References
Butler, A.G. ([1870]) Catalogue of diurnal Lepidoptera described by Fabricius in the collection of the British Museum. Taylor and Francis, London, v + 303 pp., 3 pls.
Calhoun, J.V. (2019) From oak woods and swamps: the butterflies recorded in Georgia by John Abbot (1751–c.1840) based on his drawings and specimens. Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society, 73 (4), 211–256. https://doi.org/10.18473/lepi.73i4.a8
de Jong, R. (2005) Metamorpha sulpitia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) en de lotgevallen van oude collecties. Entomologische Berichten, 65 (4), 124–127.
Evans, W.H. (1953) A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum (Natural History). Part III. Pyrginae. Section 2. British Museum, London, 246 pp.
Fabricius, J.C. (1793) Entomologia systematica emendata et aucta. Secundum classes, ordines, genera, species adjectis synonimis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus. 3 (1). Christian Gottlieb Proft, Fil. et Soc., Hafniae, [vi] + 488 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.125869
Jones, W. (1745–1818) William Jones Collection [Jones’ Icones]. Unpublished manuscript, Hope Entomological Collection, Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Oxford, 20 pp.
Latreille, P.A. ([1824]) s.n. In: Latreille, P.A. & Godart, J.B., Encyclopédie Méthodique. Histoire naturelle. Entomologie, ou histoire naturelle des crustacés, des arachnides et des insectes. 9 (2). veuve Agasse, Paris, pp. 711–793.
Scudder, S.H. (1889) s.n. In: The butterflies of the Eastern United States and Canada with special reference to New England. Vol. 2. Author, Cambridge, pp. i–xii + 767–1774. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.40437
Siewert, R.R., Mielke, O.H.H. & Casagrande, M.M. (2020) Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Telemiades Hübner, [1819] (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Eudaminae), with descriptions of fourteen new species. Zootaxa, 4721 (1), 1–111. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4721.1.1
Vane-Wright, R.I. (2021) Comment (Case 3767)—Support for the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 (currently Parnassius phoebus), and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne), by designation of a neotype. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 78, 36–37. https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v78.a010