Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Type: Article
Published: 2023-03-15
Page range: 304-323
Abstract views: 248
PDF downloaded: 36

Earthworm species in native and planted forests in Brazil

Brazilian National Institute for Space Research – INPE, Avenida dos Astronautas 1758, São José dos Campos, São Paulo State, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Paraná, Setor de Ciências Agrárias, Rua dos Funcionários, 1540 – CEP: 80035-050, Juvevê, Curitiba-PR, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Paraná, Setor de Ciências Agrárias, Rua dos Funcionários, 1540 – CEP: 80035-050, Juvevê, Curitiba-PR, Brazil.
3Universidade de São Paulo/ESALQ, Depto. de Ciência do Solo, C.P. 09, CEP: 13418-900 –Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
4Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Cra. 27 ##10-02, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia.
Universidade Federal do Paraná, Setor de Ciências Agrárias, Rua dos Funcionários, 1540 – CEP: 80035-050, Juvevê, Curitiba-PR, Brazil. Embrapa Forestry, Estrada da Ribeira, km 111, CEP: 83411-000, Colombo – PR, Brazil.
Annelida Pontoscolex corethrurus Oligochaeta Atlantic forest Biodiversity Forest plantations

Abstract

Over 150 species of earthworms are known from the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest, but many more are expected to live in this megadiverse biome. In the present study, we evaluated earthworm species occurrence and diversity in native and reforested areas in four National Forests in three Brazilian states: Três Barras National Forest (Santa Catarina), Irati and Piraí do Sul National Forests (Paraná) and Capão Bonito National Forest (São Paulo) using formalin and hand sorting methods. A total of 13 species were found, five exotic and eight natives (of which four were new, undescribed species), belonging to six genera and five families (Rhinodrilidae, Glossoscolecidae, Ocnerodrilidae, Benhamiidae, Megascolecidae). In general, higher number of earthworms were collected in Araucaria plantations, except in Capão Bonito where Pinus sp. plantations had higher abundance. Hand sorting also collected more species in all forests, so this should be the preferred sampling method to evaluate earthworm communities. Formalin extraction was efficient only for epi-endogeic earthworms, most of them exotic species. Exotic pine species plantations tend to reduce species richness and abundance, compared with native forests and Araucaria plantations, and substitution of native vegetation for pine plantations should consider potential negative effects on soil animal populations.

 

References

  1. Alvares, C.A., Stape, J.L., Sentelhas, P.C., De Moraes Gonçalves, J.L. & Sparovek, G. (2013) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22, 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
    De Assis, J.E., Souza, J.R.B., Vieira, M.L.M., Souza, J.V.N., Rodrigues, G.G. & Christoffersen, M.L. (2017) A catalogue of the eudrilidae and megascolecidae (Clitellata: Lumbricina) from South America, with two new records of exotic species from Brazil. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 41, 599–614. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1604-74
    Baretta, D., Brown, G.G., James, S.W. & Cardoso, E.J.B.N. (2007) Earthworm populations sampled using collection methods in atlantic forests with Araucaria angustifolia. Scientia Agricola, 64, 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162007000400009
    Bartz, M.L.C., Brown, G.G., da Rosa, M.G., Filho, O.K., James, S.W., Decaëns, T. & Baretta, D. (2014a) Earthworm richness in land-use systems in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Applied Soil Ecology, 83, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.03.003
    Bartz, M.L.C., Pasini, A. & Brown, G.G. (2013) Earthworms as soil quality indicators in Brazilian no-tillage systems. Applied Soil Ecology, 69, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.01.011
    Bartz, M.L.C., Pasini, A. & Brown, G.G. (2014b) Earthworm richness, abundance and biomass in different land use systems in northern Paraná, Brazil (Oligochaeta). In: Advances in Earthworm Taxonomy VI (Annelida: Oligochaeta). Palmeira do Faro, pp. 59–73.
    Blouin, M., Hodson, M.E., Delgado, E.A., Baker, G., Brussrd, L., Butt, K.R., Dai, J., Dendooven, L., Peres, G., Tondoh, J.E., Cluzeau, D. & Brun, J.J. (2013) A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Science, 64, 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12025
    Brown, G.G. & Gabriac, Q. (2021) Fauna edáfica e epiedáfica em Florestas com Araucária. In: Sousa, V.A., Fritzsons, E., Pinto Júnior, J.E. & de Aguiar, A.V. (Eds.), Araucária: Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento no Brasil. Embrapa, Brasília, DF, pp. 121–147.
    Brown, G.G. & James, S.W. (2007) Ecologia, biodiversidade e biogeografia das minhocas no Brasil. In: Brown, G.G. & Fragoso, C. (Eds.), Minhocas na América Latina: Biodiversidade e Ecologia. Embrapa Soja, Londrina, pp. 297–381.
    Chang, C.-H., Bartz, M.L.C., Brown, G., Callaham Jr, M.A., Cameron, E.K., Dávalos, A., Dobson, A., Görres, J.H., Herrick, B.M., Ikeda, H., James, S.W., Johnston, M.R., McCay, T.S., McHugh, D., Minamuiya, Y., Nouri-Aiin, M., Novo, M., Ortiz-Pachar, J., Pinder, R.A., Ransom, T., Richardson, J.B., A, S.B. & Szlávecz, K. (2021) The second wave of earthworm invasions in North America : biology , environmental impacts , management and control of invasive jumping worms. Biological invasions, 23, 3291–3322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02598-1
    Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund – CEPF (2021) Impact Report 2001-2021. Annual report 2021. Conservation International, Arlington. 61 pp. Available from: https://www.cepf.net/sites/default/files/2021_cepf_impact_and_annual_report.pdf (Accessed 29 November 2022)

  2. Demetrio, W.C., Santos, A., Ferreira, T., Naldony, H., Cardoso, G.B.X., Torres, J.L.M., Dudas, R., Oliveira, V., Barreto, J.O., James, S.W., Silva, E., Brown, G.G. & Bartz, M.L.C. (2018) Earthworm species in various land use systems in the Campos Gerais region of Lapa, Paraná, Brazil. Zootaxa, 4496, 503. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4496.1.39
    Demetrio, W., Brown, G., Pupin, B., Novo, R., Dudas, R., Baretta, D., Römbke, J., Bartz, M. & Borma, L. (2022) Are exotic earthworms threatening soil biodiversity in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest?. Applied Soil Ecology, 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104693
    Ferlian, O., Eisenhauer, N., Aguirrebengoa, M., Camara, M., Ramirez-Rojas, I., Santos, F., Tanalgo, K. & Thakur, M.P. (2018) Invasive earthworms erode soil biodiversity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology, 87, 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12746
    Ferreira, T., Santos, A., Demetrio, W.C., Cardoso, G.B.X., Moraes, R., Assis, O., Niva, C., Smokanit, M., Knópik, J., Sautter, K.D., Brown, G.G. & Bartz, M.L.C. (2018) Earthworm species in public parks in Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. Zootaxa, 4496, 535. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4496.1.41
    Gee, G.W. & Bauder, J.W. (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp. 383–411. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c15
    Góis, D.T. de, Santos, J.C.P., Alves, M.V., Prando, A.M., Toledo, G.C. & Souza, D.G. (2007) Avaliação da macrofauna edáfica em áreas de reflorestamento de pinus com diferentes tipos de uso no Litoral Catarinense. In: XXXI Congresso Brasileiro de Ciência do Solo. Gramado, pp. 4–7.
    Gutiérrez-López, M., Moreno, G., Trigo, D., Juárez, E., Jesús, J.B. & Díaz Cosín, D.J. (2016) The efficiency of earthworm extraction methods is determined by species and soil properties in the Mediterranean communities of Central-Western Spain. European Journal of Soil Biology, 73, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.01.005
    James, S.W. & Brown, G.G. (2010) Rediscovery of Fimoscolex sporadochaetus Michaelsen 1918 (clitellata: glossoscolecidae), and considerations on the endemism and diversity of Brazilian earthworms. Acta Zoológica Mexicana, 26, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2010.262877
    Jouquet, P., Dauber, J., Lagerlöf, J., Lavelle, P. & Lepage, M. (2006) Soil invertebrates as ecosystem engineers: intended and accidental effects on soil and feedback loops. Applied Soil Ecology, 32, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.07.004
    Krabbe, E.L., Driemeyer, D.J., Antoniolli, Z.I. & Giracca, E.M.N. (1993) Avaiação populacional de oligoquetas e características físicas do solo em diferentes sistemas de cultivo. Ciência Rural, 23, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84781993000100005
    Lima, O.G. (2011) Indicadores Físicos, Químicos e Biológicos da Qualidade do Solo em Plantios Florestais e Floresta Ombrófila Mista na Embrapa Florestas - Colombo PR. M.Sc. Dissertation. Universidade Federal do Paraná. 67 pp.
    Marques, R. & Motta, A.C.V (2003) Análise química do solo para fins de fertilidade. In: M. R. Lima (Ed.), Manual de Diagnóstico da Fertilidade e Manejo dos Solos Agrícolas. Departamento de Solos e Engenharia Agrícola, Curitiba, pp. 82–102.
    Ortiz, D.O. (2016) Efeito do plantio de Pinus elliottii para fauna edáfica e para a germinação de sementes: estudos na Floresta Nacional de Três Barras. Undergraduate thesis. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. 78 pp.
    Pelosi, C., Bertrand, M., Capowiez, Y., Boizard, H. & Roger-Estrade, J. (2009) Earthworm collection from agricultural fields: Comparisons of selected expellants in presence/absence of hand sorting. European Journal of Soil Biology, 45, 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.09.013
    Pereira, J.M. (2012) Atributos Biológicos Como Indicadores de Qualidade do Solo em Floresta de Araucária Nativa e Reflorestada no Estado de São Paulo. Ph.D. Thesis. Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz.” 138 pp.
    Pompeo, P.N., dos Santos, M.A.B., Biasi, J.P., Siqueira, S.F., da Rosa, M.G., Baretta, C.R.D.M. & Baretta, D. (2016) Fauna e sua relação com atributos edáficos em Lages, Santa Catarina – Brasil. Revista Scientia Agrária, 17, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.5380/rsa.v17i1.46535
    Römbke, J., Sousa, J.P., Schouten, T., Riepert, F. (2006) Monitoring of soil organisms: a set of standardized field methods proposed by ISO. European Journal of Soil Biology, 42, S61–S64. Supplement 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejsobi.2006.07.016.
    Ribeiro, M.C., Metzger, J.P., Martensen, A.C., Ponzoni, F.J. & Hirota, M.M. (2009) The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed?. Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 142, 1141–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021
    da Silva, E., de Lima, O.G., de Andrade, D.P. & Brown, G.G. (2019) Earthworm populations in forestry plantations (Araucaria angustifolia, Pinus elliottii) and Native Atlantic forest in Southern Brazil compared using two sampling methods. Pedobiologia, 72, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2018.10.002
    Soares, M.I.J. & Costa, E.C. (2001) Fauna do solo em áreas com Eucalyptus spp. e Pinus elliottii, Santa Maria, RS. Ciência Florestal, 11, 29–43. https://doi.org/10.5902/19805098493

  3. Steffen, G.P.K., Steffen, R.B., Bartz, M.L.C., James, S.W., Jacques, R.J.S., Brown, G.G. & Antoniolli, Z.I. (2018) Earthworm diversity in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Zootaxa, 4496, 562–575. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4496.1.43
    Taheri, S., Pelosi, C. & Dupont, L. (2018) Harmful or useful? A case study of the exotic peregrine earthworm morphospecies Pontoscolex corethrurus. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 116, 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.030

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.030
  4.