Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 2943 No. 1: 7 Jul. 2011
Type: Editorial
Published: 2011-07-07
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2943.1.3
Page range: 58–62
Abstract views: 42
PDF downloaded: 17

Recommendations about nomenclature for papers submitted to Zootaxa

Reptiles & Amphibiens, UMR 7205 OSEB, Département de Systématique & Evolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CP 30, 25 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France
Department of Biology, University of Padova, Via Ugo Bassi 58 B, 35131 Padova, Italy
New Zealand Arthropod Collection, Landcare Research, 231 Morrin Road, St. Johns, Auckland 1072, New Zealand
General nomenclature

Abstract

The rapid success of Zootaxa has been due in part to the decentralization of its editorial process and to the taxonomic specialization of members of the editorial board (Zhang 2010). Both these factors allowed a quicker publication of papers than in many other journals, after an appropriate review by editors well acquainted with the taxa covered and the relevant literature.

References

  1. David, N., Dickinson, E.C. & Gregory, S.M.S. (2009) Contributions to a list of First Reviser actions: ornithology. Zootaxa, 2085, 1–24.

    Dubois, A. (2007) Genitives of species and subspecies nomina derived from personal names should not be emended. Zootaxa, 1550, 49–68.

    Dubois, A. (2008a) A partial but radical solution to the problem of nomenclatural taxonomic inflation and synonymy load. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 93, 857–863.

    Dubois, A. (2008b) Phylogenetic hypotheses, taxa and nomina in zoology. In: Minelli, A., Bonato, L. & Fusco, G. (Eds.), Updating the Linnaean heritage: names as tools for thinking about animals and plants. Zootaxa, 1950, 51–86.

    Dubois, A. (2010) Retroactive changes should be introduced in the Code only with great care: problems related to the spellings of nomina. Zootaxa, 2426, 1–42.

    Dubois, A. & Nemésio, A. (2007) Does nomenclatural availability of nomina of new species or subspecies require the deposition of vouchers in collections? Zootaxa, 1409, 1–22.

    International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1985) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Third edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, i–xx + 1–338.

    International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1996) Opinion 1830. Caeciliidae Kolbe, 1880 (Insecta, Psocoptera): spelling emended to Caeciliusidae, so removing the homonymy with Caeciliidae Rafinesque, 1814 (Amphibia, Gymnophiona). Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature, 53, 68–69.

    International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, i–xxix + 1–306.

    Nemésio, A. (2007) “Page priority” does not exist in the Code: Neomegalotomus parvus (Westwood, 1842) has precedence over Neomegalotomuns simplex (Westwood, 1842) (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Alydidae). Zootaxa, 1524, 57–59.

    Ng, P.K.L. (1994) The citation of species names and the role of the author’s name. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 42, 509–513.

    Simpson, G.G. (1940) Types in modern taxonomy. American Journal of Science, 238, 413–431.

    Zhang, Z.-Q. (2010) Reviving descriptive taxonomy after 250 years: promising signs from a mega-journal in taxonomy. In: Polaszek, A. (Ed.), Systema Naturae 250—The Linnaean Ark, London, Taylor & Francis, pp. 95–107.