Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2020-09-03
Page range: 357–374
Abstract views: 67
PDF downloaded: 4

A species continuum exists between Pseudomallada prasinus and P. abdominalis (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae)

Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf ZH, Switzerland.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Unit 3043, 75 North Eagleville Road, Storrs, CT 06269-3043, USA.
Neuroptera green lacewings speciation hybridization reproductive isolation crossing

Abstract

It has recently been determined that Pseudomallada prasinus (Burmeister, 1839) is part of a complex of prasinoid species (Duelli & Obrist, 2019). Apart from P. prasinus s.s. and P. abdominalis s.s., each at the opposite end of the prasinoid spectrum, some populations in Switzerland and surrounding countries show consistently differing morphological and biological traits, while nevertheless living in the same habitats. To test whether they constitute reproductively isolated species, seven strains of three morphologically distinctive prasinoid morphs (Pp1, Pp2, Pp3) were reared and the virgin offspring (F1) paired with single partners of each of the six other strains. The four strains of morph Pp3 were unable to produce any viable offspring when paired with the two other morphs, suggesting that Pp3 is a distinct species. The Mediterranean morph Pp1 produced some offspring with the two strains of morph Pp2, but the crossed offspring (F2) of the hybrids yielded less than 2% viable larvae. Furthermore, in a cage experiment with free choice of partners between Pp1 and Pp2, all females produced offspring of their own morph; there were no hybrids. We conclude that north and south of the Alps there are at least three reproductively isolated prasinoid species in addition to P. prasinus and P. abdominalis. Their distinctiveness is principally based on live color traits, but also on the presence or absence of the “furwing” phenotype in males (double number of setae on wing veins). Therefore, many old museum specimens, especially females, cannot be identified with confidence. Because most of the dozens of synonymized type specimens of prasinoid species and varieties in museums are females, and all have lost their color, it is presently not possible to assign valid names to the three “new” species. We call them Pseudomallada prasinoid 1 (Pp1), P. prasinoid 2 (Pp2), and P. prasinoid 3 (Pp3). Using the distinctive traits given here, most specimens that have retained their original colors (live, recently pinned, or deep frozen) can be identified.

 

References

  1. Aspöck, H., Hölzel, H. & Aspöck, U. (2001) Kommentierter Katalog der Neuropterida (Insecta: Raphidioptera, Megaloptera, Neuroptera) der Westpaläarktis. Denisia, 2, 1–606.

    Brauer, F. (1856) Rückblick auf die im Jahre 1850 beschriebenen österreichischen Arten der Gattung Chrysopa Leach nebst Beschreibung der Ch. tricolor n. sp. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 6, 703–708.

    Burmeister, H.C.C. (1839) s.n. In: Handbuch der Entomologie. Bd. 2. Abt. 2. T. C. F. Enslin, Berlin, pp. 757–1050.

    Duelli, P., Henry, C.S., Hayashi, M., Nomura, M. & Mochizuki, A. (2017) Molecular phylogeny and morphology of Pseudomallada (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), one of the largest genera within Chrysopidae. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 180, 556–569.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlw008

    Duelli, P. & Obrist, M.K. (2019) In search of the real Pseudomallada prasinus (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae). Zootaxa, 4571 (4), 510–530.

    https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4571.4.4

    Henry, C.S., Brooks, S.J., Duelli, P. & Johnson, J.B. (2002) Discovering the true Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Insecta: Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) using song analysis, morphology, and ecology. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 95, 172–191.

    https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2002)095[0172:DTTCCI]2.0.CO;2

    Henry, C.S., Brooks, S.J., Duelli, P., Johnson, J.B., Wells, M.L.M. & Mochizuki, A. (2013) Obligatory duetting behavior in the Chrysoperla carnea-group of cryptic species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): its role in shaping evolutionary history. Biological Reviews, 88, 787–808.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12027

    Henry, C.S., Brooks, S.J., Johnson, J.B. & Duelli, P. (1996) Chrysoperla lucasina (Lacroix): a distinct species of green lacewing, confirmed by acoustical analysis (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Systematic Entomology, 21, 205–218.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3113.1996.d01-11.x

    Hölzel, H. (1973) Zur Revision von Typen europäischer Chrysopa Arten. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 80, 65–82.

    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.75938

    Hölzel, H. (1995) Was ist unter Chrysopa prasina Burmeister 1839 zu verstehen?—Treffen Deutschsprachiger Neuropterologen. Galathea, 2, 1–3.

    Hölzel, H. (1998) Kommentare zu den von Friedrich Brauer in den Jahren 1850 und 1856 aus Österreich beschriebenen Chrysopa species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Stapfia, 55, 409–420.

    Mayr, E. (1982) The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 992 pp.

    McEwen, P.K., New, T.R. & Whittington, A.E. (2001) Lacewings in the Crop Environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 546 pp.

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511666117

    Nosil, P. (2008) Ernst Mayr and the integration of geographic and ecological factors in speciation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 95, 26–46.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01091.x

    Oswald, J.D. (2020) Neuropterida Species of the World. Version 5. Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. Available from: http://lacewing.tamu.edu/SpeciesCatalog/Main (accessed 5 September 2019)

    Pappas, M.L., Broufas, G.D. & Koveos, D.S. (2007) Effects of various prey species on development, survival and reproduction of the predatory lacewing Dichochrysa prasina (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Biological Control, 43, 163–170.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.07.006

    Pappas, M.L., Broufas, G.D. & Koveos, D.S. (2009) Effect of prey availability on development and reproduction of the predatory lacewing Dichochrysa prasina (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 102, 437–444.

    https://doi.org/10.1603/008.102.0312

    Principi, M.M. (1956) Contributi allo studio dei Neurotteri Italiani. XIII. Studio morfologico, etologico e sistematico di un gruppo omogeneo di specie del Gen. Chrysopa Leach (C. flavifrons Brauer, prasina Burm. e clathrata Schn.). Bollettino dell’Istituto di Entomologia della Università di Bologna, 21, 319–410.

    Singh, B.N. (2012) Concepts of species and modes of speciation. Current Science, 103, 784–790.

    Tauber, M.J. & Tauber, C.A. (2015) Phenological responses of Pseudomallada (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): Comparative data from three Nearctic species and interspecific hybrids. European Journal of Entomology, 112, 49–62.

    https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2015.015

    Volkovich, T.A. (1998) Environmental control of seasonal cycles in green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) from forest-steppe zone of Russia. Acta Zoologica Fennica, 209, 263–275.

    Withycombe, C.L. (1922) Notes on the biology of some British Neuroptera (Planipennia). Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1922, 501–594.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1923.tb02844.x