Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Articles
Published: 2012-09-05
Page range: 56–68
Abstract views: 33
PDF downloaded: 2

Confocal laser scanning microscopy technique for the study of internal genitalia and external morphology of eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea)

Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab., 1, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab., 7/9, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia
Acari CLSM apodemes spermatheca Phytoptidae Eriophyidae

Abstract

Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) is a modern powerful technique that can be used for studying the externaland internal anatomy of arthropods. CLSM has seldom been used in acarology and very rarely for studying eriophyoidmites. It allows the capture of precise digital images of the fine details of external and internal chitinous structures, whichcan be further analysed using various computer programs. CLSM can serve as an effective tool for comparing closelyrelated and/or cryptic species, correcting diagnoses of poorly described taxa, studying immature instars, and particularly,for studying the structures and the functioning of the internal genitalia of adult females and males. In this paper, thepotential use of CLSM for the study of eriophyoids is demonstrated using specimens of 13 mite species and eight generafrom the families Phytoptidae Murray 1877 and Eriophyidae Nalepa 1898. This study showed that freshly mountedspecimens on microscope slides appeared to be the most appropriate for CLSM as older specimens tended to have reducedautofluorescence. The best choice for studying the external morphology and internal genital apparatus of eriophyoid mitesappeared to be the blue laser. Green and light blue wavelengths (488 nm and 532 nm) were found to be less useful. Thequality of CLSM images depended on the slide-mounting medium used. Among those compared, Hoyer’s medium wasfound to be the most appropriate whereas Heinze medium and media including Iodium gave poorer results. The empodiaand proximal parts of setae were shown to have very weak autofluorescence signals, but they reflected red (635 nm) and blue (405 nm) laser light, which could be detected with CLSM.

References

  1. Alberti, G. & Nuzzaci, G. (1996) SEM and TEM techniques. In: Lindquist E.E., Sabelis M.W. & Bruin J. (Eds.), Eriophyoid Mites their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier. World Crop Pests, 6, pp. 399–410.

    Amrine, J.W. Jr. & Manson, D.C.M. (1996) Preparation, mounting, and descriptive study of eriophyoid mites. In: Lindquist E.E., Sabelis M.W. & Bruin J. (Eds.), Eriophyoid Mites their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier. World Crop Pests, 6, 383–396.

    Amrine, J.W.Jr., Stasny, T.A. & Flechtmann, C.H.W. (2003) Revised Keys to World Genera of Eriophyoidea (Acari: Prostigmata).Indira Publishing House, Michigan, USA, 244 pp.

    Bagnyuk, I.G. (1987) Chetirekhnogie klesci (Acariformes, Tetrapodili) obitajuscije na listvannicach. [Eriophyid mites (Acariformes, Tetrapodili) living on larches]. Entomologicheskoye Obozrenie, 66(3), 669–672 [in Russian].

    Bagnjuk, I.G., Sukhareva, S.I. & Shevchenko, V.G. (1995) Analysis of the genus Trisetacus Keifer as a key of the family Nalepellidae Roiv. (Acari, Tetrapodili). Acarina, 3, 31–65.

    Bagnjuk, I.G., Sukhareva, S.I. & Shevchenko, V.G. (1998) Major trends in the evolution of four-legged mites as a specialized group (using families Pentasetacidae Shev., Nalepellidae Roiv. and Phytoptidae Murray (Acari: Tetrapodili) as examples). Acarina, 6(1–2), 59–76.

    Boczek, J. (1964) Studies on eriophyid mites of Poland. III. Annales Zoologici Polska Akademia Nauk. 22(11), 221–236.

    Chetverikov, P.E. (2010) Eriophyoid mites (Acari, Eriophyoidea) of the family Phytoptidae Murray 1877 from angiosperms: Some tendencies of morphological evolution and ancient associations with higher taxa of Magnoliophyta. Abstract Book of the 13th International Congress of Acarology, August 23–27 2010, Recife-PE, Brazil, pp. 52–53.

    Chetverikov, P.E. (2011) Phytoptus atherodes sp. n. (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae) and a supplementary description of Phytoptus hirtae Roivainen 1950 from sedges (Cyperaceae). Zootaxa, 3045, 26–44.

    Chetverikov, P.E. (2012) Preliminary results of CLSM study of internal genitalia of eriophyoid mites (Acari, Eriophyoidea). Abstracts of the 7th Symposium of the EURopean Association of ACarologists 9–13 July 2012, Vienna, Austria, pp. 28–29.

    Chetverikov, P.E. & Sukhareva, S.I. (2009) A revision of the genus Sierraphytoptus Keifer 1939 (Eriophyoidea, Phytoptidae). Zootaxa, 2309, 30–42.

    Chetverikov, P.E., Petanović, R. & Sukhareva, S.I. (2009) Systematic remarks on eriophyoid mites from the subfamily Phytoptinae Murray, 1877 (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae). Zootaxa, 2070, 63–68.

    Claxton, N.S., Fellers, T.J. & Davidson, M.W. (2005) Laser scanning confocal microscopy. Department of Optical Microscopy and Digital Imaging, National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, 37 pp. Available from: http://www.olympusfluoview.com/theory/LSCMIntro.pdf (accessed 20 June 2012).

    Craemer, C. (2010) A systematic appraisal of the Eriophyoidea (Acari: Prostigmata). PhD Dissertation, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, November 2010.

    Coetzee, S.H. & Camerik, A.M. (1998) The use of autofluorescence of the pharyngeal pump system in Pygmephoroidae (Acari: Heterostigmata) as a new taxonomic aid. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Acarology. Australia. pp. 213–225.

    de Lillo, E., Craemer, C., Amrine, J.W. Jr. & Nuzzaci, G. (2010) Recommended procedures and techniques for morphological studies of Eriophyoidea (Acari: Prostigmata). Experimental and Applied Acarology, 51, 283–307.

    Dobrivojević, K. & Petanović, R. (1982) Fundamentals of Acarology. Slovo Ljubve Publishing, Belgrade, Serbia, 284 pp. [in Serbian].

    Dujardin, F. (1851) Sur des acariens á quatre pieds, parasites des végétaux, et qui doivent former un genre particulier (Phytoptus) in observations zoologiques. Annales des Sciences Naturelles (Paris), 3(15), 158–175.

    Gamliel-Atinsky, E., Freeman, S., Maymon, M., Belausov, E., Ochoa, R., Bauchan, G., Skoracka, A., Pena, J. & Palevsky, E. (2010) The role of eriophyoids in fungal pathogen epidemiology, more association or true interaction? Experimental and Applied Acarology, 51, 191–204.

    Keifer, H.H. (1944) Eriophyid studies XIV. Bulletin of the Department of Agriculture, State of California, 33, 121–131.

    Keifer, H.H. (1952) The eriophyid mites of California (Acarina, Eriophyoidea). Bulletin of the Caifornian Insect Survey, USA, 2, 1–123.

    Keifer, H.H. (1975) Eriophyoidea Nalepa. Chapter 12. In: Jeppson, L.R., Keifer, H.H. & Baker , E.,W., 1975. Mites injurious to economic plants. University of California Press, USA, pp. 327–396.

    Lardeaux, F., Ung, A. & Chebret, M. (2000) Spectrofluorometers are not adequate for aging Aedes and Сulex (Diptera: Culicidae) using pteridine fluorescence. Journal of Medical Entomology, 37, 769–773.

    Lee, S., Brown, R.L. & Monroe, W. (2009) Use of confocal laser scanning microscopy in systematics of insects with a comparison of fluorescence from different stains. Systematic Entomology, 34, 10–14.

    Lindquist, E.E. (1996a) Phylogenetic relationships. In: Lindquist E.E., Sabelis M.W. & Bruin J. (Eds.), Eriophyoid Mites their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier. World Crop Pests, 6, pp. 301–327.

    Lindquist, E.E. (1996b) External anatomy and notation of structures. In: Lindquist E.E., Sabelis M.W. & Bruin J. (Eds.), Eriophyoid Mites their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier Science Publishing. World Crop Pests, 6, 3–31.

    Michalska, K., Skoracka, A., Navia, D. & Amrine, J.W. (2010) Behavioural studies on eriophyoid mites: an overview. In: E.A. Ueckermann (Eds.), Eriophyoid mites: Progress and Prognoses. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., ISBN: 978-90-481-9561-9; pp. 31–59.

    Murphy, D.B. (2001) Fundamentals of light microscopy and electronic imaging. Willey-Liss, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New-York, ISBN 0-471-25391-X; 357 pp.

    Murray, A. (1877) Economic Entomology, Aptera. South Kensington Museum Science Handbooks, Chapman & Hall. London. 433 pp.

    Nalepa, A. (1890) Zur Systematik der Gallmilben. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Wien 99(2), 40–69.

    Nalepa, A. (1891) Neue Gallmilben. Nova Acta Leopoldina, 55(6), 362–395

    Nalepa, A. (1898) Zur Kenntniss der Gattung Trimerus Nal. Zoologische Jahrbuecher, 11(5), 405–411.

    Nuzzaci, G. & Alberi, G. (1996) Internal anatomy and physiology. In: Lindquist E.E., Sabelis M.W. & Bruin J. (Eds.), Eriophyoid Mites their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier Science Publishing. World Crop Pests, 6, 101–150.

    Oldfield, G.N., Newell, I.M., & Reed, D.K. (1972) Insemination of protogynes of Aculus cornutus from spermatophores and description of the sperm cell. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 65(5), 1080–1084.

    Pye, D.R.L. & de Lillo, E. (2010) A review of the eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea) on Rubus spp. in Britain, with a new species (Diptilomiopidae) and two new records. Zootaxa, 2677, 15–26.

    Roivainen, H. (1950) Eriophyid news from Sweden. Acta Entomologica Fennica, 7, 1–51.

    Saifitdinova, A.F. (2008) 2-D fluorescence microscopy for analysis of biological samples. SOLO Publishing house, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 72 pp. ISBN 978-5-98340-207-2 [in Russian].

    Shevtchenko, V.G. (1962) Novii chetirekhnogij kleshch Trisetacus kirghizorum sp.n. (Acarina, Eriophyidae) vreditel semjan arci. Trudi Kirghizskoj Lesnoj Opytnoj Stantzii, 3, 299–305.

    Shevtchenko,V.G., Bagnyuk, I.G. & Sukhareva, S.I. (1991) Novoye semeistvo chetyrekhnogikh kleshchei Pentasetacidae (Acariformes, tetrapodili) i ego znachenie dlya traktovki proiskhozhdeniya i evolyntsii gruppy. [Pentasetacidae, a new family of Acariformes Tetrapodili and its role in discussion of the origin and evolution of the group]. Zoologichesky Zhurnal, 70(5), 47–53 [in Russian].

    Sukhareva, S.I. (1992) Four-legged Mites from Grasses. Saint-Petersburg State University Press, 232 pp. [in Russian].

    Sukhareva, S.I. (1994) Family Phytoptidae Murray, 1877 (Acari: Tetrapodili), its consisting, structure and suggested ways of evolution. Acarina, 2(1–2), 47–72.

    Sukhareva, S.I. & Chetverikov, P.E. (2010) Obituary Professor Valeriy Shevchenko (1929–2010). Acarologia, 50(2), 147–149.

    Sukhareva, S.I., Chetverikov, P.E. (2011) Main steps and ways of morphological evolution of eriophyoid mites. Biodiversity and Role of Animals in Ecosystems: Extended Abstracts of the VІth International Conference, Ukraine, Dnipropetrovsk. Dnipropetrovsk University Press, pp. 219–222 [in Russian].

    Sukhareva, S.I., Bagnyuk I.G., & Kucher, V.A. (2004) Family Diptilomiopidae Keifer and its role in the evolution of eriophyoid mites (Acari, Tetrapodili). Proceedings of VIIth Russian Acarological Symposium, 30 November–2 December 2004, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, pp. 109–111 [in Russian].

    Valdecasas, A.G. (2008) Confocal microscopy applied to water mite taxonomy with the description of a new genus of Axonopsinae (Acari, Parasitengona, Hydrachnidia) from Central America. Zootaxa, 1820, 41–48.

    Valdecasas, A.G. & Abad, A. (2011) Morphological confocal microscopy in arthropods and the enhancement of auto fluorescence after proteinase K extraction. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 17, 109–113.

    Wergin, W.P., Ochoa, R., E.F. Erbe, Craemer, C. & Raina, A.K. (2000) Use of low temperature field emission scanning electron microscopy to examine mites. Scanning, 22, 145–155.