Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Responsive image
Issue: Vol. 5497 No. 4: 27 Aug. 2024
Type: Article
Published: 2024-08-27
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5497.4.2
Page range: 496-504
Abstract views: 115
PDF downloaded: 41

The monophyly of Magelona F. Müller, 1858 (Polychaeta, Magelonidae): Comments on Meißner et al.’s (2023) reinstatement of Octomagelona Aguirrezabalaga, Ceberio & Fiege, 2001

Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County; Los Angeles; CA; USA
Natural Sciences; Amgueddfa Cymru–Museum Wales; Cardiff; Wales; United Kingdom
Departamento de Biologia Animal; Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde; Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro; Seropédica; Rio de Janeiro; Brazil
Annelida Nomenclature paraphyly phylogenetic hypotheses specific hypotheses systematics

Abstract

The first published phylogenetic hypotheses involving members of the polychaete taxon Magelonidae Cunningham & Ramage, 1888, were reported by Mortimer et al. (2021), wherein results showed that for the two genera in the family, Magelona F. Müller, 1858, was paraphyletic relative to Octomagelona Aguirrezabalaga, Ceberio & Fiege, 2001. The only option to formally name at least some of the resultant phylogenetic hypotheses was to place Octomagelona into synonymy with Magelona, leaving the definition of Magelonidae redundant with that of a monophyletic Magelona. Meißner et al. (2023) subsequently described specimens as members of new species, Octomagelona borowskii Fiege, Knebelsberger & Meißner, 2023, and O. sp. cf. O. borowskii, with the view that Octomagelona should be maintained as distinct from Magelona. We present reasons why reestablishing the paraphyly of Magelona is scientifically unwarranted.

 

References

  1. Aguirrezabalaga, F., Ceberio, A. & Fiege, D. (2001) Octomagelona bizkaiensis (Polychaeta: Magelonidae) a new genus and species from the Capbreton Canyon (Bay of Biscay, north-east Atlantic). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 81, 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315401003678
  2. Anjum, R.L. & Mumford, S. (2018) Causation in Science and the Methods of Scientific Discovery. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, 278 pp. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198733669.001.0001
  3. Assis, L.C.S. (2014) Testing evolutionary hypotheses: from Willi Hennig to angiosperm phylogeny group. Cladistics, 30, 240–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12048
  4. Baum, D.A. & Smith, S.D. (2012) Tree Thinking: An Introduction to Phylogenetic Biology. Roberts and Co., Greenwood Village, 476 pp.
  5. Bolívar, G.A. & Lana, P.C. (1986) Magelonidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) do litoral sudeste do Brasil. Neritica, 1, 131–147. https://doi.org/10.5380/rn.v1i3.41200
  6. Brasil, A.C. (2003) Filogenia de Magelonidae Cunningham & Ramage, 1888 (Annelida—Polychaeta) com base na morfologia externa. PhD thesis, Universidade Federal do Paraná, 113 pp.
  7. Brower, A.V.Z. (2018) Statistical consistency and phylogenetic inference: a brief review. Cladistics, 34, 562–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12216
  8. Clarke, D.T., Paterson, G.L.J., Florence, W.K. & Gibbons, M.J. (2010) A new species of Magelona (Polychaeta: Magelonidae) from southern Namibia. African Natural History, 6, 77–82.
  9. Currie, A. (2018) Rock, Bone, and Ruin: An Optimist’s Guide to the Historical Sciences. The MIT Press, Cambridge, 372 pp. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11421.001.0001
  10. Dupré, J. & Nicholson, D.J. (2018) A manifesto for a processual philosophy of biology. In: Nicholson, D.J. & Dupré, J. (Eds.), Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 3–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198779636.001.0001
  11. Felsenstein, J. (1978) Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology, 27, 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/27.4.401
  12. Felsenstein, J. (2004) Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, 664 pp. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/27.4.401
  13. Fiege, D., Licher, F. & Mackie, A.S.Y. (2000) A partial review of the European Magelonidae (Annelida: Polychaeta): Magelona mirabilis redefined and M. johnstoni sp. nov. distinguished. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 80, 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315499001800
  14. Fitzhugh, K. (2005) The inferential basis of species hypotheses: the solution to defining the term ‘species’. Marine Ecology, 26, 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.2005.00058.x
  15. Fitzhugh, K. (2006a) The abduction of phylogenetic hypotheses. Zootaxa, 1145 (1), 1–110. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1145.1.1
  16. Fitzhugh, K. (2006b) The ‘requirement of total evidence’ and its role in phylogenetic systematics. Biology and Philosophy, 21, 309–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-7325-2
  17. Fitzhugh, K. (2008) Abductive inference: implications for ‘Linnean’ and ‘phylogenetic’ approaches for representing biological systematization. Evolutionary Biology, 35, 52–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-008-9015-x
  18. Fitzhugh, K. (2009) Species as explanatory hypotheses: refinements and implications. Acta Biotheoretica, 57, 201–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-009-9071-3
  19. Fitzhugh, K. (2012) The limits of understanding in biological systematics. Zootaxa, 3435 (1), 40–67. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3435.1.2
  20. Fitzhugh, K. (2013) Defining ‘species’, ‘biodiversity’, and ‘conservation’ by their transitive relations. In: Pavlinov, I.Y. (Ed.), The Species Problem—Ongoing Problems. InTech, New York, New York, pp. 93–130. https://doi.org/10.5772/52331
  21. Fitzhugh, K. (2014) Character mapping and cladogram comparison versus the requirement of total evidence: does it matter for polychaete systematics? Memoirs of Museum Victoria, 71, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.2014.71.07
  22. Fitzhugh, K. (2016a) Ernst Mayr, causal understanding, and systematics: an example using sabelliform polychaetes. Invertebrate Biology, 135, 302–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/ivb.12133
  23. Fitzhugh, K. (2016b) Sequence data, phylogenetic inference, and implications of downward causation. Acta Biotheoretica, 64, 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-016-9277-0
  24. Fitzhugh, K. (2016c) Dispelling five myths about hypothesis testing in biological systematics. Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 16, 443–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-016-0274-6
  25. Fitzhugh, K. (2021) Phylogenetic inference and the misplaced premise of substitution rates. Acta Biotheoretica, 69, 799–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-021-09412-4
  26. Fitzhugh, K., Nogueira, J.M.M., Carrerette, O. & Hutchings, P. (2015) An assessment of the status of Polycirridae genera (Annelida: Terebelliformia) and evolutionary transformation series of characters within the family. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 174, 666–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12259
  27. Goto, R. (2016) A comprehensive molecular phylogeny of spoon worms (Echiura Annelida): implications for morphological evolution, the origin of dwarf males, and habitat shifts. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 99, 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.03.003
  28. Harmelin, J.G. (1964) Étude de l’endofaune des ‘mattes’ d’herbiers de Posidonia oceanica Delile. Recueil des Travaux de la Station Marine d’Endoume, 35, 43–105.
  29. Hartman, O. (1944) Polychaetous annelids from California, including two new genera and nine new species. Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions, 10, 239–304.
  30. Hanson, N.R. (1958) Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, 241 pp.
  31. Heath, T.A., Hedtke, S.M. & Hillis, D.M. (2008) Taxon sampling and the accuracy of phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 46, 239–257. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1002.2008.08016
  32. Hempel, C.G. (1965) Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. The Free Press, New York, New York, 505 pp.
  33. Hennig, W. (1966) Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, 263 pp.
  34. Hernández-Alcántara, P. & Solís-Weiss, V. (2000) Magelonidae from the Mexican Pacific and northern Gulf of Mexico, with the description of a new genus (Meredithia) and four new species. In: Reish, D.J. & Lana, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Polychaete Conference, Curitiba, Brazil, 1998. Bulletin of Marine Science, 67, pp. 625–644.
  35. Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2013) Systematicity: The Nature of Science. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, 287 pp. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199985050.001.0001
  36. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, 306 pp.
  37. Jenner, R.A. (2024) Lineage thinking in evolutionary biology: How to improve the teaching of tree thinking. Science & Education. [published online] https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00531-1
  38. Johnson, H.P. (1901) The Polychaeta of the Puget Sound region. Proceedings of the Boston Society for Natural History, 29, 381–437, pls. 1–19.
  39. Jones, M.L. (1963) Four new species of Magelona (Annelida, Polychaeta) and a redescription of Magelona longicornis Johnson. American Museum Novitates, 2164, 1–31.
  40. Jones, M.L. (1968) On the morphology, feeding, and behavior of Magelona sp. Biological Bulletin, 134, 272–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/1539604
  41. Jones, M.L. (1971) Magelona berkeleyi n. sp. from Puget Sound (Annelida: Polychaeta) with a further redescription of Magelona longicornis Johnson and a consideration of recently described species of Magelona. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 28, 1445–1454. https://doi.org/10.1139/f71-223
  42. Jones, M.L. (1977) A redescription of Magelona papillicornis F. Müller. In: Reish, D.J. & Fauchald, K. (Eds.), Essays on Polychaetous Annelids in Memory of Dr Olga Hartman. Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, pp. 247–266.
  43. Jones, M.L. (1978) Three new species of Magelona (Annelida, Polychaeta) and a redescription of Magelona pitelkai Hartman. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 91, 336–363.
  44. Mahner, M. & Bunge, M. (1997) Foundations of Biophilosophy. Springer, New York, New York, 423 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03368-5
  45. Meisel, R.P. (2010) Teaching tree-thinking to undergraduate biology students. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3, 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0254-9
  46. Meißner, K., Schwentner, M., Götting, M., Knebelsberger, T. & Fiege, D. (2023) Polychaetes distributed across oceans—examples of widely recorded species from abyssal depths of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 199, 906–944. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad069
  47. Mortimer, K. & Clarke, D.T. (2024) Untangling the Magelonidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) of southern Africa, including the description of a new species. African Zoology. [published online] https://doi.org/10.1080/15627020.2024.2311085
  48. Mortimer, K., Fitzhugh, K., dos Brasil, A.C. & Lana, P. (2021) Who’s who in Magelona: phylogenetic hypotheses under Magelonidae Cunningham & Ramage, 1888 (Annelida: Polychaeta). PeerJ, 9, e11993. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11993
  49. Müller, F. (1858) Einiges über die Anneliden fauna der Insel Santa Catharina an der brasilianischen Küste. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 24, 211–220.
  50. Nogueira, J.M.M., Fitzhugh, K. & Rossi, M.C.S. (2010) A new genus and new species of fan worms (Polychaeta: Sabellidae) from Atlantic and Pacific Oceans – the formal treatment of taxon names as explanatory hypotheses. Zootaxa, 2603 (1), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2603.1.1
  51. Nogueira, J.M.M., Fitzhugh, K. & Hutchings, P. (2013) The continuing challenge of phylogenetic relationships in Terebelliformia (Annelida: Polychaeta). Invertebrate Systematics, 27, 186–238. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS12062
  52. Nogueira, J.M.M., Fitzhugh, K., Hutchings, P. & Carrerette, O. (2017) Phylogenetic analysis of the family Telothelepodidae Nogueira, Fitzhugh & Hutchings, 2013 (Annelida: Polychaeta). Marine Biology Research, 13, 671–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2017.1283526
  53. Nola, R. & Sankey, H. (2007) Theories of Scientific Method: An Introduction. McGill Queen’s University Press, Ithaca, New York, 240 pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844653881
  54. O’Hara, R.J. (1988) Homage to Clio, or, toward an historical philosophy for evolutionary biology. Systematic Zoology, 37, 142–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/2992272
  55. O’Hara, R.J. (1994) Evolutionary history and the species problem. American Zoologist, 34, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/34.1.12
  56. O’Hara, R.J. (1997) Population thinking and tree thinking in systematics. Zoologica Scripta, 26, 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.1997.tb00422.x
  57. Oosterbroek, P. (1987) More appropriate definitions of paraphyly and polyphyly, with a comment on the Farris 1974 model. Systematic Biology, 36, 103–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/2413263
  58. Parapar, J., Mortimer, K. Capa, M. & Moreira. J. (2021). On the systematics and biodiversity of the Palaeoannelida. Diversity, 13, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13020041
  59. Peirce, C.S. (1902) Reasoning. In: Baldwin, J.A. & Rand, B. (Eds.), Dictionary of Philosophy And Psychology: Prefatory Note. Text, Le-Z. Addenda: Indices. I. Greek Terms. II. Latin Terms. III. German Terms. IV. French Terms. V. Italian Terms. The Macmillan Company, New York, New York, pp. 426–428.
  60. Peirce, C.S. (1932) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume 2, Elements of Logic. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 535 pp.
  61. Popper, K.R. (1983) Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, 395 pp.
  62. Popper, K.R. (1992) Realism and the Aim of Science. Routledge, New York, New York, 420 pp.
  63. Potochnik, A. (2017) Idealization and the Aims of Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 252 pp. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226507194.001.0001
  64. Potochnik, A. (2020) What constitutes an explanation in biology? In: Kampourakis, K. & Uller, T. (Eds.), Philosophy of Science for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108648981.003
  65. Read, G. & Fauchald, K. (Eds.) (2024). World Polychaeta Database. Magelonidae Cunningham & Ramage, 1888. World Register of Marine Species. Available from: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=914 (accessed 22 July 2024)
  66. de Regt, H.W., Leonelli, S. & Eigner, K. (2009) Focusing on scientific understanding. In: de Regt, H., Leonelli, S. & Eigner, K. (Eds.), Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qh59s
  67. Rescher, N. (1970) Scientific Explanation. The Free Press, New York, New York, 242 pp.
  68. Rescher, N. (1978) Peirce’s Philosophy of Science: Critical Studies in his Theory of Induction and Scientific Method. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 119 pp.
  69. Salmon, W.C. (1984) Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 305 pp.
  70. Schmidt-Lebuhn, A.N. (2012) Fallacies and false premises—a critical assessment of the arguments for the recognition of paraphyletic taxa in botany. Cladistics, 28, 174−187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00367.x
  71. Strahler, A.N. (1992) Understanding Science: An Introduction to Concepts and Issues. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, 409 pp.
  72. Swofford, D.L., Olsen, G.J., Waddell, P.J. & Hillis, D.M. (1996) Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis, D.M., Moritz, C. & Mable, B.K. (Eds.), Molecular Systematics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 407–514.
  73. Thagard, P. (2004) Rationality and science. In: Mele, A. & Rawlings, P. (Eds.), Handbook of Rationality. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195145399.003.0019
  74. Tilic, E., Sayyari, E., Stiller, J., Mirarab, S. & Rouse, GW. (2020) More is needed – Thousands of loci are required to elucidate the relationships of the ‘flowers of the sea’ (Sabellida, Annelida). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 151, 106892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106892
  75. Uebelacker, J.M. & Jones, M.L. (1984) Family Magelonidae. In: Uebelacker, J.M. & Johnson, P.G. (Eds.), Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Vol. 3. Final report to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, contract 14-12-001-29091, report no. OCS Study 84-0049. Barry A. Vittor and Associates, Mobile, Alabama, pp. 7.1–7.29.
  76. Uller, T. & Laland, K.N. (2019) Evolutionary causation. In: Uller, T. & Laland, K.N. (Eds.), Evolutionary Causation: Biological and Philosophical Reflections. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 1‒12. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11693.003.0002
  77. Van Fraassen, B.C. (1990) The Scientific Image. Clarendon Press, New York, New York, 235 pp.
  78. Zachos, F.E. (2014) Paraphyly—again!? A plea against the dissociation of taxonomy and phylogenetics. Zootaxa, 3764 (5), 594−596. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3764.5.8