Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 1589 No. 1: 19 Sep. 2007
Type: Article
Published: 2007-09-19
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1589.1.2
Page range: 23–32
Abstract views: 48
PDF downloaded: 25

Conservation implications of a morphometric comparison between the Illinois Chorus Frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis) and Strecker’s Chorus Frog (P. s. streckeri) (Anura: Hylidae) from Arkansas, Illinois, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Texas

Department of Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University, State University, AR 72467
Department of Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University, State University, AR 72467
Department of Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University, State University, AR 72467
Anura amphibian coloration conservation morphometrics

Abstract

Much uncertainty exists regarding the taxonomic status of the Illinois Chorus Frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis Smith; ICF) relative to Strecker’s Chorus Frog (P. s. streckeri, Wright & Wright; SCF) of the southcentral United States (US). Molecular analyses have been inconsistent in providing taxonomic insight, and no formal morphological comparisons have been previously performed. Each taxon possesses a wide range of background colors. We undertook morphometric analyses to help clarify their taxonomic relationship. Tibia length and mass were compared for live Arkansas (AR) specimens and snout-vent, head and tibia lengths were measured from preserved vouchered specimens. Tibia length and mass were significantly greater for living ICFs versus SCFs in AR. Among preserved specimens, tibia, snoutvent and head lengths were significantly greatly for AR ICFs relative to most intraspecific groups, and Texas (TX) SCFs were significantly smaller than most other groups. Principal components analysis was largely consistent with univariate analyses, although Missouri (MO) ICFs also partitioned distinctly from other sample groups. These data provide morphological evidence of geographic (clinal) variation within a species, but do not provide support for the taxonomic elevation of the ICF to species status. Our data do provide evidence of distinct population segments of P. streckeri. As ICF habitat suitable for reproduction has dramatically declined in Arkansas as have population numbers, we recommend the listing of AR ICFs as a distinct population segment under the Endangered Species Act.

References

  1. Axtell, R.W. & Haskell, N. (1977) An interhiatal population of Pseudacris streckeri from Illinois, with an assessment of its postglacial dispersion history. Chicago Academy of Sciences, Natural History Miscellanea, 202, 1–8.

    Briggler, J. (2001) Status and distribution of the Illinois Chorus Frog in Missouri (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis): 2001 survey. Final Report to the Missouri Department of Conservation, 2 pp.

    Cochran, D.M. (1955) Frogs of Southeastern Brazil. Bulletin of the US National Museum 206, xvi + 423 pp.

    Collins, J.T. (1997) Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians and Reptiles, 4th Edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 25, 40 pp.

    Collins, J.T. & Taggart, T.W. (2002) Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles, and Crocodilians, 5th Edition. Center for North American Herpetology, Lawrence, Kansas, iv + 44 pp.

    Conant, R. & Collins, J.T. (1998) A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America, 3rd Edition, Expanded. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts, 616 pp.

    Duellman, W.E. & Trueb, L. (1986) Biology of Amphibians. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, 670 pp.

    Gaudin, A.J. (1974) An osteological analysis of Holarctic tree frogs, family Hylidae. Journal of Herpetology, 8, 141–152.

    Goin, C.J. & Netting, M.G. (1940) A new gopher frog from the Gulf Coast, with comments upon the Rana areolata group. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 28, 137-–169.

    Hayek, L-A.C., Heyer, W.R. & Gascon, C. (2001) Frog morphometrics: a cautionary tale. Alytes, 18, 153–177.

    Hedges, S.B. (1986) An electrophoretic analysis of Holarctic hylid frog evolution. Systematic Zoology, 35, 1–21.

    Hunter, M.L. Jr. (1996) Fundamentals of Conservation Biology. Blackwell Science, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, 482 pp.

    Johnson, T.R. (2000) The Amphibians & Reptiles of Missouri, 2nd Edition. Missouri Dept. of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 400 pp.

    Lannoo, M. (2005) Amphibian Declines: The Conservation Status of United States Species. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 1094 pp.

    Lee, J.C. (1982) Accuracy & precision in anuran morphometrics: Artifacts of preservation. Systematic Zoology, 31, 266–281.

    McCallum, M.L. & Trauth, S.E. (2002) An investigation of the distribution and status of the Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis) and condition of breeding habitat in northeastern Arkansas: A needs assessment for conservation. Final Report to the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Little Rock, 26 pp.

    Moriarty, E.C. & Cannatella, D.C. (2004) Phylogenetic relationships of the North American chorus frogs. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 30, 409–420.

    Peters, J.A. (1964) Dictionary of Herpetology. Hafner Publishing Company, New York, New York, 392 pp. + figures.

    Phillips, C.A., Brandon, R.A., & Moll, E.O. (1999) Field Guide to Amphibians and Reptiles of Illinois, Manual 8. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois, 282 pp.

    Robison, H.W. & Buchanan, T.M. (1988) Fishes of Arkansas. University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 536 pp.

    Scott, E. (2005) A phylogeny of ranid frogs (Anura: Ranoidea: Ranidae), based on a simultaneous analysis of morphological and molecular data. Cladistics, 21, 507–574.

    Smith, P.W. (1951) A new frog and a new turtle from the western Illinois sand prairies. Bulletin of the Chicago Academy of Sciences, 9, 189–199.

    Smith, P.W. (1957) An analysis of post-Wisconsin biogeography of the Prairie Peninsula region based on distributional phenomena among terrestrial vertebrate populations. Ecology, 38, 205–218.

    Smith, P.W. (1966) Pseudacris streckeri. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles, 27.1–27.2.

    Trauth, J.B., Trauth, S.E., & Johnson, R.L. (2006) Best management practices and drought combine to silence the Illinois chorus frog in Arkansas. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34, 514--–517.

    Trauth, S.E., Robison, H.W., & Plummer, M.V. (2004) Amphibians and Reptiles of Arkansas. University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 421 pp.

    Trueb, L. (1977) Osteology and anuran systematics: Intrapopulation variation in Hyla lanciformis. Systematic Zoology, 26, 165–184.

    Tucker, J.K. (1998) Status of Illinois chorus frogs in Madison County, Illinois. In: Lannoo, M. (Ed.), Status and Conservation of Midwestern Amphibians. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City, Iowa, pp. 94–101.

    Tucker, J.K. & Philipp, D.P. (1993) Population status of the Illinois chorus frog (Pseudacris streckeri illinoensis) in Madison County, Illinois, with emphasis on the new Poag Road/FAP 413 interchange and FAP 413 wetland mitigation site. Illinois Department of Transportation, Technical report, Springfield, Illinois.