Abstract
Biological names play an important role in resource identification and as anchors for all sorts of associated information. This is borne out in ever-expanding online resources but the ways in which names are stored and presented give rise to challenges and pitfalls that can lead to missed or misinterpreted information. These resources must serve a variety of users and keep abreast of changes in nomenclature and systematics. Observations on the use of biological names are presented and some solutions to the challenges are offered.References
Anonymous (2005) Taxonomic Concept Transfer Schema. Available from: http://tdwg.napier.ac.uk/ (accessed 6 September 2008).
Berendsohn, W.G. (page editor) (2007a) Access to Biological Collection Data (ABCD) Schema. Available from: http://www.bgbm.org/tdwg/codata/schema/ (accessed 6 September 2008).
Berendsohn, W.G. (2007b) The Berlin Taxonomic Information Model. Available from: http://www.bgbm.org/biodivinf/Docs/BGBM-Model/default.htm (accessed 6 September 2008).
Biodiversity Information Standards (2007) Darwin Core. Available from: http://www.tdwg.org/activities/darwincore/ (accessed 6 September 2008).
EDIT [European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy] (2008) Common data model. Available from: http://dev.e-taxo-nomy.eu/trac/wiki/CommonDataModel (accessed 6 September 2008).
Ytow, N., Morse, D.R. & Roberts D.McL. (2001) Nomencurator: a nomenclatural history model to handle multiple taxonomic views. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 73(1), 81–98. See also http://www.nomencurator.org/ (accessed 6 September 2008).