Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2019-10-10
Page range: 563–576
Abstract views: 86
PDF downloaded: 82

“Endangered or an artifact of unsound taxonomy? Case of the critically endangered bush frog Philautus sanctisilvaticus Das and Chanda, 1997”

National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560065, Karnataka, India
The Corbett Foundation, Baherakhar 481116, Madhya Pradesh, India
Zoological Survey of India, Central Zone Regional Centre, Jabalpur, 482002, Madhya Pradesh, India
Singinawa Jungle Lodge, Tehsil Baihar, Balaghat, Kohka 481111, Madhya Pradesh, India
Singinawa Jungle Lodge, Tehsil Baihar, Balaghat, Kohka 481111, Madhya Pradesh, India
Nature Environment & Wildlife Society (NEWS), Turang post, Angul 759123, Odisha, India
Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS), Mumbai 400001, Maharashtra, India
Amphibia IUCN Critically Endangered conservation Anura taxonomy 16S phylogeny Philautus terebrans syn. nov. Philautus similipalensis syn. nov.

Abstract

We investigated the phylogenetic relationship of the Critically Endangered bush frog Philautus sanctisilvaticus Das and Chanda, 1997 and other species distributed across the fragmented forests of Deccan Peninsula and the northern Eastern Ghats. A short fragment of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene was employed to assess phylogenetic relationships across Philautus sanctisilvaticus Das and Chanda, 1997, Raorchestes terebrans (Das and Chanda, 1998) and Philautus similipalensis Dutta, 2003. All sequenced specimens, including material from near the type localities of P. sanctisilvaticus (Amarkantak) and P. similipalensis (Simlipal) were genetically extremely similar, with pairwise uncorrected distances <1% in the 16S gene, and were phylogenetically placed within the genus Raorchestes. The results based on morphology are ambiguous and do not go hand in hand with molecular data, which however do not provide support for a three species hypothesis either. our findings advocate the need for making nomenclatural amendments. Philautus sanctisilvaticus Das and Chanda, 1997, is the first available nomen for this taxon, and we propose to include this species in Raorchestes as Raorchestes sanctisilvaticus (Das and Chanda, 1997), and to consider the nomina Philautus terebrans Das and Chanda, 1998 syn. nov. and Philautus similipalensis Dutta, 2003 syn. nov. as junior subjective synonyms for this nomen following the Principle of Priority in article 23.1 of the ICZN. The findings are notable from the point of conservation of the species and present a novel case with remarkable genetic homogeneity across the fragmented forests of Deccan Peninsula and Eastern Ghats.

 

References

  1. Biju, S.D. & Bossuyt, F. (2009) Systematics and phylogeny of Philautus Gistel, 1848 (Anura, Rhacophoridae) in the Western Ghats of India, with descriptions of 12 new species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1848, 374–444.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00466.x

    Biju, S.D., Shouche, Y., Dubois, A., Dutta, S.K. & Bossuyt, F. (2010) A ground-dwelling rhacophorid frog from the highest mountain peak of the Western Ghats of India. Current Science, 98, 1119–1125.

    Das, I. & Chanda, S.K. (1997) Philautus sanctisilvaticus (Anura: Rhacophoridae), a new frog from the sacred groves of Amarkantak, central India. Hamadryad, 22, 21–27.

    Das, I. & Chanda, S.K. (1998) A new species of Philautus (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from Eastern Ghats, south-eastern India. Journal of South Asian Natural History, 3, 103–112.

    Das, I., Dutta, S.K., Vasudevan, K. & Vijaykumar, S.P. (2004) Philautus sanctisilvaticus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2004, e.T58897A11846368.

    Deuti, K., Sethy, P.G.S. & Ray, S. (2014). Amphibians of the Eastern Ghats. Records of the Zoological Survey of India, 114 (1), 119–144.

    Dutta, S.K. (2003) A new species of rhacophorid frog from Simlipal Biosphere Reserve, Orissa, India. Russian Journal of Herpetology, 10, 25–32.

    Frost, D.R. (2019) Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York. Available from: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html (accessed 3 September 2019)

    Hammer, Ø, Harper, D.A.T. & Ryan, P.D. (2001) PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 1–9.

    International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999) International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. International code of Zoological Nomenclature. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature. Available from: https://www.iczn.org/ (accessed 3 September 2019)

    Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35, 1547–1549.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096

    Lanfear, R., Calcott, B., Ho, S. & Guindon, S. (2012) PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29, 1695–1701.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss020

    Mirza, Z.A., Gowande, G., Patil, R., Ambekar, M. & Patel, H. (2018) First appearance deceives many: disentangling the Hemidactylus triedrus species complex using an integrated approach. PeerJ, 6, e5341.

    https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5341

    Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J. (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19, 1572–1574.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180

    Savage, J.M. & Heyer, W.R. (1997) Digital webbing formulae for anurans: a refinement. Herpetological Review, 28 (3), 131.

    Silvestro, D. & Michalak, I. (2012) raxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 12, 335–337.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0

    Thompson, J. & Gibson, T. (2002) Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Current protocols in Bioinformatics, 1, 2.3.1–2.3.22.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi0203s00

    Vijayakumar, S.P., Dinesh, K.P., Prabhu, M.V. & Shanker, K. (2014) Lineage delimitation and description of nine new species of bush frogs (Anura: Raorchestes, Rhacophoridae) from the Western Ghats Escarpment. Zootaxa, 3893 (4), 451–488.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3893.4.1

    Vijayakumar, S.P., Menezes, R.C., Jayarajan, A. & Shanker, K. (2016) Glaciations, gradients, and geography: Multiple drivers of diversification of bush frogs in the Western Ghats escarpment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283, 20161011.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1011

    Yu, G., Rao, D., Zhang, M. & Yang, J. (2009) Re-examination of the phylogeny of Rhacophoridae (Anura) based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 50, 571–579.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.11.023