (Planipennia: Chrysopidae) in der Schweiz. Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft, 60 (3–4), 301–306.
  4. Duelli, P., Bolt, D. & Henry, C.S. (2015) Neuroptera of the Republic of Georgia. Entomological News, 124 (4), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.3157/021.124.0401
  5. Duelli, P., Johnson, J.B., Waldburger, M. & Henry, C.S. (2014) A new look at adaptive body coloration and color change in “common green lacewings” of the genus Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 107 (2), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1603/AN13139
  6. Henry, C.S., Brooks, S.J., Duelli, P. & Johnson, J.B. (1999) Revised concept of Chrysoperla mediterranea (Hölzel), a green lacewing associated with conifers: Courtship songs across 2800 kilometers of Europe (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Systematic Entomology, 24 (4), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3113.1999.00085.x
  7. Henry, C.S., Brooks, S. J., Duelli, P. & Johnson, J.B. (2002) Discovering the true Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Insecta: Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) using song analysis, morphology, and ecology. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 95 (2), 172–191. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2002)095[0172:DTTCCI]2.0.CO;2
  8. Henry, C.S., Brooks, S.J., Duelli, P. & Johnson, J.B. (2003) A lacewing with the wanderlust: the European song species „Maltese“ of the carnea group of Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Systematic Entomology, 28 (2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3113.2003.00208.x
  9. Henry, C.S., Brooks, S.J., Duelli, P., Johnson, J.B., Wells, M.M. & Mochizuki, A. (2013) Obligatory duetting behavior in the Chrysoperla carnea-group of cryptic species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): its role in shaping evolutionary history. Biological Reviews, 88, 787–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12027
  10. Henry, C.S., Brooks, S.J., Johnson, J.B., Mochizuki, A. & Duelli, P. (2014) A new cryptic species of the Chrysoperla carnea-group (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) from western Asia: parallel speciation without ecological adaptation. Systematic Entomology, 39, 380–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12061
  11. Henry, C.S., Wells, M.M. & Pupedis, R.J. (1993) Hidden taxonomic diversity within Chrysoperla plorabunda (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): Two new species based on courtship songs. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 86, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/86.1.14
  12. Hölzel, H. (1972) Anisochrysa (Chrysoperla) mediterranea n. sp. eine neue europäische Chrysopiden-Spezies (Planipennia, Chrysopidae). Nachrichtenblatt der Bayerischen Entomologen, 21, 81–83.
  13. Mayr, E. (1942) Systematics and the origin of species from the viewpoint of a zoologist. Columbia University Press, New York, 334 pp.
  14. Oswald, J.D. (chief editor) (2024) Lacewing Digital Library. https://lacewing.tamu.edu (accessed 24 September 2024).
  15. Thierry, D., Cloupeau, R., Jarry, M. & Canard, M. (1998) Discrimination of the West-Palaearctic Chrysoperla Steinmann species of the carnea Stephens group by means of claw morphology (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae). In: S. Panelius (Ed), Neuropterology 1997. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Neuropterology (13-16 July 1997, Helsinki, Finland). Acta Zoologica Fennica, 209, 255–262.