Abstract
Recently, a paper (Dubois & Nemésio 2007) expressed general views regarding the deposition of vouchers in public collections to serve as onomatophores (name-bearing type specimens), and it was suggested that deposition should be made explicitly compulsory in the Code, to avoid the growing number of descriptions that skip this process opportunistically based on some apparent ambiguities of the Code. Donegan (2008) made several criticisms to that paper, defending a “liberal approach” of the Code concerning the nature of type specimens. Here I present my rebuttal to Donegan (2008), showing point by point that his criticisms are the sum of misunderstandings of the Code and of the ideas presented in Dubois & Nemésio (2007), allied to some biased and very subjective personal interpretations. The arguments used to allow description without the deposition of voucher(s) are once more demonstrated to be based on articles of the Code that do not serve to this end and the suggestions of amendment of the Code presented by Dubois & Nemésio (2007) are shown to adequately accommodate the concerns of conservationists regarding descriptions of species found on the brink of extinction.References
Athreya, R. (2006) A new species of Liocichla (Aves: Timaliidae) from Eaglenest Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Indian Birds, 2, 82–94.
Banks, R.C., Goodman, S.M., Lanyon, S.M. & Schulenberg, T.S. (1993) Type specimens and basic principles of avian taxonomy. Auk, 110, 413–414.
Collar, N.J. (2000) Collecting and conservation: cause and effect. Bird Conservation International, 10, 1–15.
Cuervo, A.M., Salaman, P.G.W. Donegan, T.M. & Ochoa, J.M. (2001) A new species of piha (Cotingidae: Lipaugus) from the Cordillera Central of Colombia. Ibis, 143, 353–368.
Donegan, T.M. (2000) Is specimen-taking of birds in the Neotropics really “essential”? Ethical and practical objections to further collection. Neotropical Ornithology, 11, 263–267.
Donegan, T.M. (2008) Nomenclatural availability of nomina of new species or subspecies does not and should not require the deposition of dead specimens in collections. Zootaxa, 1761, 37–48.
Dubois, A. (2008) Phylogenetic hypotheses, taxa and nomina in zoology. Zootaxa, 1950, 51–86.
Dubois, A. & Nemésio, A. (2007) Does nomenclatural availability of nomina of new species or subspecies require the deposition of vouchers in collections? Zootaxa, 1409, 1–22.
Dubois, A. & Ohler, A. (1995) Frogs of the subgenus Pelophylax (Amphibia, Anura, genus Rana): a catalogue of available and valid scientific names, with comments on name-bearing types, complete synonymies, proposed common names, and maps showing all type localities. Zoologica Polonica, “1994”, 39, 139–204.
Dubois, A. & Ohler, A. (1997) Early scientific names of Amphibia Anura. I. Introduction. Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, (4), 18, 297–320.
Gentile, G., Fabiani, A., Marquez, C., Snell, H.L., Snell, H. M., Tapia, W. & Sbordoni, V. (2009) An overlooked pink species of land iguana in the Galápagos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 507–511.
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth Edition. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, Padova, XXIX + 306 pp.
Mendes Pontes, A.R., Malta, A. & Asfora, P.H. (2006) A new species of capuchin monkey, genus Cebus Erxleben (Cebidae, Primates): found at the very brink of extinction in the Pernambuco Endemism Centre. Zootaxa, 1200, 1–12.
Moser, M. (2005) Holotypic Ink. Science On Line. Available from: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/eletters/309/5744/2163c (accessed 15 October 2007)
Naish, D. (2006) The interesting and contentious discovery of the kipunji. Available from: http://darrennaish.blogspot.com/2006/06/interesting-and-contentious-discovery.html (accessed 15 October 2007)
Nemésio, A. (2001) Colour production and evolution in parrots. International Journal of Ornithology, 4, 75–102.
Nemésio, A. (2006) Euglossa anodorhynchi sp. n. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), a new orchid bee from southern Brazil. Neotropical Entomology, 35, 206–209.
Nemésio, A. (2007) Three new species of Euglossa Latreille (Hymenoptera: Apidae) from Brazil. Zootaxa, 1547, 21–31.
Nemésio, A. (2008) Eufriesea atlantica sp. n. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), a new orchid bee from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Lundiana, 8, “2007”, 147–152.
Nemésio, A. (2009) Orchid bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Zootaxa, 2041, 1–242.
Nemésio, A. & Bembé, B. (2008) A new species of Eufriesea (Hymenoptera: Apidae) from Bolivia, rearrangement of Eufriesea auripes species group and an identification key to the group. Spixiana, 31, 241–246.
Nemésio, A. & Rasmussen, C. (2009) The rediscovery of Buffon’s “Guarouba” or “Perriche jaune”: two senior synonyms of Aratinga pintoi Silveira, Lima & Höfling, 2005 (Aves: Psittaciformes). Zootaxa, 2013, 1–16.
Oliveira, M.L. & Nemésio, A. (2003) Exaerete lepeletieri (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Apini: Euglossina) a new species of cleptoparasitic bee from Amazonia. Lundiana, 4, 117–120.
Oliveira, M.M. & Langguth, A. (2006) Rediscovery of Marcgrave’s Capuchin Monkey and designation of a neotype for Simia flavia Schreber, 1774 (Primates, Cebidae). Boletim do Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, (n.s.), 523, 1–16.
Patterson, B.D. (2002) On the continuing need for scientific collecting of mammals. Journal of Neotropical Mammalogy, 9, 253–262.
Peterson, A.T., Brumfield, R.T., Moyle, R.G., Nyari, A., Remsen Jr., J.V., Robbins, M.B. (2007) The need for proper vouchering in phylogenetic studies of birds. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.08.019
Polaszek, A., Grubb, P., Groves, C, Ehardt, C.L. & Butynski, T.M. (2005) What constitutes a proper description? Response. Science, 309, 2164–2166.
Remsen Jr., J.V. (1995) The importance of continued collecting of bird specimens to ornithology and bird conservation. Bird Conservation International, 5, 145–180.
Smith, E.F.G., Arctander, P., Fjeldsa, J. & Amir, O.G. (1991) A new species of shrike (Laniidae: Laniarius) from Somalia, verified by DNA sequence data from the only known individual. Ibis, 133, 227–235.
Timm, R.M., Ramey, R.R. II & The Nomenclature Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists. (2005) What constitutes a proper description? Science, 309, 2163–2164.
Tzika, A.C., Rosa, S.F.P., Fabiani, A., Snell, H.L., Snell, H.M., Marquez, C., Tapia, W., Rassmann, K., Gentile, G. & Milinkovitch, M.C. (2008) Population genetics of Galápagos land iguana (genus Conolophus) remnant populations. Molecular Ecology, 17, 4943–4952.
Vuilleumier, F. (1998) The need to collect birds in the Neotropics. Neotropical Ornithology, 9, 201–203.
Vuilleumier, F. (2000) Response: further collection of birds in the Neotropics is still needed. Neotropical Ornithology, 11, 269–274.
Wakeham-Dawson, A., Morris, S. & Tubbs, P. (2002) Type specimens: dead or alive? Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 59, 282–284.
Winker, K. (1996) The crumbling infrastructure of biodiversity: the avian example. Conservation Biology, 10, 703–707.