Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 464 No. 1: 16 Mar. 2004
Type: Article
Published: 2004-03-16
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.464.1.1
Page range: 1–7
Abstract views: 86
PDF downloaded: 5

Using the size independent discriminant analysis to distinguish the species of Myliobatis Cuvier (Batoidea: Myliobatidae) from Brazil

Laboratório de Ictiologia, Depto. Sistemática e Ecologia - Universidade Federal da Paraíba – Brazil
Laboratório de Ictiologia, Depto de Biologia Animal e Vegetal – Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro – Brazil
Laboratório de Zooplancton, Departamento de Biologia Marinha – Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – Brazil
Pisces Identification Myliobatis Brazil size independent discriminant analysis

Abstract

The two only species of Myliobatis Cuvier, that occur in the Brazilian coast, Myliobatis freminvillii Lesueur and Myliobatis goodei Garman, have great similarity in external morphology and possess few diagnostic characters that allow easy identification. In order to discriminate these two species, 34 specimens of M. freminvillii and 19 of M. goodei were measured and twenty morphometric characters were taken from each specimen. The residuals of a previous regression analysis performed on all morphometric variables relative to the disc width were used in the Size Independent Discriminant Analysis. All specimens were correctly allocated to their respective taxa. The analysis showed a clear separation of the specimens, forming two well-defined distinct groups. The fifth interbranchial distance (5ID) was the variable with the highest standardized discriminant coefficient value. The fifth interbranchial distance (5ID)-Internarial distance (IND) and fifth interbranchial distance (5ID)-Mouth width (MW) were the proportions that showed better differentiation between Myliobatis species.

References

  1. Aguiar, A. & Gallo, V. (2002) Discriminação de espécies do gênero Gymnura (van Hasselt, 1823) (Elasmobranchii, Myliobatiformes, Gymnuridae) ocorrentes no litoral brasileiro por análises estatísticas multivariadas, XXIV Congresso Brasileiro de Zoologia, Itajaí, 1 pp.

    Bigelow, H.B. & Schroeder, W.C. (1953) Fishes of the Western North Atlantic. Sawfishes, guitarfishes, skates and rays. Memoirs of The Sears Foundation for Marine Research, 1 (2), 1–558.

    Cavalcanti, M. J., Gomes, U. L & Tomás, A. R. G. (1996) Discriminação morfológica entre Rhizoprionodon porosus (Poey, 1861) e Rhizoprionodon lalandii (Valenciennes, 1839) (Elasmobranchii, Carchrhiniformes, Carcharhinidae): um estudo multivariado. Acta Biologica Leopoldensia, 18 (2), 103–108.

    Cavalcanti, M.J., Gallo-da-Silva, V & Afonso, A.F. (1997) Identificação de Rhinoptera bonasus (Mitchill, 1815) e R. brasiliensis Müller & Henle, 1841 (Chondrichthyes, Myliobatiformes, Rhinopteridae) pela análise de funções discriminantes. Acta Biologica Leopoldensia, 19 (2), 205–215.

    Compagno, L.J.V. (1999) Systematics and Body Form. In: Hamlett, W. C. (Ed.) Sharks, skates, and rays: The biology of elasmobranch fishes, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 1–42.

    Figueiredo, J.L. (1977) Manual de peixes marinhos do sudeste do Brasil. I. Introdução. Cações, raias e quimeras, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 104 pp.

    Peres-Neto, P. R. (1995) Introdução à análises morfométricas. In: Peres-Neto, P. R., Valentin, J. L. & FERNANDEZ, F. A. S. (Ed.) Tópicos em Tratamento de Dados Biológicos, Oecologia braziliensis, Rio de Janeiro, 57– 89.