Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 5660 No. 4: 11 Jul. 2025
Type: Article
Published: 2025-07-11
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5660.4.1
Page range: 451-474
Abstract views: 34
PDF downloaded: 6

Otolith morphometric analysis of North Bornean Ariidae (Siluriformes): new insights and taxonomic implications

Geosciences programme; Faculty of Science; Universiti Brunei Darussalam; Bandar Seri Begawan; Jalan Tungku Link; Gadong BE1410; Brunei Darussalam
Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics; University of Lausanne; Lausanne; Switzerland
Geosciences programme; Faculty of Science; Universiti Brunei Darussalam; Bandar Seri Begawan; Jalan Tungku Link; Gadong BE1410; Brunei Darussalam
Geosciences programme; Faculty of Science; Universiti Brunei Darussalam; Bandar Seri Begawan; Jalan Tungku Link; Gadong BE1410; Brunei Darussalam
Pisces Shape indices Sulcus morphology Taxonomy Lapilli otolith

Abstract

This study examines the morphometric variation of lapilli otoliths in selected modern sea catfish species (Ariidae, Siluriformes) from northern Borneo. Given the pronounced similarity in otolith shape and anatomical features among these taxa, traditional taxonomic discrimination is often challenging, particularly at the species or genus level. To assess the taxonomic utility of otolith morphology, 216 otoliths from 12 species were analyzed using high-resolution imaging, a suite of shape indices (e.g., form factor, roundness), and precise measurements of defined ventral features (e.g., linea basalis). Seventeen morphometric parameters were subjected to various statistical analyses, including Principal Component Analysis (PCA), which delineated two major groups based on otolith shape. The rounded group comprised species from the genera Hexanematichthys, Netuma (two species), and Plicofollis (two species), while the elongated group included species from Arius (three species), Batrachocephalus, Cryptarius, Kyataphisa, and Osteogeneiosus. Subsequent statistical comparisons of selected morphological parameters revealed significant differences among some taxa. Hexanematichthys sagor exhibited a distinctly circular otolith morphology, characterized by a low aspect ratio (AR) and a uniquely oriented distal edge (AP6). Within the elongated group, although the parameters varied less, their combined assessment showed promise in differentiating certain taxa, such as Cryptarius and Osteogeneiosus, particularly through measurements of the otolith central area (R1), incisura linea basalis width (AP1), and otolith thickness ratio (R2). These findings demonstrate that even subtle morphological differences in otoliths can be quantitatively resolved to enhance taxonomic differentiation among ariid catfishes.

 

References

  1. Abdurahman, S.W., Ambak, M.A., Sheriff, S.M., Mohamed, S.Y.A.A. & Chowdhury, A.J.K. (2016) Morphological variations of Plicofollis species (Siluriformes: Ariidae) in Peninsular Malaysia: An insight into truss network approach. Sains Malaysiana, 45 (1), 1‒7.
  2. Acero, P.A. (2002) Order Siluriformes-Ariidae. In: The living marine resources of the western central Atlantic. FAO, Rome, pp. 831‒852.
  3. Acero, P.A. & Betancur-R, R. (2007) Monophyly, affinities, and subfamilial clades of sea catfishes (Siluriformes: Ariidae). Ichthyological exploration of freshwaters, 18 (2), 133.
  4. Aguilera, O.A., Moraes-Santos, H., Costa, S., Ohe, F., Jaramillo, C. & Nogueira, A. (2013) Ariid sea catfishes from the coeval Pirabas (Northeastern Brazil), Cantaure, Castillo (Northwestern Venezuela), and Castilletes (North Colombia) formations (early Miocene), with description of three new species. Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, 132 (1), 45‒68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-013-0052-4
  5. Aguilera, O., Lopes, R.T., Rodriguez, F., dos Santos, T.M., Rodrigues-Almeida, C., Almeida, P., Machado, A.S. & Moretti, T. (2020) Fossil sea catfish (Siluriformes; Ariidae) otoliths and in-skull otoliths from the Neogene of the Western Central Atlantic. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 2020, 102619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102619
  6. Arroyo‐Zúñiga, K.I., Pacheco‐Ovando, R., Granados‐Amores, E., Granados‐Amores, J., González Ramírez, J. & Díaz‐Santana‐Iturrios, M. (2022) Lapillus otolith shape, a useful taxonomic feature for the identification of sea catfishes (Ariidae: Siluriformes) from the north‐eastern Pacific. Journal of Fish Biology, 101 (5), 1262‒1269. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15198
  7. Betancur-R, R. (2009) Molecular phylogenetics and evolutionary history of ariid catfishes revisited: A comprehensive sampling. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 9 (1), 175. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-175
  8. Bond, C.E. (1996) Biology of Fishes. 2nd Edition. Saunders College Publisher, Fort Worth, Texas, 750 pp.
  9. Burgess, W.E. (1989) An atlas of freshwater and marine catfishes. A preliminary survey of the Siluriformes. TFH Publication, Neptune City, Canada, 28, 305‒325.
  10. Chen, Y. & Zhu, G. (2023) Using machine learning to alleviate the allometric effect in otolith shape-based species discrimination: the role of a triplet loss function. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 80 (5), 1277–1290. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsad052
  11. Dantas, D.V., Barletta, M., Costa, M.F., Barbosa‐Cintra, S.C.T., Possatto, F.E., Ramos, J.A., Lima, A.R. & Saint‐Paul, U. (2010) Movement patterns of catfishes (Ariidae) in a tropical semi‐arid estuary. Journal of Fish Biology, 76 (10), 2540‒2557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02646.x
  12. Farooq, N. & Panhwar, S.K. (2023) Taxonomic and Otolith Shape Parameters of Nine Sympatric Catfishes Commercially Harvested in Pakistan. Croatian Journal of Fisheries, 81 (1), 23‒32. https://doi.org/10.2478/cjf-2023-0003
  13. Ferraris, C.J. (2007) Checklist of catfishes, recent and fossil (Osteichthyes: Siluriformes), and catalogue of siluriform primary types. Zootaxa, 1418 (1), 1‒628. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1418.1.1
  14. Froese, R. & Pauly, D. (Eds.) (2024) FishBase. Version February 2024.World Wide Web electronic publication. Available from: https://www.fishbase.org (accessed 25 April 2025)
  15. Gauldie, R.W. & Crampton, J.S. (2002) An eco‐morphological explanation of individual variability in the shape of the fish otolith: comparison of the otolith of Hoplostethus atlanticus with other species by depth. Journal of Fish Biology, 60 (5), 1204‒1221. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfbi.2002.1938
  16. Hammer, Ø. (2023) PAST - PAleontological Statistics. Version 4.13, Reference manual. (PDF). Available from: https://www.fileeagle.com/software/download/16046/e249bd (accessed 10 May 2023)
  17. Kailola, P.J. & Bussing, W.A. (1995) Ariidae (frecuentemente ‘Tachysuridae’ en la literatura). In: Fischer, W., Krupp, F., Schneider, W., Sommer, C., Carpenter, K.E. & Niem, V.H. (Eds.), Guia FAO para la identificacion de especies para los fines de la pesca. Pacific centro-oriental. Vol. II. Vertebrados. Parte I. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, pp. 860–886.
  18. Kailola, P.J. (1999) Order Siluriformes Ariidae. In: Carpenter, K.E. & Niem, V.H. (Eds.), The Living Marine Resources of the Western Central Pacific, 3, pp. 1827‒1847.
  19. Kocsis, L., Lin, C.H., Bernard, E. & Johari, A. (2024) Late Miocene teleost fish otoliths from Brunei Darussalam (Borneo) and their implications for palaeoecology and palaeoenvironmental conditions. Historical Biology, 36 (12), 2642–2676. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2023.2271489
  20. Maciel, T.R., Vaz-dos-Santos, A.M., Barradas, J.R.D.S. & Vianna, M. (2019) Sexual dimorphism in the catfish Genidens genidens (Siluriformes: Ariidae) based on otolith morphometry and relative growth. Neotropical Ichthyology, 17, e180101. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20180101
  21. Mahé, K., Gourtay, C., Defruit, G.B., Chantre, C., de Pontual, H., Amara, R., Claireaux, G., Audet, C., Zambonino-Infante, J.L. & Ernande, B. (2019) Do environmental conditions (temperature and food composition) affect otolith shape during fish early-juvenile phase? An experimental approach applied to European Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 521, 151239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2019.151239
  22. Marceniuk, A.P. & Menezes, N.A. (2007) Systematics of the family Ariidae (Ostariophysi, Siluriformes), with a redefinition of the Genera. Zootaxa, 1416 (1), 1–126. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1416.1.1
  23. Marceniuk, A.P., Menezes, N.A. & Britto, M.R. (2012) Phylogenetic analysis of the family Ariidae (Ostariophysi: Siluriformes), with a hypothesis on the monophyly and relationships of the genera. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 165, 534‒669. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00822.x
  24. Marceniuk, A.P., Acero, A.P., Cooke, R.G. & Betancur-R, R. (2017) Taxonomic revision of the New World genus Ariopsis Gill (Siluriformes: Ariidae), with description of two new species. Zootaxa, 4290 (1), 1‒42. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4290.1.1
  25. Marceniuk, A.P., Oliveira, C. & Ferraris Jr, C.J. (2024) A new classification of the family Ariidae (Osteichthyes: Ostariophysi: Siluriformes) based on combined analyses of morphological and molecular data. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 200, 426–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad078
  26. Nolf, D. (1985) Otolithi piscium. In: Schultze, H. (Ed.), Handbook of paleoichthyology. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 1–146.
  27. Nolf, D. (2013) The diversity of fish otoliths, past and present. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences.
  28. Ohe, F. (2000) Otoliths of three species belonging to family Ariidae from East China Sea. Kaseki no Tomo, 47, 35‒42.
  29. Ohe, F. (2006) Skulls and otoliths of eleven sea catfishes (Family Ariidae) from Malaysia and one species related to them from the East China Sea. Natural Environmental Science Research, 19, 11‒28.
  30. Ponton, D. (2006) Is geometric morphometrics efficient for comparing otolith shape of different fish species? Journal of Morphology, 267 (6), 750‒757. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10439
  31. Popper, A.N., Ramcharitar, J. & Campana, S.E. (2005) Why otoliths? Insights from inner ear physiology and fisheries biology. Marine and freshwater Research, 56 (5), 497‒504. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04267
  32. Pusey, B.J., Jardine, T.D., Bunn, S.E. & Douglas, M.M. (2020) Sea catfishes (Ariidae) feeding on freshwater floodplains of northern Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research, 71 (12), 1628‒1639. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF20012
  33. Santificetur, C., Giaretta, M.B., Conversani, V.R.M., Brenha-Nunes, M.R., Siliprandi, C.C. & Rossi-Wongtschowski, C.L.D.B. (2017) Atlas of marine bony fish otoliths of Southeastern-Southern Brazil Part VIII: Siluriformes (Ariidae) and Pleuronectiformes (Achiridae, Paralichthyidae, Cynoglossidae). Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, 65 (3), 448‒494. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-87592017143106503
  34. Santos, L. & Vaz-dos-Santos, A.M. (2023) Insights of otoliths morphology to reveal patterns of teleostean fishes in the Southern Atlantic. Fishes, 8 (1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8010021
  35. Simier, M., Osse, O.J.F., Sadio, O. & Ecoutin, J.M. (2021) Biology and ecology of sea catfish (Ariidae) of estuarine, lagoon and coastal ecosystems in West Africa. Journal of Fish Biology, 99 (2), 629‒643. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14751
  36. Souza, A.T., Soukalová, K., Děd, V., Šmejkal, M., Blabolil, P., Říha, M., Jůza, T., Vašek, M., Čech, M., Peterka, J., Vejřík, L., Vejříková, I., Tušer, M., Muška, M., Holubová, M., Boukal, D.S. & Kubečka, J. (2020) Ontogenetic and interpopulation differences in otolith shape of the European perch (Perca fluviatilis). Fisheries Research, 230, 105673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105673
  37. Tuset, V.M., Farré, M., Otero-Ferrer, J.L., Vilar, A., Morales-Nin, B. & Lombarte, A. (2016) Testing otolith morphology for measuring marine fish biodiversity. Marine and Freshwater Research, 67 (7), 1037‒1048. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF15052
  38. Vignon, M. (2012) Ontogenetic trajectories of otolith shape during shift in habitat use: Interaction between otolith growth and environment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 420, 26‒32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2012.03.021
  39. Weisler, M.I. (1993) The importance of fish otoliths in Pacific Island archaeofaunal analysis. New Zealand Journal of Archaeology, 15, 131‒159.

How to Cite

Johari, A., Kocsis, L., Roslim, A. & Haziq, I. (2025) Otolith morphometric analysis of North Bornean Ariidae (Siluriformes): new insights and taxonomic implications. Zootaxa, 5660 (4), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5660.4.1