Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2019-02-20
Page range: 445–472
Abstract views: 92
PDF downloaded: 1

Antennal ultrastructure in Patia (Pieridae, Dismorphiinae)

Museo de Zoología, Depto. Biología Evolutiva Fac. Ciencias. UNAM. Cd. México, 04510. National Museum of Natrual HIstory, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC. 20013–7012 USA.
Museo de Zoología, Depto. Biología Evolutiva Fac. Ciencias. UNAM. Cd. México, 04510. National Museum of Natrual HIstory, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC. 20013–7012 USA.
Lepidoptera Antennomere sulci pseudosulci sensilla microtrichia Neotropical nudum

Abstract

In our previous work we studied the ultrastructure of the antennae of pierids through a character analysis. In this study we describe the antennal ultrastructure of three species and six subspecies of Patia focused on these traits at the intrageneric level. Patia is a genus of Dismorphiinae with the highest number of scaleless antennomeres (nudum = 11‒15). Therefore, the length of its antennal club is greater than that of any other genus of the subfamily. Several other features differentiate the species of Patia, particularly the number of sulci and pseudosulci and its contour or perimeter. A pattern was observed, especially in P. rhetes, in which the central sulci are disintegrated and surrounded by several pseudosulci in the basal antennomeres and along the club; in the medial and distal antennomeres, the pseudosulci merge to form sulci aggregates. Pseudosulci are uncommon on the distal antennomeres, even in P. rhetes. The central sulci are irregular and have a discontinuous edge when they are disaggregated and accompanied by pseudosulci; those that are elliptical and have a continuous contour, seldom have pseudosulci nearby. Another noteworthy feature is the different shapes of the distal antennomere that occur in the subspecies of P. cordillera and P. orise. In the former, this antennomere is quite elongated and ends at a point, whereas the distal one is less elongated and its apex blunt. Patia rhetes shows the lowest number of scaleless antennomeres (n = 11) while P. cordillera sspp. the largest (n = 14 or 15). The variety of the sensilla present in the Patia species does not provide specific differences, except in P. cordillera sororna where we discovered the presence of a claviform sensillum that does not present in any other species or subspecies. In our small sample size, we did not observe sexual dimorphism.

 

References

  1. Bargmann, R. (1929) Neue exotische Falter. Entomologische Anzeiger, 9 (2), 32–38.

    Boisduval, J.B. (1836) Suites à Buffon. Histoire naturelle des Insects. Spécies general des Lépidoptères. Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, Paris, 696 pp.

    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.9194

    Butler, A.G. (1872) Descriptions of new butterflies from Costa Rica. Cistula entomologica, 1 (4), 72–90.

    Castro-Gerardino, D.J. & Llorente-Bousquets, J. (2017) Comparative exploration of antennae in Pseudopontia, and antennal clubs of the tribes Leptideini and Dismorphiini (Lepidoptera: Pieridae), Zootaxa, 4347 (3), 401–445.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4347.3.1

    Faucheux, M.J. (1999) Biodiversité et unité des organes sensoriels des Insectes Lépidoptères. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de l'Ouest de la France, Supp. Hors Série, 1–294.

    Felder, C. & Felder, R. (1862) Lepidoptera nova Columbiae. Wiener entomologische Monatschrift, 6 (12), 409–427.

    Godman, F.D. & Salvin, O. (1889) Biologia Centrali-Americana. Insecta. Lepidoptera-Rhopalocera. Vol. 2. Dulau & Co., Bernard Quaritch, London, 782 pp.

    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.730

    Hallberg, E., Löfstedt, C. & Hansson, B.S. (2003) Sensilla and proprioceptors. In: Kristensen, N.P. (Ed.), Handbook of Zoology: Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies: Vol 2 Morphology, Physiology and Development. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 267–288.

    Hewitson, W.C. [1857] (1852–1877) Illustrations of new species of exotic butterflies, selected chiefly from the collections of W. Wilson Saunders and William C. Hewitson. Vol. 2. John Van Voorst, London, 17 pp. [pp. 21–37]

    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.12625

    Hewitson, W.C. (1869) Remarks on and descriptions of new species of butterflies collected by Mr. Buckley in Ecuador. Vol. 3. John Van Voorst, London, 16 pp. [pp. 33–48]

    Hübner, J. (1816[1816–1826]) Verzeichniss bekannter Schmetterlinge. (1). bey dem Verfasser zu Finden, Augsburg, 16 pp.

    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.48607

    Jordan, K. (1898) Contributions to the Morphology of Lepidoptera. Novitates Zoologicae, 5, 374–415.

    Kirby, W.F. (1881) Notes on new or interesting species of Papilionidae and Pieridae, collected by M. Buckley in eastern Ecuador. Transactions of Entomological Society of London, 1881 (3), 351–358.

    Klots, A.B. (1931–1933) A generic revision of the Pieridae (Lepidoptera). Together with a study of the male genitalia. Entomologica Americana, 12 (3 & 4), 139–204 & 205–242.

    Lamas G. (ed.) (2004) Hesperioidea-Papilionoidea. In: Heppner, J.B., (Ed.), Checklist: Part 4A. Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera. Vol. 5A. McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Association for Tropical Lepidoptera, Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, pp. 261–274.

    Lamas, G. (1979) Los Dismorphiinae (Pieridae) de Mexico, América Central y las Antillas. Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Lepidopterología, 5 (1), 3–37.

    LeCrom, J.F., Llorente-Bousquets, J., Constantino, L.M. & Salazar, J.A. (2004) Mariposas de Colombia Tomo II. Pieridae. Carlec Ltda. Bogotá, 123 pp., 42 pls.

    Llorente-Bousquets, J. (1980) Sinopsis Sistemática y Biogeográfica de los Dismorphiinae de México con especial referencia al género Enantia (Huebner) (Lepidoptera Pieridae). biologist dissertation, UNAM, Fac Ciencias, Museo Zoologia, México, Distrito Federal, 207 pp.

    Llorente-Bousquets, J. (1984) Sinopsis Sistemática y Biogeográfica de los Dismorphiinae de México con especial referencia al género Enantia Huebner (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Folia Entomologica Mexicana, 58, 1–207.

    Llorente-Bousquets, J. & Castro-Gerardino, D.J. (2004) Subfamilia Dismorphiinae. In: LeCrom, J.F., Constantino, L.M., Llorente-Bousquets, J. & Salazar, J.A. (Eds.), Mariposas de Colombia. Tomo 2. Pieridae. Ed. Carlec, Bogotá, pp. 14–16.

    Llorente-Bousquets, J. & Castro-Gerardino, D.J. (2018) Antennal ultrastructure of Leptidea (Pieridae, Dismorphiinae, Leptideini) and its taxonomic implications. Zootaxa, 4402 (3), 401–442.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4402.3.1

    Rosenberg, W.F.H. & Talbot, G. (1914) New South American butterflies. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1913 (4), 671–682.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1914.tb01793.x

    Shields, V.D.C. & Hildebrand, J.G. (1999a) Fine structure of antennal sensilla of the female sphinx moth, Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). I. Trichoid and basiconic sensilla. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 77 (2), 290–301.

    https://doi.org/10.1139/z98-204

    Shields, V.D.C. & Hildebrand, J.G. (1999b) Fine structure of antennal sensilla of the female sphinx moth, Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). II. Auriculate, coeloconic, and styliform complex sensilla. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 77 (2), 302–313.

    https://doi.org/10.1139/z99-003

    Schenk, O. (1903) Die antennalen Hautsinnesorgane einiger Lepidopteren und Hymenopteren. Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Anatomie und Ontogenie der Tiere, 17, 573–618.

    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.4636

    Sellier, R. (1974) Donnees documentaires sur l'ultrastructure des recepteurs sensoriels antennaires chez les Lepidopteres rhopaloceres; etude en microscopie electronique par balayage. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, 10, 917–937.

    Talbot, G. (1929) New forms of butterflies from South America. Bulletin of the Hill Museum, 3 (1), 81–84.