Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 5584 No. 3: 10 Feb. 2025
Type: Article
Published: 2025-02-10
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5584.3.5
Page range: 394-408
Abstract views: 129
PDF downloaded: 6

Osteology-based phylogeny and systematics implications of the genus Asio (Strigiformes, Strigidae)

Laboratory of Ecology; Systematics and Conservation of Neotropical Birds; Mato Grosso do Sul Federal University.; Ranulpho Marques Leal Av.; 3484. Distrito Industrial; Três Lagoas; MS; Brazil.
Laboratory of Ecology; Systematics and Conservation of Neotropical Birds; Mato Grosso do Sul Federal University.; Ranulpho Marques Leal Av.; 3484. Distrito Industrial; Três Lagoas; MS; Brazil.
Aves Eared owls form and function anatomy taxonomy

Abstract

We present the first phylogenetic analysis of Asio based on an osteological dataset comprising 35 characters (cranial and postcranial) from 36 specimens representing seven species. Parsimony analysis resulted in a single tree (50 steps, CI = 0.72, RI = 0.75): ((Asio otus ((Asio stygius (Asio clamator/Asio grammicus))) ((Asio solomonensis ((Asio capensis/Asio flammeus))))). This topology supports the previously proposed synonymization of Pseudoscops and Nesasio into Asio, based on molecular phylogenetic studies. The primary discrepancy between morphological and molecular datasets lies in the relationships among A. otus, A. grammicus, and A. clamator. Our results provide support (Bootstrap = 100, Bremer = 12, and 17 synapomorphies) for a sister relationship between A. grammicus and A. clamator. Conversely, molecular phylogenies suggest a closer relationship between A. clamator and A. otus. Additionally, we present the first phylogenetic placement of A. stygius, which our analysis identifies as most closely related to the A. grammicus/A. clamator clade (Bootstrap = 56, Bremer = 6, and eight synapomorphies). This finding aligns with the shared Neotropical distribution and we suggest A. grammicus likely evolved from an isolated ancient lineage shared with A. clamator. Significantly, the observed intraspecific osteological variation highlights the necessity for further taxonomic investigations to elucidate species diversity within Asio, particularly within the A. flammeus and A. clamator complexes.

 

References

  1. Aguiar, K.M.O. & Naiff, R.H. (2009) Aspectos reprodutivos e dieta alimentar dos ninhegos de Rhinoptynx clamator (Aves: Strigidae) no campus Marco Zero da Universidade Federal do Amapá, Macapá-AP. Acta Amazonica, 39 (1), 221–224.
  2. Baumel, J., King, A.S., Breazile, J.E., Evans, H.E. & Berge, J.C.V. (1993) Handbook of avian anatomy: Nomina anatomica avium. 2nd Edition. Nuttall Ornithological Club, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 637 pp.
  3. Callender-Crowe, L.M. & Sansom, R.S. (2022) Osteological characters of birds and reptiles are more congruent with molecular phylogenies than soft characters are. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 194 (1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa136
  4. Clements, J.F., Schulenberg, T.S., Iliff, M.J., Sullivan, B.L., Wood, C.L. & Roberson, D. (2013) The eBird/Clements checklist of birds of the world. Version 6.8. Available from: http://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download (accessed 10 September 2024)
  5. Csermely, D. (2000) Footedness bias in hunting birds of prey. In: Chancellor, R.D. & Meyburg, B.-U. (Eds.), Raptors at risk. Hancock House, Midrand, pp. 885–889.
  6. Dickinson, E.C., Remsen Jr., J.V. & Christidis, L. (2013) The Howard & Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World. Vol. 1. Non-passerines. Aves Press Limited, Eastbourne, 461 pp.
  7. Ford, N.L. (1967) A systematic study of the owls based on comparative osteology. PhD Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 128 pp.
  8. Giribet, G. (2015) Morphology should not be forgotten in the era of genomics – a phylogenetic perspective. Zoologischer Anzeiger – A Journal of Comparative Zoology, 256, 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2015.01.003
  9. Gosse, P.H. (1847) The Birds of Jamaica. Bentley, Wilson & Fley, London, 447 pp. [pp. 19] https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.14540
  10. Guérin-Méneville, M. (1843) Oiseaux nouveaux decouverts par MM Ferret et Galinier pendant leur Voyage en Abyssinie. Decrits par M. Guérin-Méneville. M. Revue Zoologique, 6, 321.
  11. Hartert, E.J.O. (1901) [Mr. Ernst Hartert exhibited and described examples of the following new species of birds]. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club, 12 (LXXXIII), 24–25.
  12. Kaup, J.J. (1848) Isis, oder Encyclopädische Zeitung, von Oken. Vol. 41. Expedition der Isis, Jena. [unknown pagination, col. 766 + 769]
  13. König, C. & Weick, F. (2008) Owls of the world. Christopher Helm, London, 529 pp.
  14. Kollibay, P. (1910) Psorhina leucotis grantii nom. nov. Ornithologische Monatsberichte, 18 (9), 148.
  15. Konishi, M. (1973) How the owl tracks its prey: experiments with trained barn owls reveal how their acute sense of hearing enables them to catch prey in the dark. American Scientist, 61 (4), 414–424.
  16. Langer, G. (1980) Vergleichend morphologische Untersuchungen an Einzelknochen in Mitteleuropa vorkommender mittelgrosser Eulenarten. Ph.D Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich. [unknown pagination]
  17. Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae. Vol. 1. Regnum Animale. 10th Edition. Revised. Salvii, L. Holmiae, iv + 824 pp.
  18. Loyn, R.H. & Debus, S.J.S. (2000) Description of juvenile Fearful Owl Nesasio solomonensis. Australian Field Ornithology, 18 (7), 288–289.
  19. Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. (2023) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.81. Available from: http://www.mesquiteproject.org (accessed 23 December 2024)
  20. Marks, J.S., Cannings, R.J. & Mikkola, H. (1999) Family Strigidae. In: de1 Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal, J. (Eds.), Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol. 5. Lynx Editions, Barcelona, pp. 76–151.
  21. Olson, S.L. (1995) The genera of owls in the Asioninae. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club, 115, 35–39.
  22. Pacheco, J.F., Silveira, L.F., Aleixo, A., Agne, C.A., Bencke, G.A., Bravo, G.A., Brito, G.R.R., Cohn-Haft, M., Maurício, G.N., Naka, L.N., Olmos, F., Posso, S., Lees, A.C., Figueiredo, L.F.A., Carrano, E., Guedes, R.C., Cesari, E., Franz, I., Schunck, F. & Piacentini, V.Q. (2021) Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee – second edition. Ornithology Research, 29 (2), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43388-021-00058-x
  23. Peters, J.L. (1937) A new genus for Pseudoptynx solomonensis Hartert. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 27 (2), 81–83.
  24. Pontoppidan, E. (1763) The Danish Atlas or the Kingdom of Denmark. Vol. 1. Gomér & Andersson Linköping, Copenhagen, 723 pp. [pp. 617, pl. 25]
  25. Posso, S.R. & Donatelli, R.J. (2005) Skull and mandible formation in the cuckoo (Aves Cuculidae): Contributions to the nomenclature in avian osteology and systematics. European Journal of Morphology, 42, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243860500315507
  26. Pycraft, W.P. (1902) A contribution towards our knowledge of the morphology of the owls. Part II. Osteology. Transactions of the Linnean Society, Series Zoology, 7, 223–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1890.tb00201.x
  27. Randi, E., Fusco, G., Lorenzini, R. & Spina, F. (1991) Allozyme divergence and phylogenetic relationships within the Strigiformes. The Condor, 93, 295–301. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368945
  28. Salter, J.F., Oliveros, C.H., Hosner, P.A., Manthey, J.D., Robbins, M.B., Moyle, R.G., Brumfield, R.T. & Faircloth, B.C. (2020) Extensive paraphyly in the typical owl family (Strigidae). The Auk, 137 (1), 1–15. [print version] https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/ukz070.
  29. Shufeldt, R.W. (1900) On the osteology of the Striges (Strigidae and Bubonidae). Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 39, 665–722.
  30. Sick, H. (1997) Order Strigiformes. In: Sick, H., Ornitologia Brasileira. Nova Fronteira S.A., Rio de Janeiro, pp. 393–405.
  31. Smith, A. (1834) The South African Quarterly Journal. Series 2. No. 4. Albion Press, Cape Town, 390 pp. [pp. 316]
  32. Swofford, D.L. (2014) PAUP. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods). Version 4.0a136. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. [program]
  33. Temminck, C.J. (1820) Nouveau Recueil de Planches Coloriées d’Oiseaux, pour servir de suíte et de complément aux Planches Enluminées de Buffon. Livr 3. Gabr. Dufour & E. dÓcagne, Paris. [unknown pagination, pl. 16]
  34. Vieillot, M.L.P. (1808) Histoire Naturelle de Oiseaux. Le Amerique Septentrionale, Chez Desray, Paris, 94 pp. [pp. 52 pp., pl. 201]
  35. Wagler, J.G. (1832) Isis oder Encyclopaedische Zeitung, von Oken, 25 collection. Expedition der Isis, Jena, 1575 pp. [pp. 1221]
  36. Ward, A.B., Weigl, P.D. & Conroy, R.M. (2002) Functional morphology of raptor hindlimbs: implications for resource partitioning. The Auk, 119, 1052–1063. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/119.4.1052
  37. Weick, F. (2006) Owls (Strigiformes): Annotated and illustrated checklist. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 350 pp.
  38. Wink, M. & Heidrich, P. (2000) Molecular systematics of owls (Strigiformes) based on DNA sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. In: Chancellor, R.D. & Meyburg, B.-U. (Eds.), Raptors at risk. Hancock House, Midrand, pp. 819–828.
  39. Wink, M., El-Sayed, A., Sauer-Gürth, H. & Gonzalez, J. (2009) Molecular phylogeny of owls (Strigiformes) inferred from DNA sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b and the nuclear RAG-1 gene. Ardea, 97, 581–591. https://doi.org/10.5253/078.097.0425
  40. Wink, M. (2016) Molekulare taxonomie und systematik der eulen (Strigiformes). Kauzbrief, 28, 36–43.
  41. Zhang, Y., Song, T., Pan, T., Sun, X., Sun, Z., Qian, L. & Zhang, B. (2016) Complete sequence and gene organization of the mitochondrial genome of Asio flammeus (Strigiformes: Strigidae). Mitochondrial DNA, Part A, 27 (4), 2665–2667. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2015.1043538