Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Articles
Published: 2009-10-16
Page range: 51–60
Abstract views: 52
PDF downloaded: 1

Further notes on the taxonomy of four species of Physalaemus (Anura, Leiuperidae) from the Atlantic Forest of Southeastern Brazil

Laboratório de Taxonomia, Comportamento, Ecologia e Sistemática de Anuros Neotropicais, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia (MG), Brasil
Laboratório de Taxonomia, Comportamento, Ecologia e Sistemática de Anuros Neotropicais, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia (MG), Brasil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Comparada (Mestrado). Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Depto. de Biologia da FFCLRP. Avenida dos Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto-SP, 14040-901, Brasil
Laboratório de Taxonomia, Comportamento, Ecologia e Sistemática de Anuros Neotropicais, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia (MG), Brasil
Amphibia Physalaemus bokermanni Physalaemus jordanensis Physalaemus moreirae Physalaemus olfersii vocalization tadpole

Abstract

We analyzed the advertisement calls of four species of Physalaemus (P. olfersii, P. moreirae, P. bokermanni, and P. jordanensis) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. The tadpole of P. olfersii is described for the first time. Calls of all species are composed by just one kind of note. Those of P. olfersii are long (4035 ms), pseudo-pulsed, with dominant frequency around 2375 Hz; 7–10 sidebands are well distinguishable. The calls of P. moreirae are pulsed, with duration about 604 ms, mean dominant frequency around 1369 Hz and 3–5 sidebands. Physalaemus bokermanni has a call structurally different from the other species by the absence of sidebands or harmonics, larger inter-pulse breaks (around 34–42 ms) and a wider frequency range (around 3700 Hz). Calls of P. jordanensis are pulsed and have 7–8 harmonics, last about 1068 ms and dominant frequency around 2742 Hz. Physalaemus olfersii tadpoles show typical features of other Physalaemus larvae, measuring about 19 mm in total length. Our data on call of P. olfersii suggest that a broader taxonomic survey would be worthwhile by revealing that different species are included under this name. Calls of P. moreirae and P. bokermanni, in general, are in agreement with those previously described from other sites, but complementary features are given. Those of Physalaemus jordanensis show some differences in relation to the calls from the type locality, but additional data are still necessary for a taxonomic conclusion.

References

  1. Altig, R. & McDiarmid, R.W. (1999) Body plan, development and morphology. In McDiarmid, R.W. & Altig, R. (Eds), Tadpoles: The biology of anuran larvae. Univ. Chicago Press. Chicago and London pp. 24–51.

    Bertoluci, J. & Rodrigues, M.T. (2002) Utilização de habitats reprodutivos e micro-habitats de vocalização em uma taxocenose de anuros (Amphibia) da Mata Atlântica do sudeste do Brasil. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 42(11), 287–297.

    Bokermann, W.C.A. (1966) Dos nuevas species de Physalaemus de Espiritu Santo, Brazil (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Physis 26(71), 193–202.

    Bokermann, W.C.A. (1967) Três novas espécies de Physalaemus do sudeste brasileiro (Amphibia; Leptodactylidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 27(2), 135-143.

    Caramaschi, U & Caramaschi, E.P. (1991) Reassessment of the type locality and synonymy of Physalaemus moreirae (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1937) (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Journal of Herpetology, 25(1), 107–108.

    Cardoso, A.J., Andrade, G.V. & Haddad, C.F.B. (1989) Distribuição espacial em comunidades de anfíbios (Anura) no sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 49(1), 241–249.

    Cardoso, A.J. & Haddad, C.F.B. (1985) Nova espécie de Physalaemus do grupo signiferus (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 45, 33–37.

    Cardoso, A.J. & Haddad, C.F.B. (1992) Diversidade e turno de vocalizações de anuros em comunidade neotropical. Acta Zoologica Lilloana, 41, 93–105.

    Cruz, C.A.G., Cassini, C.S. & Caramaschi, U. (2008) A new species of the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura, Leiuperidae) from Southern Brazil. South American Journal of Herpetology, 3(3), 239–243.

    Duellman, W. & Trueb, L. (1986) Biology of Amphibians. McGraw-Hill, New York, 670 pp.

    Feio, R.N., Pombal Jr, J.P. & Caramaschi, U. (1999). New Physalaemus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from the Atlantic Forest of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Copeia, 1999(1), 141–145.

    Frost, D.R. (2008) Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference, v. 5.2. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Available from: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.php (12 November 2008)

    Giaretta, A.A., Facure, K.G., Sawaya, R.J., Meyer, J.H.M. & Chemin, N. (1999) Diversity and abundance of litter frogs in a montane forest of Southeastern Brazil: Seasonal and altitudinal changes. Biotropica, 31(4), 669–674.

    Giaretta, A.A. & Facure, K.G. (2008) Reproduction and habitat of ten Brazilian frogs (Anura). Contemporary Herpetology, 2008(3), 1–4.

    Gosner, K.L. (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica, 16, 183−190.

    Gridi-Papp, M. (2007) Sound Ruler acoustic analysis. v. 0.9.6.0. Available from http://soundruler.sourceforge.net (17 August 2007).

    Haddad, C.F.B. & Pombal Jr., J.P. (1998) Redescription of Physalaemus spiniger (Anura, Leptodactylidae) and description of two new reproductive modes. Journal of Herpetology, 32 (4), 557–565.

    Heyer, W.R. (1985) New species of frogs from Boracéia, São Paulo, Brazil. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 98(3), 657–671.

    Heyer, W.R. & Wolf, A.J. (1989) Physalaemus crombiei (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae), a new frog species from Espírito Santo, Brazil with comments on the P. signifer group. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 102(2), 500–506.

    Heyer, W.R., Rand, A.S., Cruz, C.A.G., Peixoto, O.L. & Nelson, C.E. (1990) Frogs of Boracéia. Arquivos de Zoologia, 31(4), 231–410.

    Nascimento, L.B., Caramaschi, U. & Cruz, C.A.G. (2005) Taxonomy review of the species groups of the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 with the revalidation of the genera Engystomops Jimenez-De-La-Espada, 1872 and Eupemphix Steindachner, 1863 (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae). Arquivos do Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro, 63(2), 297–320.

    Sueur, J., Aubin, T., Simonis, C. (2008) Seewave, a free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis. Bioacoustics, 18, 213–226.

    Thomé, M.T., Oyamaguchi, H.M. & Brasileiro, C.A. (2007) Amphibia, Anura, Leiuperidae, Physalaemus bokermanni: Distribution extension. Check List 3(1), 1–3.

    Tolledo, J., Oliveira, E.F., Feio, R.N. & Weber, L.N. (2009) Amphibia, Anura, Leiuperidae, Physalaemus jordanensis Bokermann, 1967: Distribution extension and geographic distribution map. Check List 5(3), 422–424.

    Weber, L.N., Carvalho e Silva, S.P. & Gonzaga, L.P. (2005a) The tadpole of Physalaemus soaresi, Izecksohn, 1965 (Anura, Leptodactylidae), with comments on taxonomy, reproductive behavior, and vocalizations. Zootaxa, 1072, 35–42.

    Weber, L.N., Gonzaga, L.P. & Carvalho e Silva, S.P. (2005b). A new species of Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 from the lowland Atlantic Forest of Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae). Arquivos do Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro, 63(4), 677–684.

    Wogel, H., Abrunhosa, P.A. & Pombal Jr., J.P. (2002) Atividade reprodutiva de Physalaemus signifer (Anura, Leptodactylidae) em ambiente temporário. Iheringia, série Zoologia, 92(2), 57–70.

    Zar, J.H. (1999) Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 718 pp.