Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2008-02-27
Page range: 27–38
Abstract views: 52
PDF downloaded: 23

DNA barcoding of new world cicada killers (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae)

Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA
Department of Biology, Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042, USA
Department of Biology, Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042, USA
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA
Hymenoptera cryptic species introgression Big Bend National Park sympatric species cytochrome c oxidase subunit I

Abstract

We are engaged in a comprehensive study of cicada killers (Sphecius spp.), including their behavioral ecology. At one location, we observed interactions among three putative species of Sphecius, and used DNA barcoding to help clarify relationships among them. For this, we sequenced a fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene. During our study, a new taxonomic key of New World cicada killers, based on morphology, was published, and we expanded the barcoding project to test the congruence between barcodes and this key. In general, barcoding evidence supports morphological distinctions among species; sequence divergences between individuals of different species were within the range expected for congeneric Hymenoptera. However, two conflicts between barcoding and morphological evidence were noted. 1) Haplotypes of Sphecius grandis Say fall into two highly divergent clades, suggesting they are cryptic species. 2) Two clades of S. convallis Patton were found, and the sequences of one clade are virtually identical to those of S. speciosus Drury, suggesting that this clade of S. convallis is conspecific with S. speciosus. Alternative explanations are possible for this result, including hybridization and introgression between the two species. We conclude that our DNA barcoding evidence should be interpreted with caution, but that it has generated interesting questions we hope to resolve with field research coupled with analysis of suitable nuclear gene sequences.

References

  1. Ballard, J.W.O. & Rand, D.M. (2005) The population biology of mitochondrial DNA and its phylogenetic implications. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 36, 621–642.

    Barrett, R. & Hebert, P.D.N. (2005) Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 83, 481–491.

    Bohart, R.M. (2000) A review of the Gorytini in the neotropical region (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae: Bembicinae). Contributions on Entomology International, 4, 111–259.

    Danforth, B.N., Mitchell, P.L. & Packer, L. (1998) Mitochondrial DNA differentiation between two cryptic Halictus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) species. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 91, 387-391.

    Danforth, B.N., Sauquet, H. & Packer, L. (1999) Phylogeny of the bee genus Halictus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) based on parsimony and likelihood analyses of nuclear EF-1α sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 13(3), 605-618.

    Dasmahapatra, K.K. & Mallet, J. (2006) DNA barcodes: recent successes and future prospects. Heredity, 97, 254–255.

    DeSalle, R., Egan, M.G. & Siddall, M. (2005) The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation, and DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 360, 1905–1916.

    Evans, H.E. & O’Neill, K.M. (2007) The Sand Wasps: Natural History and Behavior. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts, 340 pp.

    Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R. & Vrijenhoek, R. (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3, 294–297.

    Fox, W.J. (1895) Synopsis of the Stizini of Boreal America. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 47, 264–268.

    Gompert, Z., Nice, C.C., Fordyce, J.A., Forister, M.L. & Shapiro, A.M. (2006) Identifying units for conservation using molecular taxonomy: the cautionary tale of the Karner blue butterfly. Molecular Ecology, 15, 1759–1768.

    Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L. & deWaard, J.R. (2003a) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 270, 313–321.

    Hebert, P.D.N., Ratnasingham, S. & de Waard, J.R. (2003b) Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 270, S96–S99.

    Hebert, P.D.N., Stoeckle, M.Y., Zemlak, T.S. & Francis, C.M. (2004a) Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biology, 2(10), e312.

    Hebert, P.D.N., Penton, E.H., Burns, J.M., Janzen, D.H. & Hallwachs, W. (2004b) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 14812–14817.

    Holliday, C.W. & Coelho, J.R. (2006) Improved key to New World species of Sphecius (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 99, 793–798.

    Leys, R., Cooper, S.J.B., Schwarz, M.P. (2002) Molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the large carpenter bees, genus Xylocopa (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 77, 249–266.

    Meier, R., Shiyang, K., Vaidys, G. & Ng, P.K.L. (2006) DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Systematic Biology, 55(5), 715–728.

    Melo, G.A.R. (1999) Phylogenetic relationships and classification of the major lineages of Apoidea (Hymenoptera), with emphasis on the crabronid wasps. Scientific Papers, Natural History Museum of the University of Kansas, 14, 1–55.

    Melo-Ferreira, J., Boursot, P., Suchentrunk, F., Ferrand, N. & Alves, P.C. (2005) Invasion from the cold past: extensive introgression of mountain hare (Lepus timidus) mitochondrial DNA into three other hare species in northern Iberia. Molecular Ecology, 14, 2459–2464.

    Moritz, C. & Cicero, C. (2004) DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PloS Biology, 2(10), e354.

    Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14(9), 817–818.

    Pulawski, W.J. (2006, 3 August version) Catalog of Sphecidae. http://www.calacademy.org/research/entomology/Entomology_Resources/Hymenoptera/sphecidae.htm. 14 November 2007.

    Scheffer, S.J., Lewis, L.L. & Joshi, C.J. (2006) DNA barcoding applied to invasive leafminers (Diptera: Agromyzidae) in the Philippines. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 99(2), 204–210.

    Smith, M.A., Fisher, B.L. & Hebert, P.D.N. (2005) DNA Barcoding for effective biodiversity assessment of a hyperdiverse arthropod group: the ants of Madagascar. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 360, 1825-1834.

    Smith, M.A., Woodley, N.E., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W. & Hebert, P.D.N. (2006) DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specificity within the presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 3657–3662.

    Smith, M.A., Wood, D.M., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W., & Hebert, P.D.N. (2007) DNA barcodes affirm that 16 species of apparently generalist tropical parasitoid flies (Diptera, Tachinidae) are not all generalists. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 4967–4972.

    Sonnenberg, R., Nolte, A.W., & Tautz, D. (2007) An evaluation of LSU rDNA D1–D2 sequences for their use in species identification. Frontiers in Zoology, 4, 6.

    Swofford, D.L. (2002) Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (And Other Methods). 4.0 Beta. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Will, K.W. & Rubinoff, D. (2004) Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics, 20, 47–55.